Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

Intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS) is a congenital entity that can be confused with malignant distal pancreatic masses. Radiologic imaging and radionuclide imaging have an important place in the diagnosis of IPAS.

Case Report

Blood tests were performed on a 36-year-old female patient who presented with tachypnea, tachycardia, pain in the joints, and pain in the left abdominal quadrant. Laboratory test results were as follows: hemoglobin value 6.0 mg/dl, sedimentation 120, aspartate transaminase (AST) 150U/L, and alanine transaminase level (ALT) 110U/ L. Additional laboratory tests and ultrasonography were performed. The anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) level was 800 IU/ml. C3 and C4 values were both 0.64 IU/ml, with anti-Ro-52 +++(three positive) and anti-Ro-60 ++ (two positive). A clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was made. Ultrasonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced upper abdominal MRI showed lesions suggestive of multiple hemangiomas in the liver and a 29x18 mm lesion in the tail of the pancreas with a similar appearance as the spleen. SLE treatment was started. Scintigraphy was recommended for the diagnosis of IPAS. Scintigraphy was performed in the third week of the treatment. Uptake was not observed. In the second month of the treatment, a control upper abdominal MRI was performed, and a decrease in the size of the lesion was observed.

Conclusion

IPAS can be confused with pancreatic masses. Lack of uptake in scintigraphy may be due to treatment protocols that produce low phagocytic activity. If radiological imaging findings are compatible, a reduction in lesion size after immunosuppressive therapy can be accepted as evidence for the diagnosis of IPAS.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230815142649
2023-01-01
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e150823219727.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230815142649&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. MorteléK.J. MorteléB. SilvermanS.G. CT features of the accessory spleen.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.200418361653165710.2214/ajr.183.6.0183165315547205
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MohammadiS. HedjaziA. SajjadianM. GhrobiN. MoghadamM. MohammadiM. Accessory spleen in the splenic hilum: A cadaveric study with clinical significance. Med. Arh.201670538939110.5455/medarh.2016.70.389‑39127994303
    [Google Scholar]
  3. YadavS.P. KotakS.D. KumarS. PujariV.S. ChandrasekaranA. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: An imaging enigma.Indian J. Radiol. Imaging202030339239410.4103/ijri.IJRI_407_2033273778
    [Google Scholar]
  4. UchiyamaS. ChijiiwaK. HiyoshiM. OhuchidaJ. ImamuraN. NaganoM. HidakaH. YoritaK. AkiyamaY. NishiuraM. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen mimicking endocrine tumor of the pancreas: case report and review of the literature.J. Gastrointest. Surg.20081281471147310.1007/s11605‑007‑0325‑617929107
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SpencerL.A. SpizarnyD.L. WilliamsT.R. Imaging features of intrapancreatic accessory spleen.Br. J. Radiol.20108399266867310.1259/bjr/2030897619690077
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KimS.H. LeeJ.M. HanJ.K. LeeJ.Y. KimK.W. ChoK.C. ChoiB.I. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: Findings on MR Imaging, CT, US and scintigraphy, and the pathologic analysis.Korean J. Radiol.20089216217410.3348/kjr.2008.9.2.16218385564
    [Google Scholar]
  7. TatekawaY. An intrapancreatic accessory spleen presenting as a rapidly growing pancreatic mass after splenectomy in a patient with hereditary spherocytosis: a case report and literature review.J. Surg. Case Rep.201820182rjy02910.1093/jscr/rjy02929492255
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KurashimaY. OhnoK. HaseR. SuzukiY. TakadaM. TakeuchiM. OhtakeS. FujimoriM. SekishitaY. A case of laparoscopic resection of the accessory spleen for the recurrence of hereditary spherocytosis 17 years after splenectomy (Abstract in English).Nihon Shokaki Geka Gakkai Zasshi201043101042104710.5833/jjgs.43.1042
    [Google Scholar]
  9. AlShammariA. KalagiD. HijjiT. AburahmahM. Laparoscopic intrapancreatic accessory splenectomy: A case report of recurrent immune thrombocytopenia in a 33 years old male patient after 6 years of splenectomy.Int. J. Surg. Case Rep.20196016817010.1016/j.ijscr.2019.06.02131229770
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LiB.Q. XuX.Q. GuoJ.C. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: A diagnostic dilemma.HPB201820111004101110.1016/j.hpb.2018.04.00429843985
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DingQ. RenZ. WangJ. MaX. ZhangJ. SunG. ZuoC. GuH. JiangH. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: Evaluation with CT and MRI.Exp. Ther. Med.20181643623363110.3892/etm.2018.661330250526
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LinX. XuL. WuA. GuoC. ChenX. WangZ. Differentiation of intrapancreatic accessory spleen from small hypervascular neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas: Textural analysis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.Acta Radiol.201960555356010.1177/028418511878889530086651
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ArkadopoulosN. AthanasopoulosP. StafylaV. KarakatsanisA. KoutoulidisV. TheodosopoulosT. KarvouniE. SmyrniotisV. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen issues: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.JOP200910440040519581743
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KimS.H. LeeJ.M. HanJ.K. LeeJ.Y. KangW.J. JangJ.Y. ShinK.S. ChoK.C. ChoiB.I. MDCT and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR findings of intrapancreatic accessory spleen in seven patients.Eur. Radiol.20061691887189710.1007/s00330‑006‑0193‑616547707
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zurek Munk-MadsenM. ZakarianK. Sandor OturaiP. HansenC.P. FederspielB. FallentinE. Linno WillemoeG. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen mimicking malignant tumor: Three case reports.Acta Radiol. Open201986205846011985934710.1177/205846011985934731285851
    [Google Scholar]
  16. EkmekçiŞ. Diz-KüçükkayaR. TürkmenC. AdaletI. Selective spleen scintigraphy in the evaluation of accessory spleen/splenosis in splenectomized/nonsplenectomized patients and the contribution of spect imaging.Mol. Imaging Radionucl. Ther.20152411710.4274/mirt.4008525800591
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HalfdanarsonT.R. RabeK.G. RubinJ. PetersenG.M. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): Incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival.Ann. Oncol.200819101727173310.1093/annonc/mdn35118515795
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GuoW. HanW. LiuJ. JinL. LiJ.S. ZhangZ.T. WangY. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: A case report and review of the literature.World J. Gastroenterol.20091591141114310.3748/wjg.15.114119266611
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HarrisG.N. KaseD.J. BradnockH. MckinleyM.J. Accessory spleen causing a mass in the tail of the pancreas: MR imaging findings.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.199416351120112110.2214/ajr.163.5.79768877976887
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230815142649
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230815142649
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test