Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Dentistry
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-579X
  • E-ISSN: 2542-5803

Abstract

Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation. Thus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate protocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.

This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets bonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.

ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20) as follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38% phosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed bur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to ACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens were stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.

The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when using the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because of different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution generated complex failures.

Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated, sufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.

© Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640
2019-05-01
2024-11-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ReynoldsI.R. A review of direct orthodontic bonding.Br. J. Orthod.19752171178
     [Google Scholar]
  2. GangeP. Bonding in today’s orthodontic practice.J. Clin. Orthod.200640361367
     [Google Scholar]
  3. EvansL.S. McGroryK.R. EnglishJ.D. A comparison of shear bond strengths among different self-etching primers.Tex. Dent. J.20091264312319
     [Google Scholar]
  4. SfondriniM.F. CalderoniG. VitaleM.C. GandiniP. ScribanteA. Is laser conditioning a valid alternative to conventional etching for aesthetic bracket.Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent.20181916166
     [Google Scholar]
  5. CostaA.R. Vedovello-FilhoM. CorrerA.B. Bonding orthodontic brackets to enamel using experimental composites with an iodonium salt.Eur. J. Orthod.201436297302
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GuptaS.P. ShresthaB.K. Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times.Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent.2018106167
     [Google Scholar]
  7. PazziniC.A. PereiraL.J. MarquesL.S. Ramos-JorgeJ. Aparecida da SilvaT. PaivaS.M. Nickel-free vs conventional braces for patients allergic to nickel: gingival and blood parameters during and after treatment.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2016150610141019
     [Google Scholar]
  8. GodardM. DeuveB. LopezI. HippolyteM.P. BarthélemiS. Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel.Int. Orthod.2017153388404
     [Google Scholar]
  9. TonusJ.L. ManfroiF.B. BorgesG.A. GrigoloE.C. HelegdaS. SpohrA.M. Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo. Dental Press J. Orthod.20172218288
     [Google Scholar]
  10. DemarcoF.F. CorrêaM.B. CenciM.S. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials.Dent. Mater.20122887101
     [Google Scholar]
  11. LemosC.A. MauroS.J. SantosP.H. BrisoA.L. FagundesT.C. Influence of mechanical and chemical degradation in the surface roughness, gloss, and color of microhybrid composites.J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.2017184283288
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LemosC.A. MauroS.J. CamposR.A. SantosP.H. MachadoL.S. FagundesT.C. Repair ability of aged resin composites mediated by different restorative system.Acta Odontol. Latinoam.2016291713
     [Google Scholar]
  13. PetersonJ. RizkM. HochM. WiegandA. Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.Odontology20181062171180
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ShafieiF. BerahmanN. NiaziE. Effect of finishing time on microleakage at the composite-repair interface.Open Dent. J.201610497504
     [Google Scholar]
  15. KlockeA. Kahl-NiekeB. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing.Dent. Mater.200521391396
     [Google Scholar]
  16. BarbosaI.V. LadewigV.M. Almeida-PedrinR.R. CardosoM.A. SantiagoJunior J.F. ContiA.C.C.F. The association between patient’s compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study.Prog. Orthod.20181911115
     [Google Scholar]
  17. BourkeB.M. RockW.P. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain.Br. J. Orthod.199926285290
     [Google Scholar]
  18. EvansL.J. PetersC. FlickingerC. A comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets using various light sources, light guides, and cure times.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2002121510515
     [Google Scholar]
  19. PickettK.L. SadowskyP.L. JacobsonA. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results.Angle Orthod.200171141148
     [Google Scholar]
  20. BakaZ.M. AkinM. IleriZ. BasciftciF.A. Effects of remineralization procedures on shear bond strengths of brackets bonded to demineralized enamel surfaces with self-etch systems.Angle Orthod.2016864661667
     [Google Scholar]
  21. ClaudinoD. KugaM.C. BelizárioL. PereiraJ.R. Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants.J. Clin. Exp. Dent.2018103e248e251
