Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

The etiology of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) have been investigated for years and many underlying causes have been identified. Shoulder joint morphology is one of the extrinsic causes of RCTs.

Aim

Morphometric measurements on MRI sections determined which parameters are an important indicator of RCT in patients with shoulder pain. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors in the etiology of RCTs by evaluating the shoulder joint morphology with the help of previously defined radiological parameters.

Methods

Between January 2019-December 2020, 408 patients (40-70 years old) who underwent shoulder MRI and met the criteria were included in the study. There were 202 patients in the RCT group and 206 patients in the control group. Acromion type, acromial index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromiohumeral distance (AHD), lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromial angulation (AA), acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index (ATI), and glenoid version angle (GVA) were measured from the MRI images of the patients.

Results

AI (0.64 0.60, = 0.003) CSA (35.3° 32.4°, = 0.004), ATI (0.91 0.83, < 0.001), and AA (13.6° 11.9°, = 0.011) values were higher in the RCT group than in the control group and the difference was significant. AHD (8.1 mm 9.9 mm, < 0.001), LAA (77.2° 80.9°, = 0.004) and GVA (-3.9° -2.5°, < 0.001) values were lower in the RCT group than in the control group, and again the difference was significant. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values were 0.623 for AI and 0.860 for ATI.

Conclusion

Acromion type, AI, CSA, AHD, LAA, AA, ATI, and GVA are suitable radiological parameters to evaluate shoulder joint morphology. High AI, CSA, AA, ATI, GVA and low AHD and LAA are risk factors for RCT.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426141113
2023-07-07
2024-11-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E260423216209.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426141113&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. YamamotoA. TakagishiK. OsawaT. YanagawaT. NakajimaD. ShitaraH. KobayashiT. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.201019111612010.1016/j.jse.2009.04.00619540777
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SørensenA.K.B. BakK. KrarupA.L. ThuneC.H. NygaardM. JørgensenU. SlothC. Torp-PedersenS. Acute rotator cuff tear: Do we miss the early diagnosis? A prospective study showing a high incidence of rotator cuff tears after shoulder trauma.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.200716217418010.1016/j.jse.2006.06.01017169582
    [Google Scholar]
  3. TeunisT. LubbertsB. ReillyB.T. RingD. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.201423121913192110.1016/j.jse.2014.08.00125441568
    [Google Scholar]
  4. OlivaF. OstiL. PaduloJ. MaffulliN. Epidemiology of the rotator cuff tears: A new incidence related to thyroid disease.Muscles Ligaments Tendons J.20194330931410.32098/mltj.03.2014.0825489548
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GerberC. SnedekerJ.G. BaumgartnerD. ViehöferA.F. Supraspinatus tendon load during abduction is dependent on the size of the critical shoulder angle: A biomechanical analysis.J. Orthop. Res.201432795295710.1002/jor.2262124700399
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HennR.F.III KangL. TashjianR.Z. GreenA. Patients’ preoperative expectations predict the outcome of rotator cuff repair.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.20078991913191910.2106/00004623‑200709000‑0000417768186
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BalkeM. LiemD. GreshakeO. HoeherJ. BouillonB. BanerjeeM. Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears.Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc.20162472200220510.1007/s00167‑014‑3499‑y25547273
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ShiX. XuY. DaiB. LiW. HeZ. Effect of different geometrical structure of scapula on functional recovery after shoulder arthroscopy operation.J. Orthop. Surg. Res.201914131210.1186/s13018‑019‑1362‑z31521195
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZaidM.B. YoungN.M. PedoiaV. FeeleyB.T. MaC.B. LansdownD.A. Anatomic shoulder parameters and their relationship to the presence of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.201928122457246610.1016/j.jse.2019.05.00831353303
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BiglianiL.U. MorrisonD.S. AprilE.W. The morphology of the acromion and rotator cuff impingement.Orthop Trans198610228
