Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Cosmetic Science
  4. Fast Track Articles
  5. Fast Track Article
image of Enhancing Collaboration and Interdisciplinary Strategies for Navigating Innovative Technologies and Regulatory Approvals in the Cosmetic Industry

Abstract

The cosmetic industry, driven by innovation, constantly seeks safer, more effective, and sustainable products. However, regulatory hurdles often impede the introduction of innovative cosmetics. This paper explores the convergence of advanced technologies and regulatory conformity, emphasizing the need for collaborative, interdisciplinary approaches.

Through an extensive review of literature and case studies, we reveal the multifaceted challenges within the industry. These encompass shifting consumer expectations, ingredient safety concerns, and intricate global regulations. Cross-functional collaborations, uniting researchers, regulators, industry experts, and consumers, are pivotal, driving innovation while ensuring product safety and compliance.

Our research stresses the importance of a proactive, all-encompassing approach to product development. This approach should integrate cutting-edge technologies, rigorous safety assessments, and smart regulatory strategies from project inception. Additionally, it emphasizes engaging stakeholders, sharing knowledge, and practicing transparency to earn trust from consumers and regulators.

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the balance between innovation and regulation in the cosmetic industry, advocating for a paradigm shift characterized by collaboration and interdisciplinary efforts. By aligning innovation with regulatory compliance, the industry can effectively navigate the complex landscape of modern cosmetics, fostering the creation of safer, more sustainable, and consumer-centric products.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
2024-10-04
2024-11-23

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kumar S. Massie C. Dumonceaux M.D. Comparative innovative business strategies of major players in cosmetic industry. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 2006 106 3 285 306 10.1108/02635570610653461
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sung I. Interdisciplinary literaure analysis between cosmetic container design and customer purchasing intention. . Indust. Distrib. & Busin. 2021 12 3 21 29
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Raj S. Jose S. Sumod U.S. Sabitha M. Nanotechnology in cosmetics: Opportunities and challenges. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2012 4 3 186 193 10.4103/0975‑7406.99016 22923959
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bafna A. Gandhi P. Jain A. Dantara V. Desai K. Dholakiya M. Kanabar H. Influence of celebrity endorsements on the consumer behavior for facial care product. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 2016 2 5 219 235
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barton A.E. Borchard G. Wacker M.G. Pastorin G. Saleem I.Y. Chaudary S. Elbayoumi T. Zhao Z. Flühmann B. Need for expansion of pharmacy education globally for the growing field of nanomedicine. Pharmacy (Basel) 2022 10 1 17 10.3390/pharmacy10010017 35202067
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lunt J. Staves M. Weyman A. Ensuring safe behaviour on a global scale: L’Oréal’s approach. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 2019 17 1 32 53 10.1080/14773996.2018.1528724
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakaoka I. Park Y. Chen Y. Strategic Network Formation with Structural Hole in R&D Projects: The Case Study on Japanese Cosmetic Industry. Journal of Robotics. Networking and Artificial Life 2016 3 3 188 192
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bayus B.L. Shane S. Understanding customer needs. Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management O’Reilly 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sahota A. Sustainability: How the Cosmetics Industry is Greening Up John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Morel S. Sapino S. Peira E. Chirio D. Gallarate M. Regulatory Requirements for Exporting Cosmetic Products to Extra-EU Countries. Cosmetics 2023 10 2 62 10.3390/cosmetics10020062
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wacker M.G. Proykova A. Santos G.M.L. Dealing with nanosafety around the globe—Regulation vs. innovation. Int. J. Pharm. 2016 509 1-2 95 106 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.015 27184102
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Daniel A.B. Strickland J. Allen D. Casati S. Zuang V. Barroso J. Whelan M. Régimbald-Krnel M.J. Kojima H. Nishikawa A. Park H.K. Lee J.K. Kim T.S. Delgado I. Rios L. Yang Y. Wang G. Kleinstreuer N. International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018 95 52 65 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.003 29518484
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan T.P. Deal G. Koo H.L. Rees D. Sun H. Chen S. Dou J.H. Makarov V.G. Pozharitskaya O.N. Shikov A.N. Kim Y.S. Huang Y.T. Chang Y.S. Jia W. Dias A. Wong V.C. Chan K. Future development of global regulations of Chinese herbal products. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012 140 3 568 586 10.1016/j.jep.2012.02.029 22373513
