Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Cosmetic Science
  4. Volume 3, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2666-7797
  • E-ISSN: 2666-7800

Abstract

The cosmetic industry, driven by innovation, constantly seeks safer, more effective, and sustainable products. However, regulatory hurdles often impede the introduction of innovative cosmetics. This paper explores the convergence of advanced technologies and regulatory conformity, emphasizing the need for collaborative, interdisciplinary approaches.

Through an extensive review of literature and case studies, we reveal the multifaceted challenges within the industry. These encompass shifting consumer expectations, ingredient safety concerns, and intricate global regulations. Cross-functional collaborations, uniting researchers, regulators, industry experts, and consumers, are pivotal, driving innovation while ensuring product safety and compliance.

Our research stresses the importance of a proactive, all-encompassing approach to product development. This approach should integrate cutting-edge technologies, rigorous safety assessments, and smart regulatory strategies from project inception. Additionally, it emphasizes engaging stakeholders, sharing knowledge, and practicing transparency to earn trust from consumers and regulators.

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the balance between innovation and regulation in the cosmetic industry, advocating for a paradigm shift characterized by collaboration and interdisciplinary efforts. By aligning innovation with regulatory compliance, the industry can effectively navigate the complex landscape of modern cosmetics, fostering the creation of safer, more sustainable, and consumer-centric products.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
2024-10-04
2025-03-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. KumarS. MassieC. DumonceauxM.D. Comparative innovative business strategies of major players in cosmetic industry.Ind. Manage. Data Syst.2006106328530610.1108/02635570610653461
     [Google Scholar]
  2. SungI. Interdisciplinary literaure analysis between cosmetic container design and customer purchasing intention.Indust. Distrib. & Busin.20211232129
     [Google Scholar]
  3. RajS. JoseS. SumodU.S. SabithaM. Nanotechnology in cosmetics: Opportunities and challenges.J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci.20124318619310.4103/0975‑7406.99016 22923959
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BafnaA. GandhiP. JainA. DantaraV. DesaiK. DholakiyaM. KanabarH. Influence of celebrity endorsements on the consumer behavior for facial care product.Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research201625219235
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BartonA.E. BorchardG. WackerM.G. PastorinG. SaleemI.Y. ChaudaryS. ElbayoumiT. ZhaoZ. FlühmannB. Need for expansion of pharmacy education globally for the growing field of nanomedicine.Pharmacy (Basel)20221011710.3390/pharmacy10010017 35202067
     [Google Scholar]
  6. LuntJ. StavesM. WeymanA. Ensuring safe behaviour on a global scale: L’Oréal’s approach.Policy and Practice in Health and Safety2019171325310.1080/14773996.2018.1528724
     [Google Scholar]
  7. NakaokaI. ParkY. ChenY. Strategic Network Formation with Structural Hole in R&D Projects: The Case Study on Japanese Cosmetic Industry. Journal of Robotics.Networking and Artificial Life201633188192
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BayusB.L. ShaneS. Understanding customer needs.Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management.O’Reilly2008
     [Google Scholar]
  9. SahotaA. Sustainability: How the Cosmetics Industry is Greening Up.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd2013
     [Google Scholar]
  10. MorelS. SapinoS. PeiraE. ChirioD. GallarateM. Regulatory Requirements for Exporting Cosmetic Products to Extra-EU Countries.Cosmetics20231026210.3390/cosmetics10020062
