Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background:

MRI of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) can predict the pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Our purpose was to use MRI results to evaluate the diagnostic value of combined changes in signal intensity (SI) and volume (V) of patients with LARC for predicting pCR to CRT.

Methods:

This retrospective study on 100 patients with LARC analyzed clinical and imaging data that were collected from March, 2018, to March, 2020. Before and after CRT, T2-weighted (T2W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (ceT1W) data were analyzed. Percent changes of V (%∆V) and relative SI ratio (%∆SIR) on different sequences were calculated. After CRT, patients had pathological confirmation as pCR or non-pCR. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results:

There were 34 pCR and 66 non-pCR patients. Except for ADC-%∆SIR, the combined parameters and single parameters had a greater decrease in the pCR group. The combination of ADC-%∆V and T2W-%∆SIR had the greatest diagnostic value (AUC=0.85,cutoff=0.23%) and the combination of ADC-%∆V% and ∆SIR had the best accuracy (89%, cutoff=44.11%). Except for T2W-%∆V and T2W-%∆SIR, the different sequences had moderate differences in diagnostic performance. The diagnostic performance of combined parameters or single parameters on ADC and T2W was significantly better than those on ceT1W (p<0.01).

Conclusion:

All sequences except ADC-%∆SIR provided reliable predictions of pCR, although ceT1W data had limited usefulness.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258900231025043146
2023-11-28
2025-06-26
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. SiddiquiM.R.S. BhodayJ. BattersbyN.J. ChandM. WestN.P. AbulafiA.M. TekkisP.P. BrownG. Defining response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological scales.World J. Gastroenterol.201622378414843410.3748/wjg.v22.i37.841427729748
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SclafaniF. BrownG. CunninghamD. WotherspoonA. MendesL.S.T. BalyasnikovaS. EvansJ. PeckittC. BegumR. TaitD. TaberneroJ. GlimeliusB. RosellóS. ThomasJ. OatesJ. ChauI. Comparison between MRI and pathology in the assessment of tumour regression grade in rectal cancer.Br. J. Cancer2017117101478148510.1038/bjc.2017.32028934761
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KimS. HanK. SeoN. KimH.J. KimM.J. KoomW.S. AhnJ.B. LimJ.S. T2-weighted signal intensity-selected volumetry for prediction of pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Eur. Radiol.201828125231524010.1007/s00330‑018‑5520‑129858637
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PetrilloA. FuscoR. GranataV. FiliceS. SansoneM. RegaD. DelrioP. BiancoF. RomanoG.M. TatangeloF. AvalloneA. PecoriB. Assessing response to neo-adjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer using Intra-voxel Incoherent Motion modelling by DWI data and Standardized Index of Shape from DCE-MRI.Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol.20181010.1177/175883591880987530479672
    [Google Scholar]
  5. TanZ ChengL XieL Comparison of the diagnostic performance of changes in signal intensity and volume from multiparametric MRI for assessing response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology20222022
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HorvatN. Carlos Tavares RochaC. Clemente OliveiraB. PetkovskaI. GollubM.J. MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management.Radiographics201939236738710.1148/rg.201918011430768361
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WanL.J. ZhangC.D. ZhangH.M. MengY.K. YeF. LiuY. ZhaoX.M. ZhouC.W. The value of MR T2WI signal intensity related parameters for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi2019411183784331770851
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HötkerA.M. TarlintonL. MazaheriY. WooK.M. GönenM. SaltzL.B. GoodmanK.A. Garcia-AguilarJ. GollubM.J. Multiparametric MRI in the assessment of response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A comparison of morphological, volumetric and functional MRI parameters.Eur. Radiol.201626124303431210.1007/s00330‑016‑4283‑926945761