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mishra L. Das Kurmi B. Cosmetics regulations and standardization guidelines. Pharmaspire 2023 15 3 137 150 10.56933/Pharmaspire.2023.15124
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wardell D.A. Tapsoba A. Lovett P.N. Zida M. Rousseau K. Gautier D. Elias M. Bama T. Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn.)–the emergence of global production networks in Burkina Faso, 1960–2021 1. Int. For. Rev. 2021 23 4 534 561 10.1505/146554821834777189
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferreira M. Matos A. Couras A. Marto J. Ribeiro H. Overview of cosmetic regulatory frameworks around the world. Cosmetics 2022 9 4 72 10.3390/cosmetics9040072
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wortsman X. Alfageme F. Roustan G. Arias-Santiago S. Martorell A. Catalano O. Scotto di Santolo M. Zarchi K. Bouer M. Gonzalez C. Bard R. Mandava A. Gaitini D. Guidelines for performing dermatologic ultrasound examinations by the DERMUS group. J. Ultrasound Med. 2016 35 3 577 580 10.7863/ultra.15.06046 26887446
    [Google Scholar]
  18. O’Neil A. A call for truth in the fashion pages: What the global trend in advertising regulation means for US beauty and fashion advertisers. Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 2014 21 2 619 641 10.2979/indjglolegstu.21.2.619
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halim M.A.A. Salleh M.M.M. The possibility of uniformity on halal standards in organization of Islamic countries (OIC) country. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012 17 17 6 10
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Aadithya S. Ganesh G.N.K. Reddy M.V. Regulations for Software Used in Medical Device: Current Global Scenario, Challenges and Future Scope. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 2022 36 2
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Redondo G.L.M. Salas M.F.R. Rojas M.C. Corrales D.G. Navarro E.P. Barquero M.R. Characterization and Comparison of quality management systems for cosmetic products in the world. International Journal Of Drug Regulatory Affairs 2021 9 3 47 56
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Li Z. Barenji A.V. Huang G.Q. Toward a blockchain cloud manufacturing system as a peer to peer distributed network platform. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2018 54 133 144 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.05.011
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Suzik H.A. Jack-of-all-trades: Quality professionals go cross-functional. Quality 1999 38 3 24
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Maloni M. Dembla P. Swaim J.A. A cross-functional systems project in an IS capstone course. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 2012 23 3 283
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rîpa I.A. Customer relationship management in the international context–theoretical and practical considerations. Proceed. Int. Conf.n Busin. Excel. 2022 16 1 1060 1072 10.2478/picbe‑2022‑0098
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tuccori S.R.M. Júnior E.L. de Quadros Carvalho R. dos Santos G.V. Collaboration for technological innovation: choices and decisions that make partnerships excel. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies 2014 6 1 172 220
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Varrichio P. Diogenes D. Jorge A. Garnica L. Collaborative networks and sustainable business: a case study in the Brazilian system of innovation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012 52 90 99 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.445
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Alexander B. Contreras L.O. Inter-industry creative collaborations incorporating luxury fashion brands. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2016 20 3 254 275 10.1108/JFMM‑09‑2015‑0075
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Aka K.G. Labelle F. The collaborative process of sustainable innovations under the lens of actor–network theory. Sustainability (Basel) 2021 13 19 10756 10.3390/su131910756
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hjalager A.M. Konu H. Co-branding and co-creation in wellness tourism: The role of cosmeceuticals. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2011 20 8 879 901 10.1080/19368623.2011.611727
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Liem A.G. Arief N.N. Integrated Marketing Communication Strategy for Cosmetic Retail Company: a Study of New Central Palu. Journal of Economics and Business UBS 2023 12 1 413 430
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mazur-Wierzbicka E. Communicating socially responsible actions by means of social media in the process of building the image of an organization, as seen in the case of start-ups from the cosmetics industry. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021 192 4279 4289 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.204
