Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

In order to perform a full surgical resection on non-palpable breast lesions, a current method necessitates correct intraoperative localization. Additionally, because it is an important prognostic factor for these patients, the examination of the lymph node status is crucial.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique in localizing non-palpable breast lesions together with sentinel lymph node (SLN) using a single radiotracer, that is, nanocolloid particles of human serum albumin (NC) labeled with technetium-99m (99mTc).

Methods

39 patients were included, each having a single non-palpable breast lesion and clinically no evidence of axillary disease. Patients received 99mTc-NC intratumorally on the same day as surgery under the guidance of ultrasound. Planar and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography lymphoscintigraphy were performed to localize the breast lesion and the SLN. The occult breast lesion and SLN were both localized using a hand-held gamma-probe, which was also utilized to determine the optimal access pathway for surgery. In order to ensure a radical treatment in a single surgical session and reduce the amount of normal tissue that would need to be removed, the surgical field was checked with the gamma probe after the specimen was removed to confirm the lack of residual sources of considerable radioactivity.

Results

Breast lesions were successfully localized and removed in all patients. Pathological findings revealed breast carcinoma in 11/39 patients (28%) and benign lesions in 28 (72%). Axillary SLNs were detected in 31/39 (79.5%) patients. The metastatic involvement of SLN was only seen in two cases.

