Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Purpose

This study is to investigate the effectiveness of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) elastography in differentiating radiologically similar renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and oncocytoma in solid masses of the kidney.

Methods

The patients with solid renal mass histopathological diagnosed after excision or tru-cat biopsy who underwent a preoperative ARFI elastography of the lesion during a 4-year period were included in this study. Preoperative shear wave velocity (SWV) values were measured in all the lesions. SWV results of RCCs and oncocytomas were compared by an independent t-test, and cut-off, sensitivity and specificity values were calculated.

Results

Forty-two of the 60 patients included in the study were men (70%) and, 18 were women (30%), and the mean age was 59.7 ± 14 (27-94) years. Among 46 RCCs (76.6%), 23 and 14 oncocytomas, 5 (23.4%) were located in the right kidney (p:0.34722). Mean SWV values were found to be significantly higher in RCCs (2.87± 0.74 (0.96-4.14) m/s) than oncocytomas (1.83 ± 0.78 (0.80-3.76) m/s) (p <0.001). In the ROC analysis, a cut-off value of 2.29 m/s was found to havean 80.4% sensitivity and a 78.6% specificity for the discrimination of RCCs from oncocytomas.

Conclusion

ARFI elastography measurements may be useful in distinguishing RCC and oncocytomas that may have similar solid radiological imaging features.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056263924240126061957
2024-01-01
2025-07-09
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. JemalA. BrayF. CenterM.M. FerlayJ. WardE. FormanD. Global cancer statistics.CA Cancer J. Clin.2011612699010.3322/caac.2010721296855
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SilvermanS.G. IsraelG.M. HertsB.R. RichieJ.P. Management of the incidental renal mass.Radiology20082491163110.1148/radiol.249107078318796665
    [Google Scholar]
  3. StakhovskyiO. YapS.A. LeveridgeM. LawrentchukN. JewettM.A.S. Small renal mass: What the urologist needs to know for treatment planning and assessment of treatment results.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.201119661267127310.2214/AJR.10.633621606288
    [Google Scholar]
  4. IsraelG.M. SilvermanS.G. The incidental renal mass.Radiol. Clin. North Am.201149236938310.1016/j.rcl.2010.10.00721333783
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AbdessaterM. KanbarA. ComperatE. Dupont-AthenorA. AlechinskyL. MoutonM. SebeP. Renal oncocytoma: An algorithm for diagnosis and management.Urology202014317318010.1016/j.urology.2020.05.04732512107
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WobkerS.E. WilliamsonS.R. Modern pathologic diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.J. Kidney Cancer VHL20174411210.15586/jkcvhl.2017.9629090117
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YipS.K.H. TanP.H. ChengW.S. LiM.K. FooK.T. Surgical management of angiomyolipoma: Nephron-sparing surgery for symptomatic tumour.Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.2000341323510.1080/00365590075001685010757267
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WooS. ChoJ.Y. Imaging findings of common benign renal tumors in the era of small renal masses: differential diagnosis from small renal cell carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.Korean J. Radiol.20151619911310.3348/kjr.2015.16.1.9925598678
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LiuS. LeeS. RashidP. BangashH. HamidA. LauJ. CohenR. Active surveillance is suitable for intermediate term follow-up of renal oncocytoma diagnosed by percutaneous core biopsy.BJU Int.2016118S3Suppl. 3303410.1111/bju.1353827457972
    [Google Scholar]
  10. WobkerS.E. PrzybycinC.G. SircarK. EpsteinJ.I. Renal oncocytoma with vascular invasion: A series of 22 cases.Hum. Pathol.2016581610.1016/j.humpath.2016.07.02027498062
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WilliamsonS.R. Renal oncocytoma with perinephric fat invasion.Int. J. Surg. Pathol.201624762562610.1177/106689691664838227170678
