Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/157340482101240926090816
2024-09-26
2024-11-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. GAO, US Government Accountability OfficeArtificial Intelligence: Generative AI Technologies and Their Commercial Applications GAO-24- 106946 Washington DC.Published: Jun 20, 2024. Publicly Released: Jun 20, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DaneshvarN PanditaD EricksonS Snyder SulmasyL DeCampM ACP Medical Informatics Committee and the Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Health Care: An American College of Physicians Policy Position Paper.Ann Intern Med.2024Jul1777964967Epub 2024 Jun 4.10.7326/M24‑0146 38830215
    [Google Scholar]
  3. RazaM.M. VenkateshK.P. KvedarJ.C. Generative AI and large language models in health care: pathways to implementation.npj. Digit. Med.202476210.1038/s41746‑023‑00988‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ReddyS. Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance.Implement. Sci.2024192710.1186/s13012‑024‑01357‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  5. YehJ ClareCA Women’s Health and Artificial Intelligence (AI): Addressing Potential for Bias and Discrimination in AI.Current Women`s Health Reviews;2023194e01032321422210.2174/157340481904230301140515
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DeCampM LindvallC. Mitigating bias in AI at the point of care.Science.2023Jul14;3816654150152Epub 2023 Jul 13.10.1126/science.adh2713 37440631 PMC10680368
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LeeS.W. MorcosM. LeeD.W. YoungJ. Demographic Representation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Images of Physicians.JAMA Netw. Open202478e242599310.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25993
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AlkaissiH McFarlaneSI Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing.Cureus2023Feb19;152e3517910.7759/cureus.35179 36811129 PMC9939079
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GumilarKE TanM The promise and challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Models (AI-LLMs) in obstetrics and gynecology.Majalah Obstetri & Ginekologi (Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Science).202432212813510.20473/mog.V32I22024
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LeeY KimSY Potential applications of ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology in Korea: a review article.Obstet Gynecol Sci.2024Mar672153159Epub 2024 Jan 22.10.5468/ogs.23231 38247132 PMC10948210
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PatelD.J. ChaudhariK. AcharyaN. Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Transforming Care and Outcomes.Cureus2024167e6472510.7759/cureus.64725
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HorganR. NehmeL. AbuhamadA. Artificial intelligence in obstetric ultrasound: a scoping review.Prenat. Diagn.20234391176121910.1002/pd.6411
    [Google Scholar]
  13. QinS. ChislettB. IschiaJ. RanasingheW. de SilvaD. Coles-BlackJ. ChatGPT and generative AI in urology and surgery—A narrative review.BJUI Compass202410.1002/bco2.390
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HadiA. TranE. NagarajanB. KirpalaniA. Evaluation of ChatGPT as a diagnostic tool for medical learners and clinicians.PLoS One2024197e030738310.1371/journal.pone.0307383
    [Google Scholar]
  15. CohenA. BurnsJ. GabraM. GordonA. DeebelN. TerleckiR. WoodburnK. Performance of chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) on personal review of learning in obstetrics and gynecology.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology20242304S1169S117010.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.051
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BachmannM. DutaI. MazeyE. Exploring the capabilities of ChatGPT in women’s health: obstetrics and gynaecology. npj.Womens Health (Lond. Engl.)202422610.1038/s44294‑024‑00028‑w
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RiedelM. KaefingerK. StuehrenbergA. RitterV. AmannN. GrafA. ReckerF. KleinE. KiechleM. RiedelF. MeyerB. ChatGPT’s performance in German OB/GYN exams – paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.Front. Med.202310129661510.3389/fmed.2023.1296615
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PanET Florian-RodriguezM Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.Am J Obstet Gynecol.2024Aug2312276.e1276.e10Epub 2024 May 6.10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.045 38710267
    [Google Scholar]
  19. CohenN. KhoK. SmithK. Battle of the bots: a comparative analysis of generative ai responses from leading chatbots to patient questions about endometriosis, AmericanJournal of Obstetrics and Gynecology20242304S117010.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.052
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/157340482101240926090816
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Editorial
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test