Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Applied Polymer Science
  4. Volume 5, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2452-2716
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2724

Abstract

Background

Thermoplastic expandable microspheres (TEMs) are spherical particles that consist of polymer shell encapsulating a low boiling point liquid hydrocarbon that acts as the blowing agent. When TEMs are heated at 80-190 °C, the polymer shell softens, and the hydrocarbon gasifies, causing the microspheres to expand, leading to an increase in volume and decrease in density. TEMs are used in food packaging, elastomeric cool roof coatings, shoe soles, fiber and paper board, and various applications in the automotive industry. It is noted that TEMs are known by their brand name ‘Expancel’, which is also used to refer TEMs in this paper.

Objective

The objective of this work was to develop and characterize forms prepared from TEMs with/without carbon nanofibers (CNFs) coatings to study the effect of CNFs on structural, thermal, and mechanical properties.

Methods

Sonochemical method was used to coat TEMs with various weight percentages (1, 2, and 3%) of CNF. Neat foam (without CNF) and composite foams (TEMs coated with various wt.% of CNF) were prepared by compression molding the TEMs and TEMs-CNF composites powders. Thermal and mechanical properties of the neat and composite foams were investigated.

Results

The mechanical properties of the composite foam were notably improved, which is exhibited by a 54% increase in flexural modulus and a 6% decrease in failure strain with the TEMs-(2 wt.% CNF) composite foam as compared to the neat foam. Improvement in thermal properties of composite foam was demonstrated by a 38% increase in thermal stability at 800ºC with the TEMs-(1 wt.% CNF) composite foam as compared to the neat foam. However, no change in the glass transition of TEMs was observed with the CNF coating. SEM-based analysis revealed that CNFs were well dispersed throughout the volume of the TEMs matrix, forming a strong interface.

Conclusion

Straightforward sonochemical method successfully triggered efficient coating of TEMs with CNFs, resulting in a strong adhesion interface. The mechanical properties of composite foams increased up to 2% of CNFs coating and then decreased with the higher coating, presumably due to interwoven bundles and aggregation of CNFs, which might have acted as critical flaws to initiate and propagate cracking. Thermal properties of foams increased with the CNFs coating while no change in glass transition temperature was observed due to coating.