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Van den BeginR. KleijnenJ.P. EngelsB. PhilippensM. van AsselenB. RaaymakersB. ReerinkO. De RidderM. IntvenM. Tumor volume regression during preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective observational study with weekly MRI.Acta Oncol.201857672372710.1080/0284186X.2017.140068929157069
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MaedaK. ShibutaniM. TachimoriA. NishiiT. AomatsuN. FukuokaT. NagaharaH. OtaniH. InoueT. OhiraM. Prognostic significance of neoadjuvant rectal score and indication for postoperative adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.In Vivo202034128328910.21873/invivo.1177231882490
    [Google Scholar]
  11. YoenH. ParkH.E. KimS.H. YoonJ.H. HurB.Y. BaeJ.S. KimJ.H. OhH.J. HanJ.K. Prognostic value of tumor regression grade on MR in rectal cancer: A large-scale, single-center experience.Korean J. Radiol.20202191065107610.3348/kjr.2019.079732691542
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HuhJ.W. KimH.C. KimS.H. ParkY.A. ChoY.B. YunS.H. LeeW.Y. ParkH.C. ChoiD.H. ParkJ.O. ParkY.S. ChunH.K. Tumor regression grade as a clinically useful outcome predictor in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.Surgery2019165357958510.1016/j.surg.2018.08.02630314723
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LambregtsD.M.J. YassienA.B. LahayeM.J. BetgenA. MaasM. BeetsG.L. van der HeideU.A. van TriestB. Beets-TanR.G.H. Monitoring early changes in rectal tumor morphology and volume during 5 weeks of preoperative chemoradiotherapy-an evaluation with sequential MRIs.Radiother. Oncol.2018126343143610.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.02429343409
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Curvo-SemedoL. LambregtsD.M.J. MaasM. ThywissenT. MehsenR.T. LammeringG. BeetsG.L. Caseiro-AlvesF. Beets-TanR.G.H. Rectal cancer: Assessment of complete response to preoperative combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy-conventional MR volumetry versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging.Radiology2011260373474310.1148/radiol.1110246721673229
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HausmannD. LiuJ. BudjanJ. ReichertM. OngM. MeyerM. SmakicA. GrimmR. StreckerR. SchoenbergS.O. WangX. AttenbergerU.I. Image quality assessment of 2D versus 3D T2WI and evaluation of ultra-high b-value (b=2,000 mm/s2) DWI for response assessment in rectal cancer.Anticancer Res.201838296997829374729
    [Google Scholar]
  16. NeubauerH. LiM. MüllerV. PabstT. BeerM. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted mri for tumor characterization, differentiation and monitoring in pediatric patients with neuroblastic tumors.Röfo Fortschr. Geb. Röntgenstr. Neuen Bildgeb. Verfahr.2017189764065010.1055/s‑0043‑10899328511265
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BlazicI.M. LilicG.B. GajicM.M. Quantitative assessment of rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy: Comparison of three methods of positioning region of interest for ADC measurements at diffusion-weighted MR imaging.Radiology2017282241842810.1148/radiol.201615190827253423
    [Google Scholar]
  18. EdgeS.B. ComptonC.C. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: The 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM.Ann Surg Oncol.20101714711474
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RyanR. GibbonsD. HylandJ.M.P. TreanorD. WhiteA. MulcahyH.E. O’DonoghueD.P. MoriartyM. FennellyD. SheahanK. Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.Histopathology200547214114610.1111/j.1365‑2559.2005.02176.x16045774
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KimS.H. ChangH.J. KimD.Y. ParkJ.W. BaekJ.Y. KimS.Y. ParkS.C. OhJ.H. YuA. NamB.H. What is the ideal tumor regression grading system in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy?Cancer Res. Treat.2016483998100910.4143/crt.2015.25426511803
    [Google Scholar]
  21. IntvenM. MonninkhofE.M. ReerinkO. PhilippensM.E.P. Combined T2w volumetry, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI for response assessment after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.Acta Oncol.201554101729173610.3109/0284186X.2015.103701025914930
    [Google Scholar]
