Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

The temporomandibular joint diseases have been associated with various predisposing factors. Joint spaces, articular eminence height and inclination, and the shapes of the condylar and glenoid fossa have all been shown to vary in temporomandibular joint diseases (TMD) patients. Advanced imaging techniques like cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) have been employed to estimate these parameters.

Aims and Objectives

The aim of the current study was to investigate the condylar morphology, condylar and glenoid fossa shapes, and assessment of joint spaces, such as anterior, posterior, superior, lateral, and medial spaces, through CBCT slices in coronal and sagittal planes and compare them between the control group and TMD group.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was planned where 80 joints in 40 patients were assessed for the above parameters; group I consisted of healthy patients, and group II included those with temporomandibular joint diseases (TMDs). The articular eminence height and inclination were assessed on the midsagittal section. The condylar changes and shapes of the glenoid fossa and condyles, as well as the joint spaces, were assessed on the selected coronal and sagittal sections.

Results

The condylar fossa had a triangular shape in the TMJ group and an oval shape in the control group. The results were highly significant (P = 0.000**). A highly significant difference in morphological parameters, such as AJS, PJS, SJS, MJS, LJS, articular eminence height, and inclination, was found between the two groups (P = 0.000**). The association of morphological parameters, such as AJS, PJS, SJS, MJS, LJS, and articular eminence height and inclination were compared with condylar and glenoid fossa shapes, where the association of superior joint space and articular eminence inclination was observed. A highly significant difference was noted between the two groups with regard to all the parameters with P=0.00*.