     [Google Scholar]
  11. WackerM.G. ProykovaA. SantosG.M.L. Dealing with nanosafety around the globe—Regulation vs. innovation.Int. J. Pharm.20165091-29510610.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.015 27184102
     [Google Scholar]
  12. DanielA.B. StricklandJ. AllenD. CasatiS. ZuangV. BarrosoJ. WhelanM. Régimbald-KrnelM.J. KojimaH. NishikawaA. ParkH.K. LeeJ.K. KimT.S. DelgadoI. RiosL. YangY. WangG. KleinstreuerN. International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing.Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.201895526510.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.003 29518484
     [Google Scholar]
  13. FanT.P. DealG. KooH.L. ReesD. SunH. ChenS. DouJ.H. MakarovV.G. PozharitskayaO.N. ShikovA.N. KimY.S. HuangY.T. ChangY.S. JiaW. DiasA. WongV.C. ChanK. Future development of global regulations of Chinese herbal products.J. Ethnopharmacol.2012140356858610.1016/j.jep.2012.02.029 22373513
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MishraL. Das KurmiB. Cosmetics regulations and standardization guidelines.Pharmaspire202315313715010.56933/Pharmaspire.2023.15124
     [Google Scholar]
  15. WardellD.A. TapsobaA. LovettP.N. ZidaM. RousseauK. GautierD. EliasM. BamaT. Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn.)–the emergence of global production networks in Burkina Faso, 1960–2021 1.Int. For. Rev.202123453456110.1505/146554821834777189
     [Google Scholar]
  16. FerreiraM. MatosA. CourasA. MartoJ. RibeiroH. Overview of cosmetic regulatory frameworks around the world.Cosmetics2022947210.3390/cosmetics9040072
     [Google Scholar]
  17. WortsmanX. AlfagemeF. RoustanG. Arias-SantiagoS. MartorellA. CatalanoO. Scotto di SantoloM. ZarchiK. BouerM. GonzalezC. BardR. MandavaA. GaitiniD. Guidelines for performing dermatologic ultrasound examinations by the DERMUS group.J. Ultrasound Med.201635357758010.7863/ultra.15.06046 26887446
     [Google Scholar]
  18. O’NeilA. A call for truth in the fashion pages: What the global trend in advertising regulation means for US beauty and fashion advertisers.Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud.201421261964110.2979/indjglolegstu.21.2.619
     [Google Scholar]
  19. HalimM.A.A. SallehM.M.M. The possibility of uniformity on halal standards in organization of Islamic countries (OIC) country.World Appl. Sci. J.20121717610
     [Google Scholar]
  20. AadithyaS. GaneshG.N.K. ReddyM.V. Regulations for Software Used in Medical Device: Current Global Scenario, Challenges and Future Scope.Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs2022362
     [Google Scholar]
  21. RedondoG.L.M. SalasM.F.R. RojasM.C. CorralesD.G. NavarroE.P. BarqueroM.R. Characterization and Comparison of quality management systems for cosmetic products in the world.International Journal Of Drug Regulatory Affairs2021934756
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LiZ. BarenjiA.V. HuangG.Q. Toward a blockchain cloud manufacturing system as a peer to peer distributed network platform.Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf.20185413314410.1016/j.rcim.2018.05.011
     [Google Scholar]
  23. SuzikH.A. Jack-of-all-trades: Quality professionals go cross-functional.Quality199938324
     [Google Scholar]
  24. MaloniM. DemblaP. SwaimJ.A. A cross-functional systems project in an IS capstone course.J. Inf. Syst. Educ.2012233283
     [Google Scholar]
  25. RîpaI.A. Customer relationship management in the international context–theoretical and practical considerations.Proceed. Int. Conf.n Busin. Excel.20221611060107210.2478/picbe‑2022‑0098
     [Google Scholar]
  26. TuccoriS.R.M. JúniorE.L. de Quadros CarvalhoR. dos SantosG.V. Collaboration for technological innovation: choices and decisions that make partnerships excel.Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies201461172220
