Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

The quantitative measure of dopamine transporter (DaT) in the human midbrain is generally used as a biomarker for analyzing Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Introduction

DaT scan images or Single- photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images are utilized to capture the dopamine content more accurately.

Methods

Only sixteen slices out of ninety-one of SPECT images were chosen on the basis of the high amount of dopamine content and were named Volume rendering image slices (VRIS). This paper proposes a novel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) called JAN Net which particularly treats the VRIS for identifying PD. The JAN Net preserves the edges and spatial features of the striatum by using a modified exigent feature (M-ExFeat) block, that contains convolutional and additive layer. The different-sized convolutional layer extracts both low- and high-level features of Striatum. The additive layer adds up all the features of different filter sized convolutional layers like 1x1, 3x3, and 5x5. The added output features are used to improve the learnability of neurons in the hidden layer. The network performance is tested for stride 1 and stride 2.

Results

The results are validated using the dataset taken from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database. The JAN Net ensures improved performance in terms of accuracy. The training and validation accuracy for stride 2 is 100% with minimum losses. The outcome has been compared with different deep learning architectures and the machine learning techniques like Extreme Learning Machines (ELM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to highlight the efficacy of the proposed architecture.

Conclusion

Hence, the present work could be of great aid to the experts in neurology to protect the neurons from impairment.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230605092654
2024-01-01
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e050623217645.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230605092654&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. de LauL.M.L. BretelerM.M.B. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease.Lancet Neurol.20065652553510.1016/S1474‑4422(06)70471‑916713924
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DeMaagdG. PhilipA. Parkinson’s disease and its management: Part 1: Disease entity, risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis.P T201540850453226236139
    [Google Scholar]
  3. PringsheimT. JetteN. FrolkisA. SteevesT.D.L. The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Mov. Disord.201429131583159010.1002/mds.2594524976103
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ArmstrongM.J. OkunM.S. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: A review.JAMA2020323654856010.1001/jama.2019.2236032044947
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BallN. TeoW.P. ChandraS. ChapmanJ. Parkinson’s disease and the environment.Front. Neurol.20191021810.3389/fneur.2019.0021830941085
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KorolevS. SafiullinA. BelyaevM. DodonovaY. Residual and plain convolutional neural networks for 3D brain MRI classification.IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 18-21 April 2017, pp.835-838.10.1109/ISBI.2017.7950647
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MarekK. JenningsD. LaschS. SiderowfA. TannerC. SimuniT. CoffeyC. KieburtzK. FlaggE. ChowdhuryS. PoeweW. MollenhauerB. KlinikP-E. ShererT. FrasierM. MeunierC. RudolphA. CasaceliC. SeibylJ. MendickS. SchuffN. ZhangY. TogaA. CrawfordK. AnsbachA. De BlasioP. PiovellaM. TrojanowskiJ. ShawL. SingletonA. HawkinsK. EberlingJ. BrooksD. RussellD. LearyL. FactorS. SommerfeldB. HogarthP. PighettiE. WilliamsK. StandaertD. GuthrieS. HauserR. DelgadoH. JankovicJ. HunterC. SternM. TranB. LeverenzJ. BacaM. FrankS. ThomasC-A. RichardI. DeeleyC. ReesL. SprengerF. LangE. ShillH. ObradovS. FernandezH. WintersA. BergD. GaussK. GalaskoD. FontaineD. MariZ. GerstenhaberM. BrooksD. MalloyS. BaroneP. LongoK. ComeryT. RavinaB. GrachevI. GallagherK. CollinsM. WidnellK.L. OstrowizkiS. FontouraP. HoT. LuthmanJ. BrugM. ReithA.D. TaylorP. The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI).Prog. Neurobiol.201195462963510.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.09.00521930184
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PrashanthR. Dutta RoyS. GhoshS. Pravat MandalK. Shape features as biomarkers in early Parkinson’s disease.6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).San Diego, CA, US, 06-08 November 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FranciscoP.M.O. Castelo-BrancoM. Computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease based on [123I] FP-CIT SPECT binding potential images, using the voxels-as-features approach and support vector.J. Neural Eng.20151210