Conclusion

The articular eminence inclination, as well as the superior joint space, were found to be associated with the glenoid and condyle fossa shapes in the TMJ group. These observations would, therefore, help in the early diagnosis of temporomandibular joint diseases.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056248617231002110417
2024-01-01
2024-11-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e15734056248617.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056248617231002110417&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. MahdianN. DostálováT. DanĕkJ. NedomaJ. KohoutJ. HubáčekM. HliňákováP. 3D reconstruction of TMJ after resection of the cyst and the stress–strain analyses.Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.2013110327928910.1016/j.cmpb.2012.12.00123332173
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dupuy-BonaféI. OtalP. MontalS. BonaféA. MaldonadoI.L. Biometry of the temporomandibular joint using computerized tomography.Surg. Radiol. Anat.201436993393910.1007/s00276‑014‑1277‑724619474
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DygasS. SzarmachI. RadejI. Assessment of the morphology and degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joint using CBCT according to the orthodontic approach: A scoping review.BioMed Res. Int.2022202212810.1155/2022/686301435155678
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PandisN. KarpacJ. TrevinoR. WilliamsB. A radiographic study of condyle position at various depths of cut in dry skulls with axially corrected lateral tomograms.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.1991100211612210.1016/S0889‑5406(05)81518‑51867162
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhangY. XuX. LiuZ. Comparison of morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint for asymptomatic subjects using the two-dimensional and three- dimensional measuring methods.J. Healthc. Eng.201720171810.1155/2017/568070829065621
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KikuchiK. TakeuchiS. TanakaE. ShibaguchiT. TanneK. Association between condylar position, joint morphology and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients without temporomandibular joint disorders.J. Oral Rehabil.200330111070107510.1046/j.1365‑2842.2003.01194.x14641670
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AhmedJ. SujirN. ShenoyN. BinnalA. OngoleR. Morphological assessment of TMJ spaces, mandibular condyle, and glenoid fossa using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A retrospective analysis.Indian J. Radiol. Imaging2021311788510.1055/s‑0041‑172948834316114
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-RawiN.H. UthmanA.T. SodeifyS.M. Spatial analysis of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders and normal controls using cone beam computed tomography.Eur. J. Dent.201711109910510.4103/ejd.ejd_202_1628435374
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZhangYL SongJL XuXC Morphologic analysis of the temporomandibular joint between patients with facial asymmetry and asymptomatic subjects by 2D and 3D evaluation a preliminary study.Medicine201695133052
    [Google Scholar]
  10. UekiK. MoroiA. SotoboriM. IshiharaY. MarukawaK. YoshizawaK. KatoK. KawashiriS. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.201240882182710.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.00322507292
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ÇağlayanF. SümbüllüM.A. AkgülH.M. Associations between the articular eminence inclination and condylar bone changes, condylar movements, and condyle and fossa shapes.Oral Radiol.2014301849110.1007/s11282‑013‑0149‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  12. İlgüyD. İlgüyM. FişekçioğluE. DölekoğluS. ErsanN. Articular eminence inclination, height, and condyle morphology on cone beam computed tomography.ScientificWorldJournal201420141610.1155/2014/76171424696193
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SinghB. KumarN.R. BalanA. NishanM. HarisP.S. JinishaM. DennyC.D. Evaluation of normal morphology of mandibular condyle: A radiographic survey.J. Clin. Imaging Sci.2020105110.25259/JCIS_84_202032874756
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChoudharyA. AhujaU. RathoreA. PuriN. DhillonM. BudakotiA. Association of temporomandibular joint morphology in patients with and without temporomandibular joint dysfunction: A cone-beam computed tomography based study.Dent. Res. J.202017533834610.4103/1735‑3327.29433433343841
    [Google Scholar]
  15. YunJ.M. ChoiY.J. WooS.H. LeeU.L. Temporomandibular joint morphology in Korean using cone-beam computed tomography: Influence of age and gender.Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.20214312110.1186/s40902‑021‑00307‑534224004
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SümbüllüM.A. ÇağlayanF. AkgülH.M. YilmazA.B. Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.201241323424010.1259/dmfr/2478064322074873
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PaknahadM. ShahidiS. AkhlaghianM. AbolvardiM. Is mandibular fossa morphology and articular eminence inclination associated with temporomandibular dysfunction?J. Dent.201617213414127284559
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KoyamaJ. NishiyamaH. HayashiT. Follow-up study of condylar bony changes using helical computed tomography in patients with temporomandibular disorder.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.200736847247710.1259/dmfr/2807835718033943
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MaJ. WangJ. HuangD. WangZ. HuM. LiuH. JiangH. Cone-beam computed tomographic assessment of the inclination of the articular eminence in patients with temporomandibular disorders and chewing side preference.BMC Oral Health202121139610.1186/s12903‑021‑01760‑434389008
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SülünT. CemgilT. DucJ.M.P. RammelsbergP. JägerL. GernetW. Morphology of the mandibular fossa and inclination of the articular eminence in patients with internal derangement and in symptom-free volunteers.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.20019219810710.1067/moe.2001.11462111458253
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChenY LiY LiL LuoN ZhangX DaiH Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in skeletal Class I malocclusion with variable degrees of deep overbite and open bite.Cranio202211210.1080/08869634.2022.2126918
    [Google Scholar]
  22. IsbergA. WestessonP.L. Steepness of articular eminence and movement of the condyle and disk in asymptomatic temporomandibular joints.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.199886215215710.1016/S1079‑2104(98)90117‑29720088
    [Google Scholar]
  23. IkedaK. KawamuraA. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2009135449550110.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.02119361736
    [Google Scholar]
  24. DaliliZ. KhakiN. KiaS. SalamatF. Assessing joint space and condylar position in the people with normal function of temporomandibular joint with cone-beam computed tomography.Dent. Res. J.20129560761210.4103/1735‑3327.10488123559927
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ImanimoghaddamM. MadaniA.S. MahdaviP. BagherpourA. DarijaniM. EbrahimnejadH. Evaluation of condylar positions in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A cone-beam computed tomographic study.Imaging Sci. Dent.201646212713110.5624/isd.2016.46.2.12727358820
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HintonR.J. Relationships between mandibular joint size and craniofacial size in human groups.Arch. Oral Biol.1983281374310.1016/0003‑9969(83)90024‑96347144
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MajorP.W. KinniburghR.D. NebbeB. PrasadN.G. GloverK.E. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joint osseous articular surface contour and spatial relationships associated with disc displacement and disc length.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2002121215216110.1067/mod.2002.12064111840129
    [Google Scholar]
  28. YaleS.H. AllisonB.D. HauptfuehrerJ.D. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.196621216917710.1016/0030‑4220(66)90238‑65215976
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MathewA.L. SholapurkarA.A. PaiK.M. Condylar changes and its association with age, TMD, and dentition status: A cross-sectional study.Int. J. Dent.201120111710.1155/2011/41363922114595
    [Google Scholar]
  30. OliveiraR.S. OliveiraS. RodriguesE. JunqueiraJ.L. PanzarellaF. Accuracy of panoramic radiography for degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint.J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent.20201019610010.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_411_1932181226
    [Google Scholar]
  31. RabeloK.A. Sousa MeloS.L. TorresM.G.G. CamposP.S.F. BentoP.M. MeloD.P. Condyle excursion angle, articular eminence inclination, and temporomandibular joint morphologic relations with disc displacement.J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2017755938.e1938.e1010.1016/j.joms.2017.01.01928219631
    [Google Scholar]
  32. DerwichM Mitus-KenigM PawlowskaE. Interdisciplinary approach to the temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis-review of the literature.Medicina202056522510.3390/medicina56050225
    [Google Scholar]
  33. NahK.S. Condylar bony changes in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A CBCT study.Imaging Sci. Dent.201242424925310.5624/isd.2012.42.4.24923301212
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056248617231002110417
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056248617231002110417
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test