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ZhaoW. TianB. WuC. PengY. WangH. GuW.L. GaoF.H. DOG1, cyclin D1, CK7, CD117 and vimentin are useful immunohistochemical markers in distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma.Pathol. Res. Pract.2015211430330710.1016/j.prp.2014.12.01425596994
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GillI.S. KavoussiL.R. LaneB.R. BluteM.L. BabineauD. ColomboJ.R.Jr FrankI. PermpongkosolS. WeightC.J. KaoukJ.H. KattanM.W. NovickA.C. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.J. Urol.20071781414610.1016/j.juro.2007.03.03817574056
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KutikovA. FossettL.K. RamchandaniP. TomaszewskiJ.E. SiegelmanE.S. BannerM.P. Van ArsdalenK.N. WeinA.J. MalkowiczS.B. Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging.Urology200668473774010.1016/j.urology.2006.04.01117070344
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ArdaK. CiledagN. AktasE. ArıbasB.K. KöseK. Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2011197353253610.2214/AJR.10.544921862792
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ClevertD.A. StockK. KleinB. Slotta-HuspeninaJ. PrantlL. HeemannU. ReiserM. Evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal tumors of unknown etiology in comparison to histological findings.Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc.2009431-29510710.3233/CH‑2009‑122419713604
    [Google Scholar]
  17. OzgokceM. YavuzA. AkbudakI. DurmazF. UneyI. AydinY. YildizH. BaturA. ArslanH. DundarI. Usability of transthoracic shear wave elastography in differentiation of subpleural solid masses.Ultrasound Q.201834423323710.1097/RUQ.000000000000037430169488
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ThomasA. DegenhardtF. FarrokhA. WojcinskiS. SlowinskiT. FischerT. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: Calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.Acad. Radiol.201017555856310.1016/j.acra.2009.12.00620171905
    [Google Scholar]
  19. CantisaniV. LodiseP. Di RoccoG. GrazhdaniH. GiannottiD. PatriziG. MedvedyevaE. OliveM. FioravantiC. GiacomelliL. ChiesaC. RedlerA. CatalanoC. D’AmbrosioF. RicciP. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of Quasistatic Ultrasound Elastography in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Ultraschall Med.201436216216710.1055/s‑0034‑136646724955842
    [Google Scholar]
  20. AnvariA. BarrR.G. DhyaniM. SamirA.E. Clinical application of sonoelastography in thyroid, prostate, kidney, pancreas, and deep venous thrombosis.Abdom. Imaging201540470972210.1007/s00261‑015‑0383‑225750099
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WaageJ. RafaelsenS. BorleyN. HavreR. GubberudE. LehS. KolbroT. HagenK. EideG. PfefferF. Strain elastography evaluation of rectal tumors: Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility.Ultraschall Med.201536661161710.1055/s‑0034‑139898525876223
    [Google Scholar]
  22. BaturA. YavuzA. OzgokceM. BoraA. BulutM.D. ArslanH. AlpaslanM. The utility of ultrasound elastography in differentiation of endometriomas and hemorrhagic ovarian cysts.J. Med. Ultrason.201643339540010.1007/s10396‑016‑0701‑526880060
    [Google Scholar]
  23. YavuzA. YokusA. TakenK. BaturA. OzgokceM. ArslanH. Reliability of testicular stiffness quantification using shear wave elastography in predicting male fertility: A preliminary prospective study.Med. Ultrason.201820214114710.11152/mu‑127829730678
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AydinS. YildizS. TurkmenI. SharifovR. UysalO. GucinZ. ArmaganA. KocakocE. Value of shear wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant renal lesions.Med. Ultrason.201811212610.11152/mu‑116129400363
    [Google Scholar]
  25. GöyaC. DaggulliM. HamidiC. YavuzA. HattapogluS. CetincakmakM.G. TekeM. The role of quantitative measurement by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in differentiating benign renal lesions from malignant renal tumours.Radiol. Med.2015120329630310.1007/s11547‑014‑0443‑725096889
