Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the similarities and differences in clinical presentations, multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) features, and treatment of three types of adult intussusceptions based on location.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 184 adult patients with 192 intussusceptions. Depending on the location, intussusceptions were classified as enteric, ileocolic, and colonic types. The similarities and differences of clinical presentations, MDCT features, and treatment of three types of adult intussusception were compared. Meanwhile, the three types of intussusceptions were further divided into surgical and conservative groups based on the treatment. Uni- and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify risk factors for intussusception requiring surgery.

Results

Enteric and ileocolic intussusceptions were mainly presented with abdominal pain (78.46% and 85.71%). Hematochezia/melena (64.29%) was the main symptom of colonic intussusception. On MDCT, ileocolic intussusceptions were longer in length and had more signs of intestinal necrosis (hypodense layer, fluid collection and no/poor bowel wall enhancement) than enteric and colonic intussusceptions. Moreover, it was found that 93.88% (46/49) of ileocolic intussusception and 98.59% (70/71) of colonic intussusception belonged to the surgical group, whereas only 43.06% (31/72) of enteric intussusception belonged to the surgical group. Intussusception length (OR=1.171, =0.028) and discernible lead point on MDCT (OR=21.003, <0.001) were reliable indicators of enteric intussusception requiring surgery.

Conclusion

Ileocolic intussusception may be more prone to intestinal necrosis than enteric and colonic intussusceptions, requiring more attention from clinicians. Surgery remains the treatment of choice for most ileocolic and colonic intussusceptions. Less than half of enteric intussusceptions require surgery, and MDCT features are effective in identifying them.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295254240209102215
2024-02-20
2024-12-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056295254.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295254240209102215&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. SuT. HeL. ZhouT. WuM. GuoY. WangQ. JiangJ. CaoX. Most adult intussusceptions are caused by tumors: A single-centre analysis.Cancer Manag. Res.202012100111001510.2147/CMAR.S26892133116857
    [Google Scholar]
  2. NeymarkM. AbramovR. DronovM. GilshteinH. Management of adult intussusception—a case series experience from a tertiary center.World J. Surg.202145123584359110.1007/s00268‑021‑06277‑z34363099
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HongK.D. KimJ. JiW. WexnerS.D. Adult intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Tech. Coloproctol.201923431532410.1007/s10151‑019‑01980‑531011846
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PanzeraF. Di VenereB. RizziM. BiscagliaA. PraticòC.A. NastiG. MardighianA. NunesT.F. InchingoloR. Bowel intussusception in adult: Prevalence, diagnostic tools and therapy.World J. Methodol.2021113818710.5662/wjm.v11.i3.8134026581
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AydinN. RothA. MisraS. Surgical versus conservative management of adult intussusception: Case series and review.Int. J. Surg. Case Rep.20162014214610.1016/j.ijscr.2016.01.01926859872
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ReaJ.D. LockhartM.E. YarbroughD.E. LeethR.R. BledsoeS.E. ClementsR.H. Approach to management of intussusception in adults: A new paradigm in the computed tomography era.Am. Surg.200773111098110510.1177/00031348070730110418092641
    [Google Scholar]
  7. TarchouliM. Ait AliA. Adult intussusception: An uncommon condition and challenging management.Visc. Med.202137212012710.1159/00050738033981752
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChangC.C. ChenY.Y. ChenY.F. LinC.N. YenH.H. LouH.Y. Adult intussusception in Asians: Clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment.J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.200722111767177110.1111/j.1440‑1746.2007.04907.x17914948
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SommaF. FaggianA. SerraN. GattaG. IacobellisF. BerrittoD. ReginelliA. Di MizioV. CappabiancaS. Di MizioR. GrassiR. Bowel intussusceptions in adults: The role of imaging.Radiol. Med.2015120110511710.1007/s11547‑014‑0454‑425115295
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GuptaR.K. AgrawalC.S. YadavR. BajracharyaA. SahP.L. Intussusception in adults: Institutional review.Int. J. Surg.201191919510.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.00320951844
