Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Dentistry
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-579X
  • E-ISSN: 2542-5803

Abstract

The final goal of color measurement or shade specification in dentistry is the reproduction by prosthetic materials of all important appearance characteristics of natural oral structures. The application of color science in dentistry is an objective way to measure and evaluate such structures and dental materials in clinical practice and dental research.

Literature on color science was reviewed to present new metrics to evaluate color differences of dental materials and dental structures. Visual acceptability and perceptibility values of color differences are reviewed and new whiteness indexes to describe whiteness in dentistry are presented.

In the last decade, the CIELAB 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were set to 1.2 and 2.7, respectively, and the CIEDE2000 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were set to 0.8 and 1.8 The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula became increasingly popular in dentistry. Developments in color science have led to the description of tooth whiteness and changes in tooth whiteness based on whiteness indexes, with the most relevant being the whiteness index, which is a customized index based in CIELAB color space.

The application of color science in dentistry has allowed the precise description of tooth color and whiteness. The revised and new CIEDE2000 color-difference formula is expected to fully replace the outdated CIELAB formula in almost all dental applications. Recent psychophysical studies have reported values of visual thresholds and new whiteness indexes, which can serve as quality control tools to guide the selection of esthetic dental materials, evaluate clinical performance, and interpret visual and instrumental findings in clinical dentistry, dental research, and subsequent standardization.

© Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180719125137
2019-05-01
2024-11-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180719125137
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. JohnstonW.M. Color measurement in dentistry.J. Dent.200937Suppl. 1e2e6
     [Google Scholar]
  2. JoinerA. LuoW. Tooth colour and whiteness: A review.J. Dent.201767Suppl. 1S3S10
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BrookA.H. SmithR.N. LathD.J. The clinical measurement of tooth colour and stain.Int. Dent. J.2007575324330
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ChenH. HuangJ. DongX. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching.Quintessence Int.2012438649659
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ChuS.J. TrushkowskyR.D. ParavinaR.D. Dental color matching instrumentals and systems.Rev Clin Res Aspects J Dent201038Suppl. 2e2e16
     [Google Scholar]
  6. International Organization for StandardizationISO/TR 28642: 2016. Technical Report(E): Dentistry - Guidance on colour measurements.ISO Geneva2016
     [Google Scholar]
  7. WyszeckiG. StilesW.S. Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae.2nd edNew YorkWiley1982
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. CIE Technical Report: Colorimetry. CIE Pub No. 15.3. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. JoinerA. HopkinsonI. DengY. A review of toothcolour and whiteness.J. Dent.200836Suppl. 1S2S7
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ClarkeF.J.J. McDonaldR. RiggB. Modification to the JPC79 color difference formula.J. Soc. Dyers Colour.19841004128132
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. CIE Technical Report: Industrial color-difference evaluation. CIE Pub No. 116. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau; 1995
  12. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. CIE Technical Report: Improvement to industrial color difference equation. CIE Pub No. 142. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau; 2001.
  13. LuoM.R. CuiG. RiggB. The development of the CIE 2000 color difference formula: CIEDE2000.Color Res. Appl.2001265340350
     [Google Scholar]
  14. SharmaG. WuW. DalalE.N. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations.Color Res. Appl.20053012130
     [Google Scholar]
  15. PérezM.M. SalehA. YebraA. Study of the variation between CIELAB delta E* and CIEDE2000 color-differences of resin composites.Dent. Mater. J.20072612128
     [Google Scholar]
  16. LeeY.K. Comparison of CIELAB DeltaE(*) and CIEDE2000 color differences after polymerization and thermo-cycling of resin composites.Dent. Mater.2005217678682
     [Google Scholar]
  17. KimS.H. LeeY.K. LimB.S. Influence of porcine liver esterase on the color of dental resin composites by CIEDE2000 system.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.2005722276283
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ParavinaR.D. KimuraM. PowersJ.M. Evaluation of polymerization-dependent changes in color and translucency of resin composites using two formulae.Odontology20059314651
     [Google Scholar]
  19. XuB.T. ZhangB. KangY. Applicability of CIELAB/ CIEDE2000 formula in visual color assessments of metal ceramic restorations.J. Dent.201240Suppl. 1e3e9
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gómez-PoloC. Portillo MuñozA. Lorenzo-LuengoM.C. Comparison of two color-difference formulas using the Bland-Altman approach based on natural tooth color space.J. Prosthet. Dent.20161154482488
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gómez-PoloC. Portillo MuñozA. Lorenzo-LuengoM.C. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.J. Prosthet. Dent.201611516570
     [Google Scholar]
  22. PechoO.E. GhineaR. AlessandrettiR. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.Dent. Mater.20163218289
     [Google Scholar]
  23. PechoO.E. GhineaR. PerezM.M. Influence of gender on visual shade matching in dentistry.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2017292E15E23
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gómez-PoloC MonteroJ Gómez PoloM Comparison of the CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas on gingival color space. J Prosthodont 2017; (in press) doi: 10.1111/jopr. 12717: [Epub ahead of print].
  25. OlmsC. SetzJ.M. The repeatability of digital shade measurement a clinical study.Clin. Oral Investig.201317411611166
     [Google Scholar]
  26. GuerraF. MazurM. CorridoreD. Evaluation of the esthetic properties of developmental defects of enamel: A spectrophotometric clinical study.Sci. World J.201587823519
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ElaminH.O. AbubakrN.H. IbrahimY.E. Identifying the tooth shade in group of patients using Vita Easyshade.Eur. J. Dent.201592213217
     [Google Scholar]
  28. ChuS.J. Use of a reflectance spectrophotometer in evaluating shade change resulting from tooth-whitening products.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.200315Suppl. S1S42S48
     [Google Scholar]
  29. RaoufiS. BirkhedD. Effect of whitening toothpastes on tooth staining using two different colour-measuring devices. A 12-week clinical trial.Int. Dent. J.2010606419423
     [Google Scholar]