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee Y.H. Chen S.L. Effect of green attributes transparency on wta for green cosmetics: Mediating effects of CSR and green brand concepts. Sustainability (Basel) 2019 11 19 5258 10.3390/su11195258
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fortunati S. Martiniello L. Morea D. The strategic role of the corporate social responsibility and circular economy in the cosmetic industry. Sustainability (Basel) 2020 12 12 5120 10.3390/su12125120
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Cheng Y.S. Lam K.W. Ng K.M. Ko R.K.M. Wibowo C. An integrative approach to product development—A skin-care cream. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009 33 5 1097 1113 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.10.010 32287504
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Enkler H.G. Sporleder L. Agile product development—coupling explorative and established CAx methods in early stages of virtual product development. Procedia CIRP 2019 84 848 853 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.221
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Amrina U. Hidayatno A. Zagloel T.Y.M. A model-based strategy for developing sustainable cosmetics small and medium industries with system dynamics. J. Open Innov. 2021 7 4 225 10.3390/joitmc7040225
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lopes R. Videira N. Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017 28 28 42 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.012
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Gevaert C.M. Explainable AI for earth observation: A review including societal and regulatory perspectives. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022 112 102869 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102869
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen W. Krainak D. Sahiner B. Petrick N. A Regulatory Science Perspective on Performance Assessment of Machine Learning Algorithms in Imaging. Machine Learning for Brain Disorders New York, NY Humana 2023 705 752 10.1007/978‑1‑0716‑3195‑9_23
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Alépée N. Bessou-Touya S. Cotovio J. de Smedt A. de Wever B. Faller C. Jones P. Le Varlet B. Marrec-Fairley M. Pfannenbecker U. Tailhardat M. van Goethem F. McNamee P. Cosmetics Europe multi-laboratory pre-validation of the SkinEthic™ reconstituted human corneal epithelium test method for the prediction of eye irritation. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013 27 5 1476 1488 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.02.009 23524228
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zangheri M. Calabretta M.M. Calabria D. Fiori J. Guardigli M. Michelini E. Melandri S. Maris A. Mirasoli M. Evangelisti L. Immunological analytical techniques for cosmetics quality control and process monitoring. Processes (Basel) 2021 9 11 1982 10.3390/pr9111982
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Goussard V. Duprat F. Gerbaud V. Ploix J.L. Dreyfus G. Nardello-Rataj V. Aubry J.M. Predicting the surface tension of liquids: Comparison of four modeling approaches and application to cosmetic oils. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017 57 12 2986 2995 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00512 29091426
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jaeger S.R. Cardello A.V. Chheang S.L. Beresford M.K. Hedderley D.I. Pineau B. Holistic and consumer-centric assessment of beer: A multi-measurement approach. Food Res. Int. 2017 99 Pt 1 287 297 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.004 28784485
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Filieri R. Lin Z. The role of aesthetic, cultural, utilitarian and branding factors in young Chinese consumers’ repurchase intention of smartphone brands. Comput. Human Behav. 2017 67 139 150 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.057
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen T. Luh D.B. Wang J. Product family modeling technology for customized cosmetic packaging design based on basic-element theory. Journal of Dermatologic Science and Cosmetic Technology 2024 1 1 100002 10.1016/j.jdsct.2023.12.002
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Pereira de Carvalho A. Barbieri J.C. Innovation and sustainability in the supply chain of a cosmetics company: a case study. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2012 7 2 144 156 10.4067/S0718‑27242012000200012
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sajjaviriya C. Jhundra-indra P. Boonlua S. The Antecedents of Strategic Customer Response Capability: Empirical Evidence of Cosmetic Businesses in Thailand. Songklanakarin J.Manage. Sci. 2020 37 2 1 30
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Balls M. On establishing the safety of cosmetic ingredients and products produced and/or marketed within the European Economic Community. Altern. Lab. Anim. 1991 19 2 237 244 10.1177/026119299101900217
