Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2772-2708
  • E-ISSN: 2772-2716

Abstract

Background

Diseases are medical situations that are allied with specific signs and symptoms. A disease may be instigated by internal dysfunction or external factors like pathogens. Cerebrovascular disease can progress from diverse causes, comprising thrombosis, atherosclerosis, cerebral venous thrombosis, or embolic arterial blood clot.

Objective

In this paper, authors have proposed a robust framework for the detection of cerebrovascular diseases employing two different proposals which were validated by use of other datasets.

Methods

In proposed model 1, the Discrete Fourier transform is used for the fusion of CT and MR images which was classified them using machine learning techniques and pre-trained models while in proposed model 2, the cascaded model was proposed. The performance evaluation parameters like accuracy and losses were evaluated.

Results

92% accuracy was obtained using Support Vector Machine using Gray Level Difference Statistics and Shape features with Principal Component Analysis as a feature selection technique while Inception V3 resulted in 95.6% accuracy while the cascaded model resulted in 96.21% accuracy.

Conclusion

The cascaded model is later validated on other datasets which results in 0.11% and 0.14% accuracy improvement over TCIA and BRaTS datasets respectively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raiad/10.2174/0127722708288426240408042054
2024-09-01
2024-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations 3rd.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK378/ 1990
  2. Cerebrovascular Disease.Available from: https://www.aans.org/en/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Cerebrovascular-Disease
  3. MohanG. SubashiniM.M. Medical Imaging with Intelligent Systems: A ReviewIn: Deep Learning and Parallel Computing Environment for Bioengineering Systems.Academic Press201922105373
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ReblinM. SahebjamS. PeeriN.C. MartinezY.C. ThompsonZ. EganK.M. Medical cannabis use in glioma patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center in florida.J. Palliat. Med.201922101202120710.1089/jpm.2018.052831081711
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KohlerB.A. WardE. McCarthyB.J. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system.J. Natl. Cancer Inst.2011103971473610.1093/jnci/djr07721454908
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HerreraS.L. Inferring axon diameters using magnetic resonance imaging oscillating gradient spin echo sequences.Magn ResonImag20186470
    [Google Scholar]
  7. JinJ. Electromagnetic analysis and design in magnetic resonance imaging.In: Engineering & Technology.New YorkRoutledge2018128210.1201/9780203758731
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DespotovićI. GoossensB. PhilipsW. MRI segmentation of the human brain: challenges, methods, and applications.Comput. Math. Methods Med.2015201512310.1155/2015/45034125945121
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SkogenK. SchulzA. DormagenJ.B. GaneshanB. HelsethE. ServerA. Diagnostic performance of texture analysis on MRI in grading cerebral gliomas.Eur. J. Radiol.201685482482910.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.01326971430
    [Google Scholar]
  10. WangX. WangD. YaoZ. Machine learning models for multi parametric glioma grading with quantitative result interpretations.Front. Neurosci.2018121046
    [Google Scholar]
  11. VijanA. DubeyP. JainS. Comparative Analysis of Various Image Fusion Techniques for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images.Procedia Comput. Sci.202016741342210.1016/j.procs.2020.03.250
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PalB. MahajanS. JainS. A comparative study of traditional image fusion techniques with a novel hybrid method.International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)North Eastern Hill University. Shillong, Meghalaya, India202082082510.1109/ComPE49325.2020.9200017
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PalB. MahajanS. JainS. Medical image fusion employing enhancement techniques Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE).Bangladesh. Dec 26-27, 2020;2020
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LiS. KangX. FangL. HuJ. YinH. Pixel-level image fusion: A survey of the state of the art.Inf. Fusion20173310011210.1016/j.inffus.2016.05.004
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChenG. RuJ. ZhouY. MTANS: multi-scale mean teacher combined adversarial network with shape-aware embedding for semi-supervised brain lesion segmentation.Neuroimage202124411856810.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.11856834508895
    [Google Scholar]