     [Google Scholar]
  27. VarrichioP. DiogenesD. JorgeA. GarnicaL. Collaborative networks and sustainable business: a case study in the Brazilian system of innovation.Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.201252909910.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.445
     [Google Scholar]
  28. AlexanderB. ContrerasL.O. Inter-industry creative collaborations incorporating luxury fashion brands.J. Fash. Mark. Manag.201620325427510.1108/JFMM‑09‑2015‑0075
     [Google Scholar]
  29. AkaK.G. LabelleF. The collaborative process of sustainable innovations under the lens of actor–network theory.Sustainability (Basel)202113191075610.3390/su131910756
     [Google Scholar]
  30. HjalagerA.M. KonuH. Co-branding and co-creation in wellness tourism: The role of cosmeceuticals.J. Hosp. Mark. Manag.201120887990110.1080/19368623.2011.611727
     [Google Scholar]
  31. LiemA.G. AriefN.N. Integrated Marketing Communication Strategy for Cosmetic Retail Company: a Study of New Central Palu.Journal of Economics and Business UBS2023121413430
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Mazur-WierzbickaE. Communicating socially responsible actions by means of social media in the process of building the image of an organization, as seen in the case of start-ups from the cosmetics industry.Procedia Comput. Sci.20211924279428910.1016/j.procs.2021.09.204
     [Google Scholar]
  33. LeeY.H. ChenS.L. Effect of green attributes transparency on wta for green cosmetics: Mediating effects of CSR and green brand concepts.Sustainability (Basel)20191119525810.3390/su11195258
     [Google Scholar]
  34. FortunatiS. MartinielloL. MoreaD. The strategic role of the corporate social responsibility and circular economy in the cosmetic industry.Sustainability (Basel)20201212512010.3390/su12125120
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ChengY.S. LamK.W. NgK.M. KoR.K.M. WibowoC. An integrative approach to product development—A skin-care cream.Comput. Chem. Eng.20093351097111310.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.10.010 32287504
     [Google Scholar]
  36. EnklerH.G. SporlederL. Agile product development—coupling explorative and established CAx methods in early stages of virtual product development.Procedia CIRP20198484885310.1016/j.procir.2019.04.221
     [Google Scholar]
  37. AmrinaU. HidayatnoA. ZagloelT.Y.M. A model-based strategy for developing sustainable cosmetics small and medium industries with system dynamics.J. Open Innov.20217422510.3390/joitmc7040225
     [Google Scholar]
  38. LopesR. VideiraN. Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping.Ecosyst. Serv.201728284210.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.012
     [Google Scholar]
  39. GevaertC.M. Explainable AI for earth observation: A review including societal and regulatory perspectives.Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.202211210286910.1016/j.jag.2022.102869
     [Google Scholar]
  40. ChenW. KrainakD. SahinerB. PetrickN. A Regulatory Science Perspective on Performance Assessment of Machine Learning Algorithms in Imaging.Machine Learning for Brain Disorders.New York, NYHumana202370575210.1007/978‑1‑0716‑3195‑9_23
     [Google Scholar]
  41. AlépéeN. Bessou-TouyaS. CotovioJ. de SmedtA. de WeverB. FallerC. JonesP. Le VarletB. Marrec-FairleyM. PfannenbeckerU. TailhardatM. van GoethemF. McNameeP. Cosmetics Europe multi-laboratory pre-validation of the SkinEthic™ reconstituted human corneal epithelium test method for the prediction of eye irritation.Toxicol. In Vitro20132751476148810.1016/j.tiv.2013.02.009 23524228
     [Google Scholar]
  42. ZangheriM. CalabrettaM.M. CalabriaD. FioriJ. GuardigliM. MicheliniE. MelandriS. MarisA. MirasoliM. EvangelistiL. Immunological analytical techniques for cosmetics quality control and process monitoring.Processes (Basel)2021911198210.3390/pr9111982
     [Google Scholar]
