Skip to content
2000
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0250-6882
  • E-ISSN: 0250-6882
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing dramatically in young people and is the leading cause of death worldwide.

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate differences in the adaptive and compensatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system (CVS) in young men and women to determine the most significant risk factors and assess the stability of the non-invasive method used in the early detection of CVD risk factors in young people.

Objectives

Currently, early evaluation of CVD risk factors is possible only through invasive methods, such as the Framingham risk score and the SCORE chart. Therefore, the development of a more flexible and non-invasive method is crucial in large populations.

Methods

A cohort cross-sectional investigation examined 173 volunteers, divided into two groups according to gender (n=83, n=90), and their heart rate, blood pressure (SBP/DBP), height, weight, and waist and hip circumference were non-invasively measured. Then, the potential adaptation value (R.M. Baevsky , 1987), Martinet test (MT), body mass index (BMI), and waist/hip ratio were calculated. Moreover, we collected information on lifestyle risk factors, including tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, factors related to unhealthy diet, lack of physical activity, sleep deprivation, and anxiety, through special in-person interviews using paper/online questionnaires. The T-test and the x2 tests were applied for statistical analysis.

Results

Impaired/pathological cardiovascular adaptation was observed in 11.54% of the female group and 46.07% of the male group. In the female group, cardiovascular recovery abnormalities were observed in the SBP, DBP, and HR MT in 20.59%, 16.18%, and 44.12%, respectively, whereas in the male group, 32.50%, 21.25% and 36.25%, respectively. Despite gender, these deviations were accompanied by the prevalence of sympathetic influences in the regulation of CVS functions in 72.73% of the first group and 69.66% of the second group. BMI was violated in 47.19% of males and 29.49% of females. The test results were identical to that in the invasive methods of assessment of CVD risk factors.

Conclusion

Abnormalities in cardiovascular adaptation mechanisms in young women are less pronounced. Gender-dependent risk factors have high yields, such as obesity, low physical activity, and hypertension, which are more pronounced in men. The usability of the test requires further investigation on a larger sample.

