Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Dentistry
  4. Volume 2, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-579X
  • E-ISSN: 2542-5803

Abstract

Cast metal posts-and-core are frequently used to retain restorations to extensively destroyed teeth. However, the influence of different cements on the posts bond strength to dentin remains unclear. Objective: to evaluate the effect of different cements on the bond strength of cast metal posts and dentin.

Forty roots (14 mm length) of extracted human teeth were endodontically treated and prepared. Impressions of each root canal were taken to obtain customized cast metal posts. The roots were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10): (1) ZP: zinc phosphate cement (non adhesive); (2) ARC_Sin: Single Bond adhesive and RelyX ARC; (3) ARC_Sco: Scotchbond adhesive and RelyX ARC; (4) U200: RelyX U200. After cementation, the samples were cross-sectioned to obtain specimens of 1mm thickness. Push-out test was performed applying a compressive load (0.5 mm/min) to the center of the metal post until failure. Bond strength was calculated based on the diameter of the root canal and the thickness of each specimen. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey (α=0.05). The fracture mode was analyzed.

Bond strength values were statistically similar between the groups (p>0.05). The fracture analysis showed the prevalence of mixed fractures (cement partially attached to the dentin and/or post). Experimental groups showed inexpressive amount of adhesive fractures (complete detachment of the cement from dentin and/or post). The ARC_Sco and U200 groups presented higher prevalence of dentin cohesive fracture.

Bonding had no influence on the immediate bond strength between cast metal posts and root canal dentin.

©2020 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
2020-07-02
2025-01-30