    [Google Scholar]
  10. AnitaS. Aruna PriyaP. Diagnosis of parkinson’s disease at an early stage using volume rendering spect image slices.Arab. J. Sci. Eng.20204542799281110.1007/s13369‑019‑04152‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  11. AnitaS. PriyaP.A. Three dimensional analysis of SPECT Images for diagnosing early Parkinson’s disease using radial basis function kernel − Extreme learning machine.Curr. Med. Imaging Rev.201915546147010.2174/157340561466617121915415432008553
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KrizhevskyA. SuskeverI. HintonG.E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.20122510971105
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LeCunY. BengioY. HintonG. Deep learning.Nature2015521755343644410.1038/nature1453926017442
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SimonyanK. ZissermanA. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.arXiv201420141556
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HeK ZhangX RenS SunJ Deep residual learning for image recognition.IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27-30 June 2016, pp.770-778.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SzegedyC VanhouckeV IoffeS ShlensJ WojnaZ Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision.IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27-30 June 2016, pp.2818-2826.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308
    [Google Scholar]
  17. OrtizA. MunillaJ. Martínez-IbañezM. GórrizJ.M. RamírezJ. Salas-GonzalezD. Parkinson’s disease detection using isosurfaces-based features and convolutional neural networks.Front. Neuroinform.2019134810.3389/fninf.2019.0004831312131
    [Google Scholar]
  18. The study that could change everything.2010 Available From: https://www.ppmi-info.org
  19. Gil-MartínM. MonteroJ.M. San-SegundoR. Parkinson’s disease detection from drawing movements using convolutional neural networks.electronics20198890710.3390/electronics8080907
    [Google Scholar]
  20. VermaM. BhuiJ.K. VipparthiS.K. SinghG. EXPERTNet: Exigent features preservative network for facial expression recognition.11th Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (ICVGIP 2018)New York, NY, USA20181810.1145/3293353.3293374
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MasoodS. SharifM. MasoodA. YasminM. RazaM. A survey on medical image segmentation.Curr. Med. Imaging Rev.201511131410.2174/157340561101150423103441
    [Google Scholar]
  22. DjangD.S.W. JanssenM.J.R. BohnenN. BooijJ. HendersonT.A. HerholzK. MinoshimaS. RoweC.C. SabriO. SeibylJ. Van BerckelB.N.M. WannerM. SNM practice guideline for dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-ioflupane SPECT 1.0.J. Nucl. Med.201253115416310.2967/jnumed.111.10078422159160
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Barbero-GómezJ. GutiérrezP-A. VargasV-M. Vallejo-CasasJ-A. Hervás-MartínezC. An ordinal CNN approach for the assessment of neurological damage in Parkinson’s disease patients.Expert Syst. Appl.202118211527110.1016/j.eswa.2021.115271
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ChoiH. HaS. ImH.J. PaekS.H. LeeD.S. Refining diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease with deep learning-based interpretation of dopamine transporter imaging.Neuroimage Clin.20171658659410.1016/j.nicl.2017.09.01028971009
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PianpanitT. LolakS. SawangjaiP. SudhawiyangkulT. WilaiprasitpornT. Parkinson’s disease recognition using SPECT image and interpretable AI: A tutorial.IEEE Sensors J.202199
    [Google Scholar]
  26. NikhilJ.D. ThomopoulosS.I. Owens-WaltonC. 3D Convolutional neural networks for classification of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease with T1-weighted brain MRI.bioRxiv2021202145390310.1101/2021.07.26.453903
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WolfswinkelEv. WielaardJ. LavalayeJ. Artificial intelligence-based assistance in clinical 123I-FP-CIT SPECT scan interpretation.Res. Square202110.21203/rs.3.rs‑721186/v1
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MohammedF. HeX. LinY. Retracted: An easy-to-use deep-learning model for highly accurate diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using SPECT images.Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.20218710181010.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.10181033279760
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230605092654
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230605092654
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Artificial intelligence; CNN; Early PD; JAN network; Modified exfeat; Performance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test