Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

Evidence of the association between obesity and renal cell carcinoma progression is contradictory. The effects of renal cell carcinoma on fat distribution are still unknown.

Objective

The goal of this study was to determine the ability of various forms of fat deposition to predict the Fuhrman nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma [ccRCC].

Methods

This retrospective study included 320 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC [215 men and 105 women; 263 low-grade ccRCC and 57 high-grade ccRCC]. Based on computed tomography scans, adipose tissue in various body regions was classified into the perirenal fat area [PFA], visceral fat area [VFA], total fat area [TFA], subcutaneous fat area [SFA], and hepatic steatosis [HS]. Subsequently, the relative VFA [rVFA] was computed. Age, sex, body mass index, and maximal tumor diameter were also regarded as clinical factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression studies were conducted to evaluate whether there was an association between body fat composition and the Fuhrman classification and whether it was related to gender.

Results

After correcting for age, males with low-grade ccRCC exhibited higher TFA [257.6 . 203.0, p = 0.002], VFA [151.6 .115.5, p = 0.007], SFA [106.0 . 87.5, p = 0.015], PFA [55.1 . 30.4, p < 0.001], and HS [18% . 0%, p = 0.031] than those with high-grade ccRCC. There was no significant difference among rVFA in males. In females, there was no significant difference in any of the parameters. VFA and PFA remained independent predictors for high-grade ccRCC in males in both the monovariate [VFA: odds ratio [OR] 0.992, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.987–0.997, p = 0.004; PFA: OR 0.949, 95% CI 0.930–0.970, p < 0.001] and multivariate [VFA: OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.001–1.074, p < 0.001; PFA: OR 0.878, 95% CI 0.833–0.926, p < 0.001] models.

