Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the association of different patterns of breast edema and clinical-pathological features and axillary lymph node (ALN) status in early invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) for simple and readily available assessment and to guide surgeons to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy for selected patients.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective analysis involved 207 individuals with clinical T1-T2 stage IDC. The clinical-pathological features of the patients were compared with different breast edema and ALN statuses. Independent risk factors for ALN metastasis were verified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

ALN metastasis was confirmed in 100 of 207 patients (48.3%) with early-stage IDC. Significant differences were found between different ALN states for tumour size, clinical T stage, and breast edema (P <0.05). The clinical T2 stage (odds ratio-1.882, p=0.043) and moderate to severe edema (odds ratio-10.869, p=0.004) were independent risk factors for ALN metastasis. Moreover, better prognostic factors, including smaller tumour size, lower Ki-67 index and histologic grade, luminal A subtype, and lower incidence of lymph node metastasis, were more frequently found in patients with no breast edema (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Breast edema can be considered a promising feature to improve the predictive performance of pathological ALN status in patients with early-stage breast cancer and thus may contribute to preoperative treatment planning.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056243245231024082647
2023-11-07
2024-11-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/20/1/CMIM-20-e15734056243245.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056243245231024082647&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. QuietC.A. FergusonD.J. WeichselbaumR.R. HellmanS. Natural history of node-negative breast cancer: a study of 826 patients with long-term follow-up.J. Clin. Oncol.19951351144115110.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.11447738620
    [Google Scholar]
  2. WarmuthM.A. BowenG. ProsnitzL.R. ChuL. BroadwaterG. PetersonB. LeightG. WinerE.P. Complications of axillary lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the breast.Cancer19988371362136810.1002/(SICI)1097‑0142(19981001)83:7<1362::AID‑CNCR13>3.0.CO;2‑29762937
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Del BiancoP. ZavagnoG. BurelliP. ScalcoG. BaruttaL. CarraroP. PietrarotaP. MeneghiniG. MorbinT. TacchettiG. PecoraroP. BelardinelliV. De SalvoG.L. GIVOM Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: Results of the sentinella–GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial.Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.200834550851310.1016/j.ejso.2007.05.01717614245
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SenerS.F. WinchesterD.J. MartzC.H. FeldmanJ.L. CavanaughJ.A. WinchesterD.P. WeigelB. BonnefoiK. KirbyK. MoreheadC. Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma.Cancer200192474875210.1002/1097‑0142(20010815)92:4<748::AID‑CNCR1378>3.0.CO;2‑V11550143
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FangS. ZhuJ. WangY. ZhouJ. WangG. XuW. ZhangW. The value of whole-lesion histogram analysis based on field‑of‑view optimized and constrained undistorted single shot (FOCUS) DWI for predicting axillary lymph node status in early-stage breast cancer.BMC Med. Imaging202222116310.1186/s12880‑022‑00891‑636088299
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WangZ. SunH. LiJ. ChenJ. MengF. LiH. HanL. ZhouS. YuT. Preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using CNN based on multiparametric MRI.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging202256370070910.1002/jmri.2808235108415
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LiL. YuT. SunJ. JiangS. LiuD. WangX. ZhangJ. Prediction of the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer by radiomic signature based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Acta Radiol.20226381014102210.1177/0284185121102585734162234
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HuangZ. TuX. LinQ. ZhanZ. TangL. LiuJ. LinD. LuoS. ZhangD. RuanC. Intramammary edema of invasive breast cancers on MRI T2-weighted fat suppression sequence: Correlation with molecular subtypes and clinical-pathologic prognostic factors.Clin. Imaging202283879210.1016/j.clinimag.2021.12.02335026664
    [Google Scholar]
  9. UematsuT. KasamiM. WatanabeJ. Is evaluation of the presence of prepectoral edema on T2-weighted with fat-suppression 3 T breast MRI a simple and readily available noninvasive technique for estimation of prognosis in patients with breast cancer?Breast Cancer201421668469210.1007/s12282‑013‑0440‑z23341125
    [Google Scholar]
  10. UematsuT. Focal breast edema associated with malignancy on T2-weighted images of breast MRI: peritumoral edema, prepectoral edema, and subcutaneous edema.Breast Cancer2015221667010.1007/s12282‑014‑0572‑925336185
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HaradaT.L. UematsuT. NakashimaK. KawabataT. NishimuraS. TakahashiK. TadokoroY. HayashiT. TsuchiyaK. WatanabeJ. SuginoT. Evaluation of breast edema findings at T2-weighted Breast MRI is useful for diagnosing occult inflammatory breast cancer and can predict prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Radiology20212991536210.1148/radiol.202120260433560188
    [Google Scholar]
