Skip to content
2000
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Aim:

We aimed to examine all-cause mortality risk in relation to the extent of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in Chinese middle-aged and older patients in a multicenter study with nine-year follow-up.

Methods:

This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre study. The study population consisted of 3,240 consecutive middle-aged and older patients (age ≥ 40 years) with suspected CAD who underwent coronary CTA between June 2011 and December 2013 at three hospitals in Wuhan, China. Patients were grouped according to CAD extent for the final analysis: no CAD, 1-vessel non-obstructive CAD, 2-vessels non-obstructive CAD, and 3-vessels non-obstructive CAD. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analysis.

Results:

A total of 2,522 patients were included in the present analysis. Of these, 188 (7.5%) deaths occurred during the median 9.0 years (interquartile range 8.6–9.4) of study follow-up. The annualized all-cause mortality rate was 0.54 (: 0.44–0.68), 0.91 (: 0.68–1.21), 1.44 (: 1.01–1.93), and 2.00 (: 1.46–2.69) for the no CAD, 1-vessel non-obstructive CAD, 2-vessels non-obstructive CAD, and 3-vessels non-obstructive CAD group, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed a significant increase in the cumulative events associated with the extent of non-obstructive CAD ( < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, after adjustment for age and sex, the presence of 3-vessels non-obstructive CAD was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality ( 1.60, 1.04–2.45, = 0.032).

Conclusion:

In this cohort of Chinese middle-aged and older patients undergoing coronary CTA, the presence and extent of non-obstructive CAD, compared to no CAD, were associated with a significantly greater nine-year risk of all-cause mortality. The present findings suggest the clinical importance of the stage of non-obstructive CAD and warrant investigation of the optimal risk stratification to improve outcomes among these patients.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230622101535
2023-09-04
2025-01-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmim/20/1/e220623218148.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230622101535&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. MaddoxT.M. StanislawskiM.A. GrunwaldG.K. BradleyS.M. HoP.M. TsaiT.T. PatelM.R. SandhuA. ValleJ. MagidD.J. LeonB. BhattD.L. FihnS.D. RumsfeldJ.S. Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction.JAMA2014312171754176310.1001/jama.2014.1468125369489
    [Google Scholar]
  2. HoffmannU. FerencikM. UdelsonJ.E. PicardM.H. TruongQ.A. PatelM.R. HuangM. PencinaM. MarkD.B. HeitnerJ.F. FordyceC.B. PellikkaP.A. TardifJ.C. BudoffM. NahhasG. ChowB. KosinskiA.S. LeeK.L. DouglasP.S. InvestigatorsP. Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain.Circulation2017135242320233210.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.02436028389572
    [Google Scholar]
  3. EmamiH. TakxR.A.P. MayrhoferT. JanjuaS. ParkJ. PursnaniA. TawakolA. LuM.T. FerencikM. HoffmannU. Nonobstructive coronary artery disease by coronary CT angiography improves risk stratification and allocation of statin therapy.JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging20171091031103810.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.02228330658
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NewbyD.E. AdamsonP.D. BerryC. BoonN.A. DweckM.R. FlatherM. ForbesJ. HunterA. LewisS. MacLeanS. MillsN.L. NorrieJ. RoditiG. ShahA.S.V. TimmisA.D. van BeekE.J.R. WilliamsM.C. Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction.N. Engl. J. Med.20183791092493310.1056/NEJMoa180597130145934
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FerencikM. MayrhoferT. BittnerD.O. EmamiH. PuchnerS.B. LuM.T. MeyersohnN.M. IvanovA.V. AdamiE.C. PatelM.R. MarkD.B. UdelsonJ.E. LeeK.L. DouglasP.S. HoffmannU. Use of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaque detection for risk stratification of patients with stable chest pain.JAMA Cardiol.20183214415210.1001/jamacardio.2017.497329322167
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CananA. RanganathP. GoerneH. AbbaraS. LanderasL. RajiahP. CAD-RADS: Pushing the limits.Radiographics202040362965210.1148/rg.202019016432281902
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DouglasP.S. HoffmannU. PatelM.R. MarkD.B. Al-KhalidiH.R. CavanaughB. ColeJ. DolorR.J. FordyceC.B. HuangM. KhanM.A. KosinskiA.S. KrucoffM.W. MalhotraV. PicardM.H. UdelsonJ.E. VelazquezE.J. YowE. CooperL.S. LeeK.L. InvestigatorsP. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.N. Engl. J. Med.2015372141291130010.1056/NEJMoa141551625773919
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SCOT-HEART investigatorsCT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): An open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial.Lancet201538599852383239110.1016/S0140‑6736(15)60291‑425788230
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamilton-CraigC. FifootA. HansenM. PincusM. ChanJ. WaltersD.L. BranchK.R. Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG — A randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).Int. J. Cardiol.2014177386787310.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.09025466568
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MossA.J. WilliamsM.C. NewbyD.E. NicolE.D. The updated NICE guidelines: cardiac CT as the first-line test for coronary artery disease.Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep.20171051510.1007/s12410‑017‑9412‑628446943
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GulatiM. LevyP.D. MukherjeeD. AmsterdamE. BhattD.L. BirtcherK.K. BlanksteinR. BoydJ. Bullock-PalmerR.P. ConejoT. DiercksD.B. GentileF. GreenwoodJ.P. HessE.P. HollenbergS.M. JaberW.A. JneidH. JoglarJ.A. MorrowD.A. O’ConnorR.E. RossM.A. ShawL.J. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.20217822e187e28510.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.05334756653
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KnuutiJ. WijnsW. SarasteA. CapodannoD. BarbatoE. Funck-BrentanoC. PrescottE. StoreyR.F. DeatonC. CuissetT. AgewallS. DicksteinK. EdvardsenT. EscanedJ. GershB.J. SvitilP. GilardM. HasdaiD. HatalaR. MahfoudF. MasipJ. MunerettoC. ValgimigliM. AchenbachS. BaxJ.J. NeumannF-J. SechtemU. BanningA.P. BonarosN. BuenoH. BugiardiniR. ChieffoA. CreaF. CzernyM. DelgadoV. DendaleP. FlachskampfF.A. GohlkeH. GroveE.L. JamesS. KatritsisD. LandmesserU. LettinoM. MatterC.M. NathoeH. NiessnerA. PatronoC. PetronioA.S. PettersenS.E. PiccoloR. PiepoliM.F. PopescuB.A. RäberL. RichterD.J. RoffiM. RoithingerF.X. ShlyakhtoE. SibbingD. SilberS. SimpsonI.A. Sousa-UvaM. VardasP. WitkowskiA. ZamoranoJ.L. AchenbachS. AgewallS. BarbatoE. BaxJ.J. CapodannoD. CuissetT. DeatonC. DicksteinK. EdvardsenT. EscanedJ. Funck-BrentanoC. GershB.J. GilardM. HasdaiD. HatalaR. MahfoudF. MasipJ. MunerettoC. PrescottE. SarasteA. StoreyR.F. SvitilP. ValgimigliM. WindeckerS. AboyansV. BaigentC. ColletJ-P. DeanV. DelgadoV. FitzsimonsD. GaleC.P. GrobbeeD. HalvorsenS. HindricksG. IungB. JüniP. KatusH.A. LandmesserU. LeclercqC. LettinoM. LewisB.S. MerkelyB. MuellerC. PetersenS. PetronioA.S. RichterD.J. RoffiM. ShlyakhtoE. SimpsonI.A. Sousa-UvaM. TouyzR.M. BenkheddaS. MetzlerB. SujayevaV. CosynsB. KusljugicZ. VelchevV. PanayiG. KalaP. Haahr-PedersenS.A. KabilH. AinlaT. KaukonenT. CaylaG. PagavaZ. WoehrleJ. KanakakisJ. TóthK. GudnasonT. PeaceA. AronsonD. RiccioC. EleziS. MirrakhimovE. HansoneS. SarkisA. BabarskieneR. BeisselJ. MaempelA.J.C. RevencoV. de GroothG.J. PejkovH. JuliebøV. LipiecP. SantosJ. ChioncelO. DuplyakovD. BertelliL. DikicA.D. StudenčanM. BuncM. AlfonsoF. BäckM. ZellwegerM. AddadF. YildirirA. SirenkoY. ClappB. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.Eur. Heart J.202041340747710.1093/eurheartj/ehz42531504439
