Skip to content
2000
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2666-2949
  • E-ISSN: 2666-2957

Abstract

In this article we develop a global warming indicator model under fuzzy system. It is the light of the sun that environmental pollution is responsible for the cause and immediate effect of global warming. Limited amount of oxygen in the air, continuous decrease of fresh water volume, more especially the amount of drinking water and the rise of temperature of the globe are the major symptoms (variants) of global warming. Thus, to capture the facts we need to develop a mathematical model which has not yet been developed by the earlier researchers.

An efficient literature survey has been done over the three major parameters of the environment namely oxygen, fresh water and surface temperature exclusively. In fact we have accumulated 150 years-data structure of these major components and have analyzed them under fuzzy system.

First of all, we gave few definitions on fuzzy set. Utilizing the data set we have constructed appropriate membership functions of the three major components of the environment. Then applying goal programming problem, we have constructed a fuzzy global warming indicator (GWI) model subject to some goal constraints with respective priority vectors (Scenario 1 and Scenario 2). An extension has also been included for multi-valued goal programming problem and numerical illustrations have been done with the help of LINGO software.

Numerical study reveals that the GWI takes maximum and minimum values in a decreasing manner as time increases. It is seen that for scenario 1, the global environmental system will attain its stability after 30 years by degrading 31% of GWI with respect to present base line. For scenario 2, after the same time the global environmental system will attain its stability quite slowly by degrading 28% of GWI with respect to present base line.

Here we have studied a mathematical model of global warming first time using fuzzy system. No other mathematical models have been found existing in the literature. Thus, the basic novelty lies in a robust decision-making approach which showed the expected time of extinction of major species in this world. However, extensive study on data analytics over major environmental components can tell the stability of the global warming indicator and hence the future fate of the globe also.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901999201222150703
2022-04-01
2024-11-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AliS. XuH. AhmedW. AhmadN. Resolving strategic conflict for environmental conservation of glacial ecosystem: An attitudinal conflict resolution approach.Int. J. Glob. Warm.2019183/422123810.1504/IJGW.2019.101084
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AllahviranlooT. SaneifardR. Defuzzification method for ranking fuzzy numbers based on center of gravity.Iranian J. Fuzzy Syst.2012965767
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BaltaciH. Spatiotemporal variability of climate extremes in the Marmara Region (NW Turkey).Int. J. Glob. Warm.2019183/423925210.1504/IJGW.2019.101085
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BaycanN. PehlivanY. Waste management and determination of carbon footprint of a marine port: a case study from Izmir, Turkey.Int. J. Glob. Warm.2019191/2375310.1504/IJGW.2019.101771
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BuckleyJ.J. Generalized and extended fuzzy sets with applications.Fuzzy Sets Syst.19882515917410.1016/0165‑0114(88)90184‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CagmanN. EnginogluS. And CitakF. Fuzzy soft theory and its application.Int. J. Fuzzy Syst.201183137147
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ChutiaR. MahantaS. BaruahH.K. An alternative method of finding the membership of a fuzzy numberInt. J. Latest Trends Comput20106972
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DeS.K. "On degree of fuzziness and fuzzy decision making"Cybernatics and Systems202010.1080/01969722.2020.1723872
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DeS.K. BegI. Triangular dense fuzzy sets and new defuzzification methods.J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.201631146947710.3233/IFS‑162160
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DeS.K. Triangular dense fuzzy lock set.Soft Comput.201710.1007/s00500‑017‑2726‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DemirelB. BicakciogluN. DumanS. MadranC. ArbakY. SumerB. OzkulS. BaranT. GulG.O. FistikogluO. GulA. AksoyA.O. DoganM. BarbarosF. Understanding and perceptions of climate change: a perspective of university stakeholders.Int. J. Glob. Warm.2019183/438540010.1504/IJGW.2019.101095
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DiamondP. “The structure of type k fuzzy numbers” In the coming of age of fuzzy logic,Seattle1989671674
    [Google Scholar]
  13. EzzatiR. AllahviranlooT. KhezerlooS. KhezerlooM. An approach for ranking of fuzzy numbers.Expert Syst. Appl.20123969069510.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.060
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GulşenH. YapiciogluP. Greenhouse gas emission estimation for a UASB reactor in a dairy wastewater treatment plantInt. J. Glob. Warm.201917437338810.1504/IJGW.2019.10021487
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HajjariT. AbbasbandyS. A note on the revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree.Expert Syst. Appl.201139134911349210.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.081
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KarmakarS. DeS.K. GoswamiA. A pollution sensitive dense fuzzy economic production quantity model with cycle time dependent production rate.J. Clean. Prod.201715413915010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.080
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KarmakarS. DeS.K. GoswamiA. “A pollution sensitive remanufacturing model with waste items: Triangular dense fuzzy lock set approach", J. Clean. Prod.201818778980310.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.161
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MamdaniE.H. AssilianS. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1975711310.1016/S0020‑7373(75)80002‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MolodtsovD. Soft set theory first result.Comput. Math. Appl.199937193110.1016/S0898‑1221(99)00056‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  20. O. N. C. KimH. KimG.S RiG.S Characterisation analysis of national greenhouse gas emissions in DPR of Korea: emission trends for a 12-year period.Int. J. Global Warming2019174401416
    [Google Scholar]
  21. OrucO. DincerI. Environmental impact assessment of using various fuels in a thermal power plant.Int. J. Glob. Warm.2019183/419120510.1504/IJGW.2019.101082
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PawlakZ. Rough sets.J. Inf. Comput. Sci.19821134135610.1007/BF01001956
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ShahzadU. Global warming: Causes, effects and solutions.Durreesamin J.201514973979
    [Google Scholar]
  24. TakagiT. SugenoM. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.19851511613210.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TakasM. Multilevel fuzzy approach to the risk and disaster management.Acta Polytech. Hung.20107491102
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TrenberthK.E. FasulloJ. SmithL. Trends and variability in column-integrated atmospheric water vapor.Clim. Dyn.20052474175810.1007/s00382‑005‑0017‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TurhanC. ArsanZ.D. AkkurtG.G. Impact of climate change on indoor environment of historic libraries in Mediterranean climate zone.Int. J. Glob. Warm.2019183/420622010.1504/IJGW.2019.101083
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901999201222150703
Loading
/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901999201222150703
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): decision making; fuzzy systems; Global warming; goal programming; LINGO; model development
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test