Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Objective

To explore the application value of a combined model based on multi-parameter MRI radiomics and clinical features in preoperative prediction of lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI) in endometrial carcinoma (EC).

Methods

This retrospective study collected the clinicopathological and imaging data of 218 patients with EC in Yuncheng Central Hospital from March 2018 to May 2022. The patients were randomly divided into training group (n=152) and validation group (n= 66) according to the ratio of 7: 3. Based on the ADC, CE-sag, CE-tra, DWI, T2WI-sag-fs, T2WI-tra sequence images of each patient, the region of interest was manually segmented and the features were extracted. The four-step dimensionality reduction method based on max-relevance and min-redundancy (MRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection and radiomics model construction. Independent predictors of clinicopathological features were screened by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The imaging model based on ADC, CE-sag, CE-tra, DWI, T2WI-sag-fs, T2WI-tra single sequence and combined sequence and the fusion model with clinicopathological features were constructed, and the nomogram was made. ROC curve, correction curve and decision analysis curve were used to evaluate the efficacy and clinical benefits of the nomogram.

Results

There was no significant difference in general clinical data between the training and validation groups (P > 0.05). After screening the extracted features, 16 radiomics features were obtained, which were all related to LVSI in EC patients (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the six independent sequence radiomics models in the training group was 0.807, 0.794, 0.826, 0.794, 0.828, 0.824, respectively. The AUC corresponding to the radiomics model constructed by the combined sequence was 0.884, and the diagnostic efficiency was the best, which was verified in the validation group. The AUC of the nomogram constructed by the combined radiomics model and age、maximum tumor diameter(MTD), lymph node enlargement (LNE) in the training group and the validation group were 0.914 and 0.912, respectively. The correction curve shows that the nomogram has good correction performance. The decision curve suggests that taking radiomics nomogram to predict LVSI net benefit when the risk threshold is > 10% is better than considering all patients as LVSI+ or LVSI-.