  22. DeLongE.R. DeLongD.M. Clarke-PearsonD.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach.Biometrics198844383784510.2307/25315953203132
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AmodeoS. RosmanA.S. DesiatoV. HindmanN.M. NewmanE. BermanR. PachterH.L. MelisM. MRI-based apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting pathologic response of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.20182115W205W21610.2214/AJR.17.1913530240291
    [Google Scholar]
  24. van der SandeM.E. BeetsG.L. HupkensB.J.P. BreukinkS.O. MelenhorstJ. BakersF.C.H. LambregtsD.M.J. GrabschH.I. Beets-TanR.G.H. MaasM. Response assessment after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Why are we missing complete responses with MRI and endoscopy?Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.20194561011101710.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.01930528891
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KudouM. NakanishiM. KuriuY. MurayamaY. AritaT. KishimotoM. KonishiE. GotoM. YamadaK. OtsujiE. Value of intra-tumor heterogeneity evaluated by diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting pathological stages and therapeutic responses to chemoradiotherapy in lower rectal cancer.J. Cancer202011116817610.7150/jca.3835431892983
    [Google Scholar]
  26. BelliG. BusoniS. CiccaroneA. ConiglioA. EspositoM. GiannelliM. MazzoniL.N. NocettiL. SghedoniR. TarducciR. ZatelliG. AnojaR.A. BelmonteG. BertolinoN. BettiM. BiaginiC. CiarmatoriA. CrettiF. FabbriE. FedeliL. FiliceS. FulcheriC.P.L. GasperiC. MangiliP.A. MazzocchiS. MeliadòG. MorzentiS. NoferiniL. OberhoferN. OrsingherL. ParucciniN. PrincigalliG. QuattrocchiM. RinaldiA. ScelfoD. FreixasG.V. TenoriL. ZuccaI. LuchinatC. GoriC. GobbiG. Quality assurance multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging201643121321910.1002/jmri.2495626013043
    [Google Scholar]
  27. De FeliceF. MagnanteA.L. MusioD. CiolinaM. De CeccoC.N. RengoM. LaghiA. TomboliniV. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.20174371324132910.1016/j.ejso.2017.03.01028363512
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NapoletanoM. MazzuccaD. ProsperiE. AisaM.C. LupattelliM. AristeiC. ScialpiM. Locally advanced rectal cancer: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in restaging after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.Abdom. Radiol.201944113664367310.1007/s00261‑019‑02012‑431004202
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PhamT.T. LineyG.P. WongK. BartonM.B. Functional MRI for quantitative treatment response prediction in locally advanced rectal cancer.Br. J. Radiol.20179010722015107810.1259/bjr.2015107828055248
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WanL. ZhangC. ZhaoQ. MengY. ZouS. YangY. LiuY. JiangJ. YeF. OuyangH. ZhaoX. ZhangH. Developing a prediction model based on MRI for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Abdom. Radiol.20194492978298710.1007/s00261‑019‑02129‑631327039
    [Google Scholar]
  31. WuL.M. ZhuJ. HuJ. YinY. GuH.Y. HuaJ. ChenJ. XuJ.R. Is there a benefit in using magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer?Int. J. Colorectal Dis.20132891225123810.1007/s00384‑013‑1676‑y23516072
    [Google Scholar]
  32. GollubM.J. BlazicI. FelderS. KnezevicA. GonenM. Garcia-AguilarJ. PatyP.P. SmithJ.J. Value of adding dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI visual assessment to conventional MRI and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of complete tumour response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.Eur. Radiol.20192931104111310.1007/s00330‑018‑5719‑130242504
    [Google Scholar]
  33. LambregtsD.M.J. RaoS.X. SassenS. MartensM.H. HeijnenL.A. BuijsenJ. SosefM. BeetsG.L. VliegenR.A. Beets-TanR.G.H. MRI and Diffusion-weighted MRI volumetry for identification of complete tumor responders after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.Ann. Surg.201526261034103910.1097/SLA.000000000000090925211270
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258900231025043146
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056258900231025043146
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Chemoradiotherapy; Complete response; LARC; MRI; Rectal cancer; Tumor volumetry
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test