Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Aim:

We have aimed to investigate the role of ultrasonographic muscle parameters (UMP) in predicting osteosarcopenia in bedridden patients in a palliative care center.

Background:

The role of ultrasound has not been evaluated in predicting osteosarcopenia.

Objective:

Reduced muscle thickness (MT) and cross-sectional area (CSA) have often been observed in individuals with sarcopenia, reflecting muscle loss and atrophy. Meanwhile, the potential role of muscle ultrasound has not been evaluated in predicting osteosarcopenia.

Methods:

We have conducted a prospective, observational study between January 2021 and 2022. We have recorded the demographics, comorbidities, and nutritional status by using the mini nutritional assessment-short form. We measured handgrip strength with a hand dynamometer and the muscle mass with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Sarcopenia was defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 criteria. Osteoporosis was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria. We have categorized the body phenotypes into four groups: “non-sarcopenic non-osteoporotic,” “sarcopenic alone,” “osteoporotic alone,” and “sarcopenic osteoporotic.” We have measured the subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), MT, and CSA of the rectus femoris (RF) and biceps brachii (BB) via ultrasonography. A multivariate regression analysis was performed and area under curve (AUC) values were used to evaluate the accuracy of UMPs.

Results:

We included 31 patients (mean age: 74.6±12.1 years, 54.8%: male). The prevalences of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and sarcopenic osteoporosis were 71%, 48.4%, and 41.9%, respectively. Only the “sarcopenic osteoporotic” phenotype was negatively correlated with all UMPs. In the regression analysis, only the “sarcopenic osteoporotic” phenotype was independently associated with RFCSA (ß=-0.456, p= 0.024). The AUC for all patients was >0.700.

Conclusion:

RFCSA measurement might be useful in the screening for osteosarcopenia. This has been the first study investigating the relationship between UMPs and body phenotypes. Multi-center and large-scale studies are, however, needed.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056275133231211115630
2024-03-19
2025-05-14
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. HaroenH. HarunH. SariC.W.M. WitdiawatiW. Uncovering methods and outcomes of palliative care for geriatric patients: A scoping review.J. Multidiscip. Healthc.2023162905292010.2147/JMDH.S42932337790991
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CosmanF. de BeurS.J. LeBoffM.S. LewieckiE.M. TannerB. RandallS. LindsayR. National Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Osteoporos. Int.201425102359238110.1007/s00198‑014‑2794‑225182228
    [Google Scholar]
  3. PolitoA. BarnabaL. CiarapicaD. AzziniE. Osteosarcopenia: A narrative review on clinical studies.Int. J. Mol. Sci.20222310559110.3390/ijms2310559135628399
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DreyM. SieberC.C. BertschT. BauerJ.M. SchmidmaierR. FiAT intervention group Osteosarcopenia is more than sarcopenia and osteopenia alone.Aging Clin. Exp. Res.201628589589910.1007/s40520‑015‑0494‑126563287
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RashidA. Chaudhary HaugeS. SuettaC. HansenD. “Sarcopenia and risk of osteoporosis, falls and bone fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review”.PLoS One2022171e026257210.1371/journal.pone.026257235061818
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WangJ.C. WuW.T. ChangK.V. ChenL.R. ChiS.Y. KaraM. ÖzçakarL. Ultrasound imaging for the diagnosis and evaluation of sarcopenia: An umbrella review.Life2021121910.3390/life1201000935054402
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LeighebM. de SireA. ColangeloM. ZagariaD. GrassiF.A. RenaO. ConteP. NeriP. CarrieroA. SacchettiG.M. PennaF. CarettiG. FerraroE. Sarcopenia diagnosis: Reliability of the ultrasound assessment of the tibialis anterior muscle as an alternative evaluation tool.Diagnostics20211111215810.3390/diagnostics1111215834829505
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KaiserM.J. BauerJ.M. RamschC. UterW. GuigozY. CederholmT. ThomasD.R. AnthonyP. CharltonK.E. MaggioM. TsaiA.C. GrathwohlD. VellasB. SieberC.C. MNA-International Group Validation of the mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA®-SF): A practical tool for identification of nutritional status.J. Nutr. Health Aging200913978278810.1007/s12603‑009‑0214‑719812868
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruz-JentoftA.J. BahatG. BauerJ. BoirieY. BruyèreO. CederholmT. CooperC. LandiF. RollandY. SayerA.A. SchneiderS.M. SieberC.C. TopinkovaE. VandewoudeM. VisserM. ZamboniM. BautmansI. BaeyensJ-P. CesariM. CherubiniA. KanisJ. MaggioM. MartinF. MichelJ-P. PitkalaK. ReginsterJ-Y. RizzoliR. Sánchez-RodríguezD. ScholsJ. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2 Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.Age Ageing2019481163110.1093/ageing/afy16930312372
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HaY.C. YooJ.I. Cross-calibration of bone mineral densities and body composition between GE lunar prodigy and osteosys primus.J. Bone Metab.202128321522110.11005/jbm.2021.28.3.21534520655
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Galindo MartínC.A. Monares ZepedaE. Lescas MéndezO.A. Bedside ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris: A tutorial for the nutrition support clinician.J. Nutr. Metab.201720171510.1155/2017/276723228386479
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LambellK.J. TierneyA.C. WangJ.C. NanjayyaV. ForsythA. GohG.S. VicendeseD. RidleyE.J. ParryS.M. MourtzakisM. KingS.J. Comparison of ultrasound-derived muscle thickness with computed tomography muscle cross-sectional area on admission to the intensive care unit: A pilot cross-sectional study.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.202145113614510.1002/jpen.182232291773
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sri-onJ. RueanthipS. VanichkulbodeeA. PaksopisT. ChetanasilpinC. The validity of ultrasonographic measurements of the rectus femoris muscle in older adults with sarcopenia in thai population.Clin. Interv. Aging2022171249125910.2147/CIA.S37541936003922
    [Google Scholar]
  14. NijholtW. Jager-WittenaarH. RajI.S. van der SchansC.P. HobbelenH. Reliability and validity of ultrasound to estimate muscles: A comparison between different transducers and parameters.Clin. Nutr. ESPEN20203514615210.1016/j.clnesp.2019.10.00931987109
    [Google Scholar]
  15. CatikkasN.M. Binay SaferV. Biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area measured by ultrasonography is independently associated with one-month mortality: A prospective observational study.J. Clin. Ultrasound202351915121521Epub ahead of print10.1002/jcu.2357137787651
    [Google Scholar]
  16. CanalesC. MazorE. CoyH. GroganT.R. DuvalV. RamanS. CannessonM. SinghS.P. Preoperative point-of-care ultrasound to identify frailty and predict postoperative outcomes: A diagnostic accuracy study.Anesthesiology2022136226827810.1097/ALN.000000000000406434851395
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MatsuzawaR. YamamotoS. SuzukiY. ImamuraK. HaradaM. MatsunagaA. TamakiA. FukuiT. ShimokadoK. The clinical applicability of ultrasound technique for diagnosis of sarcopenia in hemodialysis patients.Clin. Nutr.20214031161116710.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.02532798065
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RustaniK. KundisovaL. CapecchiP.L. NanteN. BicchiM. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris muscle thickness as a quick screening test for sarcopenia assessment.Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.20198315115410.1016/j.archger.2019.03.02131029040
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sengul AycicekG. OzsurekciC. CaliskanH. KizilarslanogluM.C. Tuna DogrulR. BalciC. UnsalP. EsmeM. YavuzB.B. CankurtaranM. HalilM.G. Ultrasonography versus bioelectrical impedance analysis: Which predicts muscle strength better?Acta Clin. Belg.202176320420810.1080/17843286.2019.170498931847723