  43. GoussardV. DupratF. GerbaudV. PloixJ.L. DreyfusG. Nardello-RatajV. AubryJ.M. Predicting the surface tension of liquids: Comparison of four modeling approaches and application to cosmetic oils.J. Chem. Inf. Model.201757122986299510.1021/acs.jcim.7b00512 29091426
     [Google Scholar]
  44. JaegerS.R. CardelloA.V. ChheangS.L. BeresfordM.K. HedderleyD.I. PineauB. Holistic and consumer-centric assessment of beer: A multi-measurement approach.Food Res. Int.201799Pt 128729710.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.004 28784485
     [Google Scholar]
  45. FilieriR. LinZ. The role of aesthetic, cultural, utilitarian and branding factors in young Chinese consumers’ repurchase intention of smartphone brands.Comput. Human Behav.20176713915010.1016/j.chb.2016.09.057
     [Google Scholar]
  46. ChenT. LuhD.B. WangJ. Product family modeling technology for customized cosmetic packaging design based on basic-element theory.Journal of Dermatologic Science and Cosmetic Technology20241110000210.1016/j.jdsct.2023.12.002
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Pereira de CarvalhoA. BarbieriJ.C. Innovation and sustainability in the supply chain of a cosmetics company: a case study.J. Technol. Manag. Innov.20127214415610.4067/S0718‑27242012000200012
     [Google Scholar]
  48. SajjaviriyaC. Jhundra-indraP. BoonluaS. The Antecedents of Strategic Customer Response Capability: Empirical Evidence of Cosmetic Businesses in Thailand.Songklanakarin J.Manage. Sci.2020372130
     [Google Scholar]
  49. BallsM. On establishing the safety of cosmetic ingredients and products produced and/or marketed within the European Economic Community.Altern. Lab. Anim.199119223724410.1177/026119299101900217
     [Google Scholar]
  50. PfuhlerS. KirstA. AardemaM. BanduhnN. GoebelC. ArakiD. Costabel-FarkasM. DufourE. FautzR. HarveyJ. HewittN.J. HibatallahJ. CarmichaelP. MacfarlaneM. ReisingerK. RowlandJ. SchellaufF. SchepkyA. ScheelJ. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis.Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.2010572-331532410.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.012 20382194
     [Google Scholar]
  51. PratiwiR. Auliya AsN.N. YusarR.F. ShofwanA.A.A. Analysis of prohibited and restricted ingredients in cosmetics.Cosmetics2022948710.3390/cosmetics9040087
     [Google Scholar]
  52. RampalA. KantiS.P.Y. Cosmetics in US and India: Overview of regulations and registration process.International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs202084202410.22270/ijdra.v8i4.430
     [Google Scholar]
  53. ChanT.Y.K. Inorganic mercury poisoning associated with skin-lightening cosmetic products.Clin. Toxicol. (Phila.)2011491088689110.3109/15563650.2011.626425 22070559
     [Google Scholar]
  54. ElhagD.E. OsmanH.O. DahabA.A. Investigation of mercury content in cosmetic products by using direct mercury analyzer.American Journal of PharmTech Research2015553
     [Google Scholar]
  55. InfanteP.F. PettyS.E. GrothD.H. MarkowitzG. RosnerD. Vinyl chloride propellant in hair spray and angiosarcoma of the liver among hairdressers and barbers: case reports.Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health2009151364210.1179/oeh.2009.15.1.36 19267125
     [Google Scholar]
  56. HostynekJ.J. MaibachH.I. Silver, titanium and zirconium: Metals in cosmetics and personal-care products.Cosmetics & Toiletries2002117114
     [Google Scholar]
  57. WinslowS.G. GerstnerH.B. Health aspects of chloroform--a review.Drug Chem. Toxicol.19781325927510.3109/01480547809105020 385279
     [Google Scholar]
  58. GiokasD.L. SalvadorA. ChisvertA. UV filters: From sunscreens to human body and the environment.Trends Analyt. Chem.200726536037410.1016/j.trac.2007.02.012
     [Google Scholar]
  59. SheteN.A. MohanR.S. KotameR.N. GoreS.J. TagadR.R. Changing scenario of packaging in pharmaceutical industry.World J. Pharm. Res.2020911786
     [Google Scholar]
