Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Medical Imaging
  4. Volume 20, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between vertical direction differences and the nasal cavity in skeletal Class I individuals.

Materials and Methods

This study was divided into 2 groups according to the vertical direction angle, and it was conducted on a total of 60 individuals with skeletal Class I features, with 30 individuals in each subgroup. Angular and millimetric measurements (N-ANS, ANS-ME, N-ME, Ba-N/Ptm-Gn°, nasal septum, nasal cavity width (NCL), nasal cavity angle° (NCA)) were made in accordance with the parameters determined on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) before the treatment of the individuals constituting the research groups. In a retrospective study, the relationship between vertical skeletal development of the nasal cavity on CBCT images was examined in detail. The Mann-Whitney U test was used, and Student's t test was used to compare two groups with a normal distribution. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between quantitative data.

Results

In the comparison of Class I vertical direction subgroups, a statistically significant difference was found in terms of measurement values ANS-Me and N-Me, nasal cavity width and angular measurements (p<0.001) According to the results of the Mann-Whitney U test, men had significantly higher measurements of the sex and nasal cavity than women (p = 0.001; p<0.001).

Conclusion

Class I individuals with different vertical direction dimensions were affected by changes in the nasal cavity during vertical development.

© 2024 Sadry and Somtürk
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648
2024-01-01
2024-11-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e110723218618.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. YatabeM. GaribD. FacoR. de ClerckH. SoukiB. JansonG. NguyenT. CevidanesL. RuellasA. Mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP: A 3-D preliminary assessment.Angle Orthod.201787342343110.2319/052516‑419.127802079
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-TaaiN. PerssonM. RansjöM. Levring JäghagenE. ForsR. WesterlundA. Craniofacial changes from 13 to 62 years of age.Eur. J. Orthod.202244555656510.1093/ejo/cjac01135348638
     [Google Scholar]
  3. TurkerG. OzturkY.M. Evaluation of associations between condylar morphology, ramus height, and mandibular plane angle in various vertical skeletal patterns: A digital radiographic study.BMC Oral Health202222111010.1186/s12903‑022‑02365‑134980089
     [Google Scholar]
  4. VallettaR. RongoR. MadariagaACP Relationship between the condylion–gonion–menton angle and dentoalveolar heights.Int J Environ Res Public Health2020179330910.3390/ijerph17093309
     [Google Scholar]
  5. NandaS.K. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.199098324725810.1016/S0889‑5406(05)81602‑62403077
     [Google Scholar]
  6. KotułaJ. New sagittal and vertical cephalometric analysis methods: A systematic review.Diagnostics2022127172310.3390/diagnostics1207172335885628
     [Google Scholar]
  7. PatilH.S. GolwalkarS. ChouguleK. KulkarniN.R. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with skeletal class II malocclusion with various vertical growth patterns: A cephalometric study.Folia Med.2021631748010.3897/folmed.63.e5216533650399
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Mi-YeonC. HongY-J ChoiJ-E Classification of early age facial growth pattern and identification of the genetic basis in two Korean populations.Sci. Rep.202212111234992227
     [Google Scholar]
  9. LiuZ.Y. ChenG. DaiF.F. XuT.M. JiangR.P. Analysis of correlation of 3-dimensional lip vermilion morphology and dentoskeletal forms in young Chinese adults on the basis of sex and skeletal patterns.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20211595e423e43710.1016/j.ajodo.2020.07.03633653638
     [Google Scholar]
  10. MladinaR. ŠubarićM. Are some septal deformities inherited?Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.200367121291129410.1016/j.ijporl.2003.07.00714643471
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ByunS. ChungS.K. NaY. Air-conditioning characteristics in nasal cavity models exhibiting nasal cycle states.J. Therm. Biol.201983606810.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.05.00431331526
     [Google Scholar]
  12. EladD. WolfM. KeckT. Air-conditioning in the human nasal cavity.Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.20081631-312112710.1016/j.resp.2008.05.00218565805
     [Google Scholar]
  13. AntA. KemalogluY.K. YilmazM. DilciA. Craniofacial Deviations in the Children With Nasal Obstruction.J. Craniofac. Surg.201728362562810.1097/SCS.000000000000340928468136
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ShettyS.R. Al BayattiS.W. Al-RawiN.H. KamathV. ReddyS. NarasimhanS. Al KawasS. MadiM. AchalliS. BhatS. The effect of concha bullosa and nasal septal deviation on palatal dimensions: A cone beam computed tomography study.BMC Oral Health202121160710.1186/s12903‑021‑01974‑634814910
     [Google Scholar]
  15. SahinB. Paranasal sinus fungus ball, anatomical variations and dental pathologies: Is there any relation?.Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol20226012310.4274/tao.2022.2021‑11‑8
     [Google Scholar]
  16. AtsalG. DemirE. Yildirim. The relationship between degree of nasal septum deviation with sinonasal structures and variations.J. Craniofac. Surg.2021335e447e44934690315
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dadgar-YeganehA. HatcherD.C. OberoiS. Association between degenerative temporomandibular joint disorders, vertical facial growth, and airway dimension.J. World Fed. Orthod.2021101202810.1016/j.ejwf.2021.01.00133627292
     [Google Scholar]
  18. BenitezB.K. WeibelSK HalbeisenFS Craniofacial growth at age 6–11 years after one-stage cleft lip and palate repair: A retrospective comparative study with historical controls.Children202298122810.3390/children908122836010118
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MoonJ.H. KimM.G. HwangH.W. ChoS.J. DonatelliR.E. LeeS.J. Evaluation of an individualized facial growth prediction model based on the multivariate partial least squares method.Angle Orthod.202292670571310.2319/110121‑807.135980769