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pfuhler S. Kirst A. Aardema M. Banduhn N. Goebel C. Araki D. Costabel-Farkas M. Dufour E. Fautz R. Harvey J. Hewitt N.J. Hibatallah J. Carmichael P. Macfarlane M. Reisinger K. Rowland J. Schellauf F. Schepky A. Scheel J. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010 57 2-3 315 324 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.012 20382194
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pratiwi R. Auliya As N.N. Yusar R.F. Shofwan A.A.A. Analysis of prohibited and restricted ingredients in cosmetics. Cosmetics 2022 9 4 87 10.3390/cosmetics9040087
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rampal A. Kanti S.P.Y. Cosmetics in US and India: Overview of regulations and registration process. International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs 2020 8 4 20 24 10.22270/ijdra.v8i4.430
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Chan T.Y.K. Inorganic mercury poisoning associated with skin-lightening cosmetic products. Clin. Toxicol. (Phila.) 2011 49 10 886 891 10.3109/15563650.2011.626425 22070559
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Elhag D.E. Osman H.O. Dahab A.A. Investigation of mercury content in cosmetic products by using direct mercury analyzer. American Journal of PharmTech Research 2015 5 5 3
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Infante P.F. Petty S.E. Groth D.H. Markowitz G. Rosner D. Vinyl chloride propellant in hair spray and angiosarcoma of the liver among hairdressers and barbers: case reports. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2009 15 1 36 42 10.1179/oeh.2009.15.1.36 19267125
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hostynek J.J. Maibach H.I. Silver, titanium and zirconium: Metals in cosmetics and personal-care products. Cosmetics & Toiletries 2002 117 1 1 4
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Winslow S.G. Gerstner H.B. Health aspects of chloroform--a review. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 1978 1 3 259 275 10.3109/01480547809105020 385279
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Giokas D.L. Salvador A. Chisvert A. UV filters: From sunscreens to human body and the environment. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2007 26 5 360 374 10.1016/j.trac.2007.02.012
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Shete N.A. Mohan R.S. Kotame R.N. Gore S.J. Tagad R.R. Changing scenario of packaging in pharmaceutical industry. World J. Pharm. Res. 2020 9 1 1786
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nohynek G.J. Antignac E. Re T. Toutain H. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010 243 2 239 259 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.001 20005888
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Brown B. Sun-Proof Your Makeup: Protect your skin without sacrificing your beauty routine. Prevention 2023 75 7 28 30
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Raj R.K. Chandrul K.K. Regulatory requirements for cosmetics in relation with regulatory authorities in India against US, Europe, Australia and Asean countries. International Journal of Pharma Research and Health Sciences 2016 4 5 1332 1341 10.21276/ijprhs.2016.05.01
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Banerjee A. Haridas H.K. SenGupta A. Jabalia N. Artificial Intelligence in 3D Printing: A Revolution in Health Care. Emerging Applications of 3D Printing During CoVID 19 Pandemic Springer 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Rydz J. Sikorska W. Musioł M. Janeczek H. Włodarczyk J. Misiurska-Marczak M. Łęczycka J. Kowalczuk M. 3D-Printed polyester-based prototypes for cosmetic applications—Future directions at the forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. Materials (Basel) 2019 12 6 994 10.3390/ma12060994 30917574
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rogers H. Srivastava M. Emerging sustainable supply chain models for 3D food printing. Sustainability (Basel) 2021 13 21 12085 10.3390/su132112085
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Detamornrat U. McAlister E. Hutton A.R.J. Larrañeta E. Donnelly R.F. The role of 3D printing technology in microengineering of microneedles. Small 2022 18 18 2106392 10.1002/smll.202106392 35362226
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Manero A. Sparkman J. Dombrowski M. Smith P. Senthil P. Smith S. Rivera V. Chi A. Evolving 3D-Printing Strategies for Structural and Cosmetic Components in Upper Limb Prosthesis. Prosthesis 2023 5 1 167 181 10.3390/prosthesis5010013
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Rodpan T. Tubtong S. Choanakij J. Digital marketers for attitudes and purchase intentions towards modern personalized cosmetics, impact of manufacturing and engineering technology management. J. Propulsion Technol. 2023 44 3 1536 1549
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Woldt J. L’Oreal ACD’s Fair explores skin care opportunities. Chain Drug Rev. 2022 44 3 12 14
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sharma S. Ayyaswamy J. Kishore J. Technology driven healthcare. Adv. Techniq. Biol. Med. 2015 3 3 2379 1764 10.4172/2379‑1764.1000146
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lee C.H. Chen C.H. Trappey A.J.C. A structural service innovation approach for designing smart product service systems: Case study of smart beauty service. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019 40 154 167 10.1016/j.aei.2019.04.006
