Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

A developing approach for the bedside installation of feeding tubes is the Electromagnetic Navigation-assisted Tube Placement Device (ENTPD). The ENTPD monitors the tip position of feeding tubes when they are inserted into the digestive tract. It aids in the avoidance of airway misalignment and allows placing into the small bowel. Several recent exploratory studies have shown that ENTPD for nasojejunal feeding tube installation can improve success rates, lower costs, and allow for a more rapid beginning of enteral nutrition.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of using an ENTPD for bedside placement of small bowel feeding tubes with blind placement on patients with acute severe pancreatitis and to see how well the electromagnetic navigation trajectory image (ENTI) and X-ray agreed on the location of the tube tip after placement.

Methods

The study was done prospectively using randomized and single-blind methods. The 65 cases used electromagnetic navigation-assisted placement, and 58 cases were blind placement. For judging the tube tip location, we compared the success rate, median time, number of repeat placements, complications, and agreement of ENTI . X-ray.

Results

The blind placement group's success rate was 86.21% compared to the ENTPD's 95.38%, P = 0.075. The median time was significantly longer in the blind placement group (116.55 ± 68.62 min . 25.37 ±12.63 min, P=0.000); the average number of repeating placements was 3.02 ± 1.21 . 1.16 ± 0.31 (Blind placement . ENTPD, P = 0.002). It provided a high degree of agreement between ENTI and X-ray after contrast, κ=0.752 [95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.84]. No complications occurred in the two groups.

Conclusion

ENTPD was used safely and effectively at the bedside to help patients with acute severe pancreatitis get feeding tubes. It not only improved the high successful rate of placement, decreased the time and reduced the exposure to X-ray, but it was also very convenient for bedside placement because of the portable equipment.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230811142726
2023-10-06
2024-11-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e110823219689.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230811142726&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. PanL.L. LiJ. ShamoonM. BhatiaM. SunJ. Recent advances on nutrition in treatment of acute pancreatitis.Front. Immunol.2017876210.3389/fimmu.2017.0076228713382
    [Google Scholar]
  2. JensenK.B. ChanD.L. Nutritional management of acute pancreatitis in dogs and cats.J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care201424324025010.1111/vec.1218024690138
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Aguilar-NascimentoJ.E. KudskK.A. Clinical costs of feeding tube placement.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.200731426927310.1177/014860710703100426917595433
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LaiC. BarlowR. BarnesM. HawthorneA.B. Bedside placement of nasojejunal tubes: A randomised-controlled trial of spiral- vs straight-ended tubes.Clin. Nutr.200322326727010.1016/S0261‑5614(02)00210‑812765666
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZalogaG.P. RobertsP.R. Bedside placement of enteral feeding tubes in the intensive care unit.Crit. Care Med.199826698798810.1097/00003246‑199806000‑000079635639
    [Google Scholar]
  6. JimenezL.L. RamageJ.E.Jr Benefits of postpyloric enteral access placement by a nutrition support dietitian.Nutr. Clin. Pract.200419551852210.1177/011542650401900551816215148
    [Google Scholar]
  7. UgoP.J. MohlerP.A. WilsonG.L. Bedside postpyloric placement of weighted feeding tubes.Nutr. Clin. Pract.19927628428710.1177/01154265920070062841289702
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RiveraR. CampanaJ. HamiltonC. LopezR. SeidnerD. Small bowel feeding tube placement using an electromagnetic tube placement device: Accuracy of tip location.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.201135563664210.1177/014860711038604721844241
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PowersJ. LuebbehusenM. AguirreL. CluffJ. DavidM.A. HollyV. LinfordL. ParkN. BrunelleR. Improved safety and efficacy of small-bore feeding tube confirmation using an electromagnetic placement device.Nutr. Clin. Pract.201833226827310.1002/ncp.1006229529335
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PhangJ. MarshW. PragerR. Feeding tube placement with the aid of a new electromagnetic transmitter.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.200630S48S49
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SorokinR. GottliebJ.E. Enhancing patient safety during feeding-tube insertion: A review of more than 2,000 insertions.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.200630544044510.1177/014860710603000544016931614
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GabrielS. AckermannR. GabrielS. AckermannC. Swadener-CulpepperL. Evaluation of a nasoenteral feeding tube with balloon to facilitate placement.Crit. Care. Nurse.2020401374410.4037/ccn202084532006034
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Slingerland-BootR. Bouw-RuiterM. van ManenC. ArbousS. van ZantenA. Video-assisted placement of enteral feeding tubes using the integrated real-time imaging system (IRIS)-technology in critically ill patients.Clin. Nutr.20214085000500710.1016/j.clnu.2021.07.02634364239
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SmithardD. BarrettN.A. HargrovesD. ElliotS. Electromagnetic sensor-guided enteral access systems: A literature review.Dysphagia201530327528510.1007/s00455‑015‑9607‑425943295
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GerritsenA. de RooijT. DijkgraafM.G. BuschO.R. BergmanJ.J. UbbinkD.T. van DuijvendijkP. ErkelensW.G. KlosM. KruytP.M. BacD.J. RosmanC. TanA.C. MolenaarQ.I. MonkelbaanJ.F. Mathus-VliegentE.M. BesselinkM.G. Electromagnetic-guided bedside placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes by nurses is non-inferior to endoscopic placement by gastroenterologists: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.Am. J. Gastroenterol.201611181123113210.1038/ajg.2016.22427272012
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WatanabeJ KakehiE OkamotoM IshikawaS KataokaY Electromagnetic-guided versus endoscopic-guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev.20221010CD013865
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BanksP.A. BollenT.L. DervenisC. GooszenH.G. JohnsonC.D. SarrM.G. TsiotosG.G. VegeS.S. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: Revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.Gut201362110211110.1136/gutjnl‑2012‑30277923100216
    [Google Scholar]
  18. CarterM. RobertsS. CarsonJ.A. Small-bowel feeding tube placement at bedside: Electronic medical device placement and X-Ray agreement.Nutr. Clin. Pract.201833227428010.1002/ncp.1007229532510
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230811142726
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230811142726
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test