Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Background

Endometrial scratching (ES) has been reported as a strategy to improve the outcome of IVF. Considering that the follicular phase and luteal phase have their specific characteristics and hormonal secretions, we investigated whether scratching in different phases affects a woman's chances of becoming pregnant following frozen embryo transfer.

Methods

A total of 300 frozen embryo transfer candidate women with normal cavities and good embryo quality were randomly divided into two groups: Group A with ES in the follicular phase and group B with ES in the luteal phase. In both groups, endometrial scratching was performed before IVF. The rate of pregnancy and baseline characteristics, such as age, education, and embryo quality, were compared between the two groups.

Results

Our results showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the women who underwent ES in the follicular phase and those in the luteal phase for the outcome of IVF and chemical or clinical pregnancies.

Conclusion

ES in different phases of the cycle preceding frozen embryo transfer did not affect the outcome of pregnancy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048228678231106103348
2023-11-21
2024-11-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SimonA. LauferN. Repeated implantation failure: Clinical approach.Fertil. Steril.20129751039104310.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.01022464086
    [Google Scholar]
  2. KupkaM.S. FerrarettiA.P. de MouzonJ. ErbK. D’HoogheT. CastillaJ.A. Calhaz-JorgeC. De GeyterC. GoossensV. StrohmerH. Obruca Kreuz-KinderwunschzentrumS.P.G. BogaertsK. BiostatI. D’HoogheT. KyurkchievS. AntonovaI. RezabekK. MarkovaJ. ErbK. GisslerM. TiitinenA. RoyereD. BuhlerK. UszkorietM. LoutradisD. TarlatzisB.C. KosztolanyiG. UrbancsekJ. BjorgvinssonH. MocanuE. ScaravelliG. LokshinV. RavilV. GudlevicieneZ. MatkeviciuteG. LazarevskiS. MoshinV. SimicT.M. VukicevicD. HazekampJ.T. KurzawaR. Calhaz--JorgeC. LaranjeiraA.R. RugescuI. KorsakV. RadunovicN. TabsN. TomazevicT. Virant-KlunI. HernandezJ.H. Castilla AlcalaJ.A. BerghC. WederM. De GeyterC. SmeenkJ.M.J. LambalkC. VeselovskyV. BaranowskiR. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.Hum. Reprod.201429102099211310.1093/humrep/deu17525069504
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GoverniniL. LuongoF.P. HaxhiuA. PiomboniP. LuddiA. Main actors behind the endometrial receptivity and successful implantation.Tissue Cell20217310165610.1016/j.tice.2021.10165634634636
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PaulsonR.J. SauerM.V. LoboR.A. Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: Importance of endometrial receptivity.Fertil. Steril.199053587087410.1016/S0015‑0282(16)53524‑92110078
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JhalaD. GhoshS. PathakA. BarhateD. Predicting embryo viability to improve the success rate of implantation in IVF procedure: An AI-based prospective cohort study. Computational vision and bio-inspired computing.Springer2021383400
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SunH. LinY. LinD. ZouC. ZouX. FuL. MengF. QianW. Mediterranean diet improves embryo yield in IVF: A prospective cohort study.Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.20191717310.1186/s12958‑019‑0520‑931477128
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Van MontfoortA.P.A. ArtsE.G.J.M. WijnandtsL. SluijmerA. PelinckM.J. LandJ.A. Van Echten-ArendsJ. Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.Hum. Reprod. Open202020201hoz03610.1093/hropen/hoz03631989044
    [Google Scholar]
  8. NeykovaK. TostoV. GiardinaI. TsibizovaV. VakrilovG. Endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome.J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.202011532744104
    [Google Scholar]
  9. OronG. HierschL. RonaS. Prag-RosenbergR. SapirO. Tuttnauer-HamburgerM. ShufaroY. FischB. Ben-HaroushA. Endometrial thickness of less than 7.5 mm is associated with obstetric complications in fresh IVF cycles: A retrospective cohort study.Reprod. Biomed. Online201837334134810.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.01330146441
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PotdarN. GelbayaT. NardoL.G. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod. Biomed. Online201225656157110.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.00523063812
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GnainskyY. GranotI. AldoP. BarashA. OrY. MorG. DekelN. Biopsy-induced inflammatory conditions improve endometrial receptivity: The mechanism of action.Reproduction20151491758510.1530/REP‑14‑039525349438
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BlawaE.D. Al-ObaidiM.T. AbdulhameedW.A. Effect of endometrial scratch on heparin binding epidermal growth factor level in women undergoing intrauterine insemination.Iraqi J. Embryos Infertil. Res.20199210.28969/IJEIR.v9.i2.r7
    [Google Scholar]