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Chua C.K. Teh S.H. Gay R.K.L. Rapid prototyping versus virtual prototyping in product design and manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 1999 15 8 597 603 10.1007/s001700050107
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Ferri M.G. Jones W.H. Determinants of financial structure: A new methodological approach. J. Finance 1979 34 3 631 644 10.1111/j.1540‑6261.1979.tb02130.x
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Aoun I. Tournois L. Building holistic brands: an exploratory study of Halal cosmetics. J. Islamic Mark. 2015 6 1 109 132 10.1108/JIMA‑05‑2014‑0035
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Wei Y. Syahrivar J. Widyanto H.A. Using facial enhancement technology (FET) in online sales of branded color cosmetics. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2023 25 4 502 530 10.1108/JSIT‑12‑2022‑0282
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Molitor J. Ryall M. Kelter P. Emerging Issues Commentary: Teaching Our K-1 Students and Ourselves about Sustainable Development as We Raise Questions to Develop a Nuanced Understanding. Sci. Educ. 2013 22 1 48 62
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Ibrahim I.D. Hamam Y. Sadiku E.R. Ndambuki J.M. Kupolati W.K. Jamiru T. Eze A.A. Snyman J. Need for Sustainable Packaging: An Overview. Polymers (Basel) 2022 14 20 4430 10.3390/polym14204430 36298009
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Wang H.M.D. Chen C.C. Huynh P. Chang J.S. Exploring the potential of using algae in cosmetics. Bioresour. Technol. 2015 184 355 362 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.001 25537136
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Goyal N. Jerold F. Biocosmetics: technological advances and future outlook. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021 30 10 25148 25169 10.1007/s11356‑021‑17567‑3 34825334
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Santos A.C. Morais F. Simões A. Pereira I. Sequeira J.A.D. Pereira-Silva M. Veiga F. Ribeiro A. Nanotechnology for the development of new cosmetic formulations. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2019 16 4 313 330 10.1080/17425247.2019.1585426 30793641
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Blackburn R.A. Job quality in small businesses: electrical and electronic engineering firms in Dorset. Environ. Plann. 1990 22 7 875 892
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Meredith J. The strategic advantages of new manufacturing technologies for small firms. Strateg. Manage. J. 1987 8 3 249 258 10.1002/smj.4250080304
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Spitzer M.S. Yoeruek E. Leitritz M.A. Szurman P. Bartz-Schmidt K.U. A new technique for treating posttraumatic aniridia with aphakia: first results of haptic fixation of a foldable intraocular lens on a foldable and custom-tailored iris prosthesis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2012 130 6 771 775 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1778 22801839
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Soetaert W. Vandamme E. The impact of industrial biotechnology. Biotechnol. J. 2006 1 7-8 756 769 10.1002/biot.200600066 16897819
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Jarwitz M. Traunecker D. von Arnim C. Müller N. Kramer S. Towards a universal manufacturing node: Requirements for a versatile, laser-based machine tool for highly adaptable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2022 111 816 821 10.1016/j.procir.2022.08.090
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Ustymenko R. Trends and Innovations in Cosmetic Marketing. Economics & Education 2023 8 3 12 17 10.30525/2500‑946X/2023‑3‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Hajghasem M. Abtahi A.R. Yousefi Zenouz R. Determining the level of automation in the cosmetics industry considering new technology. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 2022 18 2 19 40
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Chauhan A. Chauhan C. Emerging trends of nanotechnology in beauty solutions: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023 81 1052 1059 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.378
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Lima L.L. Bispo-dos-Santos K. Trevisan I.M.C. Rapôso C. Velho P.E.N.F. Bagatin E. Rezende R.A. da Silva J.V.L. Ricci Leonardi G. Developing Botanical Formulations for Sustainable Cosmetics. Cosmetics 2023 10 6 159 10.3390/cosmetics10060159
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Kabasakal I. Keskin F.D. Ventura K. Soyuer H. From mass customization to product personalization in automotive industry: potentials of industry 4.0. Pressacademia 2017 4 3 244 250 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.486
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Ameen N. Tarhini A. Reppel A. Anand A. Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Comput. Human Behav. 2021 114 106548 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548 32905175