    [Google Scholar]
  20. FuH. WangL. ZhangW. LuJ. YangM. Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for sarcopenia diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle2023141577010.1002/jcsm.1314936513380
    [Google Scholar]
  21. BarotsisN. GalataA. HadjiconstantiA. PanayiotakisG. The ultrasonographic measurement of muscle thickness in sarcopenia. A prediction study.Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.202056442743710.23736/S1973‑9087.20.06222‑X32293812
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KuyumcuM.E. HalilM. KaraÖ. ÇuniB. ÇağlayanG. GüvenS. YeşilY. ArıkG. YavuzB.B. CankurtaranM. ÖzçakarL. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the calf muscle mass and architecture in elderly patients with and without sarcopenia.Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.20166521822410.1016/j.archger.2016.04.00427107379
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SariA. EsmeM. AycicekG.S. ArmaganB. KilicL. ErtenliA.I. HalilM.G. AkdoganA. Evaluating skeletal muscle mass with ultrasound in patients with systemic sclerosis.Nutrition20218411099910.1016/j.nut.2020.11099933160811
    [Google Scholar]
  24. YuguchiS. AsahiR. KamoT. AzamiM. OgiharaH. Gastrocnemius thickness by ultrasonography indicates the low skeletal muscle mass in Japanese elderly people.Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.20209010409310.1016/j.archger.2020.10409332526562
    [Google Scholar]
  25. IsakaM. SugimotoK. YasunobeY. AkasakaH. FujimotoT. KurinamiH. TakeyaY. YamamotoK. RakugiH. The usefulness of an alternative diagnostic method for sarcopenia using thickness and echo intensity of lower leg muscles in older males.J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc.20192091185.e11185.e810.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.15230902675
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WangJ. HuY. TianG. Ultrasound measurements of gastrocnemius muscle thickness in older people with sarcopenia.Clin. Interv. Aging2018132193219910.2147/CIA.S17944530464428
    [Google Scholar]
  27. FukumotoY. IkezoeT. TaniguchiM. YamadaY. SawanoS. MinaniS. AsaiT. KimuraM. IchihashiN. Cut-off values for lower limb muscle thickness to detect low muscle mass for sarcopenia in older adults.Clin. Interv. Aging2021161215122210.2147/CIA.S30497234211270
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WilkinsonT.J. GoreE.F. VadaszyN. NixonD.G.D. WatsonE.L. SmithA.C. Utility of ultrasound as a valid and accurate diagnostic tool for sarcopenia.J. Ultrasound Med.202140345746710.1002/jum.1542132780522
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SatoY. ShiraishiH. NakanishiN. ZenK. NakamuraT. YamanoT. ShirayamaT. MatobaS. Clinical significance of rectus femoris diameter in heart failure patients.Heart Vessels202035567268010.1007/s00380‑019‑01534‑731701229
    [Google Scholar]
  30. HidaT. AndoK. KobayashiK. ItoK. TsushimaM. KobayakawaT. MorozumiM. TanakaS. MachinoM. OtaK. KanbaraS. ItoS. IshiguroN. HasegawaY. ImagamaS. <Editors’ Choice> Ultrasound measurement of thigh muscle thickness for assessment of sarcopenia.Nagoya J. Med. Sci.201880451952710.18999/nagjms.80.4.51930587866
    [Google Scholar]
  31. TadaM. YamadaY. MandaiK. HidakaN. Screening for sarcopenia and obesity by measuring thigh muscle and fat thickness by ultrasound in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Osteoporos. Sarcopenia202172818710.1016/j.afos.2021.06.00234278004
    [Google Scholar]
  32. YoshidaT. KumonY. Usefulness of ultrasound assessment of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 111 River St, Hoboken 07030-5774.NJ, USAWiley2020
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Neira ÁlvarezM. Vázquez RondaM.A. Soler RangelL. Thuissard-VasalloI.J. Andreu-VazquezC. Martinez MartinP. Rábago LoriteI. San MartínG.S. Muscle assessment by ultrasonography: Agreement with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (dxa) and relationship with physical performance.J. Nutr. Health Aging202125895696310.1007/s12603‑021‑1669‑434545914
    [Google Scholar]
  34. YamadaM. KimuraY. IshiyamaD. NishioN. AbeY. KakehiT. FujimotoJ. TanakaT. OhjiS. OtobeY. KoyamaS. OkajimaY. AraiH. Differential characteristics of skeletal muscle in community-dwelling older adults.J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc.2017189807.e9807.e1610.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.01128676289
    [Google Scholar]
  35. NielsenB.R. AndersenH.E. HaddockB. HovindP. SchwarzP. SuettaC. Prevalence of muscle dysfunction concomitant with osteoporosis in a home-dwelling Danish population aged 65–93 years - The copenhagen sarcopenia study.Exp. Gerontol.202013811097410.1016/j.exger.2020.11097432464171
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ScottD. JohanssonJ. McMillanL.B. EbelingP.R. NordstromP. NordstromA. Associations of sarcopenia and its components with bone structure and incident falls in swedish older adults.Calcif. Tissue Int.20191051263610.1007/s00223‑019‑00540‑130899995
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Di MonacoM. CastiglioniC. BardesonoF. FreiburgerM. MilanoE. MassazzaG. Is sarcopenia associated with osteoporosis? A cross-sectional study of 262 women with hip fracture.Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.202258463864510.23736/S1973‑9087.22.07215‑X35412037
    [Google Scholar]
  38. KaraM. KaymakB. FronteraW. AtaA. RicciV. EkizT. ChangK. HanD. MichailX. QuittanM. LimJ. BeanJ. FranchignoniF. sarcopeniaL. Diagnosing sarcopenia: Functional perspectives and a new algorithm from the ISarcoPRM.J. Rehabil. Med.2021536jrm0020910.2340/16501977‑285134121127
    [Google Scholar]
  39. GuptaM. LehlS. LambaA. Ultrasonography for assessment of sarcopenia: A primer.J Midlife Health202213426927710.4103/jmh.jmh_234_2237324795
    [Google Scholar]
  40. WijntjesJ. van AlfenN. Muscle ultrasound: Present state and future opportunities.Muscle Nerve202163445546610.1002/mus.2708133051891
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056275133231211115630
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056275133231211115630
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test