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SorensenJ.A. Preservation of tooth structure.J. Calif. Dent. Assoc.198816111522 2478673
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AggarwalV. SinglaM. YadavS. YadavH. SharmaV. BhasinS.S. The effect of ferrule presence and type of dowel on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with metal-ceramic crowns.J. Conserv. Dent.201417218318710.4103/0972‑0707.128053 24778519
     [Google Scholar]
  3. NaumannM. BlankensteinF. KiesslingS. DietrichT. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observational clinical study.Eur. J. Oral Sci.2005113651952410.1111/j.1600‑0722.2005.00257.x 16324143
     [Google Scholar]
  4. NaumannM. BlankensteinF. DietrichT. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study.J. Dent.200533430531210.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.005 15781138
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BitterK. NoetzelJ. StammO. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months.J. Endod.200935111477148210.1016/j.joen.2009.07.026 19840634
     [Google Scholar]
  6. CarliniB.Jr CecchinD. PereiraG.D. PaulilloL.A. Influence of remaining coronal structure and finish line on the fracture strength of roots restored with metallic posts.Braz. Oral Res.201125434535010.1590/S1806‑83242011000400011 21860923
     [Google Scholar]
  7. CloetE. DebelsE. NaertI. Controlled Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Glass Fiber Composite Cores Versus Wrought Posts and Cast Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.Int. J. Prosthodont.2017301717910.11607/ijp.4861 28085986
     [Google Scholar]
  8. de MoraesA.P. Poletto NetoV. BoscatoN. Pereira-CenciT. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of impression technique on the fabrication of cast metal posts.J. Prosthet. Dent.20161161475110.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.022 26868965
     [Google Scholar]
  9. FerrariM. Ferrari CagidiacoE. GoracciC. Posterior partial crowns out of lithium disilicate (LS2) with or without posts: A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial with a 3-year follow up.J. Dent.201983121710.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.004 30716452
     [Google Scholar]
  10. FigueiredoF.E. Martins-FilhoP.R. Faria-E-SilvaA.L. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Endod.201541330931610.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006 25459568
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GarciaP.P. WambierL.M. de GeusJ.L. da CunhaL.F. CorrerG.M. GonzagaC.C. Do anterior and posterior teeth treated with post-and-core restorations have similar failure rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Pros Dent20191216887894
     [Google Scholar]
  12. NaumannM. SterzenbacG. AlexandraF. DietrichT. Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: preliminary results after up to 3 years.Int. J. Prosthodont.2007205499503 17944340
     [Google Scholar]
  13. SterzenbachG. FrankeA. NaumannM. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss.J. Endod.201238121557156310.1016/j.joen.2012.08.015 23146637
     [Google Scholar]
  14. WangX. ShuX. ZhangY. YangB. JianY. ZhaoK. Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quintessence Int.2019501820 30600326
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ZicariF. Van MeerbeekB. DebelsE. LesaffreE. NaertI. An up to 3-Year Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Outcome of Glass Fiber Posts and Composite Cores with Gold Alloy-Based Posts and Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.Int. J. Prosthodont.2011244363372 21716975
     [Google Scholar]
  16. FerrariM. VichiA. García-GodoyF. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores.Am. J. Dent.200013Spec No15B18B 11763866
     [Google Scholar]
  17. SoaresC.J. ValdiviaA.D. da SilvaG.R. SantanaF.R. Menezes MdeS. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: a literature review.Braz. Dent. J.201223213574010.1590/S0103‑64402012000200008 22666771
     [Google Scholar]
  18. JiangkongkhoP. KamonkhantikulK. TakahashiH. ArksornnukitM. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using fiber post with an elastic modulus similar to dentin.Dent. Mater. J.201332578178610.4012/dmj.2013‑052 24088834
     [Google Scholar]
  19. RadovicI CorciolaniG MagniE KrstanovicG PavlovicV VulicevicZR Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2009; 25(7): 837-44. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.004
     [Google Scholar]
  20. RadovicI. MazzitelliC. ChieffiN. FerrariM. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches.Eur. J. Oral Sci.2008116655756310.1111/j.1600‑0722.2008.00577.x 19049527
     [Google Scholar]
  21. TeshigawaraD. InoT. OtsukaH. IsogaiT. FujisawaM. Influence of elastic modulus mismatch between dentin and post-and-core on sequential bonding failure.J. Prosthodont. Res.201963222723110.1016/j.jpor.2018.12.003 30651211
     [Google Scholar]
  22. OnaM. WakabayashiN. YamazakiT. TakaichiA. IgarashiY. The influence of elastic modulus mismatch between tooth and post and core restorations on root fracture.Int. Endod. J.2013461475210.1111/j.1365‑2591.2012.02092.x 22775227
     [Google Scholar]
  23. SathornC. PalamaraJ.E. PalamaraD. MesserH.H. Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis.J. Endod.200531428829210.1097/01.don.0000140579.17573.f7 15793386
     [Google Scholar]
  24. TürkerS.A. ÖzçelikB. YilmazZ. Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Fracture Resistance of Different Post Systems.J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.2015161078879310.5005/jp‑journals‑10024‑1758 26581458
     [Google Scholar]
  25. HillE.E. LottJ. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials.Aust. Dent. J.201156Suppl. 1677610.1111/j.1834‑7819.2010.01297.x 21564117