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DoganM. CayN. TosunO. KaraoglanogluM. BozkurtM. Glenoid axis is not related with rotator cuff tears—a magnetic resonance imaging comparative study.Int. Orthop.201236359559810.1007/s00264‑011‑1356‑x21922256
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BanasM.P. MillerR.J. TottermanS. Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.19954645446110.1016/S1058‑2746(05)80038‑28665291
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NyffelerR.W. WernerC.M. SukthankarA. SchmidM.R. GerberC. Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.200688480080516595470
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MoorB.K. BouaichaS. RothenfluhD.A. SukthankarA. GerberC. Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?Bone Joint J.201395-B793594110.1302/0301‑620X.95B7.3102823814246
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McGinleyJ.C. AgrawalS. BiswalS. Rotator cuff tears: Association with acromion angulation on MRI.Clin. Imaging201236679179610.1016/j.clinimag.2012.04.00723154011
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LiuH.X. XuX.X. XuD.L. HuY.Z. PanX.Y. YuZ. XuY.J. The acromion–greater tuberosity impingement index: A new radiographic measurement and its association with rotator cuff pathology.J. Orthop. Surg.2020281230949902091334810.1177/230949902091334832212965
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SuterT. Gerber PoppA. ZhangY. ZhangC. TashjianR.Z. HenningerH.B. The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.2015246e149e15810.1016/j.jse.2014.10.02125591458
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ChalmersP.N. BeckL. MillerM. KawakamiJ. DukasA.G. BurksR.T. GreisP.E. TashjianR.Z. Acromial morphology is not associated with rotator cuff tearing or repair healing.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.202029112229223910.1016/j.jse.2019.12.03532417045
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SpieglU.J. HoranM.P. SmithS.W. HoC.P. MillettP.J. The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI.Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc.20162472244225110.1007/s00167‑015‑3587‑725820655
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BalkeM. SchmidtC. DedyN. BanerjeeM. BouillonB. LiemD. Correlation of acromial morphology with impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears.Acta Orthop.201384217818310.3109/17453674.2013.77341323409811
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HeubererP.R. PlachelF. WillingerL. MoroderP. LakyB. PauzenbergerL. LomoschitzF. AnderlW. Critical shoulder angle combined with age predict five shoulder pathologies: A retrospective analysis of 1000 cases.BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.201718125910.1186/s12891‑017‑1559‑428619059
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KumD.H. KimJ.H. ParkK.M. LeeE.S. ParkY.B. YooJ.C. Acromion index in Korean population and its relationship with rotator cuff tears.Clin. Orthop. Surg.20179221822210.4055/cios.2017.9.2.21828567226
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MoorB.K. WieserK. SlankamenacK. GerberC. BouaichaS. Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.201423453654110.1016/j.jse.2013.11.00824480324
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AndradeR. CorreiaA.L. NunesJ. Xará-LeiteF. CalvoE. Espregueira-MendesJ. SevivasN. Is bony morphology and morphometry associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthroscopy2019351233043315.e210.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.00531785763
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MorelliK.M. MartinB.R. CharaklaF.H. DurmisevicA. WarrenG.L. Acromion morphology and prevalence of rotator cuff tear: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin. Anat.201932112213010.1002/ca.2330930362636
    [Google Scholar]
  26. AmesJ.B. HoranM.P. Van der MeijdenO.A.J. LeakeM.J. MillettP.J. Association between acromial index and outcomes following arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.201294201862186910.2106/JBJS.K.0150023079878
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MoorB.K. RöthlisbergerM. MüllerD.A. ZumsteinM.A. BouaichaS. EhlingerM. GerberC. Age, trauma and the critical shoulder angle accurately predict supraspinatus tendon tears.Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res.2014100548949410.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.02225012397
    [Google Scholar]
  28. BlonnaD. GianiA. BellatoE. MatteiL. CalóM. RossiR. CastoldiF. Predominance of the critical shoulder angle in the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the shoulder.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.20162581328133610.1016/j.jse.2015.11.05926899036