© 2022 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220114113214
2022-03-24
2024-12-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220114113214
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. StewartJ.K. MahfuzH. CarlssonL.A. Enhancing mechanical and fracture properties of sandwich composites using nanoparticle reinforcement.J. Mater. Sci.201045133490349610.1007/s10853‑010‑4380‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  2. HouZ. XiaY. QuW. KanC. Preparation and properties of thermoplastic expandable microspheres with P (VDC-AN-MMA) shell by suspension polymerization.Inter J Polymer Mater Polymer Biomater201564842743110.1080/00914037.2014.958831
     [Google Scholar]
  3. GaoY. ZhangN. ZhuL. HouZ. Preparation and properties of thermoplastic expandable microspheres with P (AN-MMA) shell.Russ. J. Appl. Chem.201790101634163910.1134/S1070427217010123
     [Google Scholar]
  4. RohmA. Technical Information for ROHACELL Foam.2002
     [Google Scholar]
  5. IncD. Technical Information for Divinycell Foam.Dab Group2002
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Expancel is a lightweight filler and blowing agent all in one. Its high performance opens a world of possibilities. Available from: https://www.nouryon.com/products/expancel-microspheres/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AnderssonH. GrissP. StemmeG. Expandable microspheres-surface immobilization techniques.Sens. Actuators B Chem.2002842-329029510.1016/S0925‑4005(02)00017‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  8. LuX. ZhouJ. LuW. LiuQ. LiJ. Carbon nanofiber-based composites for the construction of mediator-free biosensors.Biosens. Bioelectron.20082381236124310.1016/j.bios.2007.11.00618083363
     [Google Scholar]
  9. TomalinoM. BianchiniG. Heat-expandable microspheres for car protection production.Prog. Org. Coat.1997321-4172410.1016/S0300‑9440(97)00080‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  10. VaikhanskiL. NuttS.R. Fiber-reinforced composite foam from expandable PVC microspheres.Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf.200334121245125310.1016/S1359‑835X(03)00255‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KimY-W. KimS-H. KimH-D. ParkC.B. Processing of closed- cell silicon oxycarbide foams from a preceramic polymer.J. Mater. Sci.200439185647565210.1023/B:JMSC.0000040071.55240.85
     [Google Scholar]
  12. AglanH. SheblS. MorsyM. CalhounM. HardingH. AhmadM. Strength and toughness improvement of cement binders using expandable thermoplastic microspheres.Constr. Build. Mater.20092382856286110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.031
     [Google Scholar]
  13. PetrossianG. HohimerC.J. AmeliA. Highly-loaded thermoplastic polyurethane/lead zirconate titanate composite foams with low permittivity fabricated using expandable microspheres.Polymers (Basel)201911228010.3390/polym1102028030960264
     [Google Scholar]
  14. OkolieochaC. RapsD. SubramaniamK. AltstädtV. Microcellular to nanocellular polymer foams: Progress (2004–2015) and future directions–A review.Eur. Polym. J.20157350051910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.11.001
     [Google Scholar]
  15. JiaoS. SunZ. ZhouY. LiF. WenJ. ChenY. DuX. LiL. LiuY. Surface-coated thermally expandable microspheres with a composite of polydisperse graphene oxide sheets.Chem. Asian J.201914234328433610.1002/asia.20190123331650678
     [Google Scholar]
  16. AslaniF. WangL. ZhengM. The effect of carbon nanofibers on fresh and mechanical properties of lightweight engineered cementitious composite using hollow glass microspheres.J. Compos. Mater.201953172447246410.1177/0021998319827078
     [Google Scholar]
  17. WangJ. ZhangL. BaoJ-B. Supercritical CO2 assisted preparation of open-cell foams of linear low-density polyethylene and linear low-density polyethylene/carbon nanotube composites.Chin. J. Polym. Sci.201634788990010.1007/s10118‑016‑1806‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhouY. PervinF. JeelaniS. MallickP. Improvement in mechanical properties of carbon fabric–epoxy composite using carbon nanofibers.J. Mater. Process. Technol.20081981-344545310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.028
     [Google Scholar]
  19. KabirM.E. SahaM. Effect of ultrasound sonication in carbon nanofibers/polyurethane foam composite.Mater. Sci. Eng. A20074591-211111610.1016/j.msea.2007.01.031
     [Google Scholar]
  20. LeviB.G. Light comes from ultrasonic cavitation in picosecond pulses.Phys. Today19914411171810.1063/1.2810317
     [Google Scholar]
  21. SapkotaB. Bioinspired materials composed of atomically-thin nanosheets and their assemblies.MSc. Dissertation. Boston, USA: Northeastern University201910.17760/D20321696
     [Google Scholar]
  22. WanunuM. SapkotaB. Porous membranes comprising nanosheets and fabrication thereof.US 2019/0039028 A1Boston, USANortheastern University2019
  23. ZainuddinS. MahfuzH. JeelaniS. Enhancing fatigue performance of sandwich composites with nanophased core.J Nanomater20102010.10.1155/2010/712731
     [Google Scholar]
  24. MahfuzH. UddinM.F. RangariV.K. SahaM.C. ZainuddinS. JeelaniS. High strain rate response of sandwich composites with nanophased cores.Appl. Compos. Mater.2005123-419321110.1007/s10443‑005‑1123‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  25. MahfuzH. RangariV.K. IslamM.S. JeelaniS. Fabrication, synthesis and mechanical characterization of nanoparticles infused polyurethane foams.Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf.200435445346010.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.009
     [Google Scholar]
  26. MahfuzH. IslamM.S. RangariV.K. SahaM.C. JeelaniS. Response of sandwich composites with nanophased cores under flexural loading.Compos., Part B Eng.2004356-854355010.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.004
     [Google Scholar]
  27. RangariV.K. HassanT.A. ZhouY. MahfuzH. JeelaniS. ProrokB.C. Cloisite clay-infused phenolic foam nanocomposites.J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2007103130831410.1002/app.25287
     [Google Scholar]
  28. RangariV.K. JeelaniM.I. ZhouY. JeelaniS. Fabrication and characterization of MWCNT/thermoplastic microsphere nanocomposite foams.Inter J Nanosci2008702n03161169
     [Google Scholar]
  29. JonesW.D. RangariV.K. HassanT.A. JeelaniS. Synthesis and characterization of (Fe3O4/MWCNTs)/epoxy nanocomposites.J. Appl. Polym. Sci.201011652783279210.1002/app.31193
     [Google Scholar]
  30. BhoyateS. KaholP.K. MishraS.R. PerezF. GuptaR.K. Polystyrene activated linear tube carbon nanofiber for durable and high-performance supercapacitors.Surf. Coat. Tech.201834511312210.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.04.026
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ArmstrongW. SapkotaB. MishraS. Silver decorated carbon nanospheres as effective visible light photocatalyst.MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive20131509
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WangX. WangL. HeY. WuM. ZhouA. The effect of two-dimensional d-Ti3C2 on the mechanical and thermal conductivity properties of thermoplastic polyurethane composites.Polym. Compos.202041135035910.1002/pc.25374
     [Google Scholar]
  33. VermaA. BauraiK. SanjayM. SiengchinS. Mechanical, microstructural, and thermal characterization insights of pyrolyzed carbon black from waste tires reinforced epoxy nanocomposites for coating application.Polym. Compos.202041133834910.1002/pc.25373
     [Google Scholar]
  34. MaoQ. YangL. GengX. ChenL. ZhaoH. ZhuH. Interface strain induced hydrophobic facet suppression in cellulose nanocomposite embedded with highly oxidized monolayer graphene oxide.Adv. Mater. Interfaces2017423170099510.1002/admi.201700995
     [Google Scholar]
  35. CasalE. GrandaM. BermejoJ. BonhommeJ. MenéndezR. Influence of porosity on the apparent interlaminar shear strength of pitch-based unidirectional C–C composites.Carbon2001391738210.1016/S0008‑6223(00)00085‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LiJ. LuoR. Study of the mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber reinforced carbon/carbon composites.Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf.200839111700170410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.009
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220114113214
Loading
Fabrication and Characterization of Carbon Nanofibers Coated Expandable Thermoplastic Microspheres-Based Polymer Composites
Curr Appl Polym Sci 5, 117 (2022); https://doi.org/10.2174/2452271605666220114113214
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220114113214
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/2452271605666220114113214
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Carbon nanofibers; coating; mechanical properties; sonochemical; thermal properties; thermoplastic expandable microspheres

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test