Conclusion

The combined model based on multi-parametric MRI radiomics features and clinical features has good predictive value for LVSI status in EC patients.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266366231219111246
2024-01-01
2025-06-30
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. BhatlaN. AokiD. SharmaD.N. SankaranarayananR. Cancer of the cervix uteri.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.2018143S2223610.1002/ijgo.1261130306584
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CohenP.A. JhingranA. OakninA. DennyL. Cervical cancer.Lancet20193931016716918210.1016/S0140‑6736(18)32470‑X30638582
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ArbynM. WeiderpassE. BruniL. de SanjoséS. SaraiyaM. FerlayJ. BrayF. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: A worldwide analysis.Lancet Glob. Health202082e191e20310.1016/S2214‑109X(19)30482‑631812369
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JiangX. TangH. ChenT. Epidemiology of gynecologic cancers in China.J. Gynecol. Oncol.2018291e710.3802/jgo.2018.29.e729185265
    [Google Scholar]
  5. PecorelliS. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.2009105210310410.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.01219367689
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CreasmanW. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.2009105210910.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.01019345353
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FreemanS.J. AlyA.M. KataokaM.Y. AddleyH.C. ReinholdC. SalaE. The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: Implications for MR imaging.Radiographics20123261805182710.1148/rg.32612551923065170
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ColomboN. PretiE. LandoniF. CarinelliS. ColomboA. MariniC. SessaC. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Ann. Oncol.201324S6vi33vi3810.1093/annonc/mdt35324078661
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GuntupalliS.R. ZighelboimI. KizerN.T. ZhangQ. PowellM.A. ThakerP.H. GoodfellowP.J. MutchD.G. Lymphovascular space invasion is an independent risk factor for nodal disease and poor outcomes in endometrioid endometrial cancer.Gynecol. Oncol.20121241313510.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.01722030404
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HarrisK.L. MaurerK.A. JarboeE. WernerT.L. GaffneyD. LVSI positive and NX in early endometrial cancer: Surgical restaging (and no further treatment if N0), or adjuvant ERT?Gynecol. Oncol.2020156124325010.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.01631703813
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TortorellaL. RestainoS. ZannoniG.F. VizzielliG. ChianteraV. CappuccioS. GioèA. La FeraE. DinoiG. AngelicoG. ScambiaG. FanfaniF. Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as predictor of distant relapse and poor prognosis in low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer.J. Gynecol. Oncol.2021322e1110.3802/jgo.2021.32.e1133470061
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MandatoV.D. TorricelliF. MastrofilippoV. PalicelliA. CiarliniG. PirilloD. AnnunziataG. AguzzoliL. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial biopsy and intraoperative frozen section in predicting the final pathological diagnosis of endometrial cancer.Surg. Oncol.20203522923510.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.00332932219
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GilliesR.J. KinahanP.E. HricakH. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data.Radiology2016278256357710.1148/radiol.201515116926579733
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GroveO. BerglundA.E. SchabathM.B. AertsH.J.W.L. DekkerA. WangH. VelazquezE.R. LambinP. GuY. BalagurunathanY. EikmanE. GatenbyR.A. EschrichS. GilliesR.J. Quantitative computed tomographic descriptors associate tumor shape complexity and intratumor heterogeneity with prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.PLoS One2015103e011826110.1371/journal.pone.011826125739030
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SunC. TianX. LiuZ. LiW. LiP. ChenJ. ZhangW. FangZ. DuP. DuanH. LiuP. WangL. ChenC. TianJ. Radiomic analysis for pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A multicentre study.EBioMedicine20194616016910.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.04931395503
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhouX. YiY. LiuZ. CaoW. LaiB. SunK. LiL. ZhouZ. FengY. TianJ. Radiomics-based pretherapeutic prediction of non-response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Ann. Surg. Oncol.20192661676168410.1245/s10434‑019‑07300‑330887373
    [Google Scholar]
  17. van GriethuysenJ.J.M. FedorovA. ParmarC. HosnyA. AucoinN. NarayanV. Beets-TanR.G.H. Fillion-RobinJ.C. PieperS. AertsH.J.W.L. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype.Cancer Res.20177721e104e10710.1158/0008‑5472.CAN‑17‑033929092951
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PetersE.E.M. BartoschC. McCluggageW.G. GenestieC. LaxS.F. NoutR. OostingJ. SinghN. SmitH.C.S.H. SmitV.T.H.B.M. Van de VijverK.K. BosseT. Reproducibility of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) assessment in endometrial cancer.Histopathology201975112813610.1111/his.1387131155736
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TomaszewskiM.R. GilliesR.J. The biological meaning of radiomic features.Radiology20212992E25610.1148/radiol.202121900533900879
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HuangY. LiangC. HeL. TianJ. LiangC. ChenX. MaZ. LiuZ. Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.J. Clin. Oncol.201634182157216410.1200/JCO.2015.65.912827138577
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GerlingerM. RowanA.J. HorswellS. LarkinJ. EndesfelderD. GronroosE. MartinezP. MatthewsN. StewartA. TarpeyP. VarelaI. PhillimoreB. BegumS. McDonaldN.Q. ButlerA. JonesD. RaineK. LatimerC. SantosC.R. NohadaniM. EklundA.C. Spencer-DeneB. ClarkG. PickeringL. StampG. GoreM. SzallasiZ. DownwardJ. FutrealP.A. SwantonC. SwantonC. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.N. Engl. J. Med.20123661088389210.1056/NEJMoa111320522397650
    [Google Scholar]
  22. DuW. WangY. LiD. XiaX. TanQ. XiongX. LiZ. Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer with radiomics –based nomogram.Front. Oncol.20211163779410.3389/fonc.2021.63779434322375
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SunnetciK.M. KabaE. Beyazal ÇelikerF. AlkanA. Comparative parotid gland segmentation by using ResNet ‐18 and MobileNetV2 based DeepLab v3+ architectures from magnetic resonance images.Concurr. Comput.2023351e740510.1002/cpe.7405
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SunnetciK.M. AlkanA. Biphasic majority voting-based comparative COVID-19 diagnosis using chest X-ray images.Expert Syst. Appl.202321611943010.1016/j.eswa.2022.11943036570382
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266366231219111246
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056266366231219111246
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the Publisher’s website.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test