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Tieman M. Darun M.R. Leveraging blockchain technology for halal supply chains. ICR Journal 2017 8 4 547 550 10.52282/icr.v8i4.167
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Nguewo Ngassam R.G. Ologeanu-Taddei R. Lartigau J. Bourdon I. A Use Case of Blockchain in Healthcare: Allergy Card. Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases Springer 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Mackey T.K. Nayyar G. A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2017 16 5 587 602 10.1080/14740338.2017.1313227 28349715
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Luengo G.S. Leonforte F. Greaves A. Rubio R.G. Guzman E. Physico-chemical challenges on the self-assembly of natural and bio-based ingredients on hair surfaces: towards sustainable haircare formulations. Green Chem. 2023 25 20 7863 7882 10.1039/D3GC02763E
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Duerre M. Steger U. Part III: Empirical study of industry complexity Industry 1: Managing complexity–The automo-tive industry. Logistics. Backbone of Managing Complex Organizations 2010 17 83
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Park E. Kwon K.H. A popularization of curation service for dermatological condition in Republic of Korea. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2022 21 12 6594 6604 10.1111/jocd.15340 36039807
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Toleti S.R. Microbial Biofilms and Biotechnology – Some Perceptions. Curr. Biotechnol. 2021 9 4 263 268 10.2174/2211550109999201026091512
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Graff G. Qaim M. Yarkin C. Zilberman D. Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries. Perspectives In World Food And Agriculture Springer 2004 417 438
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Sarmidi M.R. El Enshasy H.A. Biotechnology for wellness industry: Concepts and biofactories. Int. J. Biotechnol. Wellness Ind. 2012 1 1 3 10.6000/1927‑3037.2012.01.01.01
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Hotha K.K. Unleashing the power of innovation in cdmos through customer-centricity and culture of service. Am. J. Indust. Busin. Manag. 2023 13 4 234 246 10.4236/ajibm.2023.134016
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Sardar A. Umer S. Rout R.K. Wang S.H. Tanveer M. A secure face recognition for IoT-enabled healthcare system. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 2023 19 3 1 23 10.1145/3534122
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Ingemarsdotter E. Jamsin E. Balkenende R. Opportunities and challenges in IoT-enabled circular business model implementation – A case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 2020 162 105047 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105047
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Sanbella L. Versie I.V. Audiah S. Online Marketing Strategy Optimization to Increase Sales and E-Commerce Development: An Integrated Approach in the Digital Age. Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal) 2024 3 1 54 66 [SABDA Journal]. 10.33050/sabda.v3i1.492
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Saleem H. Uddin M.K.S. Habib-ur-Rehman S. Saleem S. Aslam A.M. Strategic data driven approach to improve conversion rates and sales performance of e-commerce websites. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2019 10 4 588 593
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Lee H.Y. Ju H.Y. Kim G.R. A Study on experiential consumption and development of the customized cosmetics on female university students in their 20s-Preliminary Study. Journal of Digital Convergence 2020 18 12 595 606
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Oskoueian E. Karimi E. Noura R. Ebrahimi M. Shafaei N. Karimi E. Nanoliposomes encapsulation of enriched phenolic fraction from pistachio hulls and its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-melanogenic activities. J. Microencapsul. 2020 37 1 1 13 10.1080/02652048.2019.1692941 31714165
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Jamal Z. Rani S. Zeba C. Hd J.P. Scholars R. Cosmetotextiles: A wearable skin care. Int. J. Home Sci 2018 4 31 35
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Novara A. Sampino S. Paternò F. Keesstra S. Climate Smart Regenerative Agriculture to Produce Sustainable Beauty Products: The Case Study of Snail Secretion Filtrate (LX360®). Sustainability (Basel) 2022 14 4 2367 10.3390/su14042367
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Sugibayashi K. Yusuf E. Todo H. Dahlizar S. Sakdiset P. Arce F.J. See G.L. Halal cosmetics: A review on ingredients, production, and testing methods. Cosmetics 2019 6 3 37 10.3390/cosmetics6030037
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Ullrich C. New Approach meets new economy: Enforcing EU product safety in e-commerce. Maastrich. J. Eur. Comp. Law 2019 26 4 558 584 10.1177/1023263X19855073
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Bradford A. Exporting standards: The externalization of the EU’s regulatory power via markets. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 2015 42 158 173 10.1016/j.irle.2014.09.004
