Skip to content
2000
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Background:

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality among women. In addition, 1 in 8 women and 1 in 833 men will be diagnosed with breast cancer in 2022. The detection of breast cancer can not only lower treatment costs but also increase survival rates. Due to increased cancer awareness, more women are undergoing breast cancer screening, leading to more cases being diagnosed worldwide, but doctors' ability to analyze these images is limited. As a result, they get overloaded leading to misinterpretations. The advent of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) minimized man’s involvement and achieved good results. CAD helps medical doctors automatically detect and analyze abnormalities found in the breast. Such abnormalities may be benign or malignant tumors.

Objective:

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using seven layers to classify breast cancer as either benign or malignant using mammograms.

Materials and Methods:

The open-source MIAS dataset of 322 images was used for our study, of which 207 were normal images and 115 were abnormal images. The proposed CNN model convolves an image into seven layers that extract features from the input images, and these features are used to classify breast cancer as malignant or benign.

Results:

The proposed CNN used a limited data set and achieved the best result compared to previous work. The method achieved results with a 0.39% loss, 99.89% accuracy, 99.85% precision, 99.89% recall, 99.87% F1-score, and an area under the curve noted to be 100.0%.

Conclusion:

CNN uses a small amount of data to determine abnormalities; the method will assist a medical doctor in determining whether or not a specific patient has cancer.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230811142718
2023-10-13
2025-01-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmim/20/1/e110823219688.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230811142718&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organizationhttps://www.who.int/news/item/03-02-2021-breast-cancer-now-most-common-form-of-cancer -who-taking-action
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breast Cancer Is Now the Most Common Form of Cancer Worldwide.https://www.healtheuropa.eu/breast-cancer-is-now-the-most-common-form-of-cancerworldwide/105624/https://www.who.int/news/item/03-02-2021-breast-cancer-now-most-common-form-ofcancer-who-taking-action
  3. Coalition, N.B.C.Breast Cancer Facts and Figures.https://www.stopbreastcancer.org/information-center/facts-figures
  4. Society, A.C.: Cancer Facts & Figures 2021.2021https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-factsand-_gures/2021/cancer-facts-and-_gures-2021.pdf
  5. Breast Cancer.https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/breast-cancer/symptoms-causes/syc-20352470
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer A.Latest Global Cancerhttps://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/latest-globalcancer-data-cancer-burden-rises-to-19-3-million-new-cases-and-10-0-million-cancer-deaths-in-2020/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Common Breast Cancer Typeshttps://www.cancercenter.com/cancer-types/breast-cancer/types/common-breast-cancer-types
  8. Healthline: A comprehensive guide to breast cancer.https://www.healthline.com/health/breast-cancer
  9. RayR. AbdullahA.A. MallickD.K. Ranjan DashS. Classi_cation of benign and malignant breast cancer using supervised machine learning algorithms based on image and numeric datasets.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.20191372101206210.1088/1742‑6596/1372/1/012062
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SocietyA.C. American cancer society recommendations for the early detection of breast cancer.https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/american-cancer-societyrecommendations- for-the-early-detection-of-breast-cancer.html
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KourouK. ExarchosT.P. ExarchosK.P. KaramouzisM.V. FotiadisD.I. Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction.Comput Struct Biotechnol J20151381710.1016/j.csbj.2014.11.005
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SchousboeJ.T. SpragueB.L. AbrahamL. O'MearaE.S. OnegaT. AdvaniS. HendersonL.M. WernliK.J. ZhangD. MigliorettiD.L. Cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 75 years : A cost-effectiveness analysis .Ann. Intern. Med.202217511119
    [Google Scholar]
  13. StephenWD LászlóT. Ming-FangAY Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: Results in 549,091 women.Cancer.20201261329712979
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChouhanN. KhanA. ShahJ.Z. HussnainM. KhanM.W. Deep convolutional neural network and emotional learning based breast cancer detection using digital mammography.Comput. Biol. Med.202113210431810.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.10431833744608
