Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

To analyze the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in suspicious cases for prenatal detection of placenta accreta (PA).

Materials and Methods

A total of 50 placental MRI exams performed on a 1.5T scanner were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists in consensus. HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo)and True-FISP (true fast imaging with steady-state precession) sequences were acquired. Findings from MRI were compared with the final diagnosis, which was determined by clinical findings at delivery and pathological examination of specimens.

Results

Of 50 pregnant women in the analysis, 33 required cesarean hysterectomy, and 17 underwent cesarean delivery.MRI signs such as myometrial thinning, loss of T2 hypointense interface(loss of retroplacental clear space on US), heterogenous intraplacental sign, and intraplacental T2 dark bands were more likely to be seen in this group.

In this group, the cases that were finally clinically and pathologically confirmed were 12, 16, and 22 cases of placenta accreta vera, placenta increta, and placenta percreta respectively.

Conclusion

MRI is particularly useful in cases where US is inconclusive and to assess the extent to which the placenta penetrates the uterine serosa and invades outward into surrounding tissues.MRI has become a routine examination for patients with suspected PA in clinical practice.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230627112729
2024-01-01
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e270623218308.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230627112729&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. SilverR.M. BranchD.W. Placenta accreta spectrum.N. Engl. J. Med.2018378161529153610.1056/NEJMcp170932429669225
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MarcellinL. DelormeP. BonnetM.P. GrangeG. KayemG. TsatsarisV. GoffinetF. Placenta percreta is associated with more frequent severe maternal morbidity than placenta accreta.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20182192193.e1193.e910.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.04929733839
    [Google Scholar]
  3. JingL. WeiG. MengfanS. YanyanH. Effect of site of placentation on pregnancy outcomes in patients with placenta previa.PLoS One2018137e020025210.1371/journal.pone.020025230016336
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BaldwinH.J. PattersonJ.A. NippitaT.A. TorvaldsenS. IbiebeleI. SimpsonJ.M. FordJ.B. Antecedents of abnormally invasiveplacenta in primiparous women: Risk associatedwith gynecologic procedures.Obstet. Gynecol.2018131222723310.1097/AOG.000000000000243429324602
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MelcerY. JauniauxE. MaymonS. TsvibanA. Pekar-ZlotinM. BetserM. MaymonR. Impact of targeted scanning protocols on perinatal outcomes in pregnancies at risk of placenta accreta spectrum or vasa previa.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20182184443.e1443.e810.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.01729353034
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CarusiD.A. The placenta accreta spectrum: Epidemiology and risk factors.Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.201861473374210.1097/GRF.000000000000039130204619
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DuzyjC.M. CooperA. MhatreM. HanC.S. PaidasM.J. IlluzziJ.L. SfakianakiA.K. Placenta accreta: A spectrum of predictable risk, diagnosis, and morbidity.Am. J. Perinatol.201936101031103810.1055/s‑0038‑167611130500963
    [Google Scholar]
  8. World Medical AssociationWorld Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.JAMA2013310202191219410.1001/jama.2013.28105324141714
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JauniauxE. HusseinA.M. FoxK.A. CollinsS.L. New evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies for placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.2019614758810.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.00631126811
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JauniauxE. CollinsS. BurtonG.J. Placenta accreta spectrum: Pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20182181758710.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.06728599899
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DurukanH. DurukanÖ.B. YazıcıF.G. Placenta accreta spectrum disorder: A comparison between fertility-sparing techniques and hysterectomy.J. Obstet. Gynaecol.202141335335910.1080/01443615.2020.175562932500820
    [Google Scholar]
  12. D’AntonioF. Timor-TritschI.E. Palacios-JaraquemadaJ. MonteagudoA. BucaD. ForlaniF. MinneciG. FotiF. ManzoliL. LiberatiM. AcharyaG. CalìG. First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: Systematic review and meta‐analysis.Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.201851217618310.1002/uog.1884028833750
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JitsumoriM. MatsuzakiS. EndoM. HaraT. TomimatsuT. MatsuzakiS. MiyakeT. TakiuchiT. KakiganoA. MimuraK. KobayashiE. UedaY. KimuraT. Obstetric outcomes of pregnancyafter uterine artery embolization.Int. J. Womens Health202012315115810.2147/IJWH.S23644332184677
