Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

There is currently no clinically accepted method for quantifying background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), though a sensitive method might allow individualized risk management based on the response to cancer-preventative hormonal therapy.

Objective

The objective of this pilot study is to demonstrate the utility of linear modeling of standardized dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI) signal for quantifying changes in BPE rates.

Methods

On a retrospective database search, 14 women with DCEMRI examinations pre- and post-treatment with tamoxifen were identified. DCEMRI signal was averaged over the parenchymal ROIs to obtain time-dependent signal curves S(t). The gradient echo signal equation was used to standardize scale S(t) to values of = 10° and = 5.5 ms, and obtain the standardized DCE-MRI signal (). Relative signal enhancement was calculated from , and the reference tissue method for T1 calculation was used to standardize to gadodiamide as the contrast agent, obtaining . in the first 6 minutes post-contrast administration was fit to a linear model with the slope α denoting the standardized rate relative BPE.

Results

Changes in α were not found to be significantly correlated with the average duration of tamoxifen treatment, age at the initiation of preventative treatment, or pre-treatment BIRADS breast density category. The average change in α showed a large effect size of -1.12, significantly higher than -0.86 observed without signal standardization ( < 0.01).

Conclusion

Linear modeling of BPE in standardized DCEMRI can provide quantitative measurements of BPE rates, improving sensitivity to changes due to tamoxifen treatment.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405619666230306105820
2024-01-01
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e060323214364.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405619666230306105820&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. ArasuV.A. MigliorettiD.L. SpragueB.L. AlsheikN.H. BuistD.S.M. HendersonL.M. HerschornS.D. LeeJ.M. OnegaT. RauscherG.H. WernliK.J. LehmanC.D. KerlikowskeK. Population-based assessment of the association between magnetic resonance imaging background parenchymal enhancement and future primary breast cancer risk.J. Clin. Oncol.2019371295496310.1200/JCO.18.0037830625040
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LamD.L. HippeD.S. KitschA.E. PartridgeS.C. RahbarH. Assessment of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging background parenchymal enhancement parameters to improve determination of individual breast cancer risk.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.2019431859210.1097/RCT.000000000000077430052617
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GrimmL.J. SahaA. GhateS.V. KimC. SooM.S. YoonS.C. MazurowskiM.A. Relationship between background parenchymal enhancement on high-risk screening MRI and future breast cancer risk.Acad. Radiol.2019261697510.1016/j.acra.2018.03.01329602724
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DontchosB.N. RahbarH. PartridgeS.C. KordeL.A. LamD.L. ScheelJ.R. PeacockS. LehmanC.D. Are qualitative assessments of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue on MR images, and mammographic density associated with breast cancer risk?Radiology2015276237138010.1148/radiol.201514230425965809
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KingV. BrooksJ.D. BernsteinJ.L. ReinerA.S. PikeM.C. MorrisE.A. Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk.Radiology20112601506010.1148/radiol.1110215621493794
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LiaoG.J. Henze BancroftL.C. StrigelR.M. ChitaliaR.D. KontosD. MoyL. PartridgeS.C. RahbarH. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging2020511436110.1002/jmri.2676231004391
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KimJ.Y. ChoN. JeyanthJ.X. KimW.H. LeeS.H. GweonH.M. MoonW.K. Smaller reduction in 3D breast density associated with subsequent cancer recurrence in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2014202491292110.2214/AJR.13.1110924660724
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RobinsonB. DijkstraB. DaveyV. TomlinsonS. FramptonC. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in christchurch women with early breast cancer.Clinical Oncology201830191510.1016/j.clon.2017.10.015
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HuX. JiangL. LiQ. GuY. Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement in breast magnetic resonance images predicts the risk of breast cancer.Oncotarget201786106201062710.18632/oncotarget.1353827895314
    [Google Scholar]
  10. WuS. WeinsteinS.P. DeLeoM.J.III ConantE.F. ChenJ. DomchekS.M. KontosD. Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI predicts response to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: Preliminary evaluation in a cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.Breast Cancer Res.20151716710.1186/s13058‑015‑0577‑025986460
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WuS. BergW.A. ZuleyM.L. KurlandB.F. JankowitzR.C. NishikawaR. GurD. SumkinJ.H. Breast MRI contrast enhancement kinetics of normal parenchyma correlate with presence of breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res.20161817610.1186/s13058‑016‑0734‑027449059
    [Google Scholar]
  12. VirostkoJ. KuketzG. HigginsE. WuC. SoraceA.G. DiCarloJ.C. AveryS. PattD. GoodgameB. YankeelovT.E. The rate of breast fibroglandular enhancement during dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reflects response to neoadjuvant therapy.Eur. J. Radiol.202113610953410.1016/j.ejrad.2021.10953433454460
    [Google Scholar]
  13. CantyM. Fuzzy c-means clustering IDL code.2004Available from: https://comp.lang.idl-pvwave.narkive.com/BpMyro7J/fuzzy-c-means-clustering-idl-code
  14. DunnJ.C. A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters.J. Cybern.197333325710.1080/01969727308546046
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rakow-PennerR. DanielB. YuH. Sawyer-GloverA. GloverG.H. Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging2006231879110.1002/jmri.2046916315211
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MedvedM. KarczmarG. YangC. DignamJ. GajewskiT.F. KindlerH. VokesE. MacEneanyP. MitchellM.T. StadlerW.M. Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging200420112212810.1002/jmri.2006115221817
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ShenY. GoernerF.L. SnyderC. MorelliJ.N. HaoD. HuD. LiX. RungeV.M. T1 relaxivities of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents in human whole blood at 1.5, 3, and 7 T.Invest. Radiol.201550533033810.1097/RLI.000000000000013225658049
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SahaA. GrimmL.J. GhateS.V. KimC.E. SooM.S. YoonS.C. MazurowskiM.A. Machine learning-based prediction of future breast cancer using algorithmically measured background parenchymal enhancement on high-risk screening MRI.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging201950245646410.1002/jmri.2663630648316
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bennani-BaitiB. DietzelM. BaltzerP.A. MRI background parenchymal enhancement is not associated with breast cancer.PLoS One2016117e015857310.1371/journal.pone.015857327379395
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TelegrafoM. RellaL. Stabile IanoraA.A. AngelelliG. MoschettaM. Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) correlates with the risk of breast cancer.Magn. Reson. Imaging201634217317610.1016/j.mri.2015.10.01426597834
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PikeMC PearceCL Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk.Annals of Oncology201324Suppl 83741
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KingV. KaplanJ. PikeM.C. LibermanL. David DershawD. LeeC.H. BrooksJ.D. MorrisE.A. Impact of tamoxifen on amount of fibroglandular tissue, background parenchymal enhancement, and cysts on breast magnetic resonance imaging.Breast J.201218652753410.1111/tbj.1200223002953
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KingV. GoldfarbS.B. BrooksJ.D. SungJ.S. NulsenB.F. JozefaraJ.E. PikeM.C. DicklerM.N. MorrisE.A. Effect of aromatase inhibitors on background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue at breast MR imaging.Radiology2012264367067810.1148/radiol.1211266922771878
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405619666230306105820
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405619666230306105820
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test