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ChalmersP.N. SalazarD. Steger-MayK. ChamberlainA.M. YamaguchiK. KeenerJ.D. Does the critical shoulder angle correlate with rotator cuff tear progression?Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.201747561608161710.1007/s11999‑017‑5249‑128120293
    [Google Scholar]
  30. CherchiL. CiornohacJ.F. GodetJ. ClavertP. KempfJ.F. Critical shoulder angle: Measurement reproducibility and correlation with rotator cuff tendon tears.Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res.2016102555956210.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.01727238292
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ShinagawaK. HattaT. YamamotoN. KawakamiJ. ShiotaY. MinetaM. ItoiE. Critical shoulder angle in an East Asian population: Correlation to the incidence of rotator cuff tear and glenohumeral osteoarthritis.J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.20182791602160610.1016/j.jse.2018.03.01329731396
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LiH. ChenY. ChenJ. HuaY. ChenS. Large critical shoulder angle has higher risk of tendon retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Am. J. Sports Med.20184681892190010.1177/036354651876763429723034
    [Google Scholar]
  33. GirardM. ColombiR. AzoulayV. LaumonerieP. MartelM. MansatP. BonnevialleN. Does anterior acromioplasty reduce critical shoulder angle?Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res.202010661101110610.1016/j.otsr.2020.04.01332703718
    [Google Scholar]
  34. GoutallierD. Le GuillouxP. PostelJ.M. RadierC. BernageauJ. ZilberS. Acromio humeral distance less than six millimeter: Its meaning in full-thickness rotator cuff tear.Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res.201197324625110.1016/j.otsr.2011.01.01021459063
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WeinerD.S. MacnabI. Superior migration of the humeral head. A radiological aid in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff.J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.197052-B352452710.1302/0301‑620X.52B3.5245455085
    [Google Scholar]
  36. KaurR. DahujaA. GargS. BansalK. GargR. SinghP. Correlation of acromial morphology in association with rotator cuff tear: A retrospective study.Pol. J. Radiol.20198445946310.5114/pjr.2019.9027731969966
    [Google Scholar]
  37. TétreaultP. KruegerA. ZurakowskiD. GerberC. Glenoid version and rotator cuff tears.J. Orthop. Res.200422120220710.1016/S0736‑0266(03)00116‑514656681
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MohamedR.E. Abo-SheishaD.M. Assessment of acromial morphology in association with rotator cuff tear using magnetic resonance imaging.Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med.201445116918010.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.11.013
    [Google Scholar]
  39. BassettR.W. BrowneA.O. MorreyB.F. AnK.N. Glenohumeral muscle force and moment mechanics in a position of shoulder instability.J. Biomech.199023540541510.1016/0021‑9290(90)90295‑E2373713
    [Google Scholar]
  40. İncesoyM.A. YıldızK.İ. TürkÖ.İ. AkıncıŞ. TurgutE. AycanO.E. BayhanI.A. The critical shoulder angle, the acromial index, the glenoid version angle and the acromial angulation are associated with rotator cuff tears.Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc.20212972257226310.1007/s00167‑020‑06145‑832671437
    [Google Scholar]
  41. KandemirU. AllaireR.B. JollyJ.T. DebskiR.E. McMahonP.J. The relationship between the orientation of the glenoid and tears of the rotator cuff.J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.200688-B81105110910.1302/0301‑620X.88B8.1773216877616
    [Google Scholar]
  42. KarahanN. YilmazB. ÖztermeliA. KayaM. DumanS. Derin CicekE.E. Evaluation of critical shoulder angle and acromion index in patients with anterior shoulder instability and rotator cuff tear.Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc.202155322022610.5152/j.aott.2021.2007234100362
    [Google Scholar]
  43. NeerC.S.II Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: A preliminary report.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.1972541415010.2106/00004623‑197254010‑000035054450
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426141113
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426141113
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): CSA; LAA; Magnetic resonance imaging; Morphology; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder joint
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test