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ČelarA. TafajE. GrafA. LettnerS. Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions.J. Orofac. Orthop.201879426727610.1007/s00056‑018‑0139‑z29777251
     [Google Scholar]
  21. KniggeR.P. HardinA.M. MiddletonK.M. McNultyK.P. OhH.S. ValiathanM. DurenD.L. SherwoodR.J. Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.Anat. Rec. (Hoboken)202230592175220610.1002/ar.2487035076186
     [Google Scholar]
  22. ZhengY. ZhuC. ZhuM. LeiL. Difference in the alveolar bone remodeling between the adolescents and adults during upper incisor retraction: A retrospective study.Sci. Rep.2022121916110.1038/s41598‑022‑12967‑y35650260
     [Google Scholar]
  23. KniggeR.P. McNultyK.P. OhH. HardinA.M. LearyE.V. DurenD.L. ValiathanM. SherwoodR.J. Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2021160343044110.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.03834175161
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ArdaniI.G.A.W. WillyantiI. NarmadaI.B. Correlation between vertical components and skeletal class II malocclusion in ethnic Javanese.Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent.20181029730210.2147/CCIDE.S18841430588125
     [Google Scholar]
  25. HusainS. SivakumarA. RengalakshmiS. Palatal plane inclination on vertical growth pattern among Indians.Bioinformation20211712112610.6026/973206300171126
     [Google Scholar]
  26. KuitertR. BeckmannS. van LoenenM. TuinzingB. ZentnerA. Dentoalveolar compensation in subjects with vertical skeletal dysplasia.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2006129564965710.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.03216679205
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ChoiY.J. KimD.J. NamJ. ChungC.J. KimK.H. Cephalometric configuration of the occlusal plane in patients with anterior open bite.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2016149339140010.1016/j.ajodo.2015.08.02026926027
     [Google Scholar]
  28. SadryS. OkU. Investigation of The relationship between pterygomaxillary fissure in adult individuals with different vertical growth pattern of face development.Van Health Sci J13218
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SadryS. OkU. An evaluation of the relation between the maxillary third molars and facial proportions using cephalometric image.J Oral Maxillofacial Radiol2019734910.4103/jomr.jomr_24_19
     [Google Scholar]
  30. AhmedM. ShaikhA. FidaM. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern.Dental Press J. Orthod.2016214414910.1590/2177‑6709.21.4.041‑049.oar27653263
     [Google Scholar]
  31. SadryS. KoruB.E. KayalarE. Analyzing the effects of tooth extraction on the lip in orthodontic treatment.J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.20221234e126e13210.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.00435461792
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WangT. YangZ. YangF. A three dimensional study of upper airway in adult skeletal class ii patients with different vertical growth patterns. PloS one201494e9554410.1371/journal.pone.0095544
     [Google Scholar]
  33. SalazarL. PiedrahitaM. ÁlvarezE. SantamaríaA. ManriqueR. Oliveira JuniorO.B. Effect of face mask therapy on mandibular rotation considering initial and final vertical growth pattern: A longitudinal study.Clin. Exp. Dent. Res.20195434334910.1002/cre2.18831452945
     [Google Scholar]
  34. HaY. ParkY.S. LeeS.P. HA Y. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2014145679980610.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.01424880851
     [Google Scholar]
  35. da Silva GoulartM. FilhoL.C. Cláudia de Castro Ferreira ContiA. Almeida PedrinR.R. de Miranda LadewigV. CardosoM.A. Evaluation of facial esthetics in long-faced white Brazilian middle school students.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2019155681281810.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.01731153501
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LioneR. FranchiL. NovielloA. BolleroP. FanucciE. CozzaP. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: A cross-sectional study in growing children.Ultrason. Imaging201335430731710.1177/016173461350246824081727
     [Google Scholar]
  37. RodriguesM HenriqueP de CarvalhoA GabrielliM LopesR JuniorO FilhoV PasseriL How obesity affects nasal function in obstructive sleep apnea: Anatomic and volumetric parameters.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol202088329630210.1016/j.bjorl.2020.06.00232782124
     [Google Scholar]
  38. RodriguesM.M. GabrielliM.F.R. Garcia JuniorO.A. Pereira FilhoV.A. PasseriL.A. Nasal airway evaluation in obstructive sleep apnoea patients: Volumetric tomography and endoscopic findings.Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.201746101284129010.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.00928623043
     [Google Scholar]
  39. CağlayanF. TozoğluU. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial region detected by cone beam CT.Diagn. Interv. Radiol.201218215916321960135
     [Google Scholar]
  40. GauravG. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome-CT evaluation. Available from:http://radiopaedia.org/cases/obstructive-sleep-apnoea-syndrome-ct-evaluation 2013
  41. SadryS. KocaG.C. KurtulmusH. Cone beam computed tomography analysis results in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.IInt J Clin Practice2021759e1449710.1111/ijcp.14497
     [Google Scholar]
  42. KulshresthaR. TandonR. KingerS. Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics: An overview.Int J Orthodontic Rehab20167311510.4103/2349‑5243.192536
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mouhanna-FattalC. PapadopoulosM. BouserhalJ. TaukA. Bassil-NassifN. AthanasiouA. Evaluation of upper airway volume and craniofacial volumetric structures in obstructive sleep apnoea adults: A descriptive CBCT study.Int. Orthod.201917467868610.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.00531488344
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648
Loading
Is there a Relationship between Vertical Facial Development and Nasal Cavity?
Curr. Med. Imaging 20, E110723218618 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230711090648
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Cone beam computed tomography; Millimetric measurements; Nasal cavity; Orthodontics; Parameters determined; Spearman's correlation analysis; Vertical development

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test