  30. TabatabaianF. MotamediE. SahabiM. TorabzadehH. NamdariM. Effect of thickness of monolithic zirconia ceramic on final color.J. Prosthet. Dent.20181202257262
     [Google Scholar]
  31. HerreraL.J. PulgarR. SantanaJ. Prediction of color change tooth bleaching using fuzzy logic for vita classical shades.Appl. Opt.2010493422429
     [Google Scholar]
  32. GregoriusW.C. KattadiyilM.T. GoodacreC.J. Effects of ageing and staining on color of acrylic resin denture teeth.J. Dent.201240Suppl. 2e47e54
     [Google Scholar]
  33. PérezM.M. GhineaR. Ugarte-AlvánL.I. Color and translucency in silorane-based resin composite compared to universal and nanofilled composites.J. Dent.201038Suppl. 2e110e116
     [Google Scholar]
  34. JohnstonW.M. MaT. KienleB.H. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses.Int. J. Prosthodont.1995817986
     [Google Scholar]
  35. JohnstonW.M. Review of translucency determinations and applications to dental materials.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2014264217223
     [Google Scholar]
  36. ZhaoM. SunY. ZhangJ. Novel translucent and strong submicron alumina ceramics for dental restorations.J. Dent. Res.2018973289295
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Della BonaA. NogueiraA.D. PechoO.E. Optical properties of CAD–CAM ceramic systems.J. Dent.201442912021209
     [Google Scholar]
  38. PechoOE GhineaR IonescuAM Color and translucency of zirconia ceramics, human dentine and bovine dentine. J Dent 2012; 40(S): e34-40.
  39. PechoO.E. PérezM.M. GhineaR. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.Dent. Mater.2016321113621373
     [Google Scholar]
  40. SubasiM.G. AlpG. JohnstonW.M. Effect of thickness on optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics.J. Dent.2018 in press10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.010
     [Google Scholar]
  41. MarchionattiA.M. WandscherW.F. MayM.M. Color stability of ceramic laminate veneers cemented with light-polymerizing and dual-polymerizing agent: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.J. Prosthet. Dent.20171185604610
     [Google Scholar]
  42. KimH.K. KimS.H. Comparison of the optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics sintered in a conventional furnace versus a microwave oven.J. Adv. Prosthodont.201795394401
     [Google Scholar]
  43. LawsonN.C. BurgessJ.O. Gloss and resistance of ceramic-polymer CAD/CAM restorative blocks.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.201628Suppl. 1S40S45
     [Google Scholar]
  44. AcarO. YilmazB. AltintasS.H. Color stain ability of CAD/CAD and nanocomposite resin materials.J. Prosthet. Dent.201611517175
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Della BonaA. PechoO.E. GhineaR. Color parameters and shade correspondence of CAD-CAM ceramic systems.J. Dent.2015436726734
     [Google Scholar]
  46. LagoM. MozzaquatroL.R. RodriguesC. Influence of bleaching agents on color and translucency of aged resin composites.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2017295368377
     [Google Scholar]
  47. de OliveiraD.C. AyresA.P. RochaM.G. Effect of different in vitro aging methods on color stability of dental resin-based composite using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color-difference formulas.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2015275322330
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Alberton Da SilvaV. Alberton Da SilvaS. PechoO.E. Influence of composite type and light irradiance on color stability after immersion in different beverages.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.in press10.4931111/jerd.12383
     [Google Scholar]
  49. MazurM. WestlandS. GuerraF. Objective and subjective aesthetic performance of icon® treatment for enamel hypomineralization lesions in young adolescents: A retrospective single center study.J. Dent.2018681104108
     [Google Scholar]
  50. MourouzisP. KoulaouzidouE. PalaghiasG. Color match of resin composites to intact tooth structure.J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater.2015133e259e265
     [Google Scholar]
  51. AmerR.S. ChandrasekaranI. JohnstonW.M. Illuminant effect on the coverage error of a gingiva-colored composite resin shade guide.J. Prosthet. Dent.20161165770776
     [Google Scholar]
  52. CookW.D. ChongM.P. Colour stability and visual perception of dimethacrylate based dental composite resins.Biomaterials198564257264
     [Google Scholar]
  53. JohnstonW.M. KaoE.C. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry.J. Dent. Res.1989685819822
     [Google Scholar]
  54. RagainJ.C. JohnstonW.M. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers.Color Res. Appl.2000254278285
     [Google Scholar]
  55. LeowM.E. OwR.K. LeeM.H. Assessment of colour differences in silicone hand and digit prostheses: Perceptible and acceptable thresholds for fair and dark skin shades.Prosthet. Orthot. Int.2006301516
     [Google Scholar]
  56. WeeA.G. LindseyD.T. ShroyerK.M. Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas.J. Prosthet. Dent.2007982101109
     [Google Scholar]
  57. LindseyD.T. WeeA.G. Perceptibility and acceptability of CIELAB color differences in computer-simulated teeth.J. Dent.2007357593599