     [Google Scholar]
  26. AlenziA. SamranA. SamranA. Restoration Strategies of Endodontically Treated Teeth among Dental Practitioners in Saudi Arabia. A Nationwide Pilot Survey.Dent J (Basel)201863 E4410.3390/dj6030044 30177593
     [Google Scholar]
  27. KrunićN. The significance of the size and type of surface of prepared teeth for retention of permanent dentures fixed with zinc-phosphate cement.Stomatologia (Mosk.)20038265254 14671594
     [Google Scholar]
  28. FakihaZ. Al-AujanA. Al-ShamraniS. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques.J. Prosthodont.20011013741
     [Google Scholar]
  29. VargasJ.W. LiewehrF.R. JoyceA.P. RunnerR.R. A comparison of the in vitro retentive strength of glass-ionomer cement, zinc-phosphate cement, and mineral trioxide aggregate for the retention of prefabricated posts in bovine incisors.J. Endod.2004301177577710.1097/00004770‑200411000‑00006 15505508
     [Google Scholar]
  30. WassellR.W. BarkerD. SteeleJ.G. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: try-in and cementation of crowns.Br. Dent. J.20021931172010.1038/sj.bdj.4801473
     [Google Scholar]
  31. AxelssonB. The solubility of dental zinc phosphate cements.Odontol. Revy196516131134 14308501
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WilsonA.D. AbelG. LewisB.G. The ‘solubility and disintegration’ test for zinc phosphate dental cements: the use of small specimens.J. Dent.197641283210.1016/0300‑5712(76)90067‑1 1063140
     [Google Scholar]
  33. WilsonA.D. AbelG. LewisB.G. The solubility and disintegration test for zinc phosphate dental cements. A chemical study.Br. Dent. J.1974137831331710.1038/sj.bdj.4803314 4531342
     [Google Scholar]
  34. FaridF. MahgoliH. HosseiniA. ChiniforushN. Effect of eugenol-containing and resin endodontic sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts cemented with zinc phosphate and resin cements.J. Prosthodont. Res.201357428428710.1016/j.jpor.2013.08.002 24095644
     [Google Scholar]
  35. StrefezzaC. AmaralM.M. QuintoJ.Jr Gouw-SoaresS.C. ZamataroC.B. ZezellD.M. Effect of 830 nm Diode Laser Irradiation of Root Canal on Bond Strength of Metal and Fiber Post.Photomed. Laser Surg.201836843944410.1089/pho.2017.4378 29768091
     [Google Scholar]
  36. De SouzaG. BragaR.R. CesarP.F. LopesG.C. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review.J. Appl. Oral Sci.201523435836810.1590/1678‑775720140524
     [Google Scholar]
  37. RadovicI. MonticelliF. GoracciC. VulicevicZ.R. FerrariM. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review.J. Adhes. Dent.2008104251258 18792695
     [Google Scholar]
  38. WeiserF. BehrM. Self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical review.J. Prosthodont.201524210010810.1111/jopr.12192
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Barbosa De SouzaF. Sinclér DelfinoC. Lacalle TurbinoM. BrazR. Deproteinized dentin: a favorable substrate to self-bonding resin cements?J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.201198238739410.1002/jbm.b.31863 21648064
     [Google Scholar]
  40. ChenL. LeiH.Y. XuG.F. LiangX.P. LiJ.J. Bonding interfaces of three kinds of cements and root canal dentin: A scanning electron microscope observation.Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi2010282132134
     [Google Scholar]
  41. El-BadrawyW. HafezR.M. El NagaA.I. AhmedD.R. Nanoleakage for Self-Adhesive Resin Cements used in Bonding CAD/CAD Ceramic Material to Dentin.Eur. J. Dent.20115328129010.1055/s‑0039‑1698893 21769269
     [Google Scholar]
  42. HitzT. StawarczykB. FischerJ. HammerleC.H. SailerI. Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength.Dent. Mater.2012281111831190
     [Google Scholar]
  43. KenshimaS. FrancciC. ReisA. LoguercioA.D. FilhoL.E. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer.J. Dent.2006341077578310.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.001 16621219
     [Google Scholar]
  44. MazzitelliC. MonticelliF. ToledanoM. FerrariM. OsorioR. Dentin treatment effects on the bonding performance of self-adhesive resin cements.Eur. J. Oral Sci.20101181808610.1111/j.1600‑0722.2009.00703.x 20156269
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Barszczewska-RybarekI. ChladekG. Studies on the Curing Efficiency and Mechanical Properties of Bis-GMA and TEGDMA Nanocomposites Containing Silver Nanoparticles.Int. J. Mol. Sci.20181912 E393710.3390/ijms19123937 30544584
     [Google Scholar]
  46. GopalS. IrodiS. MehtaD. SubramanyaS. GovindarajuV.K. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots Restored with Fiber Posts Using Different Resin Cements- An In-vitro Study.J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2017112ZC52ZC5510.7860/JCDR/2017/21167.9387 28384981
     [Google Scholar]
  47. YousryM.M. Effect of re-etching oxalate-occluded dentin and enamel on bonding effectiveness of etch-and-rinse adhesives.J. Adhes. Dent.20121413138 22282758
     [Google Scholar]
  48. RodriguesR.F. RamosC.M. FrancisconiP.A. BorgesA.F. The shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and enamel: an in vitro study.J. Prosthet. Dent.2015113322022710.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.008 25444282
     [Google Scholar]
  49. BitterK. Meyer-LückelH. PriehnK. MartusP. KielbassaA.M. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts.Am. J. Dent.2006193138142 16838475
     [Google Scholar]
  50. PerdigãoJ. New developments in dental adhesion.Dent. Clin. North Am.200751233335710.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001 17532916
     [Google Scholar]
  51. HirabayashiS. YoshidaE. HayakawaT. SEM analysis of microstructure of adhesive interface between resin cement and dentin treated with self-etching primer.Dent. Mater. J.201130452853610.4012/dmj.2010‑197 21778607