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Rai S. Gupta A. Punetha V. Regulations of Cosmetics Across the Globe. Appl. Clin. Res. Clin. Trials Regul. Aff. 2015 2 3 137 144
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Rahi S. Rana A. Role of ICH guidelines in registration of Pharmaceutical Products. International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs 2019 7 4 14 27 10.22270/ijdra.v7i4.365
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Lee M.H. Arcidiacono J.A. Bilek A.M. Wille J.J. Hamill C.A. Wonnacott K.M. Wells M.A. Oh S.S. Considerations for tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine product development prior to clinical trials in the United States. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2010 16 1 41 54 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0449 19728784
    [Google Scholar]
  116. van der Laan J.W. Andersson M. Beken S. Bonelli M. Brendler-Schwaab S. Kane R. Pasanen M. Ponzano S. Paur J. Siezen C. Soleng A. Whomsley R. EMA commentary on the ICH guideline for testing for carcinogenicity of pharmaceuticals. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2023 89 8 2341 2348 10.1111/bcp.15790 37265032
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Jackson N. Academic regulation in UK higher education: part I ‐ the concept of collaborative regulation. Qual. Assur. Educ. 1997 5 3 120 135 10.1108/09684889710174459
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Esty D. Geradin D. Regulatory co-opetition. J. Int. Econ. Law 2000 3 2 235 255 10.1093/jiel/3.2.235
    [Google Scholar]
  119. O’Connor T.F. Yu L.X. Lee S.L. Emerging technology: A key enabler for modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing and advancing product quality. Int. J. Pharm. 2016 509 1-2 492 498 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.058 27260134
    [Google Scholar]
  120. O’Dwyer M. Filieri R. O’Malley L. Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed. J. Technol. Transf. 2023 48 3 900 931 10.1007/s10961‑022‑09932‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Abdellah W.R. Kim J.G. Hassan M.M.A. Ali M.A.M. The key challenges towards the effective implementation of digital transformation in the mining industry. Geosystem Engineering 2022 25 1-2 44 52 10.1080/12269328.2022.2120093
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Ding B. Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018 119 115 130 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.031
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Morin J.F. Paradigm shift in the global IP regime: The agency of academics. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 2014 21 2 275 309 10.1080/09692290.2013.819812
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Ovseiko P.V. Heitmueller A. Allen P. Davies S.M. Wells G. Ford G.A. Darzi A. Buchan A.M. Improving accountability through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and networks in England. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014 14 1 24 10.1186/1472‑6963‑14‑24 24438592
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Velenturf A. Purnell P. Tregent M. Ferguson J. Holmes A. Co-producing a vision and approach for the transition towards a circular economy: Perspectives from government partners. Sustainability (Basel) 2018 10 5 1401 10.3390/su10051401
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Eng S. The new realities in digital marketing: Virtual reality, augmented reality, and extended reality. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Marketing Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 2022 276
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Joskow P.L. Noll R.G. Regulation in Theory and Practice: An Overview National Bureau of Economic Research The MIT Press 1981
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Kumar V. Venkatesan R. Transformation of metrics and analytics in retailing: The way forward. J. Retailing 2021 97 4 496 506 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.004
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Marks A.B. The right to regulate (cooperatively). U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 2016 38 1
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Srivastava P. Ramakanth D. Akhila K. Gaikwad K.K. Package design as a branding tool in the cosmetic industry: consumers’ perception vs. reality. SN Busin. Econom. 2022 2 6 58 10.1007/s43546‑022‑00222‑5 35615336
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
Loading
Enhancing Collaboration and Interdisciplinary Strategies for Navigating Innovative Technologies and Regulatory Approvals in the Cosmetic Industry
Bentham Science Publishers ; https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
/content/journals/cosci/10.2174/0126667797324383240913033156
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keywords: innovation, regulatory approvals ; interdisciplinary approaches ; Cosmetic industry ; collaborative strategies ; safety assessments

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test