  60. NohynekG.J. AntignacE. ReT. ToutainH. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.2010243223925910.1016/j.taap.2009.12.001 20005888
     [Google Scholar]
  61. BrownB. Sun-Proof Your Makeup: Protect your skin without sacrificing your beauty routine.Prevention20237572830
     [Google Scholar]
  62. RajR.K. ChandrulK.K. Regulatory requirements for cosmetics in relation with regulatory authorities in India against US, Europe, Australia and Asean countries.International Journal of Pharma Research and Health Sciences2016451332134110.21276/ijprhs.2016.05.01
     [Google Scholar]
  63. BanerjeeA. HaridasH.K. SenGuptaA. JabaliaN. Artificial Intelligence in 3D Printing: A Revolution in Health Care.Emerging Applications of 3D Printing During CoVID 19 Pandemic.Springer2022
     [Google Scholar]
  64. RydzJ. SikorskaW. MusiołM. JaneczekH. WłodarczykJ. Misiurska-MarczakM. ŁęczyckaJ. KowalczukM. 3D-Printed polyester-based prototypes for cosmetic applications—Future directions at the forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials.Materials (Basel)201912699410.3390/ma12060994 30917574
     [Google Scholar]
  65. RogersH. SrivastavaM. Emerging sustainable supply chain models for 3D food printing.Sustainability (Basel)202113211208510.3390/su132112085
     [Google Scholar]
  66. DetamornratU. McAlisterE. HuttonA.R.J. LarrañetaE. DonnellyR.F. The role of 3D printing technology in microengineering of microneedles.Small20221818210639210.1002/smll.202106392 35362226
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ManeroA. SparkmanJ. DombrowskiM. SmithP. SenthilP. SmithS. RiveraV. ChiA. Evolving 3D-Printing Strategies for Structural and Cosmetic Components in Upper Limb Prosthesis.Prosthesis20235116718110.3390/prosthesis5010013
     [Google Scholar]
  68. RodpanT. TubtongS. ChoanakijJ. Digital marketers for attitudes and purchase intentions towards modern personalized cosmetics, impact of manufacturing and engineering technology management.J. Propulsion Technol.202344315361549
     [Google Scholar]
  69. WoldtJ. L’Oreal ACD’s Fair explores skin care opportunities.Chain Drug Rev.20224431214
     [Google Scholar]
  70. SharmaS. AyyaswamyJ. KishoreJ. Technology driven healthcare.Adv. Techniq. Biol. Med.2015332379176410.4172/2379‑1764.1000146
     [Google Scholar]
  71. LeeC.H. ChenC.H. TrappeyA.J.C. A structural service innovation approach for designing smart product service systems: Case study of smart beauty service.Adv. Eng. Inform.20194015416710.1016/j.aei.2019.04.006
     [Google Scholar]
  72. ChuaC.K. TehS.H. GayR.K.L. Rapid prototyping versus virtual prototyping in product design and manufacturing.Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.199915859760310.1007/s001700050107
     [Google Scholar]
  73. FerriM.G. JonesW.H. Determinants of financial structure: A new methodological approach.J. Finance197934363164410.1111/j.1540‑6261.1979.tb02130.x
     [Google Scholar]
  74. AounI. TournoisL. Building holistic brands: an exploratory study of Halal cosmetics.J. Islamic Mark.20156110913210.1108/JIMA‑05‑2014‑0035
     [Google Scholar]
  75. WeiY. SyahrivarJ. WidyantoH.A. Using facial enhancement technology (FET) in online sales of branded color cosmetics.J. Syst. Inf. Technol.202325450253010.1108/JSIT‑12‑2022‑0282
     [Google Scholar]
  76. MolitorJ. RyallM. KelterP. Emerging Issues Commentary: Teaching Our K-1 Students and Ourselves about Sustainable Development as We Raise Questions to Develop a Nuanced Understanding.Sci. Educ.20132214862
     [Google Scholar]
  77. IbrahimI.D. HamamY. SadikuE.R. NdambukiJ.M. KupolatiW.K. JamiruT. EzeA.A. SnymanJ. Need for Sustainable Packaging: An Overview.Polymers (Basel)20221420443010.3390/polym14204430 36298009
     [Google Scholar]
  78. WangH.M.D. ChenC.C. HuynhP. ChangJ.S. Exploring the potential of using algae in cosmetics.Bioresour. Technol.201518435536210.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.001 25537136
