Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

This case report presents a discrepancy in sonographic findings between a screening sonography performed by a Sonographer in the Basic Emergency Service (BES) and a subsequent ultrasound performed by a Radiologist physician in a Referral Hospital (RH). The aim of this report is to discuss the possible reasons for the discrepancy and its implications for patient care.

Case Presentation

A patient with a history of epigastric pain and vomiting underwent screening sonography in a BES, which suggested Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation Duct (IHBD) and main pancreatic duct dilatation. The patient was subsequently referred to the RH for further evaluation. However, the Radiologist in the RH did not confirm any of the initial suspicions from BES through a normal ultrasound procedure. The discrepancy raises questions regarding the quality of the screening ultrasound, misinterpretation of the BES images, or the potential for ambiguity in the point of care ultrasound (POCUS) exam.

Conclusion

The differences in sonographic findings between BES and RH, in this case, suggest that the improvement of the patient's clinical condition and therapeutic interventions may have contributed to the discrepancy. Further investigation and standardization of POCUS training and interpretation may improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056249805231003052141
2024-01-01
2024-11-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e15734056249805.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056249805231003052141&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. von HerbayA. KühnelJ. FrielingT. HäussingerD. Color doppler sonography avoids misinterpretation of the “parallel channel sign” in the sonographic diagnosis of cholestasis.J. Clin. Ultrasound199927842643210.1002/(SICI)1097‑0096(199910)27:8<426::AID‑JCU3>3.0.CO;2‑X10477884
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ĆwikG. GierblińskiI.W. Errors and mistakes in the ultrasound diagnosis of the pancreas.J. Ultrason.2013135317819110.15557/JoU.2013.001826674270
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ConwayS. 3-Piece Suit Radiologist: Ultrasound is back in style, but does its quality match?Appl. Radiol.2015443303110.37549/AR2161
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LoboM.J.C.D. TavaresS.C.C.N.M. Pereira de AlmeidaR.P. Point of care prehospital ultrasound in Basic Emergency Services in Portugal.Health Sci. Rep.202255e84710.1002/hsr2.84736189415
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LalN. MehraS. LalV. Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry.J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2014812AC01AC0410.7860/JCDR/2014/8738.523225653927
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LahhamS. BeckerB.A. GariA. BunchS. AlvaradoM. AndersonC.L. ViquezE. SpannS.C. FoxJ.C. Utility of common bile duct measurement in ED point of care ultrasound: A prospective study.Am. J. Emerg. Med.201836696296610.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.06429162442
    [Google Scholar]
  7. VardarB.U. DupuisC.S. GoldsteinA.J. VardarZ. KimY.H. Ultrasonographic evaluation of patients with abnormal liver function tests in the emergency department.Ultrasonography202241224326210.14366/usg.2115235026887
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GolseN. LewinM. RodeA. SebaghM. MabrutJ.Y. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: Diagnosis and management.J. Visc. Surg.2017154534535310.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.06.00428844704
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KatabathinaV.S. DasyamA.K. DasyamN. HosseinzadehK. Adult bile duct strictures: Role of MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in characterization.Radiographics201434356558610.1148/rg.34312521124819781
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LvY. LiuN. WuH. LiZ. Etiological classification and treatment strategies for secondary bile duct dilatation.Exp. Biol. Med.2021246328128510.1177/153537022096676733167690
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056249805231003052141
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056249805231003052141
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Case Report
Keyword(s): Abdomen; Bile ducts; Radiologists; Screening; Sonographers; Ultrasound
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test