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/04666221128110145
2023-01-24
2025-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nemj/4/1/NEMJ-4-1-E281122211293.html?itemId=/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/04666221128110145&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed on: Apr 16, 2021).
  2. BenjaminE.J. MuntnerP. AlonsoA. BittencourtM.S. CallawayC.W. CarsonA.P. ChamberlainA.M. ChangA.R. ChengS. DasS.R. DellingF.N. DjousseL. ElkindM.S.V. FergusonJ.F. FornageM. JordanL.C. KhanS.S. KisselaB.M. KnutsonK.L. KwanT.W. LacklandD.T. LewisT.T. LichtmanJ.H. LongeneckerC.T. LoopM.S. LutseyP.L. MartinS.S. MatsushitaK. MoranA.E. MussolinoM.E. O’FlahertyM. PandeyA. PerakA.M. RosamondW.D. RothG.A. SampsonU.K.A. SatouG.M. SchroederE.B. ShahS.H. SpartanoN.L. StokesA. TirschwellD.L. TsaoC.W. TurakhiaM.P. VanWagnerL.B. WilkinsJ.T. WongS.S. ViraniS.S. Heart Disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: A report from the American heart association.Circulation201913910e56e52810.1161/CIR.000000000000065930700139
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WangZ. YuB. Metabolomics, proteomics, and genomics.Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Disease.Elsevier201915917010.1016/B978‑0‑323‑54835‑9.00015‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SteinR. FerrariF. ScolariF. Genetics, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease: New insights.Curr. Cardiol. Rep.20192186810.1007/s11886‑019‑1161‑531227920
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SinghV. WatsonR.R. Lifestyle features and heart disease.Lifestyle in Heart Health and Disease.Elsevier201822322610.1016/B978‑0‑12‑811279‑3.00017‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SrourB. FezeuL.K. Kesse-GuyotE. AllèsB. MéjeanC. AndrianasoloR.M. ChazelasE. DeschasauxM. HercbergS. GalanP. MonteiroC.A. JuliaC. TouvierM. Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé).BMJ2019365l145110.1136/bmj.l145131142457
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ChoiS. KimK. KimS.M. LeeG. JeongS.M. ParkS.Y. KimY.Y. SonJ.S. YunJ.M. ParkS.M. Association of obesity or weight change with coronary heart disease among young adults in South Korea.JAMA Intern. Med.201817881060106810.1001/jamainternmed.2018.231029913019
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChomistekA.K. CookN.R. RimmE.B. RidkerP.M. BuringJ.E. LeeI.M. Physical activity and incident cardiovascular disease in women: is the relation modified by level of global cardiovascular risk?J. Am. Heart Assoc.2018712e00823410.1161/JAHA.117.00823429895589
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ReinerI.C. TibubosA.N. WernerA.M. ErnstM. BrählerE. WiltinkJ. MichalM. SchulzA. WildP.S. MünzelT. ArnoldN. MahmoudpourS.H. LacknerK.J. PfeifferN. BeutelM.E. The association of chronic anxiousness with cardiovascular disease and mortality in the community: Results from the Gutenberg Health Study.Sci. Rep.20201011243610.1038/s41598‑020‑69427‑832709910
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LibbyP. BuringJ.E. BadimonL. HanssonG.K. DeanfieldJ. BittencourtM.S. TokgözoğluL. LewisE.F. Atherosclerosis.Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers2019515610.1038/s41572‑019‑0106‑z31420554
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PolT. HeldC. WesterberghJ. LindbäckJ. AlexanderJ.H. AlingsM. ErolC. GotoS. HalvorsenS. HuberK. HannaM. LopesR.D. RuzylloW. GrangerC.B. HijaziZ. Dyslipidemia and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation therapy: Insights from the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) Trial.J. Am. Heart Assoc.201873e00744410.1161/JAHA.117.00744429419390
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HedayatniaM. AsadiZ. Zare-FeyzabadiR. Yaghooti-KhorasaniM. GhazizadehH. Ghaffarian-ZirakR. Nosrati-TirkaniA. Mohammadi-BajgiranM. RohbanM. SadabadiF. RahimiH.R. GhalandariM. GhaffariM.S. YousefiA. PouresmaeiliE. BesharatlouM.R. MoohebatiM. FernsG.A. EsmailyH. Ghayour-MobarhanM. Dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risk among the MASHAD study population.Lipids Health Dis.20201914210.1186/s12944‑020‑01204‑y32178672
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KarlsenH.R. Saksvik-LehouillierI. StoneK.L. SchernhammerE. YaffeK. LangvikE. Anxiety as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of depression: a prospective examination of community-dwelling men (the MrOS study).Psychol. Health202136214816310.1080/08870446.2020.177927332584189
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DawberT.R. MeadorsG.F. MooreF.E.Jr Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study.Am. J. Public Health Nations Health195141327928610.2105/AJPH.41.3.27914819398
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GovindarajuD.R. AdrienneAL. KannelW.B. O’DonnellC.J. AtwoodL.D. D’AgostinoR.B. FoxC.S. LarsonM. LevyD. MurabitoJ. Genetics of the framingham heart study population.Adv Genet200862336510.1016/S0065‑2660(08)00602‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SplanskyG.L. CoreyD. YangQ. AtwoodL.D. CupplesL.A. BenjaminE.J. D’AgostinoR.B.Sr FoxC.S. LarsonM.G. MurabitoJ.M. O’DonnellC.J. VasanR.S. WolfP.A. LevyD. The Third generation cohort of the national heart, lung, and blood institute’s framingham heart study: Design, recruitment, and initial examination.Am. J. Epidemiol.2007165111328133510.1093/aje/kwm02117372189