     [Google Scholar]
  22. KollM. GwinnettA.J. WolfM.S. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.198689476479
     [Google Scholar]
  23. KhanehmasjediM. NaseriM.A. KhanehmasjediS. BasirL. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination.J. Chin. Med. Assoc.2017802103108
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ChenC.S. HsuM.L. ChangK.D. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets.Angle Orthod.20087810711077
     [Google Scholar]
  25. FlemingP.S. EliadesT. KatsarosC. PandisN. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20131434Suppl.S92S103
     [Google Scholar]
  26. JurišićS. JurišićG. JurićH. Influence of adhesives and methods of enamel pretreatment on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.Acta Stomatol. Croat.2015494269274
     [Google Scholar]
  27. GungorA.Y. AlkisH. TurkkahramanH. Shear bond strengths of brackets bonded with a new self-adhering resin composite.Int. J. Artif. Organs2016398431434
     [Google Scholar]
  28. WongsamutW. SatrawahaS. WayakanonK. Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets.J. Orthod. Sci.201764129135
     [Google Scholar]
  29. ZhangZ.C. QianY.F. Yang YM1, Feng QP, Shen G. Bond strength of metal brackets bonded to a silica-based ceramic with light-cured adhesive: Influence of various surface treatment methods.J. Orofac. Orthop.2016775366372
     [Google Scholar]
  30. SchmageP. NergizI. HerrmannW. OzcanM. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20031235540546
     [Google Scholar]
  31. BuyukS.K. KucukekenciA.S. Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials.Angle Orthod.2018882221226
     [Google Scholar]
  32. ParkS.B. SonW.S. KoC.C. García-GodoyF. ParkM.G. KimH.I. KwonY.H. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.Dent. Mater. J.2009286730734
     [Google Scholar]
  33. IliadiA. BaumgartnerS. AthanasiouA.E. EliadesT. EliadesG. Effect of intraoral aging on the setting status of resin composite and glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20141454425433
     [Google Scholar]
  34. RodriguesJunior SA FerracaneJ.L. Della BonaA. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials.Dent. Mater.200925442451
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Della BonaA. Van NoortR. Shear versus tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic.J. Dent. Res.19957415911596
     [Google Scholar]
  36. GittnerR. Müller-HartwichR. EngelS. Jost-BrinkmannP.G. Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.J. Orofac. Orthop.2012734957
     [Google Scholar]
  37. BakhadherW. HalawanyH. TalicN. AbrahamN. JacobV. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets - A review of in vitro studies.Acta Med. (Hradec Kralove)20155824348
     [Google Scholar]
  38. OusehalL. El AouameA. RachdyZ. BenkiranG. Comparison of the efficacy of a conventional primer and a self-etching primer.Int. Orthod.2016142195205
     [Google Scholar]
  39. EliadesT. BrantleyW.A. Orthodontics materials, scientific and clinical aspects.StuttgartThieme2001310
     [Google Scholar]
  40. BoscatoN. Della BonaA. Del Bel CuryA. Influence of ceramic pre-treatments on tensile bond strength and mode of failure of resin bonded to ceramics.Am. J. Dent.200720103108
     [Google Scholar]
  41. KnoxJ. JonesM.L. HubschP. MiddletonJ. KraljB. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different loadcases using the finite element method of stress analysis.J. Orthod.20002713946
     [Google Scholar]
  42. EslamianL. Borzabadi-FarahaniA. MousaviN. GhasemiA. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments.Eur. J. Orthod.2012345610617
     [Google Scholar]
  43. BayramM. YesilyurtC. KusgözA. UlkerM. NurM. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning.Eur. J. Orthod.2011332174179
     [Google Scholar]
  44. DemirtasH.K. AkinM. IleriZ. BasciftciF.A. Shear-bond-strength of orthodontic brackets to aged nano-hybrid composite-resin surfaces using different surface preparation.Dent. Mater. J.20153418690
     [Google Scholar]
  45. SwartzM.L. Limitations of in vitro orthodontic bond strength testing.J. Clin. Orthod.200741207210
     [Google Scholar]
  46. MirzakouchakiB. ShiraziS. SharghiR. ShiraziS. MoghimiM. ShahrbafS. Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with conventional acid-etch and self-etch primer systems: An in-vivo study.J. Clin. Exp. Dent.201681e38e43
     [Google Scholar]
  47. WangW.N. LiC.H. ChouT.H. Bond strength of various bracket base designs.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20041256570
     [Google Scholar]
  48. JurubebaJ.E.P. CostaA.R. Correr-SobrinhoL. Influence of thermal cycles number on bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic.Braz. Dent. J.2017282206209
     [Google Scholar]
  49. BisharaS.E. SolimanM.M. OonsombatC. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.Angle Orthod.200474400404
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Sharma-SayalS.K. RossouwP.E. KulkarniG.V. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20031247482
     [Google Scholar]
  51. SmithD.C. MaijerR. Improvements in bracket base design.Am. J. Orthod.1983834277281