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Al-RadaidehA.M. OmariH.Z. Bani-HaniK.E. Adult intussusception : A 14-year retrospective study of clinical assessment and computed tomography diagnosis.Acta Gastroenterol. Belg.201881336737230350523
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TresoldiS. KimY.H. BlakeM.A. HarisinghaniM.G. HahnP.F. BakerS.P. MuellerP.R. KandarpaK. Adult intestinal intussusception: Can abdominal MDCT distinguish an intussusception caused by a lead point?Abdom. Imaging200833558258810.1007/s00261‑007‑9328‑817924160
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AmrM.A. PolitesS.F. AlzghariM. OnkendiE.O. GrotzT.E. ZielinskiM.D. Intussusception in adults and the role of evolving computed tomography technology.Am. J. Surg.2015209358058310.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.01925770396
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TanH.L. KohY.X. TaufikM. LyeW.K. GohB.K.P. OngH.S. A clinical scoring system to predict the clinical sequelae of computed tomography diagnosed intussusception.World J. Surg.201842368268710.1007/s00268‑017‑4196‑z28916884
    [Google Scholar]
  15. VarbanO.A. ArdestaniA. AzaguryD.E. KisB. BrooksD.C. TavakkoliA. Contemporary management of adult intussusception: Who needs a resection?World J. Surg.20133781872187710.1007/s00268‑013‑2036‑323571865
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HortonK.M. FishmanE.K. MDCT and 3D imaging in transient enteroenteric intussusception: Clinical observations and review of the literature.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2008191373674210.2214/AJR.07.374118716102
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LvoffN. BreimanR.S. CoakleyF.V. LuY. WarrenR.S. Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult small-bowel intussusception identified at CT.Radiology20032271687210.1148/radiol.227202045512668740
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SundaramB. MillerC.N. CohanR.H. SchipperM.J. FrancisI.R. Can CT features be used to diagnose surgical adult bowel intussusceptions?AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2009193247147810.2214/AJR.08.180119620445
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AlexanderR. TraversoP. BolorunduroO.B. OrtegaG. ChangD. CornwellE.E.III FullumT.M. Profiling adult intussusception patients: Comparing colonic versus enteric intussusception.Am. J. Surg.2011202448749110.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.00621943949
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ParkS.B. HaH.K. KimA.Y. LeeS.S. KimH.J. ParkB.J. JinY.H. ParkS.H. KimK.W. The diagnostic role of abdominal CT imaging findings in adults intussusception: Focused on the vascular compromise.Eur. J. Radiol.200762340641510.1016/j.ejrad.2007.01.00317412545
    [Google Scholar]
  21. DollingerM. BäumlerW. BrunnerS.M. StroszczynskiC. GeorgievaM. MüllerK. SchichoA. Müller-WilleR. Role of clinical and CT findings in the identification of adult small-bowel intussusception requiring surgical intervention.BJS Open202155zrab07610.1093/bjsopen/zrab07634498667
    [Google Scholar]
  22. FujimotoT. FukudaT. UetaniM. MatsuokaY. NagaokiK. AsohN. IsomotoI. OkimotoT. OhtaniH. MatsunagaN. MoriH. HayashiK. Unenhanced CT findings of vascular compromise in association with intussusceptions in adults.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.200117651167117110.2214/ajr.176.5.176116711312175
    [Google Scholar]
  23. OnkendiE.O. GrotzT.E. MurrayJ.A. DonohueJ.H. Adult intussusception in the last 25 years of modern imaging: Is surgery still indicated?J. Gastrointest. Surg.201115101699170510.1007/s11605‑011‑1609‑421830152
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KimJ.W. LeeB.H. ParkS.G. KimB.C. LeeS. LeeS.J. Factors predicting malignancy in adult intussusception: An experience in university-affiliated hospitals.Asian J. Surg.2018411929710.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.01028131633
    [Google Scholar]
  25. DucVT. ChienPC. HuyenLDM. TrietPNM. Differentiation between surgical and nonsurgical intussusception: A diagnostic model using multi-detector computed tomography.Acta Inform Med.2021291323710.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.01028131633
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295254240209102215
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295254240209102215
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the Publisher’s website.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test