Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

Extrahepatic Common Bile Duct Obstruction (EHBDO) is a serious condition that requires accurate diagnosis for effective treatment. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a widely used noninvasive imaging technique for visualizing bile ducts, but its interpretation can be complex.

Objective

This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based classification model that integrates MRCP images and clinical parameters to assist radiologists in diagnosing EHBDO more accurately.

Methods

A total of 465 patients with clinical data were included, of whom 143 also had MRCP images. Missing clinical values were addressed through data imputation. Object detection techniques were used to isolate the common bile duct region in the MRCP images. A multimodal deep learning fusion model was developed by combining the extracted imaging features with selected clinical parameters. To account for the varying significance of different features, a weighted loss function was applied. The performance of the fusion model was compared to that of single-modality approaches (using only MRCP images or clinical data), specifically the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under The Curve (AUC).

Results

The performance of the proposed deep learning fusion model was superior to that of models using only MRCP images or clinical parameters. The fusion model achieved an accuracy of 89.8%, AUC of 90.4%, sensitivity of 81.8%, and specificity of 95.7% in diagnosing EHBDO. By integrating MRCP imaging data and clinical parameters, the proposed deep learning model significantly enhanced the accuracy of EHBDO diagnosis.

Conclusion

This proposed multimodal approach outperformed traditional single-modality methods, presenting a valuable tool for improving the diagnostic accuracy of bile duct obstruction.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056363648241215145959
2025-01-17
2025-07-10
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. SmithH.J. Extrahepatic bile duct obstruction in primary carcinoma of the lung: Incidence, diagnosis, and non-operative treatment.J. National Med. Assoc.198072321520
    [Google Scholar]
  2. QinX.L. WangZ.R. ShiJ.S. LuM. WangL. HeQ.R. Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: In comparison with CEA.World J. Gastroenterol.200410342743210.3748/wjg.v10.i3.42714760772
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SugimotoY. Diagnosing malignant distal bile duct obstruction using artificial intelligence based on clinical biomarkers.Sci. Rep.2023131326210.1038/s41598‑023‑28058‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GoldfingerM.H. RidgwayG.R. FerreiraC. LangfordC.R. ChengL. KazimianecA. BorghettoA. WrightT.G. WoodwardG. HassanaliN. NichollsR.C. SimpsonH. WaddellT. VikalS. MavarM. RymellS. WigleyI. JacobsJ. KellyM. BanerjeeR. BradyJ.M. Quantitative MRCP imaging: Accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, and cohort-derived normative ranges.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging202052380782010.1002/jmri.2711332147892
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GriffinN. EdwardsC.G. GrantL.A. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: The ABC of MRCP.Insights Imaging201231112110.1007/s13244‑011‑0129‑922695995
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GaoW. WangW. SongD. WangK. LianD. YangC. ZhuK. ZhengJ. ZengM. RaoS. WangM. A multiparametric fusion deep learning model based on DCE‐MRI for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging20225641029103910.1002/jmri.2812635191550
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HouJ.U. ParkS.W. ParkS.M. ParkD.H. ParkC.H. MinS. Efficacy of an artificial neural network algorithm based on thick-slab magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography images for the automated diagnosis of common bile duct stonesJ. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.202136123532354010.1111/jgh.15569
    [Google Scholar]
  8. NjeiB. KanmounyeU.S. SetoN. McCartyT.R. MohanB.P. FozoL. NavaneethanU. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging for cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis: A systematic review with scientometric analysis.J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.202338687488210.1111/jgh.1618036919223
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ParkM-S. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: Findings at MRCP versus ERCP.Radiology20042331234240
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ZhangX. JiaN. WangY. Multi-input dense convolutional network for classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Biomed. Signal Process. Control20238010422610.1016/j.bspc.2022.104226
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JamaW.M.A.J. World medical association declaration of helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.JAMA2013310202191219410.1001/jama.2013.28105324141714
    [Google Scholar]
  12. AljiffryM. WalshM.J. MolinariM. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.World J. Gastroenterol.200915344240426210.3748/wjg.15.424019750567
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WangX. QiX. LiH. ShaoX. GuoX. An extremely increased CA19-9 level due to common bile duct stone: A case report.AME Med. J.2017221510.21037/amj.2017.02.02
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SombattheeraS. ProungvitayaT. LimpaiboonT. WongkhamS. WongkhamC. LuviraV. ProungvitayaS. Total serum bile acid as a potential marker for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma without jaundice.Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.20151641367137010.7314/APJCP.2015.16.4.136725743800
    [Google Scholar]
  15. AzurM.J. StuartE.A. FrangakisC. LeafP.J. Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work?Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res.2011201404910.1002/mpr.32921499542
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhangZ. Multiple imputation with multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) package.Ann. Transl. Med.2016423026889483
    [Google Scholar]
  17. WangC-Y. BochkovskiyA. LiaoH-Y.M. “YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors,”arXiv202222070269610.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HeK. ZhangX. RenS. SunJ. Deep residual learning for image recognitionProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognitionLas Vegas, NV, USA, 27-30, June, 2016, pp. 770-778.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ThungK.H. WeeC.Y. A brief review on multi-task learning.Mult. Tools Appl.20187722297052972510.1007/s11042‑018‑6463‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KendallA. GalY. CipollaR. Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics.arXiv170507115
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RumelhartD.E. HintonG.E. WilliamsR.J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors.Nature1986323608853353610.1038/323533a0
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KeG. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree.Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems201731493157
    [Google Scholar]
  23. TanM. LeQ. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks.arXiv2019190511946
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SzegedyC. VanhouckeV. IoffeS. ShlensJ. WojnaZ. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision.arXiv201515120056710.1109/CVPR.2016.308
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LoshchilovI. HutterF. Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restartsarXiv201603983
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SelvarajuR.R. CogswellM. DasA. VedantamR. ParikhD. BatraD. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization.Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer visionVenice, Italy, 22-29, October, 2017, pp. 618-626.10.1109/ICCV.2017.74
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LogeswaranR. A computer-aided multidisease diagnostic system using MRCP.J. Digit. Imaging200821223524210.1007/s10278‑007‑9029‑417345003
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056363648241215145959
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056363648241215145959
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test