  16. TangY. WangS. QuY. CuiZ. ZhangW. Consistency and adversarial semi-supervised learning for medical image segmentation.Comput. Biol. Med.202316110701810.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10701837216776
    [Google Scholar]
  17. XiaoZ. SuY. DengZ. ZhangW. Efficient combination of cnn and transformer for dual-teacher uncertainty-guided semi-supervised medical image segmentation.Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.202222610709910.1016/j.cmpb.2022.10709936116398
    [Google Scholar]
  18. JiaoR. ZhangY. DingL. Learning with limited annotations: A survey on deep semi-supervised learning for medical image segmentation.Comput. Biol. Med.202416910784010.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10784038157773
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RenZ. LiQ. CaoK. LiM.M. ZhouY. WangK. Model performance and interpretability of semi-supervised generative adversarial networks to predict oncogenic variants with unlabeled data.BMC Bioinformatics20232414310.1186/s12859‑023‑05141‑236759776
    [Google Scholar]
  20. XuY. HuangH. HeidariA.A. MFeature: Towards high performance evolutionary tools for feature selection.Expert Syst. Appl.202118611565510.1016/j.eswa.2021.115655
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SalauA.O. JainS. EnehJ.N. A review of various image fusion types and transforms.Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science20212431515152210.11591/ijeecs.v24.i3.pp1515‑1522
    [Google Scholar]
  22. BhardwajC. JainS. SoodM. Transfer learning based robust automatic detection system for diabetic retinopathy grading.Neural Comput. Appl.20213320139991401910.1007/s00521‑021‑06042‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  23. CaoC. LiuF. TanH. Deep learning and its applications in biomedicine.Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics2018161173210.1016/j.gpb.2017.07.00329522900
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HenaffM. BrunaJ. LeCunY. Deep convolutional networks on graph-structured data.arXiv:1506.051632015
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KrizhevskyA. SutskeverI. HintonG.E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.In: NIPS’12: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing SystemsACM Digital Library2012110971105
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LaiS. XuL. LiuK. ZhaoJ. Recurrent convolutional neural networks for text classification.Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence202529110.1609/aaai.v29i1.9513
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harvard Medical School lecture notes: Introduction to Neuroimaging.Available from: http://www.med.harvard.edu/aanlib/home.html
  28. JainS. Computer-aided detection system for the classification of non-small cell lung lesions using SVM.Curr. Computeraided Drug Des.202116683384010.2174/157340991666620010212202131899680
    [Google Scholar]
  29. LiR. ZhangW. SukH.I. Deep learning based imaging data completion for improved brain disease diagnosis.In: Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention MICCAI-BRATS.SpringerLink201430531210.1007/978‑3‑319‑10443‑0_39
    [Google Scholar]
  30. HeK. ZhangX. RenS. SunJ. Deep residual learning for image recognition.Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern RecognitionLas Vegas, NV, USA2016770778
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SzegedyC. LiuW. JiaY. Going deeper with convolutions Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.Boston, MA, USA201519
    [Google Scholar]
  32. JinZ. MinL. NgM.K. ZhengM. Image colorization by fusion of color transfers based on DFT and variance features.Comput. Math. Appl.20197792553256710.1016/j.camwa.2018.12.033
    [Google Scholar]
  33. PalB. JainS. Novel discrete component wavelet transform for detection of cerebrovascular diseases.Sadhana202247423710.1007/s12046‑022‑02016‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  34. BajwaM.N. MalikM.I. SiddiquiS.A. Two-stage framework for optic disc localization and glaucoma classification in retinal fundus images using deep learning.BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak.2019191
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SimonyanK ZissermanA Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.ArXiv14091556Cs2015
    [Google Scholar]
  36. JainS. SaxenaS. SinhaS. Ensemble architecture for prediction of grading of diabetic retinopathy.Cybern. Syst.202211910.1080/01969722.2022.2151176
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SzegedyC. VanhouckeV. IoffeS. ShlensJ. WojnaZ. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision.Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognitionLas Vegas, NV, USA20162818282610.1109/CVPR.2016.308
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raiad/10.2174/0127722708288426240408042054
Loading
/content/journals/raiad/10.2174/0127722708288426240408042054
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test