Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Introduction/Background

Placenta accreta is an abnormal total or partial invasion of the trophoblast to the myometrium of the uterus, with a prevalence of 1 in 1000 births globally in 2018. Surgical treatment of PAS is known to have a high risk of urological injury. No study reports preoperative and intraoperative factors related to urological injury, especially in Indonesia.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia. Data were obtained through medical records dated from January 2012 to December 2020. Pregnant women with PAS treated with surgical management were recruited. The selection of the case group consists of participants with urological injuries, while the control group involves participants with no urological injuries. The case and control groups were matched according to the general characteristics with a ratio of 1:1.

Results

Significant differences between groups were found in preoperative factors (history of urological symptoms, USG examination) and intraoperative factors (blood loss, multidisciplinary team, percreta placental invasion). Multivariate analysis showed an association between the history of urological symptoms and intraoperative bleeding to urological injury.

Conclusion

Preoperative factors such as ultrasonography examination and history of urological symptoms, along with intraoperative factors such as blood loss, multidisciplinary team, and degree of the placental invasion, were associated with urological injury in surgically treated PAS.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048272591240131103426
2024-02-12
2024-12-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cwhr/21/3/CWHR-21-3-06.html?itemId=/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048272591240131103426&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CahillA.G. BeigiR. HeineR.P. SilverR.M. WaxJ.R. Placenta accreta spectrum.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20182196B2B1610.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.04230471891
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FarquharC.M. LiZ. LensenS. McLintockC. PollockW. PeekM.J. EllwoodD. KnightM. HomerC.S.E. VaughanG. WangA. SullivanE. Incidence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes for placenta accreta in Australia and New Zealand: A case–control study.BMJ Open2017710e01771310.1136/bmjopen‑2017‑01771328982832
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GohW.A. ZaludI. Placenta accreta: Diagnosis, management and the molecular biology of the morbidly adherent placenta.J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.201629111795180026135782
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GarmiG. SalimR. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta.Obstet. Gynecol. Int.201220121710.1155/2012/87392922645616
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tam TamK.B. DozierJ. MartinJ.N.Jr Approaches to reduce urinary tract injury during management of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta: A systematic review.J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.201225432933410.3109/14767058.2011.57672023003574
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EngelsgjerdJ.S. LaGrangeC.A. Ureteral injury.StatPearls.Treasure Island, FLStatPearls Publishing2020
    [Google Scholar]
  7. TarneyC. Bladder injury during cesarean delivery.Curr. Womens Health Rev.201492707610.2174/15734048090214010215172924876830
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AhmedS.R. EllahM.A.A. MohamedO.A. EidH.M. Prepregnancy obesity and pregnancy outcome.Int. J. Health Sci.20093220320821475538
    [Google Scholar]
  9. OslerM. DaugbjergS. FrederiksenB.L. OttesenB. Body mass and risk of complications after hysterectomy on benign indications.Hum. Reprod.20112661512151810.1093/humrep/der06021467207
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KyozukaH. YamaguchiA. SuzukiD. FujimoriK. Ho-soyaM. YasumuraS. YokoyamaT. SatoA. HashimotoK. Risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum: Findings from the Japan environment and Children’s study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth201919144710.1186/s12884‑019‑2608‑931775687
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MurjiA. LamM. AllenB. RichardL. ShariffS.Z. AustinP.C. CallumJ. LipscombeL. Risks of preoperative anemia in women undergoing elective hysterectomy and my-omectomy.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20192216629.e1629.e1810.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.01831310749
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RacM. DasheJ. WellsC. MoschosE. McintireD. TwicklerD. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: The placenta accreta index.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20142123343.e1343.e725446658
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PutriI.F. AriadiA. The relationship between the placenta accreta index (PAI) score and the incidence of placenta accreta in patients giving birth in the obstetrics department of RSUP.Dr.M. Djamil Padang.Andalas Obstetrics Gynecology J.2018227882
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WasheckaR. BehlingA. Urologic complications of placenta percreta invading the urinary bladder: A case report and review of the literature.Hawaii Med. J.2002614666912050959
    [Google Scholar]
  15. IbrahimM.A. LiuA. DalpiazA. SchwambR. WarrenK. KhanS.A. Urological manifestations of placenta percreta.Curr. Urol.201582576510.1159/00036569126889119
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KonijetiR. RajferJ. AskariA. Placenta percreta and the urologist.Rev. Urol.200911317317619918343
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PhippsM.G. WatabeB. ClemonsJ.L. WeitzenS. MyersD.L. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery.Obstet. Gynecol.2005105115616010.1097/01.AOG.0000149150.93552.7815625157
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Al-ShahraniM. Bladder Injury during Cesarean Section: A Case Control Study for 10 Years.Bahrain Med. Bull.2012343
    [Google Scholar]
  19. EinersonB.D. SilverR.M. Multidisciplinary teams in the management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep.201983808510.1007/s13669‑019‑00264‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SmithZ.L. SehgalS.S. Van ArsdalenK.N. GoldsteinI.S. Placenta percreta with invasion into the urinary bladder.Urol. Case Rep.201421313210.1016/j.eucr.2013.11.01026955539
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048272591240131103426
Loading
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048272591240131103426
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test