     [Google Scholar]
  52. KukletováM. HalackováZ. HorkýD. MatousekA. GojisováE. CihlárJ. Comparison of dentine-resin interface in total-etch and self-etching adhesives using electron microscopy.Prague Med. Rep.20071084358367 18780648
     [Google Scholar]
  53. LiaoZ.Q. OuyangY. YangJ.Z. Nanoleakage at the resin-dental interface of four self-etching adhesives.Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi2011469554557
     [Google Scholar]
  54. TeixeiraC.S. ChainM.C. Evaluation of shear bond strength between self-etching adhesive systems and dentin and analysis of the resin-dentin interface.Gen. Dent.2010582e52e61 20236904
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ToriiY. ItouK. HikasaR. IwataS. NishitaniY. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system.J. Oral Rehabil.200229652853310.1046/j.1365‑2842.2002.00855.x 12071920
     [Google Scholar]
  56. WaldmanG.L. VaidyanathanT.K. VaidyanathanJ. Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems.Open Dent. J.2008212012510.2174/1874210600802010120 19444319
     [Google Scholar]
  57. WalkerM.P. WangY. SpencerP. Morphological and chemical characterization of the dentin/resin cement interface produced with a self-etching primer.J. Adhes. Dent.200243181189 12666753
     [Google Scholar]
  58. ZicariF. CouthinoE. De MunckJ. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post.Dent Mates200824796797710.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011
     [Google Scholar]
  59. MazzoniA. MarchesiG. CadenaroM. Push-out stress for fibre posts luted using different adhesive strategies.Eur. J. Oral Sci.2009117444745310.1111/j.1600‑0722.2009.00656.x 19627358
     [Google Scholar]
  60. BlumerL SchmidliF WeigerR FischerJ. A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2015; 31(7): 855-63.10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.015
     [Google Scholar]
  61. DalepraneB. PereiraC.N. BuenoA.C. FerreiraR.C. MoreiraA.N. MagalhãesC.S. Bond strength of fiber posts to the root canal: Effects of anatomic root levels and resin cements.J. Prosthet. Dent.2016116341642410.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.030 27086107
     [Google Scholar]
  62. AlmoharebT. Sealing Ability of Esthetic Post and Core Systems.J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.201718762763210.5005/jp‑journals‑10024‑2096 28713120
     [Google Scholar]
  63. BrondaniL.P. Pereira-CenciT. WandsherV.F. PereiraG.K. ValandroL.F. BergoliC.D. Longevity of metal-ceramic crowns cemented with self-adhesive resin cement: a prospective clinical study.Braz. Oral Res.201731 e2210.1590/1807‑3107bor‑2017.vol31.0022 28403329
     [Google Scholar]
  64. CecchinD. FarinaA.P. SouzaM.A. Carlini-JúniorB. FerrazC.C. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cements.Int. Endod. J.201144431432010.1111/j.1365‑2591.2010.01831.x 21219360
     [Google Scholar]
  65. BitterK. ParisS. PfuertnerC. NeumannK. KielbassaA.M. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin.Eur. J. Oral Sci.2009117332633310.1111/j.1600‑0722.2009.00623.x 19583763
     [Google Scholar]
  66. MakishiP. ShimadaY. SadrA. WeiS. IchinoseS. TagamiJ. Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface.J. Adhes. Dent.2010125393401 20157654
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ModaM.D. FagundesT.C. BrisoA.L.F. Dos SantosP.H. Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro.PLoS One20181311 e020802410.1371/journal.pone.0208024 30475892
     [Google Scholar]
  68. SouzaN.C. MarcondesM.L. BredaR.V. WeberJ.B. MotaE.G. SpohrA.M. Relined fiberglass post: an ex vivo study of the resin cement thickness and dentin-resin interface.Braz. Oral Res.2016301S18068324201600010027410.1590/1807‑3107BOR‑2016.vol30.0077 27556553
     [Google Scholar]
  69. PerdigaoJ. MonteiroP. GomesG. SantosV. Restoring teeth with prefabricated fiber-reinforced resin posts.Northwest Dent.20098821617
     [Google Scholar]
  70. PerdigãoJ. MonteiroP. GomesG. SantosV. Restoring teeth with prefabricated fiber-reinforced resin posts.Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent.2007196359364 17821941
     [Google Scholar]
  71. SterzenbachG. KarajouliG. NaumannM. PerozI. BitterK. Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements-an evaluation of different adhesive approaches.Acta Odontol. Scand.201270536837610.3109/00016357.2011.603702 21815838
     [Google Scholar]
  72. BitterK. GläserC. NeumannK. BlunckU. FrankenbergerR. Analysis of resin-dentin interface morphology and bond strength evaluation of core materials for one stage post-endodontic restorations.PLoS One201492 e8629410.1371/journal.pone.0086294 24586248
     [Google Scholar]
  73. BuenoC.E. PelegrineR.A. SilveiraC.F. The impact of endodontic irrigating solutions on the push-out shear bond strength of glass fiber posts luted with resin cements.Gen. Dent.20166412630 26742163
     [Google Scholar]
  74. DiasL.L. GiovaniA.R. Silva SousaY.T. VansanL.P. AlfredoE. Sousa-NetoM.D. Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods.J. Appl. Oral Sci.200917657958310.1590/S1678‑77572009000600008
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Al-AliK. Effect of eugenol-based root canal sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts luted with resin cement.Saudi Dent. J.2009212697310.1016/j.sdentj.2009.07.003 23960462
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
Loading
Zinc Phosphate and Resin Cements Provide Similar Bonding of Cast Metal Post to Dentin
Curr. Dentistry 2, 70 (2020); https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Cast post and core; dental cements; dentine; prosthodontics; push-out bond strength; resin composite cements

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test