Skip to content
2000
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0250-6882
  • E-ISSN: 0250-6882

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ameliorated insulin injection site rotation on the incidence of Lipohypertrophy (LH) and glycemic control in patients with diabetes.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design involving a pretest-posttest with a control group was utilized at the medical outpatients’ clinic of Sohag University Hospital. The participants were divided into two groups (30 in the study group and 30 in the control group). Two instruments were utilized to collect the data, ., a sociodemographic and clinical data sheet and a lipohypertrophy assessment sheet.

Results

The majority have been found to suffer from type I DM with an insulin injection duration from one to less than 6 months. A significant reduction has been noticed in the lipohypertrophy incidence and grade during the 6-month assessment compared to the pre-intervention assessment.

Conclusion

A marked reduction in the incidence of LH and improved glycemic control have been noted in the study group, indicating the clinical significance of the anti-clockwise insulin site rotation technique.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882311972240918075705
2024-11-14
2025-01-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nemj/5/1/NEMJ-5-E02506882311972.html?itemId=/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882311972240918075705&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CarrisN.W. CorvinJ.A. Prediabetes: An Undiagnosed Pandemic.Endocr. Pract.202228223123210.1016/j.eprac.2021.10.00434728322
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChoN.H. ShawJ.E. KarurangaS. HuangY. da Rocha FernandesJ.D. OhlroggeA.W. MalandaB. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045.Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.201813827128110.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.02329496507
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WangK. ZhangS. LiuC. ChenY. A meta-analysis and meta-regression on the prevalence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients on insulin therapy.Therapie202176661762810.1016/j.therap.2021.04.00233958198
    [Google Scholar]
  4. TandonN. KalraS. BalharaY.P. BaruahM. ChadhaM. ChandaliaH. ChowdhuryS. JothydevK. KumarP.M. vM. MithalA. ModiS. PitaleS. SahayR. ShuklaR. SundaramA. UnnikrishnanA. WangnooS. Forum for Injection Technique (FIT), India: The Indian recommendations 2.0, for best practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2015.Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab.201519331733110.4103/2230‑8210.15276225932385
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FamullaS. HövelmannU. FischerA. CoesterH.V. HermanskiL. KaltheunerM. KaltheunerL. HeinemannL. HeiseT. HirschL. Insulin injection into lipohypertrophic tissue: Blunted and more variable insulin absorption and action and impaired postprandial glucose control.Diabetes Care20163991486149210.2337/dc16‑061027411698
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FridA.H. KreugelG. GrassiG. HalimiS. HicksD. HirschL.J. SmithM.J. WellhoenerR. BodeB.W. HirschI.B. KalraS. JiL. StraussK.W. New insulin delivery recommendations.Mayo Clin. Proc.20169191231125510.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.01027594187
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DagdelenS. DeyneliO. OlgunN. SivaZ.O. SarginM. HatunS. KulaksizogluM. KayaA. GürlekC.A. HirschL.J. StraussK.W. Turkish Insulin Injection Techniques Study: Complications of Injecting Insulin Among Turkish Patients with Diabetes, Education They Received, and the Role of Health Care Professional as Assessed by Survey Questionnaire.Diabetes Ther.2018941615162810.1007/s13300‑018‑0463‑829961244
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SG. GG. vA. AB. AMD-OSDI consensus on injection techniques for people with diabetes mellitus.Med. Clin. Rev.20162310.21767/2471‑299X.1000034
    [Google Scholar]
  9. StrolloF. Insulin shot dependent lipodystrophy: Evidence, uncertainties and current terminology overlaps.J. Diabetes. Metab. Disord. Control20163210.15406/jdmdc.2016.03.00067
    [Google Scholar]
  10. XuY. WangL. HeJ. BiY. LiM. WangT. WangL. JiangY. DaiM. LuJ. XuM. LiY. HuN. LiJ. MiS. ChenC.S. LiG. MuY. ZhaoJ. KongL. ChenJ. LaiS. WangW. ZhaoW. NingG. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults.JAMA2013310994895910.1001/jama.2013.16811824002281
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HeX. ChenL. WangK. WuH. WuJ. Insulin adherence and persistence among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective database analysis.Patient Prefer Adher.20171123724510.2147/PPA.S123389
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HuangM.C. HungC.H. YuC.Y. BerryD.C. ShinS.J. HsuY.Y. The effectiveness of multimedia education for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.J. Adv. Nurs.201773494395410.1111/jan.1319427779772
