Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Applied Polymer Science
  4. Volume 5, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2452-2716
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2724

Abstract

Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement is widely used in orthopaedic procedures of vertebroplasty (VP) balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) and cemented total joint arthroplasty (TJA). While only very few PMMA bone cement brands are approved (by the appropriate regulatory authority) for VP and BKP, many are approved for cemented TJA. Selection of cement for these applications must be done considering a very large number of clinically relevant properties, such as injectability, setting time, maximum polymerization temperature, polymerization rate, compressive strength, fracture toughness, fatigue life, and cytocompatibility. In the literature, there is a shortage of studies on methodologies for the selection of PMMA bone cement.

The present work addresses the aforementioned shortcoming of the literature.

Three material selection methodologies (Desirability, Utility, and Weighted Property Index Methods) were applied to two study sets. Study Set 1 comprised three experimental types of bone cement for VP or BKP and five values of clinically-relevant cement properties and Set 2 comprised six approved antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) brands for cemented TJA and values of four clinically-relevant cement properties.

For each of the study sets, slight differences in the ranks of the materials were found depending on the selection methodology used, but when all the selection methodologies were considered, there was clear differentiation in ranks. The relative attractions and challenges of the three selection methodologies used are highlighted.

Decision makers in orthopaedic hospitals and clinics as well as orthopaedic surgeons, should find the results of the present study useful.

