Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 is a global pandemic. Currently, the predominant strain is SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 in many countries. Understanding its infection characteristics can facilitate clinical management.

Objectives

This study aimed to characterize the clinical, laboratory, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings in patients with mild or moderate infection from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study on patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 between April 4th and April 17th, 2022. The clinical characteristics, laboratory features, and HRCT images were reviewed.

Results

A total of 805 patients were included (411 males and 394 females, median age 33 years old). The infection was mild, moderate, severe, and asymptomatic in 490 (60.9%), 37 (4.6%), 0 (0.0%), and 278 (34.5%) patients, respectively. Notably, 186 (23.1%), 96 (11.9%), 265 (32.9%), 11 (3.4%), 7 (0.9%), and 398 (49.4%) patients had fever, cough, throat discomfort, stuffy or runny nose, fatigue, and no complaint, respectively. Furthermore, 162 (20.1%), 332 (41.2%), and 289 (35.9%) patients had decreased white blood cell counts, reduced lymphocytes, and elevated C-reactive protein levels, respectively. HRCT revealed pneumonia in 53 (6.6%) patients. The majority of the lung involvements were ground-glass opacity (50, 94.3%) mostly in the subpleural area. The grade of lung injury was mainly mild (90.6%). Short-term follow-ups showed that most patients with pneumonia recovered.

