Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background:

To compare the integrity, clarity, conciseness, ., of the structured report (SR) free-text report (FTR) for computed tomography enterography of Crohn’s disease (CD).

Methods:

FTRs and SRs were generated for 30 patients with CD. The integrity, clarity, conciseness ., of SRs FTRs, were compared. In this study, an evidence-based medicine practice model was utilized on 92 CD patients based on SR in order to evaluate its clinical value. Then, the life quality of the patients in two groups was evaluated before and after three months of intervention using an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ).

Results:

SRs received higher ratings for satisfaction with integrity (median rating 4.27 . 3.75, P=0.008), clarity (median rating 4.20 . 3.43, P=0.003), conciseness (median rating 4.23 . 3.20, P=0.003), the possibility of contacting a radiologist to interpret (median rating 4.17 . 3.20, P<0.001), and overall clinical impact (median rating 4.23 . 3.27, P<0.001) than FTRs. Besides, research group had higher score of IBDQ intestinal symptom dimension (median score 61.13 . 58.02, P=0.003), IBDQ systemic symptom dimension (median score 24.48 . 20.67, P<0.001), IBDQ emotional capacity dimension (median score 65.65 . 61.74, P<0.001), IBDQ social ability dimension (median score 26.80 . 22.37, P<0.001), and total IBDQ score (median score 178.07 . 162.80, P<0.001) than control group.

Conclusion:

The SR of CTE in CD patients was conducive to improving the quality and readability of the report, and CD patients’ life quality could significantly improve after the intervention of an evidence-based medicine model based on SR.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258848240101055747
2024-01-10
2025-01-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIR-20-E15734056258848.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258848240101055747&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. HugotJ.P. DumayA. BarreauF. MeinzerU. Crohn’s Disease: Is the cold chain hypothesis still hot?J. Crohn’s Colitis202115467868610.1093/ecco‑jcc/jjaa19232949122
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SleimanJ. El OualiS. QaziT. CohenB. SteeleS.R. BakerM.E. RiederF. Prevention and treatment of stricturing crohn’s disease – perspectives and challenges.Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.202115440141110.1080/17474124.2021.185473233225766
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FeuersteinJ.D. CheifetzA.S. Crohn Disease: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.Mayo Clin. Proc.20179271088110310.1016/j.mayocp.2017.04.01028601423
    [Google Scholar]
  4. European Society of Radiology (ESR)Medical imaging in personalised medicine: A white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).Insights Imaging20156214115510.1007/s13244‑015‑0394‑025763994
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FengQ. XuX.T. ZhouY. YanY.Q. RanZ.H. ZhuJ. Creeping fat in patients with ileo-colonic Crohn’s disease correlates with disease activity and severity of inflammation: A preliminary study using energy spectral computed tomography.J. Dig. Dis.201819847548410.1111/1751‑2980.1265230062772
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChengJ. XieH. YangH. WangK. XuG. WuG. Computed tomography enterography: Quantitative evaluation on crohn’s disease activity.Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.20182018735193630140280
    [Google Scholar]
  7. IsikA. SoyturkM. SüleymanS. FiratD. PekerK. Yilmazİ. CelebiF. Correlation of bowel wall thickening seen using computerized tomography with colonoscopies: A preliminary study.Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech.201727315415710.1097/SLE.000000000000038928291060
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SinitsynV.E. KomarovaM.A. MershinaE.A. [Radiology report: past, present and future].Vestn. Rentgenol. Radiol.201433540[Radiology report: past, present and future].25782296
    [Google Scholar]
  9. European Society of Radiology (ESR)ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology.Insights Imaging2018911710.1007/s13244‑017‑0588‑829460129
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DimarcoM. CannellaR. PellegrinoS. IadicolaD. TutinoR. AllegraF. CastiglioneD. SalvaggioG. MidiriM. BrancatelliG. VernuccioF. Impact of structured report on the quality of preoperative CT staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Assessment of intra- and inter-reader variability.Abdom. Radiol. (N.Y.)202045243744810.1007/s00261‑019‑02287‑731686180
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NörenbergD. SommerW.H. ThaslerW. D’HaeseJ. RentschM. KolbenT. SchreyerA. RistC. ReiserM. ArmbrusterM. Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer.Invest. Radiol.201752423223910.1097/RLI.000000000000033627861230
    [Google Scholar]
  12. JohnsonA.J. ChenM.Y.M. ZapadkaM.E. LydersE.M. LittenbergB. Radiology report clarity: A cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation.J. Am. Coll. Radiol.20107750150610.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.00820630384
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RochaD.M. BrasilL.M. LamasJ.M. LuzG.V.S. BacelarS.S. Evidence of the benefits, advantages and potentialities of the structured radiological report: An integrative review.Artif. Intell. Med.202010210177010.1016/j.artmed.2019.10177031980107
    [Google Scholar]
  14. BarbosaF. MacielL.M.Z. VieiraE.M. de Azevedo MarquesP.M. EliasJ.Jr MugliaV.F. Radiological reports: A comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports.Clinics2010651152110.1590/S1807‑5932201000010000420126341
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SabelB.O. PlumJ.L. KneidingerN. LeuschnerG. KoletzkoL. RaziorrouhB. SchinnerR. KunzW.G. SchoeppeF. ThierfelderK.M. SommerW.H. MeinelF.G. Structured reporting of CT examinations in acute pulmonary embolism.J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.201711318819510.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.00828259629
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FaggioniL. CoppolaF. FerrariR. NeriE. ReggeD. Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: Results from an Italian online survey.Eur. Radiol.20172751934194310.1007/s00330‑016‑4553‑627572812
    [Google Scholar]
  17. StraksyteV. KiudelisG. GineikieneI. JanciauskasD. BaseviciusA. LukoseviciusS. KupcinskasL. Index for Assessment of Crohn's Disease: Correlation with the quality of life, endoscopic disease activity.Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity and C- Reactive Protein. Open medicine201914785791
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TorresJ. MehandruS. ColombelJ.F. Peyrin-BirouletL. Crohn’s disease.Lancet2017389100801741175510.1016/S0140‑6736(16)31711‑127914655
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LoftusE.V.Jr Crohn’s Disease: Etiology, complications, assessment, therapy, and management.Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am.2017463xiiixv10.1016/j.gtc.2017.06.00128838422
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WetterauerC. WinkelD.J. Federer-GsponerJ.R. LeboutteF. HornT. SchnyderP. DugasS.G. ZahitiL. EngesserC. HallaA. SeifertH.H. BollD.T. EbbingJ. Novices in MRI-targeted prostate biopsy benefit from structured reporting of MRI findings.World J. Urol.20203871729173410.1007/s00345‑019‑02953‑x31522235
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GassenmaierS. ArmbrusterM. HaastersF. HelfenT. HenzlerT. AlibekS. PförringerD. SommerW.H. SommerN.N. Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder – improvement of report quality?Eur. Radiol.201727104110411910.1007/s00330‑017‑4778‑z28289942
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ParkS.B. KimM.J. KoY. SimJ.Y. KimH.J. LeeK.H. LOCAT Group Structured reporting versus free-text reporting for appendiceal computed tomography in adolescents and young adults: preference survey of 594 referring physicians, surgeons, and radiologists from 20 hospitals.Korean J. Radiol.201920224625510.3348/kjr.2018.010930672164
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SpiroJ.E. CeelenF. KneidingerN. SommerW.H. SchinnerR. DinkelJ. HesseN. Structured reporting of computed tomography examinations in post–lung transplantation patients.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.202145695996310.1097/RCT.000000000000120934347712
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PysarenkoK. RechtM. KimD. Structured Reporting: A tool to improve reimbursement.J. Am. Coll. Radiol.201714566266410.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.01628027857
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LarsonD.B. Strategies for implementing a standardized structured radiology reporting program.Radiographics20183861705171610.1148/rg.201818004030303804
    [Google Scholar]
  26. BolandG.W. EnzmannD.R. DuszakR.Jr Actionable reporting.J. Am. Coll. Radiol.201411984484510.1016/j.jacr.2014.06.00225096482
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MagnettaM.J. DonovanA.L. JacobsB.L. DaviesB.J. FurlanA. Evidence-based reporting: A method to optimize prostate mri communications with referring physicians.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2018210110811210.2214/AJR.17.1826029091009
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WangX. ZhangM. FuP. SunB. B.Evidence-based medicine combined with rehabilitation training in the treatment of kee osteoarthritis in menopausal women.Journal of HARBIN medical university20175114
    [Google Scholar]
  29. AngeloL.B. Shared decision-making for vaccines.J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. (Wash. D.C.)2020606e55e5910.1016/j.japh.2020.05.01032586718
    [Google Scholar]
  30. BergH. BjornestadJ. VåpenstadE.V. DavidsonL. BinderP.E. Therapist self-disclosure and the problem of shared-decision making.J. Eval. Clin. Pract.202026239740210.1111/jep.1328931709720
    [Google Scholar]
  31. FornerD. NoelC.W. ShumanA.G. HongP. CorstenM. RacV.E. PieterseA.H. GoldsteinD. Shared Decision-making in Head and Neck Surgery.JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.2020146983984410.1001/jamaoto.2020.160132701131
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SaibilF. LaiE. HaywardA. YipJ. GilbertC. Self-management for people with inflammatory bowel disease.Canadian J. Gastroenterol2008223281287
    [Google Scholar]
  33. KashaniF. AbazariP. HaghaniF. The components of diabetes educator’s competence in diabetes self-management education in Iran: A qualitative study.J. Educ. Health Promot.20211011134084858
    [Google Scholar]
  34. MarklundS. TistadM. LundellS. ÖstrandL. SörlinA. BoströmC. WadellK. NybergA. Experiences and factors affecting usage of an ehealth tool for self-management among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Qualitative study.J. Med. Internet Res.2021234e2567210.2196/2567233929327
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ValdezR.S. LunsfordC. BaeJ. LetzkusL.C. Keim-MalpassJ. Self-management characterization for families of children with medical complexity and their social networks: Protocol for a qualitative assessment.JMIR Res. Protoc.202091e1481010.2196/1481032012094
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258848240101055747
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258848240101055747
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary file Structured reporting template of computed tomography enterography for patients with crohn's disease (Part).

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test