  13. BahaaH GamalA IbrahimM ToniN ElsherifA MahranA. Role of endometrial scratch in unexplained infertility (RESCUE); A randomized clinical trial.Research square2021
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MagedA.M. Al-InanyH. SalamaK.M. SouidanI.I. Abo RagabH.M. ElnasseryN. Endometrial scratch injury induces higher pregnancy rate for women with unexplained infertility undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation: A randomized controlled trial.Reprod. Sci.201623223924310.1177/193371911560277626342054
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MagedA.M. RashwanH. AbdelAzizS. RamadanW. MostafaW.A.I. MetwallyA.A. KattaM. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of endometrial injury on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates during the first ICSI cycle.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.2018140221121610.1002/ijgo.1235529048754
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FinnC.A. MartinL. Endocrine control of the timing of endometrial sensitivity to a decidual stimulus.Biol. Reprod.197271828610.1093/biolreprod/7.1.825050152
    [Google Scholar]
  17. YavangiM. VarmaghaniN. PirdehghanA. VarmaghaniM. FaryadrasM. Comparison of pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination-candidate women with and without endometrial scratch injury: An RCT.Int. J. Reprod. Biomed.202119545746410.18502/ijrm.v19i5.925534278199
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MadhuriMS ThyagarajuC NaiduA DasariP The effect of endometrial scratching on pregnancy rate after failed intrauterine insemination: A Randomised Controlled Trail.European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2022268374210.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.028
    [Google Scholar]
  19. StrunzB. BisterJ. JönssonH. FilipovicI. Crona-GuterstamY. KvedaraiteE. SleiersN. DumitrescuB. BrännströmM. LentiniA. ReiniusB. CornilletM. WillingerT. GidlöfS. HamiltonR.S. IvarssonM.A. BjörkströmN.K. Continuous human uterine NK cell differentiation in response to endometrial regeneration and pregnancy.Sci. Immunol.2021656eabb780010.1126/sciimmunol.abb780033617461
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LensenS. OsavlyukD. ArmstrongS. StadelmannC. HennesA. NapierE. WilkinsonJ. SadlerL. GuptaD. StrandellA. BerghC. VigneswaranK. TehW.T. HamodaH. WebberL. WakemanS.A. SearleL. BhideP. McDowellS. PeeraerK. KhalafY. FarquharC. A randomized trial of endometrial scratching before in vitro fertilization.N. Engl. J. Med.2019380432533410.1056/NEJMoa180873730673547
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LiuW TalR ChaoH LiuM LiuY Effect of local endometrial injury in proliferative vs. luteal phase on IVF outcomes in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization.Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.201715175
    [Google Scholar]
  22. van HoogenhuijzeN.E. MolF. LavenJ.S.E. GroenewoudE.R. TraasM.A.F. JanssenC.A.H. TeklenburgG. de BruinJ.P. van OppenraaijR.H.F. MaasJ.W.M. MollE. FleischerK. van HooffM.H.A. de KoningC.H. CantineauA.E.P. LambalkC.B. VerbergM. van HeusdenA.M. MangerA.P. van RumsteM.M.E. van der VoetL.F. PieterseQ.D. VisserJ. BrinkhuisE.A. den HartogJ.E. GlasM.W. KlijnN.F. van der MeerS. BandellM.L. BoxmeerJ.C. van DisseldorpJ. SmeenkJ. van WelyM. EijkemansM.J.C. TorranceH.L. BroekmansF.J.M. Endometrial scratching in women with one failed IVF/ICSI cycle-outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (SCRaTCH).Hum. Reprod.2021361879833289528
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MetwallyM. ChattersR. DimairoM. WaltersS. PyeC. WhiteD. BhideP. ChaterT. CheongY. ChoudharyM. ChildT. DrakeleyA. EvbuomwanI. GelbayaT. GraceJ. HarrisP. LairdS. da SilvaS.M. MohiyiddeenL. PembertonK. Raine-FenningN. RajkhowaM. YoungT. CohenJ. A randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of the endometrial scratch procedure prior to first-time IVF, with or without ICSI.Hum. Reprod.20213671841185310.1093/humrep/deab04134050362
    [Google Scholar]
  24. BarashA DekelN FieldustS SegalI SchechtmanE GranotI Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.Fertility and Sterility.200379613172210.1016/S0015‑0282(03)00345‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ReljičM. KnezJ. KovačV. KovačičB. Endometrial injury, the quality of embryos, and blastocyst transfer are the most important prognostic factors for in vitro fertilization success after previous repeated unsuccessful attempts.J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.201734677577910.1007/s10815‑017‑0916‑428386815
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ReedBG CarrBR The normal menstrual cycle and the control of ovulation. Endotext [Internet]2015
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048228678231106103348
Loading
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048228678231106103348
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test