Conclusion

Gender-specific adipose tissue in different locations demonstrated varied values for predicting high-grade ccRCC and may be utilized as an independent predictor of high-grade ccRCC in male patients.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295913240514020603
2024-01-01
2025-06-26
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. SungH. SiegelR.L. TorreL.A. Pearson-StuttardJ. IslamiF. FedewaS.A. Goding SauerA. ShuvalK. GapsturS.M. JacobsE.J. GiovannucciE.L. JemalA. Global patterns in excess body weight and the associated cancer burden.CA Cancer J. Clin.20196928811210.3322/caac.2149930548482
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ZhuY. WangH.K. ZhangH.L. YaoX.D. ZhangS.L. DaiB. ShenY.J. LiuX.H. ZhouL.P. YeD.W. Visceral obesity and risk of high grade disease in clinical t1a renal cell carcinoma.J. Urol.2013189244745310.1016/j.juro.2012.09.03023253956
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KeehnA. SrivastavaA. MaimanR. TaylorJ. DiVitoJ. GhavamianR. SternJ.M. The relationship between visceral obesity and the clinicopathologic features of patients with small renal masses.J. Endourol.201529337237610.1089/end.2014.051225203393
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LeeH.W. JeongB.C. SeoS.I. JeonS.S. LeeH.M. ChoiH.Y. JeonH.G. Prognostic significance of visceral obesity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy.Int. J. Urol.201522545546110.1111/iju.1271625631365
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ParkY.H. LeeJ.K. KimK.M. KookH.R. LeeH. KimK.B. LeeS. ByunS.S. LeeS.E. Visceral obesity in predicting oncologic outcomes of localized renal cell carcinoma.J. Urol.201419241043104910.1016/j.juro.2014.03.10724704011
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HuZ. WuJ. LaiS. XuY. ZhanJ. LiR. LiuX. WangN. WeiX. JiangX. YangR. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: The value of sex-specific abdominal visceral fat measured on CT for prediction of Fuhrman nuclear grade.Eur. Radiol.20203073977398610.1007/s00330‑020‑06747‑332144457
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YipC. GohV. DaviesA. GossageJ. Mitchell-HayR. HynesO. MaiseyN. RossP. GayaA. LandauD.B. CookG.J. GriffinN. MasonR. Assessment of sarcopenia and changes in body composition after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and associations with clinical outcomes in oesophageal cancer.Eur. Radiol.2014245998100510.1007/s00330‑014‑3110‑424535076
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ParkS.W. LeeH.L. DooE.Y. LeeK.N. JunD.W. LeeO.Y. HanD.S. YoonB.C. ChoiH.S. LeeK.H. Visceral obesity predicts fewer lymph node metastases and better overall survival in colon cancer.J. Gastrointest. Surg.20151981513152110.1007/s11605‑015‑2834‑z25941028
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CaanB.J. Cespedes FelicianoE.M. PradoC.M. AlexeeffS. KroenkeC.H. BradshawP. QuesenberryC.P. WeltzienE.K. CastilloA.L. OlobatuyiT.A. ChenW.Y. Association of muscle and adiposity measured by computed tomography with survival in patients with nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.JAMA Oncol.20184679880410.1001/jamaoncol.2018.013729621380
    [Google Scholar]
  10. AlbertiK.G.M.M. ZimmetP. ShawJ. Metabolic syndrome—a new world‐wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation.Diabet. Med.200623546948010.1111/j.1464‑5491.2006.01858.x16681555
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bentham Science PublisherB.S.P. PorramatikulS. Al-OzairiE. Metabolic obesity: The paradox between visceral and subcutaneous fat.Curr. Diabetes Rev.20062436737310.2174/157339981060204036718220642
    [Google Scholar]
  12. IbrahimM.M. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences.Obes. Rev.2010111111810.1111/j.1467‑789X.2009.00623.x19656312
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NagaoM. Fat has an endocrine function.Acad. Radiol.202330340210.1016/j.acra.2022.12.02236585327
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KotronenA. Yki-JärvinenH. Fatty Liver.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.2008281273810.1161/ATVBAHA.107.14753817690317
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LimS. Ectopic fat assessment focusing on cardiometabolic and renal risk.Endocrinol. Metab.20142911410.3803/EnM.2014.29.1.124741447
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PalmerB.F. CleggD.J. The sexual dimorphism of obesity.Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.201540211311910.1016/j.mce.2014.11.02925578600
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SmithZ.L. PietzakE.J. MeiseC.K. Van ArsdalenK. WeinA.J. MalkowiczS.B. GuzzoT.J. Simplification of the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma.Can. J. Urol.20152268069807326688135
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gomez-PerezS.L. HausJ.M. SheeanP. PatelB. MarW. ChaudhryV. McKeeverL. BraunschweigC. Measuring abdominal circumference and skeletal muscle from a single cross‐sectional computed tomography image.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.201640330831810.1177/014860711560414926392166
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KodamaY. NgC.S. WuT.T. AyersG.D. CurleyS.A. AbdallaE.K. VautheyJ.N. CharnsangavejC. Comparison of CT methods for determining the fat content of the liver.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.200718851307131210.2214/AJR.06.099217449775
