Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background:

Endometrial Cancer (EC) is a highly heterogeneous cancer comprising both histological and molecular subtypes. Using a non-invasive modality method to trigger these subtypes as early as possible can aid clinicians in establishing individualized treatment.

Purpose:

The study aimed to clarify the value of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) of EC MRI in determining molecular subtypes.

Material and Methods:

We retrospectively recruited 109 patients with pathologically proven EC (78 endometrioid cancers and 31 non-endometrioid cancers) with available molecular classification from a tertiary centre. MRI was prospectively performed a month prior to surgery; images were blindly interpreted by two experienced radiologists with consensus reading. The ADC value was measured by an experienced radiologist on the commercially available processing workstation. Interoperator measurement consistency was calculated.

Results:

Our sample comprised 17 PLOE, 32 MSI-H, 31 NSMP, and 29 P53abn ECs. Clinical information did not differ significantly among the groups. The maximum diameter and volume of the lesions differed among the groups. The ADC value in the maximal area (ADCarea) or region of interest (ROI, ADCroi) in the P53abn group was higher than that in the other groups (894.0 ±12.6 and 817.5 ± 83.3 x10-6 mm2/s). The ADC mean values were significantly different between the P53abn group and the other groups ( = 0.000). The nomogram showed the highest discriminative ability to distinguish P53abn EC from other types (AUC: 0.859).

Conclusion:

Our results have suggested the quantitative MR characteristics (ADC values) derived from preoperative EC MRI to provide useful information in preoperatively determining P53abn cancer.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056289592240408061811
2024-01-01
2025-06-21
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. CrosbieE.J. KitsonS.J. McAlpineJ.N. MukhopadhyayA. PowellM.E. SinghN. Endometrial cancer.Lancet2022399103331412142810.1016/S0140‑6736(22)00323‑335397864
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LeiM. AdambekovS. EdwardsR.P. WangR. YuanJ.M. KalixE. LopaS. LinkovF. Endometrial cancer risk factors in Singapore Chinese: A prospective cohort study.Ann. Epidemiol.20227191410.1016/j.annepidem.2022.04.00235462044
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LiuF. CheungE.C.W. LaoT.T. Obesity increases endometrial cancer risk in Chinese women with postmenopausal bleeding.Menopause202128101093109810.1097/GME.000000000000182234183566
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ConcinN. GuiuM.X. VergoteI. CibulaD. MirzaM.R. MarnitzS. LedermannJ. BosseT. ChargariC. FagottiA. FotopoulouC. MartinG.A. LaxS. LorussoD. MarthC. MoriceP. NoutR.A. O’DonnellD. QuerleuD. RaspolliniM.R. SehouliJ. SturdzaA. TaylorA. WestermannA. WimbergerP. ColomboN. PlanchampF. CreutzbergC.L. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer2021311123910.1136/ijgc‑2020‑00223033397713
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HuvilaJ. PorsJ. ThompsonE.F. GilksC.B. Endometrial carcinoma: Molecular subtypes, precursors and the role of pathology in early diagnosis.J. Pathol.2021253435536510.1002/path.560833368243
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MaheshwariE. NougaretS. SteinE.B. RauchG.M. HwangK.P. StaffordR.J. KloppA.H. SolimanP.T. MaturenK.E. RockallA.G. LeeS.I. SadowskiE.A. VenkatesanA.M. Update on MRI in evaluation and treatment of endometrial cancer.Radiographics20224272112213010.1148/rg.22007036018785
    [Google Scholar]
  7. NougaretS. HortaM. SalaE. LakhmanY. NaggaraT.I. KidoA. MasselliG. BharwaniN. SadowskiE. ErtmerA. GarciaO.M. HuchK.R.A. CunhaT.M. RockallA. ForstnerR. Endometrial cancer MRI staging: Updated guidelines of the European society of urogenital radiology.Eur. Radiol.201929279280510.1007/s00330‑018‑5515‑y29995239
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LeeM.S. MoonM.H. KimS.Y. JangS. OhS. ChoJ.Y. Preoperative risk stratification in women with endometrial cancer: A comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging.Eur. J. Radiol.202215011027610.1016/j.ejrad.2022.11027635339860
    [Google Scholar]
  9. NougaretS. ReinholdC. AlsharifS.S. AddleyH. ArceneauJ. MolinariN. GuiuB. SalaE. Endometrial cancer: Combined MR volumetry and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of myometrial and lymphovascular invasion and tumor grade.Radiology2015276379780810.1148/radiol.1514121225928157
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ChenJ. FanW. GuH. WangY. LiuY. ChenX. RenS. WangZ. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma.Acta Radiol.202162795996510.1177/028418512094491332727213
    [Google Scholar]
  11. AnT. KimC.K. Pathological characteristics and risk stratification in patients with stage I endometrial cancer: Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis.Br. J. Radiol.20219411262021015110.1259/bjr.2021015134233478
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MaX. RenX. ShenM. MaF. ChenX. ZhangG. QiangJ. Volumetric ADC histogram analysis for preoperative evaluation of LVSI status in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.Eur. Radiol.202232146046910.1007/s00330‑021‑07996‑634137929
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KishimotoK. TajimaS. MaedaI. TakagiM. UenoT. SuzukiN. NakajimaY. Endometrial cancer: Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade.Acta Radiol.20165781021102810.1177/028418511561224926486600
    [Google Scholar]
  14. VickersA.J. WooS. Decision curve analysis in the evaluation of radiology research.Eur. Radiol.20223295787578910.1007/s00330‑022‑08685‑835348862
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KurmanR.J. VisvanathanK. ShihI.M. Bokhman’s dualistic model of endometrial carcinoma. Revisited.Gynecol. Oncol.2013129227127210.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.02923582581
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MoriT. KatoH. KawaguchiM. HatanoY. IshiharaT. NodaY. HyodoF. MatsuoM. FuruiT. MorishigeK. A comparative analysis of MRI findings in endometrial cancer: Differentiation between endometrioid adenocarcinoma, serous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma.Eur. Radiol.20223264128413610.1007/s00330‑021‑08512‑635061079
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SchultheisA.M. MartelottoL.G. De FilippoM.R. PiscuglioS. NgC.K.Y. HusseinY.R. Reis-FilhoJ.S. SoslowR.A. WeigeltB. TP53 mutational spectrum in endometrioid and serous endometrial cancers.Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol.201635428930010.1097/PGP.000000000000024326556035
    [Google Scholar]
  18. De PerrotT. Sadjo ZouaC. GlessgenC.G. BotsikasD. BerchtoldL. SalomirR. SeigneuxD.S. ThoenyH.C. ValléeJ.P. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the genitourinary system.J. Clin. Med.2022117192110.3390/jcm1107192135407528
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SattaS. DolciamiM. CelliV. Di StadioF. PerniolaG. PalaiaI. PernazzaA. RoccaD.C. RizzoS. CatalanoC. CapuaniS. ManganaroL. Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: Validation with histopathological parameters.Br. J. Radiol.20219411252021005410.1259/bjr.2021005434111974
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056289592240408061811
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056289592240408061811
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the Publisher’s website.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test