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HanD. ChenB. GransarH. AchenbachS. Al-MallahM.H. BudoffM.J. CademartiriF. MaffeiE. CallisterT.Q. ChinnaiyanK. ChowB.J.W. DeLagoA. HadamitzkyM. HausleiterJ. KaufmannP.A. VillinesT.C. KimY.J. LeipsicJ. FeuchtnerG. CuryR.C. PontoneG. AndreiniD. MarquesH. RubinshteinR. ChangH.J. LinF.Y. ShawL.J. MinJ.K. BermanD.S. Prognostic significance of plaque location in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: From the CONFIRM registry.Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging20212391240124710.1093/ehjci/jeab22334791117
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LinF.Y. ShawL.J. DunningA.M. LaBountyT.M. ChoiJ.H. WeinsaftJ.W. KoduruS. GomezM.J. DelagoA.J. CallisterT.Q. BermanD.S. MinJ.K. Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: A prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.201158551051910.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.07821777749
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LeipsicJ. AbbaraS. AchenbachS. CuryR. EarlsJ.P. ManciniG.B.J. NiemanK. PontoneG. RaffG.L. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.20148534235810.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.00325301040
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BittencourtM.S. HultenE. GhoshhajraB. O’LearyD. ChristmanM.P. MontanaP. TruongQ.A. SteignerM. MurthyV.L. RybickiF.J. NasirK. GowdakL.H.W. HainerJ. BradyT.J. Di CarliM.F. HoffmannU. AbbaraS. BlanksteinR. Prognostic value of nonobstructive and obstructive coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomography angiography to identify cardiovascular events.Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging20147228229110.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.00104724550435
    [Google Scholar]
  17. TaronJ. FoldynaB. MayrhoferT. OsborneM.T. MeyersohnN. BittnerD.O. PuchnerS.B. EmamiH. LuM.T. FerencikM. PagidipatiN.J. DouglasP.S. HoffmannU. Risk stratification with the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging202114112186219510.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.01933865792
    [Google Scholar]
  18. van RosendaelA.R. BaxA.M. SmitJ.M. van den HoogenI.J. MaX. Al’ArefS. AchenbachS. Al-MallahM.H. AndreiniD. BermanD.S. BudoffM.J. CademartiriF. CallisterT.Q. ChangH.J. ChinnaiyanK. ChowB.J.W. CuryR.C. DeLagoA. FeuchtnerG. HadamitzkyM. HausleiterJ. KaufmannP.A. KimY.J. LeipsicJ.A. MaffeiE. MarquesH. de Araújo GonçalvesP. PontoneG. RaffG.L. RubinshteinR. VillinesT.C. GransarH. LuY. PeñaJ.M. LinF.Y. ShawL.J. MinJ.K. BaxJ.J. Clinical risk factors and atherosclerotic plaque extent to define risk for major events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: The long-term coronary computed tomography angiography CONFIRM registry.Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging202021547948810.1093/ehjci/jez32232065624
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HwangI.C. LeeH. YoonY.E. ChoiI.S. KimH.L. ChangH.J. LeeJ.Y. ChoiJ.A. KimH.J. ChoG.Y. ParkJ.B. LeeS.P. KimH.K. KimY.J. SohnD.W. Risk stratification of non-obstructive coronary artery disease for guidance of preventive medical therapy.Atherosclerosis2019290667310.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.09.01831586872
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HuangZ. XiaoJ. WangX. LiZ. GuoN. HuY. LiX. WangX. Clinical evaluation of the automatic coronary artery disease reporting and data system (cad-rads) in coronary computed tomography angiography using convolutional neural networks.Acad. Radiol.202330469870610.1016/j.acra.2022.05.01535753936
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HuangZ. ZhangS. JinN. HuY. XiaoJ. LiZ. YangY. SunR. WangZ. LiX. XieY. WangX. Prognostic value of CAD-RADS classification by coronary CTA in patients with suspected CAD.BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.202121147610.1186/s12872‑021‑02286‑x34602055
    [Google Scholar]
  22. CuryR.C. AbbaraS. AchenbachS. AgatstonA. BermanD.S. BudoffM.J. DillK.E. JacobsJ.E. MaroulesC.D. RubinG.D. RybickiF.J. SchoepfU.J. ShawL.J. StillmanA.E. WhiteC.S. WoodardP.K. LeipsicJ.A. CAD-RADSTM coronary artery disease – reporting and data system. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (scct), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI).J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.201610426928110.1016/j.jcct.2016.04.00527318587
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LeipsicJ. TaylorC.M. GransarH. ShawL.J. AhmadiA. ThompsonA. HumphriesK. BermanD.S. HausleiterJ. AchenbachS. Al-MallahM. BudoffM.J. CademartiriF. CallisterT.Q. ChangH.J. ChowB.J.W. CuryR.C. DelagoA.J. DunningA.L. FeuchtnerG.M. HadamitzkyM. KaufmannP.A. LinF.Y. ChinnaiyanK.M. MaffeiE. RaffG.L. VillinesT.C. GomezM.J. MinJ.K. Sex-based prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the international multicenter CONFIRM study.Radiology2014273239340010.1148/radiol.1414026925028784
    [Google Scholar]
  24. XieJ.X. EshtehardiP. VargheseT. GoyalA. MehtaP.K. KangW. LeipsicJ. ó HartaighB. Bairey MerzC.N. BermanD.S. GransarH. BudoffM.J. AchenbachS. CallisterT.Q. MarquesH. RubinshteinR. Al-MallahM.H. AndreiniD. PontoneG. CademartiriF. MaffeiE. ChinnaiyanK. RaffG. HadamitzkyM. HausleiterJ. FeuchtnerG. KaufmannP.A. VillinesT.C. ChowB.J.W. MinJ.K. ShawL.J. Prognostic significance of nonobstructive left main coronary artery disease in women versus men.Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging2017108e00624610.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.00624628790123
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230622101535
Loading
/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230622101535
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test