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MinH. ChandraS.S. DhungelN. CrozierS. BradleyA.P. Multi-scale mass segmentation for mammograms via cascaded random forests.2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017)18-21 April 2017Melbourne, VIC, Australia113201710.1109/ISBI.2017.7950481
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DheebaJ. SinghN.A. SelviS.T. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: A swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach.J Biomed Inform.201449455210.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.010
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SchreerI. Dense breast tissue as an important risk factor for breast cancer and implications for early detection.Breast Care200942899210.1159/000211954
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SechopoulosI. TeuwenJ. MannR. Arti_cial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art.Seminars in Cancer BiologyElsevier202172214225
    [Google Scholar]
  19. JalalianA. MashohorS.B. MahmudH.R. SaripanM.I.B. RamliA.R.B. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: A review.Clin. Imaging.2013373420426
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MahmoodT. LiJ. PeiY. AkhtarF. ImranA. RehmanK.U. A brief survey on breast cancer diagnostic with deep learning schemes using multi-image modalities.IEEE Access2020816577910.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021343
    [Google Scholar]
  21. de Oliveira SilvaL.C. BarrosA.K. LopesM.V. Detecting masses in dense breast using independent component analysis.Artif Intell Med201780293810.1016/j.artmed.2017.07.003
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WangY. FengY. ZhangL. WangZ. LvQ. YiZ. Deep adversarial domain adaptation for breast cancer screening from mammograms.Med. Image Anal.20217310214710.1016/j.media.2021.10214734246849
    [Google Scholar]
  23. DhawanA.P. Medical Image Analysis.John Wiley & Sons201110.1002/9780470918548
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KrizhevskyA. SutskeverI. HintonG.E. Imagenet classi_cation with deep convolutional neural networks.Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.201225
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ConantE.F. ToledanoA.Y. PeriaswamyS. FotinS.V. GoJ. BoatsmanJ.E. Improving accuracy and efficiency with concurrent use of artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis.Radiol Artif Intell.201914e180096
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WuN. PhangJ. ParkJ. ShenY. HuangZ. ZorinM. ZorinM. ThibaultK.J. Kim Deep neural networks improve radiologists performance in breast cancer screening.IEEE Trans Med Imaging201939411841194
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SchaffterT. BuistD.S. LeeC.I. Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms.JAMA Netw Open202033e200265
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ShenL. MargoliesL.R. RothsteinJ.H. FluderE. McBrideR. SiehW. Deep learning to improve breast cancer detection on screening mammography.Sci Rep.2019911249510.1038/s41598‑019‑48995‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ZhaoZ.Q. ZhengP. XuS.t. WuX. Object detection with deep learning: A review.IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.20193011321210.1109/TNNLS.2018.2876865
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WangZ. ChenJ. HoiS.C. Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey.IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell202043103365
    [Google Scholar]
  31. NahidA.A. MehrabiM.A. KongY. Histopathological breast cancer image classi_cation by deep neural network techniques guided by local clustering.BioMed Res. Int.2018201812010.1155/2018/236210829707566
    [Google Scholar]
  32. DhahriH. Al MaghayrehE. MahmoodA. ElkilaniW. Faisal NagiM. Automated breast cancer diagnosis based on machine learning algorithms.J. Healthc. Eng.2019201911110.1155/2019/425364131814951
    [Google Scholar]
  33. AbdelrahmanL. Al GhamdiM. Collado-MesaF. Abdel-MottalebM. Convolutional neural networks for breast cancer detection in mammography: A survey.Comput. Biol. Med.202113110424810.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.10424833631497
    [Google Scholar]
  34. NazirM.S. KhanU.G. MohiyuddinA. ReshanA. SalehM. ShaikhA. RizwanM. DavidekovaM. A novel cnn-inception-v4-based hybrid approach for classi_cation of breast cancer in mammogram images.Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput.2022202210.1155/2022/2089078
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SaberA. SakrM. Abo-SeidaO.M. KeshkA. ChenH. A novel deep-learning model for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer using the transfer-learning technique.IEEE Access20219711947120910.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079204
    [Google Scholar]
  36. RamadanS.Z. Using convolutional neural network with cheat sheet and data augmentation to detect breast cancer in mammograms.Comput. Math. Methods Med.202020201910.1155/2020/952340433193807
    [Google Scholar]