Conclusion

Most patients with mild or moderate infection from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 were adults, with fever and upper respiratory symptoms as the main clinical presentations. Lower respiratory infection was mild, with ground-glass opacity in the subpleural area as the main finding.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426145140
2023-07-07
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-E260423216213.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426145140&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CucinottaD. VanelliM. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic.Acta Biomed.202091115716032191675
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Organization WHO.2022 Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
  3. MukaigawaraM. HassanI. FernandesG. KingL. PatelJ. SridharD. An equitable roadmap for ending the COVID-19 pandemic.Nat. Med.202228589389610.1038/s41591‑022‑01787‑235383313
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LundbergA.L. Lorenzo-RedondoR. OzerE.A. HawkinsC.A. HultquistJ.F. WelchS.B. PrasadP.V.V. OehmkeJ.F. AchenbachC.J. MurphyR.L. WhiteJ.I. HaveyR.J. PostL.A. Has omicron changed the evolution of the pandemic?JMIR Public Health Surveill.202281e3576310.2196/3576335072638
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KimS. NguyenT.T. TaittA.S. JhunH. ParkH.Y. KimS.H. KimY.G. SongE.Y. LeeY. YumH. ShinK.C. ChoiY.K. SongC.S. YeomS.C. KimB. NeteaM. KimS. SARS-CoV-2 omicron mutation is faster than the chase: Multiple mutations on spike/ACE2 interaction residues.Immune Netw.2021216e3810.4110/in.2021.21.e3835036025
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AndrewsN. StoweJ. KirsebomF. ToffaS. RickeardT. GallagherE. GowerC. KallM. GrovesN. O’ConnellA.M. SimonsD. BlomquistP.B. ZaidiA. NashS. IwaniN.B.A.A. ThelwallS. DabreraG. MyersR. AmirthalingamG. GharbiaS. BarrettJ.C. ElsonR. LadhaniS.N. FergusonN. ZambonM. CampbellC.N.J. BrownK. HopkinsS. ChandM. RamsayM. Lopez BernalJ. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant.N. Engl. J. Med.2022386161532154610.1056/NEJMoa211945135249272
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GaoS.J. GuoH. LuoG. Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2, a global urgent public health alert!J. Med. Virol.20229441255125610.1002/jmv.2749134850421
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChenJ. WeiG.W. Omicron BA.2 (B.1.1.529.2): High potential to becoming the next dominating variant.ArXiv [Preprint]202235169598
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LinoA. CardosoM.A. Martins-LopesP. GonçalvesH.M.R. Omicron-The new SARS-CoV-2 challenge?Rev. Med. Virol.2022324e235810.1002/rmv.235835445774
    [Google Scholar]
  10. TakashitaE. KinoshitaN. YamayoshiS. Sakai-TagawaY. FujisakiS. ItoM. Iwatsuki-HorimotoK. HalfmannP. WatanabeS. MaedaK. ImaiM. MitsuyaH. OhmagariN. TakedaM. HasegawaH. KawaokaY. Efficacy of antiviral agents against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariant BA.2.N. Engl. J. Med.2022386151475147710.1056/NEJMc220193335263535
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZhouH. TadaT. DcostaB.M. LandauN.R. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.2 by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.bioRxiv2022Preprint10.1101/2022.02.15.480166
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ZarifianA. Ghasemi NourM. Akhavan RezayatA. Rahimzadeh OskooeiR. AbbasiB. SadeghiR. Chest CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A comprehensive meta-analysis of 9907 confirmed patients.Clin. Imaging20217010111010.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.03533142125
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhuJ. JiP. PangJ. ZhongZ. LiH. HeC. ZhangJ. ZhaoC. Clinical characteristics of 3062 COVID-19 patients: A meta‐analysis.J. Med. Virol.202092101902191410.1002/jmv.2588432293716
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rodriguez-MoralesA.J. Cardona-OspinaJ.A. Gutiérrez-OcampoE. Villamizar-PeñaR. Holguin-RiveraY. Escalera-AntezanaJ.P. Alvarado-ArnezL.E. Bonilla-AldanaD.K. Franco-ParedesC. Henao-MartinezA.F. Paniz-MondolfiA. Lagos-GrisalesG.J. Ramírez-VallejoE. SuárezJ.A. ZambranoL.I. Villamil-GómezW.E. Balbin-RamonG.J. RabaanA.A. HarapanH. DhamaK. NishiuraH. KataokaH. AhmadT. SahR. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Travel Med. Infect. Dis.20203410162310.1016/j.tmaid.2020.10162332179124
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for COVID-19 patients (Trial Version 9)Health Care Sci.2022111428
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sánchez-OroR. NuezJ.T. Martínez-SanzG. Radiological findings for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (COVID-19)Medicina Clínica (English Edition)202015513640
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LiuY.C. KuoR.L. ShihS.R. COVID-19: The first documented coronavirus pandemic in history.Biomed. J.202043432833310.1016/j.bj.2020.04.00732387617
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KhandiaR. SinghalS. AlqahtaniT. KamalM.A. El-ShallN.A. NainuF. DesinguP.A. DhamaK. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant, salient features, high global health concerns and strategies to counter it amid ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.Environ. Res.202220911281610.1016/j.envres.2022.11281635093310
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PulliamJ.R.C. van SchalkwykC. GovenderN. von GottbergA. CohenC. GroomeM.J. DushoffJ. MlisanaK. MoultrieH. Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa.Science20223766593eabn494710.1126/science.abn494735289632
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ZhangY. ShiL. CaoY. ChenH. WangX. SunG. Wuhan mobile cabin hospital.Medicine (Baltimore)20211003e2407710.1097/MD.000000000002407733546011
    [Google Scholar]
  21. EspenhainL. FunkT. OvervadM. EdslevS.M. FonagerJ. InghamA.C. RasmussenM. MadsenS.L. EspersenC.H. SieberR.N. SteggerM. GunalanV. WilkowskiB. LarsenN.B. LegarthR. CohenA.S. NielsenF. LamJ.U.H. LavikK.E. KarakisM. SpiessK. MarvingE. NielsenC. Wiid SvarrerC. Bybjerg-GrauholmJ. OlsenS.S. JensenA. KrauseT.G. MüllerL. Epidemiological characterisation of the first 785 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant cases in Denmark, December 2021.Euro Surveill.20212650210114610.2807/1560‑7917.ES.2021.26.50.210114634915977