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KanekoG. MiyajimaA. YugeK. YazawaS. MizunoR. KikuchiE. JinzakiM. OyaM. Visceral obesity is associated with better recurrence-free survival after curative surgery for Japanese patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.201545221021610.1093/jjco/hyu19325420691
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WangH.K. SongX.S. ChengY. QuY.Y. ZhangS.L. DaiB. ZhangH.L. ShenY.J. ZhuY.P. ShiG.H. QinX.J. MaC.G. LinG.W. XiaoW.J. ZhuY. YeD.W. Visceral fat accumulation is associated with different pathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma ( RCC ): A multicentre study in C hina.BJU Int.2014114449650210.1111/bju.1259225383400
    [Google Scholar]
  22. GuoH. ZhaoW. WangA. LiM. MaH. WangF. WangQ. BaX. The value of sex-specific abdominal visceral fat as measured via CT as a predictor of clear renal cell carcinoma T stage.Adipocyte202110128529210.1080/21623945.2021.192495734014795
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HigginsM.I. MartiniD.J. PatilD.H. SteeleS. EvansS. PetrinecB.P. PsutkaS.P. SekharA. BilenM.A. MasterV.A. Quantification of body composition in renal cell carcinoma patients: Comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements.Eur. J. Radiol.202013210930710.1016/j.ejrad.2020.10930733010681
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KhandekarM.J. CohenP. SpiegelmanB.M. Molecular mechanisms of cancer development in obesity.Nat. Rev. Cancer2011111288689510.1038/nrc317422113164
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PinthusJ.H. KleinmannN. TisdaleB. ChatterjeeS. LuJ.P. GillisA. HamletT. SinghG. FarrokhyarF. KapoorA. Lower plasma adiponectin levels are associated with larger tumor size and metastasis in clear-cell carcinoma of the kidney.Eur. Urol.200854486687410.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.04418343565
    [Google Scholar]
  26. FerraraD. MontecuccoF. DallegriF. CarboneF. Impact of different ectopic fat depots on cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.J. Cell. Physiol.201923412216302164110.1002/jcp.2882131106419
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HagiwaraM. MiyajimaA. HasegawaM. JinzakiM. KikuchiE. NakagawaK. OyaM. Visceral obesity is a strong predictor of perioperative outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.BJU Int.201211011cE980E98410.1111/j.1464‑410X.2012.11274.x22642302
    [Google Scholar]
  28. IoffeE. HakimiA.A. OhS.K. AgalliuI. GinzburgN. WilliamsS.K. KaoL. RozenblitA.M. GhavamianR. Effect of visceral obesity on minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.Urology201382361261910.1016/j.urology.2013.04.05823987153
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ThielD.D. DavidiukA.J. MeschiaC. SerieD. CusterK. PetrouS.P. ParkerA.S. Mayo adhesive probability score is associated with localized renal cell carcinoma progression-free survival.Urology201689546210.1016/j.urology.2015.10.03426723183
    [Google Scholar]
  30. HuangH. ChenS. LiW. WuX. XingJ. High perirenal fat thickness predicts a poor progression-free survival in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Urol. Oncol.2018364157.e1157.e610.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.01129307598
    [Google Scholar]
  31. BernsteinA.P. FramE.B. SankinA. KovacE. SrivastavaA. DiVitoJ. SternJ.M. A comparison of perinephric fat surface area and Mayo Adhesive Probability score in predicting malignancy in T1 renal masses.Urol. Oncol.20183611499.e17499.e2210.1016/j.urolonc.2018.07.01830166240
    [Google Scholar]
  32. RibeiroR. MonteiroC. CatalánV. HuP. CunhaV. RodríguezA. Gómez-AmbrosiJ. FragaA. PríncipeP. LobatoC. LoboF. MoraisA. SilvaV. Sanches-MagalhãesJ. OliveiraJ. PinaF. LopesC. MedeirosR. FrühbeckG. Obesity and prostate cancer: Gene expression signature of human periprostatic adipose tissue.BMC Med.201210110810.1186/1741‑7015‑10‑10823009291
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SanchezA. FurbergH. KuoF. VuongL. GedY. PatilS. OstrovnayaI. PetruzellaS. ReisingA. PatelP. ManoR. ColemanJ. RussoP. LiuC.H. DannenbergA.J. ChanT.A. MotzerR. VossM.H. HakimiA.A. Transcriptomic signatures related to the obesity paradox in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A cohort study.Lancet Oncol.202021228329310.1016/S1470‑2045(19)30797‑131870811
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SørensenH.T. MellemkjærL. JepsenP. ThulstrupA.M. BaronJ. OlsenJ.H. VilstrupH. Risk of cancer in patients hospitalized with fatty liver: A Danish cohort study.J. Clin. Gastroenterol.200336435635910.1097/00004836‑200304000‑0001512642745
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WatanabeD. HoriguchiA. TasakiS. KurodaK. SatoA. AsakumaJ. ItoK. AsanoT. ShinmotoH. Clinical implication of ectopic liver lipid accumulation in renal cell carcinoma patients without visceral obesity.Sci. Rep.2017711279510.1038/s41598‑017‑13209‑228986556
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295913240514020603
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056295913240514020603
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test