  37. MaqsoodS. DamaševičiusR. MaskeliūnasR. Ttcnn: A breast cancer detection and classification towards computer-aided diagnosis using digital mammography in early stages.Appl. Sci. (Basel)2022127327310.3390/app12073273
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MalebaryS.J. HashmiA. Automated breast mass classification system using deep learning and ensemble learning in digital mammogram.IEEE Access20219553125532810.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071297
    [Google Scholar]
  39. AdedigbaA.P. AdeshinaS.A. AibinuA.M. Performance evaluation of deep learning models on mammogram classification using small dataset.Bioengineering (Basel)20229416110.3390/bioengineering904016135447721
    [Google Scholar]
  40. RehmanK. LiJ. PeiY. YasinA. AliS. SaeedY. Architectural distortion-based digital mammograms classification using depth wise convolutional neural network.Biology (Basel)20211111510.3390/biology1101001535053013
    [Google Scholar]
  41. AlbalawiU. ManimuruganS. VaratharajanR. Classification of breast cancer mammogram images using convolution neural network.Concurr. Comput.20223413580310.1002/cpe.5803
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chun-mingT. Xiao-meiC. XiangY. FanY. Five classification of mammography images based on deep cooperation convolutional neural network.ASRJETS201957110
    [Google Scholar]
  43. HekalA.A. ElnakibA. MoustafaH.E.-D. Automated early breast cancer detection and classification system.Signal Image Video Process2021151497150510.1007/s11760‑021‑01882‑w
    [Google Scholar]
  44. LuH-C. LohE-W. HuangS-C. The classification of mammogram using convolutional neural network with specific image preprocessing for breast cancer detection.2019 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD)25-28 May 2019Chengdu, China201910.1109/ICAIBD.2019.8837000
    [Google Scholar]
  45. KahnoueiM.S. GitiM. AkhaeeM.A. AmeriA. Microcalci_cation detection in mammograms using deep learning.Iran. J. Radiol.2022191
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Torres-GalvanJ.C. GuevaraE. Kolosovas-MachucaE.S. Oceguera-VillanuevaA. FloresJ.L. GonzalezF.J. Deep convolutional neural networks for classifying breast cancer using infrared thermography.Quant. InfraRed Thermogr.2021194283294
    [Google Scholar]
  47. ZhangY.D. SatapathyS.C. GutteryD.S. GórrizJ.M. WangS-H. G_orriz, J.M., Wang, S.-H.: Improved breast cancer classification through combining graph convolutional network and convolutional neural network.Inf. Process. Manage.202158210243910.1016/j.ipm.2020.102439
    [Google Scholar]
  48. HuT. ZhangL. XieL. YiZ. A multi-instance networks with multiple views for classification of mammograms.Neurocomputing.2021443110.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.070
    [Google Scholar]
  49. MahmoodT. LiJ. PeiY. AkhtarF. RehmanM.U. WastiS.H. Breast lesions classifications of mammographic images using a deep convolutional neural network-based approach.PLoS One2022171e026312610.1371/journal.pone.026312635085352
    [Google Scholar]
  50. SaberA. SakrM. Abou-SeidaO. KeshkA. A novel transfer-learning model for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer based deep CNN.Kafrelsheikh. J. Inf. Sci.2021211910.21608/kjis.2021.192207
    [Google Scholar]
  51. El HoubyE.M.F. YassinN.I.R. Malignant and nonmalignant classification of breast lesions in mammograms using convolutional neural networks.Biomed. Signal Process. Control20217010295410.1016/j.bspc.2021.102954
    [Google Scholar]
  52. ShenL. HeM. ShenN. Youse_, N., Wang, C., Liu, G.: Optimal breast tumor diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform and deep belief network based on improved sunower optimization method.Biomed. Signal Process. Control20206010195310.1016/j.bspc.2020.101953
    [Google Scholar]
  53. MuduliD. DashR. MajhiB. Automated diagnosis of breast cancer using multi-modal datasets: A deep convolution neural network based approach.Biomed. Signal Process. Control20227110282510.1016/j.bspc.2021.102825
    [Google Scholar]
  54. LiH. ZhuangS. LiD.a. ZhaoJ. MaY. Benign and malignant classification of mammogram images based on deep learning.Biomed. Signal Process. Control.20195134735410.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.017
    [Google Scholar]
  55. AgnesS.A. AnithaJ. PandianS. PeterJ.D. Classification of mammogram images using multiscale all convolutional neural network (ma-cnn). J Med Syst.202044130
    [Google Scholar]
  56. AlruwailiM. GoudaW. Automated breast cancer detection models based on transfer learning.Sensors (Basel)202222387610.3390/s2203087635161622
    [Google Scholar]
  57. SucklingJ. The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database.Digital Mammo1994375386
    [Google Scholar]
  58. ChiccoD. JurmanG. The advantages of the matthews correlation coefficient (mcc) over f1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.BMC. Genomics.20202116
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230811142718
Loading
/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230811142718
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test