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Da SilvaJ.D. ParkS.E. WeberH.P. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.J. Prosthet. Dent.2008995361368
     [Google Scholar]
  59. ParavinaR.D. Critical appraisal. Color in dentistry: Match me, match me not.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2009212133139
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Ishikawa-NagaiS. YoshidaA. SakaiM. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns.J. Dent.200937Suppl. 1e57e63
     [Google Scholar]
  61. LindseyD.T. WeeA.G. Assessing tooth color differences in digital facial portraits.J. Dent. Res.2010891112541258
     [Google Scholar]
  62. AlghazaliN. BurnsideG. MoallemM. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.J. Dent.201240Suppl. 1e10e17
     [Google Scholar]
  63. KhashayarG. BainP.A. SalariS. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry.J. Dent.2014426637644
     [Google Scholar]
  64. GhineaR. PérezM.M. HerreraL.J. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics.J. Dent.201038Suppl. 2e57e64
     [Google Scholar]
  65. ParavinaR.D. GhineaR. HerreraL.J. Color difference thresholds in dentistry.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.201527Suppl. 1S1S9
     [Google Scholar]
  66. PérezM.M. GhineaR. HerreraL.J. Dental ceramics: A CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences.J. Dent.201139Suppl. 3e37e44
     [Google Scholar]
  67. SailerI. FehmerV. IoannidisA. Threshold value for the perception of color changes of human gingiva.Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.2014346757762
     [Google Scholar]
  68. RenJ. LinH. HuangQ. Determining color difference thresholds in denture base acrylic resin.J. Prosthet. Dent.20151145702708
     [Google Scholar]
  69. PérezM.M. GhineaR. HerreraL.J. Color difference thresholds for computer-simulated human gingiva.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2018302E24E30
     [Google Scholar]
  70. KwonS.R. WertzP.W. Review of the mechanism of tooth whitening.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.2015275240257
     [Google Scholar]
  71. GanzE. Whiteness: photometric specification and colorimetric evaluation.Appl. Opt.197615920392058
     [Google Scholar]
  72. GanzE. Whiteness measurement.J Color Appearance1972153341
     [Google Scholar]
  73. GanzE. Whiteness formula: A selection.Appl. Opt.197918710731078
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. CIE Technical Report: Colorimetry. CIE Pub No. 15.2. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau; 1986.
  75. ASTM Designation E313-73 (Reapproved 1993). Standard test method for indices of whiteness and yellowness of near-white, opaque materials. 1993.
  76. GarcíaJ.A. RubiñoM. RomeroJ. Measuring the whiteness of human teeth.Color Res. Appl.1993185349352
     [Google Scholar]
  77. LathD.L. WidgooseD.G. GuanY.H. A digital image analysis system for the assessment of tooth whiteness compared to visual shade matching.J. Clin. Dent.20071811720
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Martin de las HerasS. ValenzuelaA. BelliniR. Objective measurement of dental color for age estimation by spectroradiometry.Forensic Sci. Int.200313215762
     [Google Scholar]
  79. LuoW. WestlandS. EllwoodR. Development of a whiteness index for dentistry.J. Dent.200937Suppl. 1e21e26
     [Google Scholar]
  80. OntiverosJ.C. ParavinaR.D. Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light.J. Dent.20093711840847
     [Google Scholar]
  81. TaoD. SmithR.D. ZhangQ. Tooth whitening evaluation of blue covarine containing toothpastes.J. Dent.201767Suppl.S20S24
     [Google Scholar]
  82. BizhangM MüllerM PharkJH Clinical trial of long-term color stability of hydrogen peroxide strips and sodium percarbonate film.Am J Dent 2007; 20(Spec A): 23A-7A
     [Google Scholar]
  83. GerlachRW ZhouX McClanahanSF Comparative response of whitening strips to a low peroxide and potassium nitrate bleaching gel.Am J Dent 2002; 15(Spec A): 19A-23A
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Hernández GuerreroJ.C. Jiménez-FarfánM.D. Lopez-SalgadoA. Professional whitening strips in a university population.Am. J. Dent.20072015A18A
     [Google Scholar]
  85. PechoO.E. GhineaR. Navarro do AmaralE.A. Relevant optical properties for direct restorative materials.Dent. Mater.2016325e105e112
     [Google Scholar]
  86. PérezM.M. GhineaR. RivasM.J. Development of a customized whiteness index for dentistry based on CIELAB color space.Dent. Mater.2016323461467
     [Google Scholar]
  87. WestlandS. LuoW. LiY. Investigation of the perceptual thresholds of tooth whiteness.J. Dent.201767Suppl.S11S14
     [Google Scholar]
  88. PérezM.M. DudeaD. HerreraL.J. Whiteness thresholds in dentistry based on WID index: preliminary results.Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Society for Color and Appearance in Dentistry (SCAD) 2017Newport Beach, CA; USA
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180719125137
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): CIE; CIEDE2000 difference color; CIELAB; Color; color-difference thresholds; whiteness indexes

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test