Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Applied Polymer Science
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2452-2716
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2724

Abstract

Background

The present study attempted to develop cost-effective, biocompatible and biodegradable mucoadhesive buccal films exploring and using seed polymer, marking its potential as a sustainable drug delivery in pharmaceutical development.

Methods

The extracted polymer was characterized for solubility, viscosity, loss on drying, pH, swelling index, starch, and mucilage ingredients. Compatibility between the polymer, drug, and excipients was assessed using FTIR analysis. Buccal film trial batches were formulated using the film casting technique and were optimized using the 23 full factorial design. Optimized formulation was characterized for drug release, permeability, mucoadhesive study, similarity, and difference factor along with histological and stability study.

Results

The polymer’s pH, loss on drying, swelling index, and viscosity were 6.2, 6.8%, 81.77%, and 50,000 cP respectively. FTIR studies showed the compatibility between natural polymer, the model drug metoprolol succinate, and the excipients used. The early trial batches of polymeric films showed an extended drug release comparable to the standard polymers with a good permeability flux of 0.4048 ± 0.081 mcg*cm-2*h-1. The optimized film provided a controlled release of 52.31 ± 0.035% for more than 8 h following zero order kinetics. Mucoadhesive strength was found to be 32.25 ± 0.29 g. The similarity factor f2 (90.2) and difference factor f1 (8.197) indicated no significant difference compared to the standard formulation. Histological study demonstrated the non-irritant nature of the films and stability was established from the stability studies.

