Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Medical Imaging
  4. Volume 20, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer, a significant contributor to male cancer mortality globally, demands improved diagnostic strategies. In Saudi Arabia, where the incidence is expected to double, this study assessed the compliance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) practices with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) guidelines across diverse healthcare institutions.

Methods

A survey was distributed to the radiology departments of all tertiary referral hospitals in Saudi Arabia (n=60) to assess their compliance with the technical specifications outlined in PI-RADS v2. Statistical analysis included chi-square, Fisher exact, ANOVA, and Student t-tests to examine the collected data;

Results

The study revealed an overall commendable compliance rate of 95.23%. However, significant variations were observed in technical parameters, particularly between 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla scanners and tertiary non-tertiary hospitals. Notable adherence in certain sequences contrasted with discrepancies in T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging parameters;

Conclusion

These findings underscore the need for nuanced approaches to optimize prostate imaging protocols, considering field strength and institutional differences. The study contributes to the ongoing refinement of standardized mpMRI practices, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve clinical outcomes in prostate cancer.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056318591240718052555
2024-01-01
2025-05-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056318591240718052555
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. CarterH.B. Prostate cancers in men with low PSA levels--must we find them?N. Engl. J. Med.2004350222292229410.1056/NEJMe04800315163780
     [Google Scholar]
  2. NICE Guidance – Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management.BJU Int.2019124192610.1111/bju.1480931206997
     [Google Scholar]
  3. SonnadS.S. LanglotzC.P. Sanford SchwartzJ. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: A meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change.Acad. Radiol.20018214915710.1016/S1076‑6332(01)90095‑911227643
     [Google Scholar]
  4. XieJ. JinC. LiuM. SunK. JinZ. DingZ. GongX. MRI/Transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front. Oncol.20221288033610.3389/fonc.2022.88033635677152
     [Google Scholar]
  5. WeinrebJ.C. BarentszJ.O. ChoykeP.L. CornudF. HaiderM.A. MacuraK.J. MargolisD. SchnallM.D. ShternF. TempanyC.M. ThoenyH.C. VermaS. PI-RADS Prostate imaging – reporting and data system: 2015, version 2.Eur. Urol.2016691164010.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.05226427566
     [Google Scholar]
  6. FüttererJ.J. BrigantiA. De VisschereP. EmbertonM. GiannariniG. KirkhamA. TanejaS.S. ThoenyH. VilleirsG. VillersA. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? a systematic review of the literature.Eur. Urol.20156861045105310.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.01325656808
     [Google Scholar]
  7. HansenN.L. KooB.C. GallagherF.A. WarrenA.Y. DobleA. GnanapragasamV. BrattO. KastnerC. BarrettT. Comparison of initial and tertiary centre second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy.Eur. Radiol.20172762259226610.1007/s00330‑016‑4635‑527778089
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BrembillaG. Dell’OglioP. StabileA. DamascelliA. BrunettiL. RavelliS. CristelG. SchianiE. VenturiniE. GrippaldiD. MendolaV. RancoitaP.M.V. EspositoA. BrigantiA. MontorsiF. Del MaschioA. De CobelliF. Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1.Eur. Radiol.20203063383339210.1007/s00330‑019‑06654‑232052171
     [Google Scholar]
  9. CoşkunM. SarpA.F. KarasuS. GelalM.F. TürkbeyB. Assessment of the compliance with minimum acceptable technical parameters proposed by PI-RADS v2 guidelines in multiparametric prostate MRI acquisition in tertiary referral hospitals in the Republic of Turkey.Diagn. Interv. Radiol.202025642142710.5152/dir.2019.1853731650967
     [Google Scholar]
  10. IşıkA. FıratD. Letter to the editor concerning “Most cited 100 articles from Turkey on abdominal wall hernias: a bibliometric study”.Turk. J. Surg.202137219319410.47717/turkjsurg.2021.497337275187
     [Google Scholar]
  11. IsikA. MemisU. Invited commentary: the efficacy of vammft compared to “bogota bag” in achieving sheath closure following temporary abdominal closure at index laparotomy for trauma.World J. Surg.20234761442144310.1007/s00268‑023‑06931‑836745199
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BurnP.R. FreemanS.J. AndreouA. Burns-CoxN. PersadR. BarrettT. A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards.Clin. Radiol.2019741189489410.1016/j.crad.2019.03.02631296337
     [Google Scholar]
  13. SackettJ. ShihJ.H. ReeseS.E. BrenderJ.R. HarmonS.A. BarrettT. CoskunM. MadariagaM. MarkoJ. LawY.M. TurkbeyE.B. MehralivandS. SanfordT. LayN. PintoP.A. WoodB.J. ChoykeP.L. TurkbeyB. Quality of prostate mri: is the pi-rads standard sufficient?Acad. Radiol.202128219920710.1016/j.acra.2020.01.03132143993
     [Google Scholar]
  14. TamuraT. UsuiS. MurakamiS. ArihiroK. FujimotoT. YamadaT. NaitoK. AkiyamaM. Comparisons of multi b ‐value DWI signal analysis with pathological specimen of breast cancer.Magn. Reson. Med.201268389089710.1002/mrm.2327722161802
     [Google Scholar]
  15. UenoY. KitajimaK. SugimuraK. KawakamiF. MiyakeH. ObaraM. TakahashiS. Ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of prostate cancer with 3-T MRI.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging201338115416010.1002/jmri.2395323292979
     [Google Scholar]
  16. KatahiraK. TakaharaT. KweeT.C. OdaS. SuzukiY. MorishitaS. KitaniK. HamadaY. KitaokaM. YamashitaY. Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation.Eur. Radiol.201121118819610.1007/s00330‑010‑1883‑720640899
     [Google Scholar]
  17. GiromettiR. CereserL. BonatoF. ZuianiC. Evolution of prostate MRI: from multiparametric standard to less-is-better and different-is better strategies.Eur. Radiol. Exp.201931510.1186/s41747‑019‑0088‑330693407
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ShahZ.K. EliasS.N. AbazaR. ZyngerD.L. DeRenneL.A. KnoppM.V. GuoB. SchurrR. HeymsfieldS.B. JiaG. Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer.Acad. Radiol.201522446747410.1016/j.acra.2014.11.00725579637
     [Google Scholar]
  19. UllrichT. QuentinM. OelersC. DietzelF. SawickiL.M. ArsovC. RabenaltR. AlbersP. AntochG. BlondinD. WittsackH.J. SchimmöllerL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.Eur. J. Radiol.20179019219710.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.04428583633
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056318591240718052555
Loading
Optimizing Prostate Imaging Practices in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PI-RADS Compliance in Multiparametric MRI
Curr. Med. Imaging 20, e15734056318591 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056318591240718052555
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056318591240718052555
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056318591240718052555
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): ANOVA; Chi-square; Fisher extract; Multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS; Prostate cancer

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test