Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Background: Imaging plays a major role in the detection, diagnosis, and ultimate treatment strategies of adnexal masses. As high as 10% of women in the United States undergo surgical evaluation for a suspected adnexal neoplasm. Objective: To understand the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality used in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Results: Ultrasound is frequently the imaging modality of choice for initial characterization. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography – computed tomography are frequently employed if malignancy is suspected to assess for metastasis. Conclusion: A basic understanding of adnexal imaging modalities will be of benefit to care providers and, in turn, be of benefit to patients.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/1573404814666171205102008
2019-02-01
2025-06-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/1573404814666171205102008
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test