Skip to content
2000
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0250-6882
  • E-ISSN: 0250-6882

Abstract

Background

Diseases of the gallbladder (GB) are a common occurrence, and gallstones are the most common biliary pathology. Lately, the incidence of gallstone disease has been on the rise in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Case Report

We present a case report of a 52 years old female who presented with severe upper abdominal pain. The clinical examination and ultrasound imaging were consistent with the calculus of the gallbladder with acute cholecystitis without obstruction. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed to remove a gallstone of 6.8 cm in size. This was performed uneventfully.

Discussion

The prevalence of gallstones ranges from 0.1% to 50.5% worldwide. Gallstones more than 5 cm in diameter are not seen often. LC is quite challenging in such cases. This case report is being presented due to the limited availability of literature on the Laparoscopic removal of giant gallstones in the UAE.

Conclusion

Our aim here is to convey that LC can be considered the first choice vis-a-vis open method even in giant gallstone cases in the presence of trained personnel and equipped settings. The epigastric port can be extended for extracting the gallbladder specimen. Open cholecystectomy is a safe method if clear delineation of anatomy is not possible.

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0250688204666230417083610
2023-06-13
2025-05-13
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. StintonL.M. ShafferE.A. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: Cholelithiasis and cancer.Gut Liver20126217218710.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.17222570746
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PortincasaP. CiaulaA.D. BonfrateL. WangD.Q. Therapy of gallstone disease: What it was, what it is, what it will be.World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther.20123272010.4292/wjgpt.v3.i2.722577615
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BagepallyB.S. HaridossM. SasidharanA. JagadeeshK.V. OswalN.K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of gallstone disease treatment outcomes in early cholecystectomy versus conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy.BMJ Open Gastroenterol.202181e00067510.1136/bmjgast‑2021‑00067534261757
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HasslerK.R. CollinsJ.T. PhilipK. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Updated 2022 Oct 24StatPearls.Treasure Island, FLStatPearls Publishing2022https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448145/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KeusF. de JongJ. GooszenH.G. van LaarhovenC.H.J.M. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.Cochrane Libr.200620101CD00622910.1002/14651858.CD00622917054284
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Al ZoubiM. El AnsariW. Al MoudarisA.A. AbdelaalA. Largest case series of giant gallstones ever reported, and review of the literature.Int. J. Surg. Case Rep.20207245445910.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.00132698264
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SinghY. MohammedS. HoseinA. RamoutarK. NaraynsinghV. A giant gallstone: The largest gallstone removed laparoscopically in the world.Cureus2020125e793310.7759/cureus.793332494539
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AlishiY.A. HowaishF.A. AlhamdanF.A. Prevalence and risk factors for gallstones among population in Riyadh City, KSA 2017.Egypt. J. Hosp. Med.20176952384238810.12816/0041681
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ShresthaA. BhattaraiS. ShresthaS. ChandM. BhattaraiA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for large/giant gallstones: Case report and brief review of literature.NMMJ202122879010.3126/nmmj.v2i2.41283
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KhanI.J. AlahmadM. AurifF. MirN.H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a giant gallstone.Arch. Clin. Med. Case Rep.20224044
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SharmaR.K. SonkarK. SinhaN. RebalaP. AlbaniA.E. BehariA. ReddyD.N. FarooquiA. KapoorV.K. Gallstones: A worldwide multifaceted disease and its correlations with gallbladder carcinoma.PLoS One20161111e016635110.1371/journal.pone.016635127832205
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0250688204666230417083610
Loading
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0250688204666230417083610
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test