Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of postoperative tumor deposits (TDs) is worse than positive lymph node metastases alone.

Objective

To detect TDs by using multiplanar high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (HRT2WI).

Material and Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 130 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Using pathology-proven tumor deposits (pTDs) as the gold standard, all patients were divided into the pTDs-negative and pTDs-positive groups, the correlation of clinicopathological factors and image features [such as MRI-detected tumor deposits (mTDs), MRI-detected metastatic lymph node (mLN), MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mEMVI), maximal extramural depth (EMD), .] with pTDs were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, and the nomogram was established based on the latter. The diagnostic efficiency was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and area under curve (AUC).

Results

mTDs, mLN, mEMVI, and EMD were significantly different between the pTDs-positive and pTDs-negative groups ( < 0.05), with the AUC of 0.767, 0.746, 0.664 and 0.644, respectively. mTDs and mLN were independent risk factors for pTDs (odds ratio: 5.74 and 3.90, < 0.05). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the nomogram were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.720 ~ 0.908), 73.9%, 79.4%, 93.4%, and 78.5%, respectively. Seventeen of 23 patients with pTDs were identified as mTDs, with a moderate agreement between pTDs and mTDs (Kappa=0.419).

Conclusion

Multiplanar HRT2WI can be used as a preoperative diagnostic tool to identify TDs in LARC. The combined model constructed by mTDs and mLN shows a good diagnostic performance for TDs.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230825113550
2024-01-01
2024-11-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E250823220369.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230825113550&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. SiegelR.L. MillerK.D. JemalA. Cancer statistics, 2019.CA Cancer J. Clin.201969173410.3322/caac.2155130620402
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SiegelR.L. MillerK.D. FedewaS.A. AhnenD.J. MeesterR.G.S. BarziA. JemalA. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.CA Cancer J. Clin.201767317719310.3322/caac.2139528248415
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SungH. FerlayJ. SiegelR.L. LaversanneM. SoerjomataramI. JemalA. BrayF. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J. Clin.202171320924910.3322/caac.2166033538338
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NagtegaalI.D. KnijnN. HugenN. MarshallH.C. SugiharaK. TotT. UenoH. QuirkeP. Tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: Improving the value of modern staging—A systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Clin. Oncol.201735101119112710.1200/JCO.2016.68.909128029327
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LuoB. ChenX. CaiG. HuW. LiY. WangJ. Tumor deposits and perineural invasion had comparable impacts on the survival of patients with non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma: A population-based propensity score matching and competing risk analysis.Cancer Contr.20222910.1177/1073274821105153335157532
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AminM.B. EdgeS.B. GreeneF.L. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.8th edNew YorkSpringer201710.1007/978‑3‑319‑40618‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WeiserM.R. AJCC 8th edition: Colorectal cancer.Ann Surg Oncol201825614541455
    [Google Scholar]
  8. YamanoT. SembaS. NodaM. YoshimuraM. KobayashiM. HamanakaM. BeppuN. YanoA. TsukamotoK. MatsubaraN. TomitaN. Prognostic significance of classified extramural tumor deposits and extracapsular lymph node invasion in T3–4 colorectal cancer: A retrospective single-center study.BMC Cancer201515185910.1186/s12885‑015‑1885‑626545360
    [Google Scholar]
  9. YabataE. UdagawaM. OkamotoH. Effect of tumor deposits on overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with regional lymph node metastases.J. Rural Med.201491202610.2185/jrm.288025648159
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SiddiquiM.R.S. SimillisC. HunterC. ChandM. BhodayJ. GarantA. VuongT. ArthoG. RasheedS. TekkisP. AbulafiA.M. BrownG. A meta-analysis comparing the risk of metastases in patients with rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) vs mrEMVI-negative cases.Br. J. Cancer2017116121513151910.1038/bjc.2017.9928449006
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SmithN.J. ShihabO. ArnaoutA. SwiftR.I. BrownG. MRI for detection of extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.200819151517152210.2214/AJR.08.129818941094
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KimJ.H. BeetsG.L. KimM.J. KesselsA.G.H. Beets-TanR.G.H. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size?Eur. J. Radiol.2004521788310.1016/j.ejrad.2003.12.00515380850
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SobinL.H. ComptonC.C. TNM seventh edition: What's new, what's changed: communication from the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer.Cancer20101162253365339
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WashingtonM.K. BerlinJ. BrantonP.A. BurgartL.J. CarterD.K. FitzgibbonsP.L. FrankelW.L. JessupJ.M. KakarS. MinskyB. NakhlehR.E. ComptonC.C. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum.Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.200813271182119310.5858/2008‑132‑1182‑PFTEOS18605770
    [Google Scholar]
  15. UenoH. MochizukiH. HashiguchiY. IshiguroM. MiyoshiM. KajiwaraY. SatoT. ShimazakiH. HaseK. Extramural cancer deposits without nodal structure in colorectal cancer: optimal categorization for prognostic staging.Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2007127228729410.1309/903UT10VQ3LC7B8L17210518
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WünschK. MüllerJ. JähnigH. HerrmannR.A. ArnholdtH.M. MärklB. Shape is not associated with the origin of pericolonic tumor deposits.Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2010133338839410.1309/AJCPAWOLX7ADZQ2K20154277
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BasnetS. LouQ. LiuN. RanaR. ShahA. KhadkaM. WarrierH. SigdelS. DhakalS. DevkotaA. MishraR. SapkotaG. ZhengL. GeH. Tumor deposit is an independent prognostic indicator in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer.J. Cancer20189213979398510.7150/jca.2747530410602
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LordA.C. D'SouzaN. ShawA. MRI-diagnosed tumor deposits and EMVI status have superior prognostic accuracy to current clinical TNM staging in rectal cancer.Annals of surger20222762334344
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LordA.C. D’SouzaN. PucherP.H. MoranB.J. AbulafiA.M. WotherspoonA. RasheedS. BrownG. Significance of extranodal tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur. J. Cancer2017829210210.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.02728651160
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ZhengH. ZhangJ. LiuY. WangX. Prognostic value of tumor deposits in locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective study with propensity score matching.Int. J. Clin. Oncol.20212661109111910.1007/s10147‑021‑01885‑033742269
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lino-SilvaL.S. XinaxtleD.L. Salcedo-HernándezR.A. Tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: The need for a new “pN” category.Ann. Transl. Med.202081273310.21037/atm.2020.03.17532647658
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HongY. SongG. JiaY. WuR. HeR. LiA. Predicting tumor deposits in patients with rectal cancer: Using the models of multiple mathematical parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging.Eur. J. Radiol.202215711057310.1016/j.ejrad.2022.11057336347167
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NorsJ. IversenL.H. NielsenK. SørensenM.M. VerwaalV.J. FunderJ.A. Peritoneal metastases found in routinely resected specimens after cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy.Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.202248479580210.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.02635012833
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PretzschE. BöschF. NeumannJ. GanschowP. BazhinA. GubaM. WernerJ. AngeleM. Mechanisms of metastasis in colorectal cancer and metastatic organotropism: Hematogenous versus peritoneal spread.J. Oncol.2019201911310.1155/2019/740719031641356
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TongT. YaoZ. XuL. CaiS. BiR. XinC. GuY. PengW. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in rectal cancer: Associating with prognostic factors and ADC value.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging201440373874410.1002/jmri.2439824307597
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230825113550
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230825113550
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): EMVI; Lymph node; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nomogram; Rectal cancer; Tumor deposits
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test