  12. XuZ. DingY. ZhaoK. HanC. ShiZ. CuiY. LiuC. LinH. PanX. LiP. ChenM. WangH. DengX. LiangC. XieY. LiuZ. MRI characteristics of breast edema for assessing axillary lymph node burden in early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective bicentric study.Eur. Radiol.202232128213822510.1007/s00330‑022‑08896‑z35704112
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GoldhirschA. WinerE.P. CoatesA.S. GelberR.D. Piccart-GebhartM. ThürlimannB. SennH.J. AlbainK.S. AndréF. BerghJ. BonnefoiH. Bretel-MoralesD. BursteinH. CardosoF. Castiglione-GertschM. CoatesA.S. ColleoniM. CostaA. CuriglianoG. DavidsonN.E. Di LeoA. EjlertsenB. ForbesJ.F. GelberR.D. GnantM. GoldhirschA. GoodwinP. GossP.E. HarrisJ.R. HayesD.F. HudisC.A. IngleJ.N. JassemJ. JiangZ. KarlssonP. LoiblS. MorrowM. NamerM. Kent OsborneC. PartridgeA.H. Penault-LlorcaF. PerouC.M. Piccart-GebhartM.J. PritchardK.I. RutgersE.J.T. SedlmayerF. SemiglazovV. ShaoZ-M. SmithI. ThürlimannB. ToiM. TuttA. UntchM. VialeG. WatanabeT. WilckenN. WinerE.P. WoodW.C. Panel members Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.Ann. Oncol.20132492206222310.1093/annonc/mdt30323917950
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LesterS.C. BoseS. ChenY.Y. ConnollyJ.L. de BacaM.E. FitzgibbonsP.L. HayesD.F. KleerC. O’MalleyF.P. PageD.L. SmithB.L. TanL.K. WeaverD.L. WinerE. Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast.Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.2009133101515153810.5858/133.10.151519792042
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChoiE.J. YoukJ.H. ChoiH. SongJ.S. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI of invasive breast cancer for the prediction of sentinel lymph node status.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging202051261562610.1002/jmri.2686531313393
    [Google Scholar]
  16. YoshiharaE. SmeetsA. LaenenA. ReyndersA. SoensJ. Van OngevalC. MoermanP. ParidaensR. WildiersH. NevenP. ChristiaensM.R. Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer and their applicability in clinical practice.Breast201322335736110.1016/j.breast.2012.09.00323022046
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZhaoM. WuQ. GuoL. ZhouL. FuK. Magnetic resonance imaging features for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer.Eur. J. Radiol.202012910909310.1016/j.ejrad.2020.10909332512504
    [Google Scholar]
  18. CheonH. KimH.J. KimT.H. RyeomH.K. LeeJ. KimG.C. YukJ.S. KimW.H. Invasive breast cancer: Prognostic value of peritumoral edema identified at preoperative MR imaging.Radiology20182871687510.1148/radiol.201717115729315062
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KataruR.P. LyC.L. ShinJ. ParkH.J. BaikJ.E. RehalS. OrtegaS. LydenD. MehraraB.J. Tumor lymphatic function regulates tumor inflammatory and immunosuppressive microenvironments.Cancer Immunol. Res.2019781345135810.1158/2326‑6066.CIR‑18‑033731186247
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BaltzerP.A.T. YangF. DietzelM. HerzogA. SimonA. VagT. GajdaM. CamaraO. KaiserW.A. Sensitivity and specificity of unilateral edema on T2w-TSE sequences in MR-Mammography considering 974 histologically verified lesions.Breast J.201016323323910.1111/j.1524‑4741.2010.00915.x20565468
    [Google Scholar]
  21. BlumgartE.I. UrenR.F. NielsenP.M.F. NashM.P. ReynoldsH.M. Predicting lymphatic drainage patterns and primary tumour location in patients with breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.2011130269970510.1007/s10549‑011‑1737‑221850393
    [Google Scholar]
  22. UematsuT. KasamiM. WatanabeJ. Can T2-weighted 3-T breast MRI predict clinically occult inflammatory breast cancer before pathological examination? A single-center experience.Breast Cancer201421111512110.1007/s12282‑012‑0425‑323104394
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhouZ. ChenY. ZhaoF. SunZ. ZhuL. YuH. WangW. Predictive value of intravoxel incoherent motion combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging for breast cancer axillary lymph node metastasis: a retrospective study.Acta Radiol.2022284185122110762610.1177/0284185122110762635765225
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ChoiS.Y. ChangY-W. ParkH.J. KimH.J. HongS.S. SeoD.Y. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.Br. J. Radiol.2012851016e474e47910.1259/bjr/7938146422128125
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LudoviniV. SidoniA. PistolaL. BellezzaG. De AngelisV. GoriS. MosconiA.M. BisagniG. CherubiniR. Rosa BianA. RodinòC. SabbatiniR. MazzocchiB. BucciarelliE. TonatoM. ColozzaM. Evaluation of the prognostic role of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in stages I and II breast cancer patients.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.200381215916810.1023/A:102575571791214572158
    [Google Scholar]
  26. DentR. TrudeauM. PritchardK.I. HannaW.M. KahnH.K. SawkaC.A. LickleyL.A. RawlinsonE. SunP. NarodS.A. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence.Clin. Cancer Res.200713154429443410.1158/1078‑0432.CCR‑06‑304517671126
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LoiS. SirtaineN. PietteF. SalgadoR. VialeG. Van EenooF. RouasG. FrancisP. CrownJ.P.A. HitreE. de AzambujaE. QuinauxE. Di LeoA. MichielsS. PiccartM.J. SotiriouC. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98.J. Clin. Oncol.201331786086710.1200/JCO.2011.41.090223341518
    [Google Scholar]
  28. DietzelM. BaltzerP.A. VagT. GröschelT. GajdaM. CamaraO. KaiserW.A. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.201034458759510.1097/RCT.0b013e3181db9f0e20657229
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056243245231024082647
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056243245231024082647
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test