Skip to content
2000
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0250-6882
  • E-ISSN: 0250-6882

Abstract

The scope of online assessment in the field of medical education is extensive and varied, encompassing a wide range of types of assessments and purposes. For the assessment of the cognitive domain, online assessment can be carried out with the help of a number of assessment methods. As is the case with any potential tool, even online assessments have their share of limitations, and we must be aware of this as it can help us to make a systematic and evidence-based decision about when to use online assessments and when to combine them with traditional assessments. In order to enhance the acceptability and use of online assessments in medical education, it is crucial to overcome the identified limitations. The primary strategy is to clearly communicate the format, the instructions, and the expectations from both teachers and students to avoid all kinds of confusion. In conclusion, online assessments have immense scope in the field of medical education. However, considering the fact that the successful implementation of these assessments depends on multiple factors, it becomes essential that we take appropriate measures to overcome the potential challenges and adopt a concerted and collaborative approach.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882315948240606070248
2024-06-26
2025-04-23
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. MortagyM. AbdelhameedA. SextonP. OlkenM. HegazyM.T. GawadM.A. SennaF. MahmoudI.A. ShahJ. ElkholyA. MahmoudA. ElframawyA. EmaraA. AbualezA. NaeemA. MohamedA. FahimB. SaadehD. YehiaH. AlsharifH. AliH. KhalilK. SayedK. FaragM. AbugdidaM. SydhomP. YousufR. AhmedR. FarahatR. ElbayarR. DiabR. HusseinY. AiashH. Egyptian Medical Education Collaborative Group (EGY MedEd) Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide assessment of medical students’ usage and perceptions.BMC Med. Educ.202222121810.1186/s12909‑022‑03249‑235354406
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlMathamK. AlWadieA. KasuleO. AlFadilS. Al-ShayaO. Assessment of postgraduate online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Adv. Med. Educ. Pract.2022131143115710.2147/AMEP.S37030836176421
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SenS. DesaiD. DesaiS. DesaiR. DashS. Assessment of online teaching as an adjunct to medical education in the backdrop of COVID-19 lockdown in a developing country – An online survey.Indian J. Ophthalmol.202068112399240310.4103/ijo.IJO_2049_2033120627
    [Google Scholar]
  4. WalshK. Online assessment in medical education-current trends and future directions.Malawi Med. J.2015272717210.4314/mmj.v27i2.826405516
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HaugenK. MetcalfK.L. Assessment of online learning.Radiol. Technol.201990330731130635464
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WongworawatMD IncrocciM CrumlishCF KlenaJ Effect of remote proctoring of the orthopaedic in-training examination on scores.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev20226e21.00225
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ArslanF. GerckensU. Virtual support for remote proctoring in TAVR during COVID‐19.Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.2021985E733E73610.1002/ccd.2950433527578
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MedinaM.S. CastleberryA.N. Proctoring strategies for computer-based and paper-based tests.Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.201673527427710.2146/ajhp15067826896498
    [Google Scholar]
  9. NigamA. PasrichaR. SinghT. ChuriP. A systematic review on AI-based proctoring systems: Past, present and future.Educ. Inf. Technol.20212656421644510.1007/s10639‑021‑10597‑x34177348
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KühbeckF. BerberatP.O. EngelhardtS. SarikasA. Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: A prospective cohort study.BMC Med. Educ.201919141210.1186/s12909‑019‑1814‑531703687
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SiddiquiN. KhanR.N. AfifaS. IslamZ. Perception and validity of online formative oral assessment in surgical trainees: A cross-sectional study.Cureus2022145e2493810.7759/cureus.2493835706746
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RabbaniM.A. Shahab SyedH.B. IkramF. Comparison of assessment tools in online and on-campus undergraduate medical examinations amidst COVID-19 pandemic.J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak.202232335936310.29271/jcpsp.2022.03.35935148590
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FatimaS.S. IdressR. JabeedK. SabzwariS. KhanS. Online assessment in undergraduate medical education: Challenges and solutions from a LMIC university.Pak. J. Med. Sci.202137494595110.12669/pjms.37.4.394834290764
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FawnsT. SchaepkensS. A matter of trust: Online proctored exams and the integration of technologies of assessment in medical education.Teach. Learn. Med.202234444445310.1080/10401334.2022.204883235466830
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MateK. WeidenhoferJ. Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences.FASEB Bioadv.20224192110.1096/fba.2021‑0007535024569
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nemj/10.2174/0102506882315948240606070248
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test