     [Google Scholar]
  79. GoyalN. JeroldF. Biocosmetics: technological advances and future outlook.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20213010251482516910.1007/s11356‑021‑17567‑3 34825334
     [Google Scholar]
  80. SantosA.C. MoraisF. SimõesA. PereiraI. SequeiraJ.A.D. Pereira-SilvaM. VeigaF. RibeiroA. Nanotechnology for the development of new cosmetic formulations.Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.201916431333010.1080/17425247.2019.1585426 30793641
     [Google Scholar]
  81. BlackburnR.A. Job quality in small businesses: electrical and electronic engineering firms in Dorset.Environ. Plan.1990227875892
     [Google Scholar]
  82. MeredithJ. The strategic advantages of new manufacturing technologies for small firms.Strateg. Manage. J.19878324925810.1002/smj.4250080304
     [Google Scholar]
  83. SpitzerM.S. YoeruekE. LeitritzM.A. SzurmanP. Bartz-SchmidtK.U. A new technique for treating posttraumatic aniridia with aphakia: first results of haptic fixation of a foldable intraocular lens on a foldable and custom-tailored iris prosthesis.Arch. Ophthalmol.2012130677177510.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1778 22801839
     [Google Scholar]
  84. SoetaertW. VandammeE. The impact of industrial biotechnology.Biotechnol. J.200617-875676910.1002/biot.200600066 16897819
     [Google Scholar]
  85. JarwitzM. TrauneckerD. von ArnimC. MüllerN. KramerS. Towards a universal manufacturing node: Requirements for a versatile, laser-based machine tool for highly adaptable manufacturing.Procedia CIRP202211181682110.1016/j.procir.2022.08.090
     [Google Scholar]
  86. UstymenkoR. Trends and Innovations in Cosmetic Marketing.Economics & Education202383121710.30525/2500‑946X/2023‑3‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  87. HajghasemM. AbtahiA.R. Yousefi ZenouzR. Determining the level of automation in the cosmetics industry considering new technology.Journal of Industrial Engineering International20221821940
     [Google Scholar]
  88. ChauhanA. ChauhanC. Emerging trends of nanotechnology in beauty solutions: A review.Mater. Today Proc.2023811052105910.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.378
     [Google Scholar]
  89. LimaL.L. Bispo-dos-SantosK. TrevisanI.M.C. RapôsoC. VelhoP.E.N.F. BagatinE. RezendeR.A. da SilvaJ.V.L. Ricci LeonardiG. Developing Botanical Formulations for Sustainable Cosmetics.Cosmetics202310615910.3390/cosmetics10060159
     [Google Scholar]
  90. KabasakalI. KeskinF.D. VenturaK. SoyuerH. From mass customization to product personalization in automotive industry: potentials of industry 4.0.Pressacademia20174324425010.17261/Pressacademia.2017.486
     [Google Scholar]
  91. AmeenN. TarhiniA. ReppelA. AnandA. Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence.Comput. Human Behav.202111410654810.1016/j.chb.2020.106548 32905175
     [Google Scholar]
  92. TiemanM. DarunM.R. Leveraging blockchain technology for halal supply chains.ICR Journal20178454755010.52282/icr.v8i4.167
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Nguewo NgassamR.G. Ologeanu-TaddeiR. LartigauJ. BourdonI. A Use Case of Blockchain in Healthcare: Allergy Card.Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases.Springer2020
     [Google Scholar]
  94. MackeyT.K. NayyarG. A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines.Expert Opin. Drug Saf.201716558760210.1080/14740338.2017.1313227 28349715
     [Google Scholar]
  95. LuengoG.S. LeonforteF. GreavesA. RubioR.G. GuzmanE. Physico-chemical challenges on the self-assembly of natural and bio-based ingredients on hair surfaces: towards sustainable haircare formulations.Green Chem.202325207863788210.1039/D3GC02763E
     [Google Scholar]
  96. DuerreM. StegerU. Part III: Empirical study of industry complexity Industry 1: Managing complexity–The automo-tive industry. Logistics.Backbone of Managing Complex Organizations20101783