© 2022 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220304090931
2022-04-01
2024-12-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220304090931
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LewisG. Injectable bone cements for use in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: State-of-the-art review.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.200676245646810.1002/jbm.b.3039816196037
     [Google Scholar]
  2. TeleraS RausL PipolaV De lureF GasbarriniA. Vertebral Body Augmentation, Vertebroplasty, and Kyphoplasty.Switzerland AGSpringer Nature2021
     [Google Scholar]
  3. European market report suite for large joint replacement devices-med suite. iData Research.BC, CanadaBarnaby20213836
     [Google Scholar]
  4. NiemelaainenM.J. MakalaK.T. RobertssonO. The effect of fixation type on the survivorship of contemporary total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years of age: A register-based study of 115,177 knees in the Nordic Arthroplasty Resister Association (NARA) 200-2016.Acta Orthop.20209118419031928097
     [Google Scholar]
  5. PrasadA.K. TanJ.H.S. BedairH.S. Dawson-BowlingS. HannaS.A. Cemented versus cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasties: A systematic review and meta-analysis.EFFORT Open Rev20205783798
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BendichI. ZhangN. BarryJ.J. WardD.T. WhooleyM.A. KuoA.C. Antibiotic-laden bone cement use and revision risk after primary total knee arthroplasty in U.S. veterans.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.2020102221939194710.2106/JBJS.20.0010232890041
     [Google Scholar]
  7. KuhnK-D. Bone Cements.Berlin, GermanySpringer-Verlag200010.1007/978‑3‑642‑59762‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  8. JiranekW.A. HanssenA.D. GreenwaldA.S. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement for infection prophylaxis in total joint replacement.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.200688112487250010.2106/JBJS.E.0112617079409
     [Google Scholar]
  9. LewisG. Properties of antibiotic-loaded acrylic bone cements for use in cemented arthroplasties: A state-of-the-art review.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.200989255857410.1002/jbm.b.3122018823020
     [Google Scholar]
  10. WallV. NguyenT-H. NguyenN. TranP.A. Controlling antibiotic release from polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.Biomedicines2021912610.3390/biomedicines9010026
     [Google Scholar]
  11. LewisG. BrooksJ.L. CourtneyH.S. LiY. HaggardW.O. An Approach for determining antibiotic loading for a physician-directed antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement formulation.Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.201046882092210010.1007/s11999‑010‑1281‑020195806
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LewisG. Antibiotic release enhancement methods for antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement for periprosthetic joint infection prophylaxis in cemented total joint arthroplasties: Current status and future prospects.J Mater Sci Res Rev20206121
     [Google Scholar]
  13. BistolfiA. FerraciniR. AlbaneseC. VernèE. MiolaM. PMMA-based bone cements and the problem of joint arthroplasty infections: Status and new perspectives.Materials (Basel)20191223400210.3390/ma1223400231810305
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LewisG. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review.J. Biomed. Mater. Res.199738215518210.1002/(SICI)1097‑4636(199722)38:2<155::AID‑JBM10>3.0.CO;2‑C9178743
     [Google Scholar]
  15. LewisG. TowlerM.R. BoydD. Evaluation of two novel aluminum-free, zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements as alternatives to PMMA bone cement for use in vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty.J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.2010211596610.1007/s10856‑009‑3845‑719655232
     [Google Scholar]
  16. LewisG. Not all antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement brands are the same: Ranking using the utility materials selection concept.J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med.201526489
     [Google Scholar]
  17. International organization for standardization (ISO). ISO 4049:2019: Dentistry – polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials.Geneva, SwitzerlandISO2019
     [Google Scholar]
  18. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)Standard F2118-14: Standard test method for constant amplitude of force-controlled fatigue testing of acrylic bone cement materials.West Conshohocken, PA, USAASTM International2020
     [Google Scholar]
  19. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)Standard D5045-14: Standard test methods for plane strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials.West ConshohockenASTM International2019
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ThakkerA. JarvisJ. BuggyM. SahedA. A novel approach to materials selection strategy case study: Wave energy extraction impulse turbine blade.Mater. Des.200829101973198010.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.022
     [Google Scholar]
  21. DeringerG. SuichR. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables.J Qual Eng198012214219
     [Google Scholar]
  22. KarandeP. GauriS.K. ChakrabortyS. Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection.Mater. Des.20134534935810.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.067
     [Google Scholar]
  23. DerekW.B. Analysis for optimal decisions.New York, NY, USAJohn Wiley & Sons1982
     [Google Scholar]
  24. FindikF. TuranK. Materials selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method.Mater. Des.20123747047710.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.016
     [Google Scholar]
  25. HwangC.L. MasudA.S.M. Multiple objective decision making-methods and applications: A state-of-the-art review Lect Notes Econ Math Syst #164.Berlin, GermanySpringer197910.1007/978‑3‑642‑45511‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  26. OpricovicS. Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems1998
     [Google Scholar]
  27. MilaniA.S. ShanianA. MadoliatR. NemeJ.A. The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: A case study in gear material selection.Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim.200529431231810.1007/s00158‑004‑0473‑1
     [Google Scholar]
  28. JiaoQ. LanY. GuanZ. LiZ. A new material selection approach using PROMETHEE method.Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology 12-14 Aug2011Harbin, ChinaIEEE2950295410.1109/EMEIT.2011.6023666
     [Google Scholar]
  29. FayazbakhshK. AbedianA. Materials selection for applications in space environment considering outgassing phenomenon.Adv. Space Res.201045674174910.1016/j.asr.2009.11.017
     [Google Scholar]
  30. ChatterjeeP. ChavrabortyS. Materials selection using preferential ranking methods.Mater. Des.20123538439310.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.027
     [Google Scholar]
  31. KumarR. DubeyR. SinghS. Multiple-criteria decision-making and sensitivity analysis for selection of materials for knee implant femoral component.Materials (Basel)2021148208410.3390/ma1408208433924189
     [Google Scholar]
  32. SchaferM. GottschlingM. CerdusF. HerrmannC. Methodology for assessing the environmental impact of emerging materials. DroderK. VietoT. In: Techniques Economic and Structural Lightweight Design Conference Proceedings.In Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Germany202110.1007/978‑3‑662‑62924‑6_8
     [Google Scholar]
  33. ManochaP. KandpalK. GoswamiR. Selection of low dimensional material alternatives to silicon for next generation tunnel field effect transistors.Silicon202013370771710.1007/s12633‑020‑00452‑y
     [Google Scholar]
  34. KumarR. BhattacherjeeA. SinghA.D. SinghS. PruncuC.I. Selection of portable hard disc drive based upon weighted aggregated sum product assessment method: A case of Indian market.Meas. Control2020537-81218123010.1177/0020294020925841
     [Google Scholar]
  35. KumarR. SinghS. BilgaP.S. Revealing the benefits of entropy weights method for multi-objective optimization in machining operations: A critical review.J. Mater. Res. Technol.2021101471149210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.114
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LealJ.E. AHP-express: A simple version of the analytical hierarchy process method.Methods20207111
     [Google Scholar]
  37. KazanH. OzdemirO. Financial performance assessment of large-scale conglomerates via topsis and critic methods.Inter J Manag Sust20143420322410.18488/journal.11/2014.3.4/11.4.203.224
     [Google Scholar]
  38. RoboC. Ohman-M¨agiC. PerssonC. Long-term mechanical properties of a novel low-modulus bone cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.J. Mech. Beh. Biomed. Mater.2021118: 104437.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220304090931
Loading
Comparison of Methodologies for Selection of Bone Cements for Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures
Curr Appl Polym Sci 5, 35 (2022); https://doi.org/10.2174/2452271605666220304090931
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220304090931
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220304090931
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): balloon kyphoplasty; glass ionomer cement; orthopaedic; Poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cement; total joint arthroplasty; vertebroplasty

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test