     [Google Scholar]
  52. SorelO. El AlamR. ChagneauF. CathelineauG. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20021223260266
     [Google Scholar]
  53. CostenobleA. VennatE. AttalJ.P. DursunE. Bond strength and interfacial morphology of orthodontic brackets bonded to eroded enamel treated with calcium silicate-sodium phosphate salts or resin infiltration.Angle Orthod.2016866909916
     [Google Scholar]
  54. MirzakouchakiB. KimyaiS. HydariM. ShahrbafS. Mirzakouchaki-BoroujeniP. Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets.Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal2012171e164e170
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ArashV. NaghipourF. RavadgarM. KarkhahA. BaratiM.S. Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives.Electron. Physician20179135843591
     [Google Scholar]
  56. DaratsianosN. MusabegovicE. ReimannS. The influence of cyclic shear fatigue on the bracket-adhesive-enamel complex: an in vitro study.Dent. Mater.201329506513
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Faria e SilvaA.L. CovellD.A.Jr FerracaneJ.L. PfeiferC.S. Effectiveness of high irradiance for short-time exposures on polymerization of composite under metal brackets.Angle Orthod.2017876834840
     [Google Scholar]
  58. SeeligerJ.H. BotzenhartU.U. GedrangeT. KozakK. StepienL. MachoyM. Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste.Biomed. Tech. (Berl.)2017624415420
     [Google Scholar]
  59. BaeshenH. AlturkiB.N. AlbishiW.W. AlsadiF.M. El-TubaigyK.M. Mechanical and physical properties of two different resin-based materials: a comparative study.J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.20171810905910
     [Google Scholar]
  60. HellakA. EbelingJ. SchauseilM. SteinS. RoggendorfM. Korbmacher-SteinerH. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials.BioMed Res. Int.201620166307107
     [Google Scholar]
  61. MontasserM.A. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength.Eur. J. Orthod.2011334402406
     [Google Scholar]
  62. JainM. ShettyS. MograS. ShettyV.S. DhakarN. Determination of optimum adhesive thickness using varying degrees of force application with light-cured adhesive and its effect on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study.Orthodontics (Chic.)2013141e40e49
     [Google Scholar]
  63. PiccoliL. MigliauG. BesharatL.K. Di CarloS. PompaG. Di GiorgioR. Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment.Ann. Stomatol. (Roma)2017827178
     [Google Scholar]
  64. CochraneN.J. LoT.W.G. AdamsG.G. SchneiderP.M. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.20171523312319
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Della BonaA. Bonding to ceramics: scientific evidences for clinical dentistry.São PauloArtes Médicas2009252
     [Google Scholar]
  66. CumerlatoM. LimaE.M. OsorioL.B. MotaE.G. MenezesL.M. RizzattoS.M.D. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated teeth on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.Dental Press J. Orthod.20172244752
     [Google Scholar]
  67. DiasF.M. Pinzan-VercelinoC.R. TavaresR.R. Gurgel JdeA. BramanteF.S. FialhoM.N. Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns.Dental Press J. Orthod.20152045762
     [Google Scholar]
  68. StellaJ.P. OliveiraA.B. NojimaL.I. MarquezanM. Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity.Dental Press J. Orthod.20152045156
     [Google Scholar]
  69. SperberR.L. WatsonP.A. RossouwP.E. SectakofP.A. Adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam: In vitro study.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.19991165506513
     [Google Scholar]
  70. ZachrissonB.U. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: Clinical versus laboratory findings.Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.2000117592594
     [Google Scholar]
  71. VidorM.M. FelixR.P. MarchioroE.M. HahnL. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.Dental Press J. Orthod.20152026167
     [Google Scholar]
  72. BaherimoghadamT. AkbarianS. RasouliR. NaseriN. Evaluation of enamel damages following orthodontic bracket debonding in fluorosed teeth bonded with adhesion promoter.Eur. J. Dent.2016102193198
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Rodríguez-ChávezJ.A. Arenas-AlatorreJ. Belio-ReyesI. Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Microsc. Res. Tech.2017807680686
     [Google Scholar]
  74. KimY.K. ParkH.S. KimK.H. KwonT.Y. Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.Eur. J. Orthod.2015375550555
     [Google Scholar]
  75. RochaJ.M. GravinaM.A. Silva CamposM.J. QuintãoC.C. EliasC.N. VitralR.W. Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets.Dental Press J. Orthod.20141917785
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640
Loading
Bond Strength of Ceramic and Metal Orthodontic Brackets to Aged Resin-based Composite Restorations
Curr. Dentistry 1, 40 (2019); https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ACR; aged biomaterials; ceramics; metals; orthodontic; Resin-based composite

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test