     [Google Scholar]
  97. ParkE. KwonK.H. A popularization of curation service for dermatological condition in Republic of Korea.J. Cosmet. Dermatol.202221126594660410.1111/jocd.15340 36039807
     [Google Scholar]
  98. ToletiS.R. Microbial Biofilms and Biotechnology – Some Perceptions.Curr. Biotechnol.20219426326810.2174/2211550109999201026091512
     [Google Scholar]
  99. GraffG. QaimM. YarkinC. ZilbermanD. Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries.Perspectives In World Food And Agriculture.Springer2004417438
     [Google Scholar]
  100. SarmidiM.R. El EnshasyH.A. Biotechnology for wellness industry: Concepts and biofactories.Int. J. Biotechnol. Wellness Ind.201211310.6000/1927‑3037.2012.01.01.01
     [Google Scholar]
  101. HothaK.K. Unleashing the power of innovation in cdmos through customer-centricity and culture of service.Am. J. Indust. Busin. Manag.202313423424610.4236/ajibm.2023.134016
     [Google Scholar]
  102. SardarA. UmerS. RoutR.K. WangS.H. TanveerM. A secure face recognition for IoT-enabled healthcare system.ACM Trans. Sens. Netw.202319312310.1145/3534122
     [Google Scholar]
  103. IngemarsdotterE. JamsinE. BalkenendeR. Opportunities and challenges in IoT-enabled circular business model implementation – A case study.Resour. Conserv. Recycling202016210504710.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105047
     [Google Scholar]
  104. SanbellaL. VersieI.V. AudiahS. Online Marketing Strategy Optimization to Increase Sales and E-Commerce Development: An Integrated Approach in the Digital Age.Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal)2024315466[SABDA Journal]10.33050/sabda.v3i1.492
     [Google Scholar]
  105. SaleemH. UddinM.K.S. Habib-ur-RehmanS. SaleemS. AslamA.M. Strategic data driven approach to improve conversion rates and sales performance of e-commerce websites.Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res.2019104588593
     [Google Scholar]
  106. LeeH.Y. JuH.Y. KimG.R. A Study on experiential consumption and development of the customized cosmetics on female university students in their 20s-Preliminary Study.Journal of Digital Convergence20201812595606
     [Google Scholar]
  107. OskoueianE. KarimiE. NouraR. EbrahimiM. ShafaeiN. KarimiE. Nanoliposomes encapsulation of enriched phenolic fraction from pistachio hulls and its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-melanogenic activities.J. Microencapsul.202037111310.1080/02652048.2019.1692941 31714165
     [Google Scholar]
  108. JamalZ. RaniS. ZebaC. HdJ.P. ScholarsR. Cosmetotextiles: A wearable skin care.Int. J. Home Sci201843135
     [Google Scholar]
  109. NovaraA. SampinoS. PaternòF. KeesstraS. Climate Smart Regenerative Agriculture to Produce Sustainable Beauty Products: The Case Study of Snail Secretion Filtrate (LX360®).Sustainability (Basel)2022144236710.3390/su14042367
     [Google Scholar]
  110. SugibayashiK. YusufE. TodoH. DahlizarS. SakdisetP. ArceF.J. SeeG.L. Halal cosmetics: A review on ingredients, production, and testing methods.Cosmetics2019633710.3390/cosmetics6030037
     [Google Scholar]
  111. UllrichC. New Approach meets new economy: Enforcing EU product safety in e-commerce.Maastrich. J. Eur. Comp. Law201926455858410.1177/1023263X19855073
     [Google Scholar]
  112. BradfordA. Exporting standards: The externalization of the EU’s regulatory power via markets.Int. Rev. Law Econ.20154215817310.1016/j.irle.2014.09.004
     [Google Scholar]
  113. RaiS. GuptaA. PunethaV. Regulations of Cosmetics Across the Globe.Appl. Clin. Res. Clin. Trials Regul. Aff.201523137144
     [Google Scholar]
  114. RahiS. RanaA. Role of ICH guidelines in registration of Pharmaceutical Products.International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs201974142710.22270/ijdra.v7i4.365
     [Google Scholar]