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ZhangJ. Mazaheri TehraniY. WangL. IshillN.M. SchwartzL.H. HricakH. Renal masses: Characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging--a preliminary experience.Radiology2008247245846410.1148/radiol.247207082318430878
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HeidenreichA. RaveryV. European Society of Oncological Urology Preoperative imaging in renal cell cancer.World J. Urol.200422530731510.1007/s00345‑004‑0411‑215290202
    [Google Scholar]
  28. GerstS. HannL.E. LiD. GonenM. TickooS. SohnM.J. RussoP. Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Initial experience.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2011197489790610.2214/AJR.10.633021940577
    [Google Scholar]
  29. GaneshanD. NotohamiprodjoM. NikolaidisP. SanyalR. BhosaleP. Recent advances in cross-sectional renal imaging-an oncologic perspective: The current concepts and the future challenges.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.201337696297010.1097/RCT.000000000000003324270120
    [Google Scholar]
  30. DyerR. DiSantisD.J. McClennanB.L. Simplified imaging approach for evaluation of the solid renal mass in adults.Radiology2008247233134310.1148/radiol.247206184618310461
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LipnikA.J. BrownD.B. Technical and Clinical Considerations Image-guided percutaneous abdominal mass biopsy.Radiol. Clin. North Am.20155351049105910.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.00726321453
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pallwein-PrettnerL. FlöryD. RotterC.R. PognerK. SyréG. FellnerC. FrauscherF. AignerF. KrauseF.S. FellnerF. Assessment and characterisation of common renal masses with CT and MRI.Insights Imaging20112554355610.1007/s13244‑011‑0116‑122347975
    [Google Scholar]
  33. VikramR. NgC.S. TamboliP. TannirN.M. JonaschE. MatinS.F. WoodC.G. SandlerC.M. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: Radiologic-pathologic correlation and spectrum of disease.Radiographics200929374175410.1148/rg.29308519019448113
    [Google Scholar]
  34. FanY.H. ChangY.H. HuangW.J.S. ChungH.J. ChenK.K. Renal oncocytoma: Clinical experience of taipei veterans general hospital.J. Chin. Med. Assoc.200871525425810.1016/S1726‑4901(08)70116‑318490230
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Perez-OrdonezB. HamedG. CampbellS. ErlandsonR. RussoP. GaudinP. ReuterV. Renal oncocytoma: A clinicopathologic study of 70 cases.Am. J. Surg. Pathol.199721887188310.1097/00000478‑199708000‑000019255250
    [Google Scholar]
  36. NeuzilletY. LechevallierE. AndreM. DanielL. NahonO. CoulangeC. Follow-up of renal oncocytoma diagnosed by percutaneous tumor biopsy.Urology20056661181118510.1016/j.urology.2005.06.00116360437
    [Google Scholar]
  37. JohnsonN.B. JohnsonM.M. SeligM.K. NielsenG.P. Use of electron microscopy in core biopsy diagnosis of oncocytic renal tumors.Ultrastruct. Pathol.201034418919410.3109/0191312100372571320594037
    [Google Scholar]
  38. NevesJ.B. WithingtonJ. FowlerS. BexA. PatkiP. BarodR. MumtazF. O’BrienT. AitchisonM. TranM.G.B. Mp48-20 contemporary surgical management of renal oncocytoma: A nation’s outcome.J. Urol.20181994S10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1519
    [Google Scholar]
  39. TanS. ÖzcanM.F. TezcanF. BalcıS. KaraoğlanoğluM. HuddamB. ArslanH. Real-time elastography for distinguishing angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: Preliminary observations.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.20132004W369W37510.2214/AJR.12.913923521480
    [Google Scholar]
  40. OnurM.R. PoyrazA.K. BozgeyikZ. OnurA.R. OrhanI. Utility of semiquantitative strain elastography for differentiation between benign and malignant solid renal masses.J. Ultrasound Med.201534463964710.7863/ultra.34.4.63925792579
    [Google Scholar]
  41. FaheyB.J. NelsonR.C. BradwayD.P. HsuS.J. DumontD.M. TraheyG.E. In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography.Phys. Med. Biol.200853127929310.1088/0031‑9155/53/1/02018182703
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056263924240126061957
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056263924240126061957
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test