Conclusion

While the identification rate of the SNOLL technique performed with an intratumoral injection of 99mTc-NC as the sole radiotracer in non-palpable breast lesions was great, it was not fully satisfactory in SLNs.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056275326231210193544
2024-01-01
2025-06-27
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. KohlerB.A. ShermanR.L. HowladerN. JemalA. RyersonA.B. HenryK.A. BoscoeF.P. CroninK.A. LakeA. NooneA.M. HenleyS.J. EhemanC.R. AndersonR.N. PenberthyL. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2011, featuring incidence of breast cancer subtypes by race/ethnicity, poverty and state.J. Natl. Cancer Inst.20151076djv04810.1093/jnci/djv04825825511
    [Google Scholar]
  2. HortobagyiG.N. de la Garza SalazarJ. PritchardK. AmadoriD. HaidingerR. HudisC.A. KhaledH. LiuM.C. MartinM. NamerM. O’ShaughnessyJ.A. ShenZ.Z. AlbainK.S. The global breast cancer burden: Variations in epidemiology and survival.Clin. Breast Cancer20056539140110.3816/CBC.2005.n.04316381622
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De FeliceC. CipollaV. StagnittiA. MariniA. PasqualittoE. MeggioriniM.L. The impact of presurgical magnetic resonance in early breast cancer: An observational study.Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.201233219319922611962
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FollacchioG.A. MonteleoneF. AnibaldiP. De VincentisG. IacobelliS. MerolaR. D’OraziV. MontiM. PastaV. A modified sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique in non-palpable breast cancer: A pilot study.J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.201534111310.1186/s13046‑015‑0230‑x26445493
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MontiS. GalimbertiV. TrifiroG. De CiccoC. PeradzeN. BrenelliF. Fernandez-RodriguezJ. RotmenszN. LatronicoA. BerrettiniA. MauriM. MachadoL. LuiniA. PaganelliG. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): Experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.Ann. Surg. Oncol.200714102928293110.1245/s10434‑007‑9452‑217674108
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AdamczykB. Seraszek-JarosA. ListwanK. WasiewiczJ. Is SNOLL a good localization technique in early breast cancer treatment? A single center’s experience.Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother.202025459459710.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.02232518530
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De CiccoC. TrifiròG. IntraM. MarottaG. CiprianA. FrassonA. PriscoG. LuiniA. VialeG. PaganelliG. Optimised nuclear medicine method for tumour marking and sentinel node detection in occult primary breast lesions.Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging200431334935410.1007/s00259‑003‑1390‑z14647985
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GiulianoA.E. BarthA.M. SpivackB. BeitschP.D. EvansS.W. Incidence and predictors of axillary metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the breast.J. Am. Coll. Surg.199618331851898784309
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PerryN.M. Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease.Eur. J. Cancer200137215917210.1016/S0959‑8049(00)00337‑311166142
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LavouéV. NosC. CloughK.B. BaghaieF. ZerbibE. PouletB. Lefrère BeldaM.A. DucellierA. LecuruF. Simplified technique of radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) plus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNOLL) in breast carcinoma.Ann. Surg. Oncol.20081592556256110.1245/s10434‑008‑9994‑y18574635
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LuiniA. ZurridaS. PaganelliG. GalimbertiV. SacchiniV. MontiS. VeronesiP. VialeG. VeronesiU. Comparison of radioguided excision with wire localization of occult breast lesions.Br. J. Surg.200286452252510.1046/j.1365‑2168.1999.01078.x10215829
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LeideniusM.H.K. Radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) in surgery of impalpable breast tumours.Breast Cancer Online200586e3210.1017/S1470903105003482
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NadeemR. ChaglaL.S. HarrisO. DesmondS. ThindR. TitterrellC. AudisioR.A. Occult breast lesions: A comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL).Breast200514428328910.1016/j.breast.2005.04.00215985370
    [Google Scholar]
  14. AdamczykB. DawidM. KarolP. ArkadiuszS. PiotrN. PawełM. Preliminary experience in sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique—One center study.Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother.201116622122610.1016/j.rpor.2011.08.00424376984
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Medina-FrancoH. Abarca-PérezL. García-AlvarezM.N. Ulloa-GómezJ.L. Romero-TrejoC. Sepúlveda-MéndezJ. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire‐guided lumpectomy for non‐palpable breast lesions: A randomized prospective evaluation.J. Surg. Oncol.200897210811110.1002/jso.2088018181162
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Van EsserS. HobbelinkM. Van der PloegI.M.C. MaliW.P.T.M. Van DiestP.J. Borel RinkesI.H.M. Van HillegersbergR. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for non‐palpable invasive breast cancer.J. Surg. Oncol.200898752652910.1002/jso.2114318767074
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FeggiL. BasagliaE. CorcioneS. QuerzoliP. SolianiG. AscanelliS. PrandiniN. BergossiL. CarcoforoP. An original approach in the diagnosis of early breast cancer: Use of the same radiopharmaceutical for both non-palpable lesions and sentinel node localisation.Eur. J. Nucl. Med.200128111589159610.1007/s00259010060111702098
    [Google Scholar]
  18. BesicN. KramaricA. PodnarB. PerhavecA. MusicM. Grazio-FrkovicS. ZgajnarJ. Factors correlated to successful surgical treatment of 181 non-palpable invasive breast carcinomas.Breast200918529429810.1016/j.breast.2009.08.00219734048
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RönkäR. KrogerusL. LeppänenE. von SmittenK. LeideniusM. Radio-guided occult lesion localization in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy.Am. J. Surg.2004187449149610.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.04015041497
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TrifiròG. VialeG. GentiliniO. TravainiL.L. PaganelliG. Sentinel node detection in pre-operative axillary staging.Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging200431S1S46S5510.1007/s00259‑004‑1526‑915103506
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Vidal-SicartS. RiojaM.E. ParedesP. KeshtgarM.R. Valdés OlmosR.A. Contribution of perioperative imaging to radioguided surgery.Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging201458214016024835290
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LermanH. MetserU. LievshitzG. SperberF. ShneebaumS. Even-SapirE. Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer: The role of SPECT-CT.Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging200633332933710.1007/s00259‑005‑1927‑416220303
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jimenez-HeffernanA. EllmannA. SadoH. HuićD. BalC. ParameswaranR. GiammarileF. PruzzoR. KostadinovaI. VorsterM. AlmeidaP. SantiagoJ. GambhirS. SergievaS. CalderonA. YoungG.O. Valdes-OlmosR. ZaknunJ. MagbooV.P. PascualT.N.B. Results of a prospective international atomic energy agency (IAEA) sentinel node trial on the value of SPECT/CT over planar imaging in various malignancies.J. Nucl. Med.20155691338134410.2967/jnumed.114.15364326229148
    [Google Scholar]
  24. van der PloegI.M.C. Valdés OlmosR.A. KroonB.B.R. RutgersE.J.T. NiewegO.E. The hidden sentinel node and SPECT/CT in breast cancer patients.Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging200936161110.1007/s00259‑008‑0910‑218712384
    [Google Scholar]
  25. VercellinoL. OhnonaJ. GroheuxD. SlamaA. CollettiP.M. ChondrogiannisS. MerletP. ToubertM.E. RubelloD. Role of SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer.Clin. Nucl. Med.201439543143610.1097/RLU.0b013e31829af8c023877520
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HusarikD.B. SteinertH.C. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomographyfor sentinel node mapping in breast cancer.Semin. Nucl. Med.2007371293310.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.08.00117161037
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WagnerT. BuscombeJ. GnanasegaranG. NavalkissoorS. SPECT/CT in sentinel node imaging.Nucl. Med. Commun.201334319120210.1097/MNM.0b013e32835c5a2423276829
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056275326231210193544
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056275326231210193544
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test