Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Aim

The automatic computer-assisted mammogram classification system is important for women patients to detect and diagnose the cancer regions. In this work, the mammogram images are classified into three cases: healthy, benign and cancer, using the proposed Resource Efficient Convolutional Neural Network (RECNN architecture).

Methods

The proposed mammogram image classification system consists of Data Augmentation (DA) module and Spatial transformation module and CNN architecture with a segmentation module. The DA methods are used to increase the mammogram image count and Spatial Gabor Transform is used as the spatial transformation module for transforming the spatial pixels into spatial-frequency pixels. Then, the proposed RECNN architecture is used to perform the classification of mammogram images into healthy, benign and cancer cases. Further, the cancer mammogram images are diagnosed as either ‘Early’ or ‘Severe’ using the proposed RECNN architecture in this work.

Results

The proposed MCDS obtains 98.65% SeDR, 98.93% SpDR and 98.84% ADR for benign case mammogram images on DDSM dataset and also obtains 98.84% SeDR, 98.7% SpDR and 98.92% ADR for cancer case mammogram images on DDSM dataset. The proposed MCDS obtains 98.94% SeDR, 98.86% SpDR and 98.96% ADR for benign case mammogram images on MIAS dataset and also obtains 98.89% SeDR, 98.88% SpDR and 99.03% ADR for cancer case mammogram images on MIAS dataset.

Conclusion

This proposed method is tested on the mammogram images from DDSM and MIAS datasets and the experimental results are compared with other similar mammogram classification works in this paper. Based on several performance evaluation measures, the experimental results show that MCDS outperforms the state-of-the-art methods currently used for the diagnosis and detection of mammography cancer.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056309483240805111535
2024-01-01
2025-07-09
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. MalathiM. SinthiaP. FarzanaFareen. Anuja MaryAloy. Breast cancer detection using active contour and classification by deep belief network.Materials Today: Proceedings20214527212724
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FangH. FanH. LinS. QingZ. SheykhahmadF.R. Automatic breast cancer detection based on optimized neural network using whale optimization algorithm.Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol.202131142543810.1002/ima.22468
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MichaelE. MaH. LiH. KulwaF. LiJ. Breast cancer segmentation methods: Current status and future potentials.Biomed Res Int.20212021996210910.1155/2021/9962109.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. VilleminJ.P. LorenziC. CabrillacM.S. OldfieldA. RitchieW. LucoR.F. A cell-to-patient machine learning transfer approach uncovers novel basal-like breast cancer prognostic markers amongst alternative splice variants.BMC Biol.2021191707910.1186/s12915‑021‑01002‑733845831
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SafdarS. RizwanM. GadekalluT.R. JavedA.R. RahmaniM.K.I. JawadK. BhatiaS. Bio-imaging-based machine learning algorithm for breast cancer detection.Diagnostics (Basel)2022125113410.3390/diagnostics1205113435626290
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AhmadS. KhanS. Fahad AlAjmiM. Kumar DuttaA. Minh DangL. Prasad JoshiG. MoonH. Deep learning enabled disease diagnosis for secure internet of medical things.Comput. Mater. Continua202273196597910.32604/cmc.2022.025760
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DebeleeTG. SchwenkerF. IbenthalA. AshenafiDY. Survey of deep learning in breast cancer image analysis.Evolving Systems202011410.1007/s12530‑019‑09297‑2.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. de LimaS.M.L. da Silva-FilhoA.G. dos SantosW.P. Detection and classification of masses in mammographic images in a multi-kernel approach.Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.2016134112910.1016/j.cmpb.2016.04.02927480729
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZebariD.A. ZeebareeD.Q. AbdulazeezA.M. HaronH. HamedH.N.A. Improved threshold based and trainable fully automated segmentation for breast cancer boundary and pectoral muscle in mammogram images.IEEE Access2020820309720311610.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036072
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PunithaS. AmuthanA. JosephK.S. Benign and malignant breast cancer segmentation using optimized region growing technique.Future Comput. Inform. J.20183234835810.1016/j.fcij.2018.10.005
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WahabN. KhanA. LeeY.S. Transfer learning based deep CNN for segmentation and detection of mitoses in breast cancer histopathological images.Microscopy (Oxf.)201968321623310.1093/jmicro/dfz00230722018
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RahmanH. Naik BukhtTF. AhmadR. AlmadhorA. JavedAR. Efficient breast cancer diagnosis from complex mammographic images using deep convolutional neural network.Comput Intell Neurosci.20232023771771210.1155/2023/7717712.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JhaSudan. AhmadSultan. AryaAnoopa. AlouffiBader. AlharbiAbdullah. Ensemble learning-based hybrid segmentation of mammographic images for breast cancer risk prediction using fuzzy c-means and CNN model.J Healthc Eng.20232023149195510.1155/2023/1491955.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. IqbalM.S. AhmadW. AlizadehsaniR. HussainS. RehmanR. Breast Cancer dataset, classification and detection using deep learning.Healthcare (Basel)20221012239510.3390/healthcare1012239536553919
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DDSM: Digital database for screening mammography.Available from: http://www.eng.usf.edu/cvprg/mammography/database.html
  16. Mammographic image analysis homepage.Available from: https://www.mammoimage.org/databases/
  17. SinghN. VeenadhariS. Breast cancer segmentation using global thresholding and region merging.Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng.2018612292297
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HaqA-U. ZhoouW. AliA. AhmadS. WaliS. SaboorA. Ping LiJ. Detection of breast cancer through clinical data using supervised and unsupervised feature selection techniques.IEEE Access2021PP991
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SoltaniH. AmrouneM. BendibI. HaouamM.Y. Breast cancer lesion detection and segmentation based on mask R-CNN.International Conference on Recent Advances in Mathematics and Informatics (ICRAMI)Tebessa, Algeria20211610.1109/ICRAMI52622.2021.9585913
    [Google Scholar]
  20. AsadiB. MemonQ. Efficient breast cancer detection via cascade deep learning network.Int. J. Intell.20234465210.1016/j.ijin.2023.02.001
    [Google Scholar]
  21. de la Luz EscobarM. De la RosaJ.I. Galván-TejadaC.E. Galvan-TejadaJ.I. Gamboa-RosalesH. de la Rosa GomezD.R. Luna-GarcíaH. Celaya-PadillaJ.M. Breast cancer detection using automated segmentation and genetic algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel)20221212309910.3390/diagnostics1212309936553106
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HammamiA. Uncertainty principles for the Hankel-Gabor transform.Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.202051125126410.1007/s13226‑020‑0398‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ŠostakA. UljaneI. EklundP. Fuzzy relational mathematical morphology: Erosion and dilation.IPMU2020123971272510.1007/978‑3‑030‑50153‑2_52.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056309483240805111535
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056309483240805111535
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test