  115. LeeM.H. ArcidiaconoJ.A. BilekA.M. WilleJ.J. HamillC.A. WonnacottK.M. WellsM.A. OhS.S. Considerations for tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine product development prior to clinical trials in the United States.Tissue Eng. Part B Rev.2010161415410.1089/ten.teb.2009.0449 19728784
     [Google Scholar]
  116. van der LaanJ.W. AnderssonM. BekenS. BonelliM. Brendler-SchwaabS. KaneR. PasanenM. PonzanoS. PaurJ. SiezenC. SolengA. WhomsleyR. EMA commentary on the ICH guideline for testing for carcinogenicity of pharmaceuticals.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.20238982341234810.1111/bcp.15790 37265032
     [Google Scholar]
  117. JacksonN. Academic regulation in UK higher education: part I ‐ the concept of collaborative regulation.Qual. Assur. Educ.19975312013510.1108/09684889710174459
     [Google Scholar]
  118. EstyD. GeradinD. Regulatory co-opetition.J. Int. Econ. Law20003223525510.1093/jiel/3.2.235
     [Google Scholar]
  119. O’ConnorT.F. YuL.X. LeeS.L. Emerging technology: A key enabler for modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing and advancing product quality.Int. J. Pharm.20165091-249249810.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.058 27260134
     [Google Scholar]
  120. O’DwyerM. FilieriR. O’MalleyL. Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed.J. Technol. Transf.202348390093110.1007/s10961‑022‑09932‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  121. AbdellahW.R. KimJ.G. HassanM.M.A. AliM.A.M. The key challenges towards the effective implementation of digital transformation in the mining industry.Geosystem Engineering2022251-2445210.1080/12269328.2022.2120093
     [Google Scholar]
  122. DingB. Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains.Process Saf. Environ. Prot.201811911513010.1016/j.psep.2018.06.031
     [Google Scholar]
  123. MorinJ.F. Paradigm shift in the global IP regime: The agency of academics.Rev. Int. Polit. Econ.201421227530910.1080/09692290.2013.819812
     [Google Scholar]
  124. OvseikoP.V. HeitmuellerA. AllenP. DaviesS.M. WellsG. FordG.A. DarziA. BuchanA.M. Improving accountability through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and networks in England.BMC Health Serv. Res.20141412410.1186/1472‑6963‑14‑24 24438592
     [Google Scholar]
  125. VelenturfA. PurnellP. TregentM. FergusonJ. HolmesA. Co-producing a vision and approach for the transition towards a circular economy: Perspectives from government partners.Sustainability (Basel)2018105140110.3390/su10051401
     [Google Scholar]
  126. EngS. The new realities in digital marketing: Virtual reality, augmented reality, and extended reality.The SAGE Handbook of Digital Marketing.Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag2022276
     [Google Scholar]
  127. JoskowP.L. NollR.G. Regulation in Theory and Practice: An OverviewNational Bureau of Economic ResearchThe MIT Press1981
     [Google Scholar]
  128. KumarV. VenkatesanR. Transformation of metrics and analytics in retailing: The way forward.J. Retailing202197449650610.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.004
     [Google Scholar]
  129. MarksA.B. The right to regulate (cooperatively).U. Pa. J. Int’l L.2016381
     [Google Scholar]
  130. SrivastavaP. RamakanthD. AkhilaK. GaikwadK.K. Package design as a branding tool in the cosmetic industry: consumers’ perception vs. reality.SN Busin. Econom.2022265810.1007/s43546‑022‑00222‑5 35615336
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
Loading
Enhancing Collaboration and Interdisciplinary Strategies for Navigating Innovative Technologies and Regulatory Approvals in the Cosmetic Industry
Curr. Cosm. Sci. 3, E26667797324383 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): collaborative strategies; Cosmetic industry; innovation; interdisciplinary approaches; regulatory approvals; safety assessments

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test