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MasloC. FriedlandR. ToubkinM. LaubscherA. AkalooT. KamaB. Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients in South Africa during the COVID-19 omicron wave compared with previous waves.JAMA2022327658358410.1001/jama.2021.2486834967859
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HuiK.P.Y. HoJ.C.W. CheungM. NgK. ChingR.H.H. LaiK. KamT.T. GuH. SitK.Y. HsinM.K.Y. AuT.W.K. PoonL.L.M. PeirisM. NichollsJ.M. ChanM.C.W. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human bronchus and lung ex vivo.Nature2022603790271572010.1038/s41586‑022‑04479‑635104836
    [Google Scholar]
  24. BrandalL.T. MacDonaldE. VenetiL. RavloT. LangeH. NaseerU. FeruglioS. BragstadK. HungnesO. ØdeskaugL.E. HagenF. Hanch-HansenK.E. LindA. WatleS.V. TaxtA.M. JohansenM. VoldL. AavitslandP. NygårdK. MadslienE.H. Outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Norway, November to December 2021.Euro Surveill.20212650210114710.2807/1560‑7917.ES.2021.26.50.210114734915975
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MeoS.A. MeoA.S. Al-JassirF.F. KlonoffD.C. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 new variant: Global prevalence and biological and clinical characteristics.Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.202125248012801834982465
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KimM.K. LeeB. ChoiY.Y. UmJ. LeeK.S. SungH.K. KimY. ParkJ.S. LeeM. JangH.C. BangJ.H. ChungK. JeonJ. Clinical characteristics of 40 patients Infected With the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in Korea.J. Korean Med. Sci.2022373e3110.3346/jkms.2022.37.e3135040299
    [Google Scholar]
  27. CDC COVID-19 Response TeamSARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant - United States, December 1-8, 2021.MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.202170501731173410.15585/mmwr.mm7050e134914670
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NiuJ. SareliC. MayerD. VisbalA. SareliA. Lymphopenia as a predictor for adverse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A single center retrospective study of 4485 cases.J. Clin. Med.202211370010.3390/jcm1103070035160150
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SorayaG.V. UlhaqZ.S. Crucial laboratory parameters in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis: An updated meta-analysis.Med. Clin. (Barc.)2020155414315110.1016/j.medcli.2020.05.017
    [Google Scholar]
  30. GhahramaniS. TabriziR. LankaraniK.B. KashaniS.M.A. RezaeiS. ZeidiN. AkbariM. HeydariS.T. AkbariH. Nowrouzi-SohrabiP. AhmadizarF. Laboratory features of severe vs. non-severe COVID-19 patients in Asian populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur. J. Med. Res.20202513010.1186/s40001‑020‑00432‑332746929
    [Google Scholar]
  31. AiT. YangZ. HouH. ZhanC. ChenC. LvW. TaoQ. SunZ. XiaL. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases.Radiology20202962E32E4010.1148/radiol.202020064232101510
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ZuoY.Y. UspalW.E. WeiT. Airborne transmission of covid-19: aerosol dispersion, lung deposition, and virus-receptor interactions.ACS Nano20201412165021652410.1021/acsnano.0c0848433236896
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SilvaC.I.S. ChurgA. MüllerN.L. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Spectrum of high-resolution CT and pathologic findings.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2007188233434410.2214/AJR.05.182617242239
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ChoJ.L. VillacresesR. NagpalP. GuoJ. PezzuloA.A. ThurmanA.L. HamzehN.Y. BlountR.J. FortisS. HoffmanE.A. ZabnerJ. ComellasA.P. Quantitative chest CT assessment of small airways disease in post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.Radiology2022304118519210.1148/radiol.21217035289657
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WallerJ.V. LinK.K. DiazM.J. CT presentations of adult and pediatric SARS-CoV-2 patients: A review of early COVID-19 data.Radiologia (Madr.)2021636495504[Engl Ed].10.1016/j.rx.2021.04.006
    [Google Scholar]
  36. SelfW.H. TenfordeM.W. RhoadsJ.P. GaglaniM. GindeA.A. DouinD.J. OlsonS.M. TalbotH.K. CaseyJ.D. MohrN.M. ZepeskiA. McNealT. GhamandeS. GibbsK.W. FilesD.C. HagerD.N. ShehuA. PrekkerM.E. EricksonH.L. GongM.N. MohamedA. HenningD.J. SteingrubJ.S. PeltanI.D. BrownS.M. MartinE.T. MontoA.S. KhanA. HoughC.L. BusseL.W. ten LohuisC.C. DuggalA. WilsonJ.G. GordonA.J. QadirN. ChangS.Y. MallowC. RivasC. BabcockH.M. KwonJ.H. ExlineM.C. HalasaN. ChappellJ.D. LauringA.S. GrijalvaC.G. RiceT.W. JonesI.D. StubblefieldW.B. BaughmanA. WomackK.N. LindsellC.J. HartK.W. ZhuY. MillsL. LesterS.N. StumpfM.M. NaiotiE.A. KobayashiM. VeraniJ.R. ThornburgN.J. PatelM.M. CalhounN. MurthyK. HerrickJ. McKillopA. HoffmanE. ZayedM. SmithM. SeattleN. EttlingerJ. PriestE. ThomasJ. ArroligaA. BeeramM. KindleR. KozikowskiL-A. De SouzaL. OuelletteS. Thornton-ThompsonS. MehkriO. AshokK. GoleS. KingA. PoynterB. StanleyN. HendricksonA. MaruggiE. ScharberT. JorgensenJ. BowersR. KingJ. AstonV. ArmbrusterB. RothmanR.E. NairR. ChenJ-T.T. KarowS. RobartE. MaldonadoP.N. KhanM. SoP. LevittJ. PerezC. VisweswaranA. RoqueJ. RiveraA. AngelesL. FrankelT. AngelesL. GoffJ. HuynhD. HowellM. FriedelJ. TozierM. DriverC. CarricatoM. FosterA. NassarP. StoutL. SibenallerZ. WalterA. MaresJ. OlsonL. ClinansmithB. RivasC. GershengornH. McSpaddenE.J. TrusconR. KaniclidesA. ThomasL. BielakR. ValvanoW.D. FongR. FitzsimmonsW.J. BlairC. ValesanoA.L. GilbertJ. CriderC.D. SteinbockK.A. PaulsonT.C. AndersonL.A. KampeC. JohnsonJ. McHenryR. BlairM. ConwayD. LaRoseM. LandrethL. HicksM. ParksL. BonguJ. McDonaldD. CassC. SeilerS. ParkD. HinkT. WallaceM. BurnhamC-A. ArterO.G. Comparative effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vaccines in preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations among adults without immunocompromising conditions — United States, March–August 2021.MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.202170381337134310.15585/mmwr.mm7038e134555004
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426145140
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405620666230426145140
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): BA.2; Computed tomography; COVID-19; Infection; Omicron variant; SARS-COV-2
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test