To Study the Effect of Confining Walls on Permeable, Flexible Planktonic Particle using Immersed Boundary Method

References

1. ProvatasN. AlavaM.J. Ala-NissilaT. Density correlations in paper.Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics1996541R36R3810.1103/PhysRevE.54.R36 9965169
   [Google Scholar]
2. KamaliM. KhodaparastZ. Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.201511432634210.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.005 24953005
   [Google Scholar]
3. CooperD.W. Particulate contamination and microelectronics manufacturing: An introduction.Aerosol Sci. Technol.19865328729910.1080/02786828608959094
   [Google Scholar]
4. GoodayA.J. TurleyC.M. Responses by benthic organisms to inputs of organic material to the ocean floor: A review.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A1990331161611913810.1098/rsta.1990.0060
   [Google Scholar]
5. YadavP. GhoshS. Numerical Studies of settling of an impermeable and permeable planktonic particle using Immersed boundary method (IBM).Eur. Phys. J. Plus2022137674010.1140/epjp/s13360‑022‑02947‑6
   [Google Scholar]
6. GhoshS. StockieJ.M. Numerical simulations of particle sedimentation using the immersed boundary method.Commun. Comput. Phys.201518238041610.4208/cicp.061113.050115a
   [Google Scholar]
7. YadavP. GhoshS. SharmaA. PanghalR. Effect of confining walls on settling permeable rigid isolated semi-torus particle applying Immersed Boundary Method (IBM). In soft computing: Theories and applications.Proceedings of SoCTA20232022473480[Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.].
   [Google Scholar]
8. ArthursK.M. MooreL.C. PeskinC.S. PitmanE.B. LaytonH.E. Modeling arteriolar flow and mass transport using the immersed boundary method.J. Comput. Phys.1998147240244010.1006/jcph.1998.6097
   [Google Scholar]
9. FogelsonA.L. A mathematical model and numerical method for studying platelet adhesion and aggregation during blood clotting.J. Comput. Phys.198456111113410.1016/0021‑9991(84)90086‑X
   [Google Scholar]
10. FauciL.J. PeskinC.S. A computational model of aquatic animal locomotion.J. Comput. Phys.19887718510810.1016/0021‑9991(88)90158‑1
    [Google Scholar]
11. BottinoD.C. FauciL.J. A computational model of ameboid deformation and locomotion.Eur. Biophys. J.199827553253910.1007/s002490050163 9760734
    [Google Scholar]
12. SudarsanR. GhoshS. StockieJ.M. EberlH.J. Simulating biofilm deformation and detachment with the immersed boundary method.Commun. Comput. Phys.201619368273210.4208/cicp.161214.021015a
    [Google Scholar]
13. GhoshS. Immersed boundary simulations of fluid shear-induced deformation of a cantilever beam.Math. Comput. Simul.202118538440210.1016/j.matcom.2021.01.001
    [Google Scholar]
14. DillonR.H. FauciL.J. An integrative model of internal axoneme mechanics and external fluid dynamics in ciliary beating.J. Theor. Biol.2000207341543010.1006/jtbi.2000.2182 11082310
    [Google Scholar]
15. BreugemW.P. A second-order accurate immersed boundary method for fully resolved simulations of particle-laden flows.J. Comput. Phys.2012231134469449810.1016/j.jcp.2012.02.026
    [Google Scholar]
16. DupuisA. ChatelainP. KoumoutsakosP. An immersed boundary–lattice-Boltzmann method for the simulation of the flow past an impulsively started cylinder.J. Comput. Phys.200822794486449810.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.009
    [Google Scholar]
17. UhlmannM. An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows.J. Comput. Phys.2005209244847610.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.017
    [Google Scholar]
18. WangL. GuoZ.L. MiJ.C. Drafting, kissing and tumbling process of two particles with different sizes.Comput. Fluids201496203410.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.005
    [Google Scholar]
19. GhoshS. Immersed boundary method for a permeable sedimenting circular particle between two parallel rigid walls.Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, an International Journal20202012028
    [Google Scholar]
20. GhoshS. PanghalR. Study of gravitational settling of a flexible circular structure using immersed boundary method.Comput. Appl. Math.202241833910.1007/s40314‑022‑02052‑5
    [Google Scholar]
21. KimY. PeskinC.S. 2–D parachute simulation by the immersed boundary method.SIAM J. Sci. Comput.20062862294231210.1137/S1064827501389060
    [Google Scholar]
22. LaytonA.T. Modeling water transport across elastic boundaries using an explicit jump method.SIAM J. Sci. Comput.20062862189220710.1137/050642198
    [Google Scholar]
23. StockieJ.M. Modelling and simulation of porous immersed boundaries.Comput. Struc.20098711-1270170910.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.001
    [Google Scholar]
24. ChhabraR.P. AgarwalS. ChaudharyK. A note on wall effect on the terminal falling velocity of a sphere in quiescent Newtonian media in cylindrical tubes.Powder Technol.20031291-3535810.1016/S0032‑5910(02)00164‑X
    [Google Scholar]
25. TakaisiY. The drag on a circular cylinder moving with low speeds in a viscous liquid between two parallel walls.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.195510868569310.1143/JPSJ.10.685
    [Google Scholar]
26. PianetG. ArquisE. Simulation of particles in fluid: A two-dimensional benchmark for a cylinder settling in a wall-bounded box.Eur. J. Mech. BFluids200827330932110.1016/j.euromechflu.2007.07.001
    [Google Scholar]
27. PanghalR. GhoshS. Study of gravitational sedimentation of flexible, permeable circular and planktonic particle applying the immersed boundary method.Int. J. Sediment Res.202338564365210.1016/j.ijsrc.2023.05.004
    [Google Scholar]
28. PanghalR. GhoshS. BhardwajR. To study the effect of confining walls on flexible circular particle using immersed boundary method.In Recent Advances in Sustainable Environment: Select Proceedings of RAiSE.Springer Nature Singapore.20223949
    [Google Scholar]
29. RomaA.M. PeskinC.S. BergerM.J. An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method.J. Comput. Phys.1999153250953410.1006/jcph.1999.6293
    [Google Scholar]