Conclusion

Thus, a sustainable approach using natural polymeric buccal films was found promising for mucoadhesion and controlled release.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/caps/10.2174/0124522716331619240830064412
2024-09-11
2025-03-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/caps/10.2174/0124522716331619240830064412
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DonnellyR.F. ShaikhR. Raj SinghT.R. GarlandM.J. WoolfsonA.D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems.J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci.2011318910010.4103/0975‑7406.7647821430958
     [Google Scholar]
  2. LamJ.K.W. CheungC.C.K. ChowM.Y.T. HarropE. LapwoodS. BarclayS.I.G. WongI.C.K. Transmucosal drug administration as an alternative route in palliative and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic.Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.202016023424310.1016/j.addr.2020.10.01833137363
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AnsariM. SadaraniB. MajumdarA. Optimization and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films loaded with resveratrol.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20184427828810.1016/j.jddst.2017.12.007
     [Google Scholar]
  4. IkramM. GilhotraN. GilhotraR.M. Formulation and optimization of mucoadhesive buccal patches of losartan potassium by using response surface methodology.Adv. Biomed. Res.2015423910.4103/2277‑9175.16860626682205
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AlopaeusJ.F. HellfritzschM. GutowskiT. ScherließR. AlmeidaA. SarmentoB. Škalko-BasnetN. ThoI. Mucoadhesive buccal films based on a graft co-polymer – A mucin-retentive hydrogel scaffold.Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.202014210514210.1016/j.ejps.2019.10514231707042
     [Google Scholar]
  6. AmiriM.S. MohammadzadehV. YazdiM.E.T. BaraniM. RahdarA. KyzasG.Z. Plant-based gums and mucilages applications in pharmacology and nanomedicine: A review.Molecules2021266177010.3390/molecules2606177033809917
     [Google Scholar]
  7. AhujaM. KumarA. YadavP. SinghK. Mimosa pudica seed mucilage: Isolation; characterization and evaluation as tablet disintegrant and binder.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20135710511010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.00423500434
     [Google Scholar]
  8. GoksenG. DemirD. DhamaK. KumarM. ShaoP. XieF. EchegarayN. LorenzoJ.M. Mucilage polysaccharide as a plant secretion: Potential trends in food and biomedical applications.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202323012314610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12314636610576
     [Google Scholar]
  9. FancherI.S. RubinsteinI. LevitanI. Potential strategies to reduce blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertension using food and drug administration–approved nanodrug delivery platforms.Hypertension201973225025710.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.1200530624988
     [Google Scholar]
  10. MundadaP.K. SawantK.K. MundadaV.P. Formulation and optimization of controlled release powder for reconstitution for metoprolol succinate multi unit particulate formulation using risk based QbD approach.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20174146247410.1016/j.jddst.2017.09.001
     [Google Scholar]
  11. OchiuzL. PopaG. StoleriuI. TomoiagăA.M. PopaM. Microencapsulation of metoprolol tartrate into chitosan for improved oral administration and patient compliance.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.20135249174321744110.1021/ie402625h
     [Google Scholar]
  12. SabaleV. PatelV. ParanjapeA. Evaluation of Calendula mucilage as a mucoadhesive and controlled release component in buccal tablets.Res. Pharm. Sci.201491394825598798
     [Google Scholar]
  13. VermaS. MalviyaR. Kumar SharmaP. Extraction, characterization and evaluation of film forming capacity of natural polymer.Drug Deliv. Lett.20144324425310.2174/2210303104666141013225327
     [Google Scholar]
  14. IlangoK.B. GowthamanS. SeramaanK.I. ChidambaramK. BayanM.F. RahamathullaM. BalakumarC. Mucilage of Coccinia grandis as an efficient natural polymer-based pharmaceutical excipient.Polymers (Basel)202214121510.3390/polym1401021535012237
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Test No. 425: Acute oral toxicity: Up-and-down procedure.2022Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-425-acute-oral-toxicity-up-and-down-procedure_9789264071049-en
  16. BukhariS.N.A. AliA. HussainM.A. Extraction optimization of mucilage from seeds of Mimosa pudica by response surface methodology.Polymers (Basel)2022149190410.3390/polym14091904
     [Google Scholar]
  17. RajewskiJ. Dobrzyńska-IngerA. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for the optimization of chromium(III) synergistic extraction by supported liquid membrane.Membranes (Basel)2021111185410.3390/membranes1111085434832083
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MadhuriP. Venkata RadhaG. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films of propafenone HCl.J. Pharm. Negat. Results2022131645165910.47750/PNR.2022.13.04.228
     [Google Scholar]
  19. SalehiS. BoddohiS. New formulation and approach for mucoadhesive buccal film of rizatriptan benzoate.Prog. Biomater.20176417518710.1007/s40204‑017‑0077‑729110144
     [Google Scholar]
  20. MeherJ.G. TaraiM. PatnaikA. MishraP. YadavN.P. Cellulose buccoadhesive film bearing glimepiride: Physicomechanical characterization and biophysics of buccoadhesion.AAPS PharmSciTech201617494095010.1208/s12249‑015‑0419‑526831445
     [Google Scholar]
  21. RanaP. MurthyR.S.R. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films impregnated with carvedilol nanosuspension: A potential approach for delivery of drugs having high first-pass metabolism.Drug Deliv.201320522423510.3109/10717544.2013.77933123651066
     [Google Scholar]
  22. AmmanageA. RodriquesP. KempwadeA. HiremathR. Formulation and evaluation of buccal films of piroxicam co-crystals.Fut J Pharm Sci20206110.1186/s43094‑020‑00033‑1
     [Google Scholar]
  23. IrfanM. RabelS. BukhtarQ. QadirM.I. JabeenF. KhanA. Orally disintegrating films: A modern expansion in drug delivery system.Saudi Pharm. J.201624553754610.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.02427752225
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Al-DhubiabB.E. NairA.B. KumriaR. AttimaradM. HarshaS. Development and evaluation of buccal films impregnated with selegiline-loaded nanospheres.Drug Deliv.20162372154216210.3109/10717544.2014.94864425182182
     [Google Scholar]
  25. JillaniU. MudassirJ. ArshadM.S. MehtaP. AlyassinY. NazariK. YousefB. PatelM. ZamanA. SayedE. ChangM-W. AliA. AhmadZ. Design and evaluation of agarose based buccal films containing zolmitriptan succinate: Application of physical and chemical enhancement approaches.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20226910304110.1016/j.jddst.2021.103041
     [Google Scholar]
  26. The European Medicines Agency's scientific guidelines on the stability of drug substances and drug products help medicine developers prepare marketing authorisation applications for human medicines.Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/research-and-development/scientific-guidelines/quality-guidelines/quality-stability
  27. KoiralaS. NepalP. GhimireG. BasnetR. RawatI. DahalA. PandeyJ. Parajuli-BaralK. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of aceclofenac.Heliyon202173e0643910.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0643933786387
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/0124522716331619240830064412
Loading
Optimization and Characterization of Mucoadhesive Buccal Films using Mimosa Seed-based Natural Polymer for Controlled Drug Release: A Sustainable Approach
Curr Appl Polym Sci 7, 98 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0124522716331619240830064412
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/0124522716331619240830064412
/content/journals/caps/10.2174/0124522716331619240830064412
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Buccal films; metoprolol succinate; mimosa; mucoadhesive; natural polymer; swelling index

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test