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JauniauxE. Ayres-de-CamposD. Langhoff-RoosJ. FoxK.A. CollinsS. DuncombeG. KlaritschP. ChantraineF. KingdomJ. GrønbeckL. RullK. TikkanenM. SentilhesL. AsatianiT. LeungW-C. AIhaidariT. BrennanD. SeoudM. HusseinA.M. JegasothyR. ShahK.N. Bomba-OponD. HubinontC. Soma-PillayP. MandićN.T. LindqvistP. ArnadottirB. HoesliI. CortezR. FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.20191461202410.1002/ijgo.1276131173360
    [Google Scholar]
  15. CollinsS.L. AlemdarB. van BeekhuizenH.J. BertholdtC. BraunT. CaldaP. DelormeP. DuvekotJ.J. GronbeckL. KayemG. Langhoff-RoosJ. MarcellinL. MartinelliP. MorelO. MhallemM. MorlandoM. NoergaardL.N. NonnenmacherA. PateiskyP. PetitP. RijkenM.J. Ropacka-LesiakM. SchlembachD. SentilhesL. StefanovicV. StrindforsG. TutschekB. VangenS. WeichertA. WeizsäckerK. ChantraineF. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of abnormally invasive placenta: Recommendations from the International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.2019220651152610.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.05430849356
    [Google Scholar]
  16. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSociety forMaternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 7: Placentaaccreta spectrum.Obstet. Gynecol.20181326e259e27510.1097/AOG.000000000000298330461695
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PalaŞ. AtilganR. BaşpınarM. KavakE.Ç. YavuzkırŞ. AkyolA. KavakB. Comparison of results of Bakri balloon tamponade and caesarean hysterectomy in management of placenta accreta and increta: A retrospective study.J. Obstet. Gynaecol.201838219419910.1080/01443615.2017.134044028903630
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZaghalA.A. HussainH.K. BerjawiG.A. MRI evaluation of the placenta from normal variants to abnormalities of implantation and malignancies.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging20195061702171710.1002/jmri.2676431102327
    [Google Scholar]
  19. FadlS. MoshiriM. FlignerC.L. KatzD.S. DigheM. Placental imaging: Normal appearance with review of pathologic findings.Radiographics201737397999810.1148/rg.201716015528493802
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KilcoyneA. Shenoy-BhangleA.S. RobertsD.J. SisodiaR.C. GervaisD.A. LeeS.I. MRI of placenta accreta, placenta increta, and placenta percreta: Pearls and pitfalls.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2017208121422110.2214/AJR.16.1628127762597
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JhaP. PōderL. BourgiotiC. BharwaniN. LewisS. KamathA. NougaretS. SoyerP. WestonM. CastilloR.P. KidoA. ForstnerR. MasselliG. Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Eur. Radiol.20203052604261510.1007/s00330‑019‑06617‑732040730
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ChenX. ShanR. ZhaoL. SongQ. ZuoC. ZhangX. WangS. ShiH. GaoF. QianT. WangG. LimperopoulosC. Invasive placenta previa: Placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5T MRI – useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta.Eur. Radiol.201828270871710.1007/s00330‑017‑4980‑z28770405
    [Google Scholar]
  23. JainC. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation.Obstet. Gynecol.2019133118610.1097/AOG.000000000000304930575654
    [Google Scholar]
  24. IacovelliA. LiberatiM. KhalilA. Timor-TrischI. LeombroniM. BucaD. MilaniM. FlaccoM.E. ManzoliL. FanfaniF. CalìG. FamiliariA. ScambiaG. D’AntonioF. Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.202033347148110.1080/14767058.2018.149345329938551
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SannananjaB. EllermeierA. HippeD.S. WinterT.C.III KangS.K. LeeS.I. KilgoreM.R. DigheM.K. Utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum abnormality.Abdom. Radiol.201843113147315610.1007/s00261‑018‑1599‑829666952
    [Google Scholar]
  26. IngramE. MorrisD. NaishJ. MyersJ. JohnstoneE. MR imaging measurementsof altered placental oxygenation in pregnancies complicatedby fetal growth restriction.Radiology2017285395396010.1148/radiol.201716238528708473
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SunH. QuH. ChenL. WangW. LiaoY. ZouL. ZhouZ. WangX. ZhouS. Identification of suspicious invasive placentation based on clinical MRI data using textural features and automated machine learning.Eur. Radiol.201929116152616210.1007/s00330‑019‑06372‑931444599
    [Google Scholar]
  28. BaoY. PangY. SunZ. LiQ. TangD. XiaL. Functional diagnosis of placenta accreta by intravoxel incoherent motion model diffusion-weighted imaging.Eur. Radiol.202131274074810.1007/s00330‑020‑07200‑132862290
    [Google Scholar]
  29. YanG. LiaoY. LiK. ZhangX. ZhengW. ZhangY. ZouY. ChenD. WuD. Diffusion MRI based myometrium tractography for detection of placenta accreta spectrum disorder.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging202255125526410.1002/jmri.2779434155718
    [Google Scholar]
  30. JauniauxE. BhideA. KennedyA. WoodwardP. HubinontC. CollinsS. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.2018140327428010.1002/ijgo.1240829405319
    [Google Scholar]
  31. KapoorH. HanaokaM. DawkinsA. KhuranaA. Review of MRI imaging for placenta accreta spectrum: Pathophysiologic insights, imaging signs, and recent developments.Placenta20211041313910.1016/j.placenta.2020.11.00433238233
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230627112729
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230627112729
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Cesarean; Magnetic resonance imaging; Morbidity; MRI; Placenta; Placenta accreta
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test