Skip to content
2000
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Background:

Deep learning-based diagnosis systems are useful to identify abnormalities in medical images with the greatly increased workload of doctors. Specifically, the rate of new cases and deaths from malignancies is rising for liver diseases. Early detection of liver lesions plays an extremely important role in effective treatment and gives a higher chance of survival for patients. Therefore, automatic detection and classification of common liver lesions are essential for doctors. In fact, radiologists mainly rely on Hounsfield Units to locate liver lesions but previous studies often pay little attention to this factor.

Methods:

In this paper, we propose an improved method for the automatic classification of common liver lesions based on deep learning techniques and the variation of Hounsfield Unit densities on CT images with and without contrast. Hounsfield Unit is used to locate liver lesions accurately and support data labeling for classification. We construct a multi-phase classification model developed on the deep neural networks of Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD, and Mask R-CNN with the transfer learning approach.

Results:

The experiments are conducted on six scenarios with multi-phase CT images of common liver lesions. Experimental results show that the proposed method improves the detection and classification of liver lesions compared with recent methods because its accuracy achieves up to 97.4%.

Conclusion:

The proposed models are very useful to assist doctors in the automatic segmentation and classification of liver lesions to solve the problem of depending on the clinician’s experience in the diagnosis and treatment of liver lesions.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230428121748
2023-04-28
2025-01-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmim/20/1/e280423216354.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230428121748&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. SungH. FerlayJ. SiegelR.L. LaversanneM. SoerjomataramI. JemalA. BrayF. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J. Clin.202171320924910.3322/caac.2166033538338
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tran LeN. Viet DaoH. Colorectal Cancer in Vietnam.Colorectal Cancer2021Intech open10.5772/intechopen.93730
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WangW. IwamotoY. HanX. ChenY.W. ChenQ. LiangD. LinL. HuH. ZhangQ. Classification of focal liver lesions using deep learning with fine-tuning.DMIP '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing2018566010.1145/3299852.3299860
    [Google Scholar]
  4. RomeroF.P. DilerA. Bisson-GregoireG. TurcotteS. LapointeR. Vandenbroucke-MenuF. TangA. KadouryS. End-to-end discriminative deep network for liver lesion classification.2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019)Venice, Italy20191243124610.1109/ISBI.2019.8759257
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhouJ. WangW. LeiB. GeW. HuangY. ZhangL. YanY. ZhouD. DingY. WuJ. WangW. Automatic detection and classification of focal liver lesions based on deep convolutional neural networks: A preliminary study.Front. Oncol.20211058121010.3389/fonc.2020.58121033585197
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RyuH. ShinS.Y. LeeJ.Y. LeeK.M. KangH. YiJ. Joint segmentation and classification of hepatic lesions in ultrasound images using deep learning.Eur. Radiol.202131118733874210.1007/s00330‑021‑07850‑933881566
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LeeH. LeeH. HongH. BaeH. LimJ.S. KimJ. Classification of focal liver lesions in CT images using convolutional neural networks with lesion information augmented patches and synthetic data augmentation.Med. Phys.20214895029504610.1002/mp.1511834287951
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WebbG.J. ChapmanT.P. CadmanP.J. GorardD.A. Pyogenic liver abscess.Frontline Gastroenterol.201451606710.1136/flgastro‑2013‑10037128839753
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JangH.J. KimT.K. LimH.K. ParkS.J. SimJ.S. KimH.Y. LeeJ.H. Hepatic hemangioma: Atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2003180113514110.2214/ajr.180.1.180013512490492
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FornerA. LlovetJ.M. BruixJ. Hepatocellular carcinoma.Lancet201237998221245125510.1016/S0140‑6736(11)61347‑022353262
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ProkopM. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body.Thieme200311110410.1055/b‑002‑79382
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DahnertW. Radiology review manual.LippincottWilliams & Wilkins2011
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AdamA DixonAK GillardJH Schaefer-ProkopC GraingerRG AllisonDJ Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology E-Book.Elsevier Health Sciences2014
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SivaP.R. MichaelF. Diagnostic imaging: Gastrointestinal.3rd edElsevier2015
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BrantW.E. HelmsC.A. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology.4th edLippincott Williams & Wilkins2012
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BaggaS. Diagnostic and surgical imaging anatomy: Chest, abdomen, and pelvis.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.20081904W27710.2214/AJR.07.3337
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DahnertW.F. Radiology review manualwisconsinDepartment of radiology, aurora baycare medical center, green bay2017
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RenS. HeK. GirshickR. SunJ. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks.Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.2015289199
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GirshickR. DonahueJ. DarrellT. MalikJ. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation.Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition201458058710.1109/CVPR.2014.81
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GirshickR. Fast r-cnn.Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision201514401448
    [Google Scholar]
  21. DaiJ. LiY. HeK. SunJ.R-F.C.N. Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks.Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.201629379387
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LiuW. AnguelovD. ErhanD. SzegedyC. ReedS. FuC.Y. BergA.C. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016.Proceedings201614Part I2137
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HeK. GkioxariG. DollárP. GirshickR. Mask r-cnn.Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision20172961296910.1109/ICCV.2017.322
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HeK. ZhangX. RenS. SunJ. Deep residual learning for image recognition.Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition2016770778
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SzegedyC. VanhouckeV. IoffeS. ShlensJ. WojnaZ. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision.Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition20162818282610.1109/CVPR.2016.308
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SzegedyC. IoffeS. VanhouckeV. AlemiA. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning.Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence2017Vol. 3110.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231
    [Google Scholar]
  27. BoseS.R. KumarV.S. Efficient inception V2 based deep convolutional neural network for real-time hand action recognition.IET Image Process.202014468869610.1049/iet‑ipr.2019.0985
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SandlerM. HowardA. ZhuM. ZhmoginovA. ChenL.C. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks.Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition201845104520
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ZhouD. FangJ. SongX. GuanC. YinJ. DaiY. YangR. Iou loss for 2d/3d object detection.2019 International Conference on 3D Vision20198594
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SaltonG. Automatic text processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of.ReadingAddison-Wesley1989169
    [Google Scholar]
  31. AhsanM.M. LunaS.A. SiddiqueZ. Machine-learning-based disease diagnosis: A comprehensive review.Healthcare202210354110.3390/healthcare10030541
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LaiY. A comparison of traditional machine learning and deep learning in image recognition.J. Physics: Conf. Series20191314101214810.1088/1742‑6596/1314/1/012148
    [Google Scholar]
  33. YangY. PedersenJ.O. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization.ICML '97: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine LearningJuly 8 - 121997412420
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230428121748
Loading
/content/journals/cmim/10.2174/1573405620666230428121748
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Faster R-CNN; Hounsfield units; Liver lesions; Mask R-CNN; R-FCN; SSD
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test