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PoudelR.S. ShresthaS. PiryaniR.M. BasyalB. KauchaK. AdhikariS. Assessment of insulin injection practice among diabetes patients in a Tertiary Healthcare Centre in Nepal: A preliminary study.J. Diabetes Res.201720171610.1155/2017/864831629333459
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LiangK. XieQ. NieJ. DengJ. Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools.Medicine (Baltimore)202110014e2542410.1097/MD.000000000002542433832143
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MirahmadizadehA. DelamH. SeifM. BanihashemiS.A. TabatabaeeH. Factors Affecting Insulin Compliance in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in South Iran, 2017: We Are Faced with Insulin Phobia.Iran. J. Med. Sci.201944320421331182886
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HeinemannL. Insulin absorption from lipodystrophic areas: A (neglected) source of trouble for insulin therapy?J. Diabetes Sci. Technol.20104375075310.1177/19322968100040033220513344
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KordonouriO. LauterbornR. DeissD. Lipohypertrophy in young patients with type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Care200225363463410.2337/diacare.25.3.63411874968
    [Google Scholar]
  18. AliasS.H. TengC.L. DevarajN.K. AmirrudinS. Abd LatibN.R. ChongF.Y. YussofS. Mohamad DinM.D. LimP.W. Prevalence and associated factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injected patients with diabetes in selected primary care clinics in Peninsular Malaysian: A cross-sectional study.Malays. Fam. Physician2023183710.51866/oa.10037449277
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ThewjitcharoenY. Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of lipodystrophy in insulin-treated patients with diabetes: An old problem in a new era of modern insulin.Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes.2020134609462010.2147/DMSO.S282926
    [Google Scholar]
  20. FridA.H. HirschL.J. MenchiorA.R. MorelD.R. StraussK.W. Worldwide injection technique questionnaire study.Mayo Clin. Proc.20169191224123010.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.01227594186
    [Google Scholar]
  21. DanneT. PhillipM. BuckinghamB.A. Jarosz-ChobotP. SabooB. UrakamiT. BattelinoT. HanasR. CodnerE. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with diabetes.Pediatr. Diabetes201819Suppl. 2711513510.1111/pedi.1271829999222
    [Google Scholar]
  22. DemirG. ErE. Atik AltınokY. ÖzenS. DarcanŞ. GökşenD. Local complications of insulin administration sites and effect on diabetes management.J. Clin. Nurs.20223117-182530253810.1111/jocn.1607134622517
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AlJaberA.N. SalesI. AlmigbalT.H. WajidS. BataisM.A. The prevalence of lipohypertrophy and its associated factors among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci.202015322423110.1016/j.jtumed.2020.03.00632647518
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ChowdhuryT.A. EscudierV. Poor glycaemic control caused by insulin induced lipohypertrophy.BMJ2003327741138338410.1136/bmj.327.7411.38312919996
    [Google Scholar]
  25. BochanenN. DecochezK. HeleuE. CuypersJ. VercammenC. CoremansP. VanhaverbekeG. ShadidS. KeymeulenB. BolsensN. De BlockC. Lipohypertrophy Monitoring Study (LIMO): Effect of single use of 4 mm pen needles combined with education on injection site rotation on glycaemic control: Confirmation of an unpleasant truth.Diabet. Med.2022391e1467210.1111/dme.1467234407260
    [Google Scholar]
  26. GentileS. GuarinoG. Della CorteT. MarinoG. SattaE. PasquarellaM. RomanoC. AlfroneC. StrolloF. Role of structured education in reducing lypodistrophy and its metabolic complications in insulin-treated people with Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized multicenter case–control study.Diabetes Ther.20211251379139810.1007/s13300‑021‑01006‑033738775
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LinY. LinL. WangW. HongJ. ZengH. Insulin-related lipohypertrophy: Ultrasound characteristics, risk factors, and impact of glucose fluctuations.Endocrine202275376877510.1007/s12020‑021‑02904‑w34648113
    [Google Scholar]
  28. OmoriK. KawamuraT. UrataM. MatsuuraM. KusamaM. ImamineR. WataraiA. NakashimaE. UmemuraT. HottaN. Effect of re-coaching on self-injection of insulin in older diabetic patients – Impact of cognitive impairment.Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.2017130344210.1016/j.diabres.2017.05.01128554141
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882311972240918075705
Loading
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882311972240918075705
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Diabetes; Glycemic control; Insulin injection; Lipohypertrophy; Site rotation; TID
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test