Skip to content
2000
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2452-2716
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2724

Abstract

The published models were sophisticated and described the expansion in dependence on time only in the first stage. The object was to explain the discrepancy between foaming under pressure release XPS and foaming by heat supply EPS by model calculations.

The rate of expansion of small samples comprising blowing agent and polystyrene was measured by buoyancy in a silicone bath at 110 °C and that of extrusion on photographs of the volume increase after the nozzle. A viscosity model and a diffusion model were established, and experimental data were compared with calculated data.

The expansion rate in the silicone bath was about 100 times slower than that in extrusion at the same nozzle temperature. The velocity of foaming in the bath by heat supply was observed to be dominated by viscosity and that of foaming under pressure release in extrusion to be stirred by diffusion. Calculations according to the viscosity model allowed the description of foaming in silicone, and the diffusion model reproduced the data of extrusion.

The common feature of both models was their simplicity. According to the models, the efficiency of blowing agents was only dependent on the molecular weight and on the solubility. The time determining influence on foaming was diffusion in extrusion of XPS and viscosity for expansion of EPS in silicone bath and water vapor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220428100658
2022-04-01
2024-12-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. PatelR.D. Bubble growth in a viscous Newtonian liquid.Chem. Eng. Sci.1980352352235610.1016/0009‑2509(80)87016‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AmmonM. DensonC.D. A study of foam the dynamics of growth of closed spaced spherical bubbles.Polym. Eng. Sci.1984241026103410.1002/pen.760241306
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ElshereefR. VlachopoulosJ. ElkamelA. Comparison and analysis of bubble growth and foam formation models.Eng. Comput.201027338740810.1108/02644401011029943
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HanC.D. YooJ.J. Studies on structural foam processing: Bubble growth during filling.Polym. Eng. Sci.198121951810.1002/pen.760210903
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RameshN.S. Rasmussen DonH. CampellG. Numerical and experimental studies of bubble growth during the microcellular Foaming Process.Polym. Eng. Sci.199131231657166410.1002/pen.760312305
    [Google Scholar]
  6. TsivintzelisI. AngelopoulouA.G. Foaming of polymers with supercritical CO2: An experimental and theoretical study.Pol20074859285939
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LengS.N. ParkC.B. XuD. LiH. FentonR.G. Computer simulation of bubble growth phenomena in foaming.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2006457823783110.1021/ie060295a
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FengJ.J. BerteloC.A. Prediction of bubble growth and size distribution in polymer foaming based on new heterogeneous nucleation model.J. Rheol. (N.Y.N.Y.)20044843946210.1122/1.1645518
    [Google Scholar]
  9. VenerusD.C. Diffusion -induced bubble growth in viscous liquids of finite and infinite extent.Polym. Eng. Sci.2001411390139810.1002/pen.10839
    [Google Scholar]
  10. YanQ. WangH. LiR. HuangD. HanX. Experimental and numerical simulation of non isothermal bubble growth in polymer foaming.IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng.2005505
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TakiKentaro HayashizakiH FukadaK A simple bubble nucleation, growth, coalescence model for coke production process.ISIJ International2014541124932502
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FasihiM. Asgari TarghiA. Investigation of material characteristics and processing conditions effects on bubble growth behavior in a physical foaming process.e-Polymer.2016387394
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RaoR. LongK. MonyL. RobertsCh. SoehnelD. VoskuilenT. Bubble growth and foam formation model calculations.The 33rd International Conference of the Polymer Society. Cancun Mexico10-14 Dec 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ArefmaneshA. AdvaniS. Diffusion -induced growth of a gas bubble in a viscoelastic fluid.Rheol. Acta19913027427810.1007/BF00366641
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HesaniM. SabaghS. RafizadehM. Simplifcation of bubble growth modeling during foam formation by using rosner -epstein method.The 8th Int Chem Eng Congr and Exhib CHEC.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ShafiM.A. JoshiK. FlumerfeltR.W. Bubble size distribution in freely expanded foams.Chem. Eng. Sci.199752463564410.1016/S0009‑2509(96)00433‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  17. StewartC. Nucleation and growth of bubbles in elastomers.J Pol Sci1970893795510.1002/pol.1970.160080609
    [Google Scholar]
  18. YangJ JiangTuahui LiuBujin Experimental and numerical analysis of bubble nucleation in foaming polymer.Mater. Des.2021203: 109577.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109577
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GoelS.K. BeckmanE.J. Generation of microcellular polymeric foams using supercritical carbon dioxide I: Effect of pressure and temperature on nucleation.Polym. Eng. Sci.199434141147115710.1002/pen.760341407
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WangJ. ZhaiW. LingJ. ShenBen ZhengWenige Park ChulB. Ultrasonic microcellular poly(lactic acid): A novel approach to reduce cell size distribution and increase foam expansion.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.20115024138401384710.1021/ie201643j
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Salah Al-EneziCO2 induced foaming behaviour of polystyrene near glass transition.Internat J of Pol Sci2017
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ShaayeganV. WangG. ParkC.B. Effect of foam processing parameters on bubble nucleation and growth dynamics in high pressure foam injetion molding.Chem. Eng. Sci.2016155
    [Google Scholar]
  23. OtsukiY. KanaiT. Numerical simulation of bubble growth in viscoelastic fluid with diffusion of dissolved foaming agents.Polym. Eng. Sci.2005451277128710.1002/pen.20395
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AlokuG.O. YuanX.F. Numerical simulation of polymer foaming process in extrusion flow.Chem. Eng. Sci.2010653749376110.1016/j.ces.2010.03.022
    [Google Scholar]
  25. YaoS. ChenY. LingY. HuD. XiZ. ZhaoL. Analysis of bubble growth in supercritical CO2 Extrusion Foaming PET Process on dynamic flow simulation.Polymers (Basel)20211216279910.3390/polym1316279934451336
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HoracekH. Manufacture and model Calculation of porcelain-like microcellular low density polystyrene.J. Cell. Plast.20150126
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HoracekH. Gleichgewichtsdrücke, Löslichkeit und Mischbarkeit des Systems. PS-KW“ Koll.Zu Z Polymere1967250863874
    [Google Scholar]
  28. RubinL.C. Some effects of cross linking upon the foaming behavior of heat plastified polystyrene.J. Cell. Plast.1965311320
    [Google Scholar]
  29. HoracekH. Zur Schaumgeometrie bei Styropor.Die Angew. Makromol. Chem.19701210513010.1002/apmc.1970.050120108
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220428100658
Loading
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220428100658
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): cell structure; diffusion; Foam; heat supply; model calculation; pressure release; viscosity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test