Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

The visualization and understanding of the details of the root configurations and root canal structure are essential prior to root canal treatment. This study aimed to identify key indicators of pronounced root divergence between the distobuccal and distolingual roots in mandibular first molars by highlighting common features observed in panoramic radiographs. These indicators can help predict the likelihood of encountering significant root divergence before initiating endodontic treatment.

Case Presentation

We present three cases in which panoramic radiographs displayed imaging features characteristic of root resorption in the distal root of the mandibular first molars. However, subsequent periapical radiographs in case 1 and cone-beam computed tomography images in cases 2 and 3 revealed that the mandibular first molars were in normal condition, with pronounced root divergence but no evidence of root resorption.

Conclusion

Panoramic radiographs depicting mandibular molar roots with a resorptive and unclear appearance may indicate the presence of severe root divergence. In such cases, we strongly recommend additional cone-beam computed tomographic imaging to ensure precise diagnosis and facilitate optimal treatment planning for endodontic procedures.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056292212240226112950
2024-01-01
2025-05-06
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. HatipoğluF.P. MağatG. HatipoğluÖ. Assessment of the prevalence of radix entomolaris and distolingual canal in mandibular first molars in 15 countries: A multinational cross-sectional study with meta-analysis.J. Endod.202349101308131810.1016/j.joen.2023.06.01137393948
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CarlsenO. AlexandersenV. Radix entomolaris: Identification and morphology.Scand. J. Dent. Res.19909853633732293344
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WuW. GuoQ. TanB.K. Geometric analysis of the distolingual root and canal in mandibular first molars: A micro-computed tomographic study.J. Endod.202147577978610.1016/j.joen.2021.02.00633609601
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChenY.C. LeeY.Y. PaiS.F. YangS.F. The morphologic characteristics of the distolingual roots of mandibular first molars in a Taiwanese population.J. Endod.200935564364510.1016/j.joen.2009.01.02019410075
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NouroloyouniA. Salem MilaniA. EtminanA. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of quality of endodontic treatment and prevalence of procedural errors in mandibular molars.Int. J. Clin. Pract.202320231810.1155/2023/355897437251955
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De MoorR.J.G. DerooseC.A.J.G. CalbersonF.L.G. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: An endodontic challenge.Int. Endod. J.2004371178979910.1111/j.1365‑2591.2004.00870.x15479262
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CottonT. GeislerT. HoldenD. SchwartzS. SchindlerW. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography.J. Endod.20073391121113210.1016/j.joen.2007.06.01117931947
    [Google Scholar]
  8. YeomH.G. KimJ.E. HuhK.H. Development of a new ball-type phantom for evaluation of the image layer of panoramic radiography.Imaging Sci. Dent.201848425525910.5624/isd.2018.48.4.25530607349
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MartinsL.A.C. NascimentoE.H.L. Gaêta-AraujoH. OliveiraM.L. FreitasD.Q. Mapping of a multilayer panoramic radiography device.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.20225142021008210.1259/dmfr.2021008234757830
    [Google Scholar]
  10. AmirĆ. AsjaC̆. MelitaV-P. AdnanĆ. VjekoslavJ. MuretićI. Evaluation of the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.199886224224810.1016/S1079‑2104(98)90132‑99720102
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LiangH. FrederiksenN.L. Focal trough and patient positioning.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.200433212812910.1259/dmfr/2697578015314007
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BrownC.E.Jr ChristenA.C. JermanA.C. Dimensions of the focal trough in panoramic radiography.J. Am. Dent. Assoc.197284484384710.14219/jada.archive.1972.01464500719
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HassenS.M. Manson-HingL.R. A study of the zone of sharpness of three panoramic x-ray machines and the effect of screen speed on the sharpness zone.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.198254224224910.1016/0030‑4220(82)90224‑96956841
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PatelJ.R. The focal trough of the Autopan panoramic dental x-ray machine.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.198968111511810.1016/0030‑4220(89)90125‑42755680
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056292212240226112950
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056292212240226112950
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Case Report
Keyword(s): Cone-beam computed tomography; Dental; Distolingual root; Panoramic; Radiography
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test