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KeysA. MenottiA. AravanisC. BlackburnH. DjordevičB.S. BuzinaR. DontasA.S. FidanzaF. KarvonenM.J. KimuraN. MohačekI. NedeljkovičS. PudduV. PunsarS. TaylorH.L. ContiS. KromhoutD. ToshimaH. The seven countries study: 2,289 deaths in 15 years.Prev. Med.198413214115410.1016/0091‑7435(84)90047‑16739443
    [Google Scholar]
  18. CybulskaB. Kłosiewicz-LatoszekL. Landmark studies in coronary heart disease epidemiology. The Framingham Heart Study after 70 years and the Seven Countries Study after 60 years.Kardiol. Pol.201977217318010.5603/KP.a2019.001730828782
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AlvesD.G.L. RochaS.G. AndradeE.V. MendesA.Z. CunhaÂ.G.J. The positive impact of physical activity on the reduction of anxiety scores: a pilot study.Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras.201965343444010.1590/1806‑9282.65.3.43430994844
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Spielberger anxiety test.Available from: https://psycho-tests.com/test/spielberger-anxiety-test
  21. ChmielewskiJ. [Simplified Method of Evaluating Martinet’s Test for Mass Studies of the Functional State of the Cardiovascular System].Kardiologiia19701091455501505
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RoyA. RawalI. JabbourS. PrabhakaranD. Tobacco and cardiovascular disease: A summary of evidence.In: Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Related Disorders3rd editionWashington (DC)The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank201710.1596/978‑1‑4648‑0518‑9_ch430212086
    [Google Scholar]
  23. BanksE. JoshyG. KordaR.J. StavreskiB. SogaK. EggerS. DayC. ClarkeN.E. LewingtonS. LopezA.D. Tobacco smoking and risk of 36 cardiovascular disease subtypes: fatal and non-fatal outcomes in a large prospective Australian study.BMC Med.201917112810.1186/s12916‑019‑1351‑431266500
    [Google Scholar]
  24. FuchsF.D. WheltonP.K. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease.Hypertension202075228529210.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.1424031865786
    [Google Scholar]
  25. GijsenF. KatagiriY. BarlisP. BourantasC. ColletC. CoskunU. DaemenJ. DijkstraJ. EdelmanE. EvansP. van der HeidenK. HoseR. KooB.K. KramsR. MarsdenA. MigliavaccaF. OnumaY. OoiA. PoonE. SamadyH. StoneP. TakahashiK. TangD. ThondapuV. TenekeciogluE. TimminsL. ToriiR. WentzelJ. SerruysP. Expert recommendations on the assessment of wall shear stress in human coronary arteries: existing methodologies, technical considerations, and clinical applications.Eur. Heart J.201940413421343310.1093/eurheartj/ehz55131566246
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WengrofskyP. Dyslipidemia and its role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Implications for evaluation and targets for treatment of dyslipidemia based on recent guidelines.In: DyslipidemiaIntechOpen201910.5772/intechopen.85772
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LiJ. LeeD.H. HuJ. TabungF.K. LiY. BhupathirajuS.N. RimmE.B. RexrodeK.M. MansonJ.E. WillettW.C. GiovannucciE.L. HuF.B. Dietary inflammatory potential and risk of cardiovascular disease among men and women in the U.S.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.202076192181219310.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.53533153576
    [Google Scholar]
  28. BucholzE.M. GoodingH.C. de FerrantiS.D. Awareness of cardiovascular risk factors in U.S. young adults aged 18–39 years.Am. J. Prev. Med.2018544e67e7710.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.02229433955
    [Google Scholar]
  29. BertoluciM.C. RochaV.Z. Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with diabetes.Diabetol. Metab. Syndr.2017912510.1186/s13098‑017‑0225‑128435446
    [Google Scholar]
  30. JeongS.M. ChoiS. KimK. KimS.M. LeeG. ParkS.Y. KimY.Y. SonJ.S. YunJ.M. ParkS.M. Effect of change in total cholesterol levels on cardiovascular disease among young adults.J. Am. Heart Assoc.2018712e00881910.1161/JAHA.118.00881929899019
    [Google Scholar]
  31. StanhewiczA.E. WennerM.M. StachenfeldN.S. Sex differences in endothelial function important to vascular health and overall cardiovascular disease risk across the lifespan.Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.20183156H1569H158810.1152/ajpheart.00396.201830216121
    [Google Scholar]
  32. CiffoneN.A. CoppleT. Managing dyslipidemia for CVD prevention.Nurse Pract.201944181610.1097/01.NPR.0000550246.96902.de30531203
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ZhangX. CashR.E. BowerJ.K. FochtB.C. PaskettE.D. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease by weight status among U.S adults.PLoS One2020155e023289310.1371/journal.pone.023289332384119
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/04666221128110145
Loading
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/04666221128110145
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test