Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

This aim of the study was to gather information for use in the present and future management of the adenomyosis condition. Adenomyosis is a benign gynecological condition that needs to be managed for the rest of one's life with either medication or surgical treatment. It is also associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. The choice a woman makes will be influenced by her age, reproductive status, and clinical indicators. The primary goals of this study were to gain knowledge on adenomyosis and to review potential treatment possibilities. According to this review, adenomyosis can be treated in a number of ways, including through medical attention utilizing least-invasive techniques a surgical operation that is performed with minimally invasive techniques. Focused ultrasound with high intensity (HIFU) for hysteroscopic ablation and resection Embolishing the uterine artery (UAE). Adenomyosis is a benign gynecological illness that necessitates a lifelong care strategy by medication or surgical therapy and is accompanied by abnormal uterine hemorrhage, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. The option a woman chooses will depend on her age, reproductive status, and clinical signs. Since there is currently no medication approved for the treatment of adenomyosis, the present review will focus on existing and future medical procedures for the condition. The uterus is impacted by the medical condition adenomyosis. It happens when the endometrial tissue that normally lines the uterus invades the myometrium, the uterine muscle wall. Although this illness is benign, some people may experience substantial pain and discomfort as a result of it. It is more typically detected in those who have had children and is most frequently diagnosed in people between the ages of 30 and 50. Treatment options depend on the severity of symptoms and the individual's specific situation. Treatment approaches may include Pain Management, Hormonal Therapy, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions and Lifestyle Changes. Several uterine-sparing therapeutic alternatives are currently available, each with unique risks and benefits, such as medication, hysteroscopic resection or ablation, conservative surgical methods, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Uterine artery embolization, a practical, secure, and cost-effective method for treating uterine fibroids, has recently grown in popularity as a treatment for uterine adenomyosis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048265172231018071749
2024-03-11
2024-12-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BirdC.C. McElinT.W. Manalo-EstrellaP. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.1972112558359310.1016/0002‑9378(72)90781‑85059589
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BenagianoG BrosensI. History of adenomyosis.Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.200620144946310.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.007
    [Google Scholar]
  3. García-SolaresJ. DonnezJ. DonnezO. DolmansM.M. Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: Invagination or metaplasia?Fertil. Steril.2018109337137910.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.03029566849
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AzzizR. Adenomyosis: Current perspectives.Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am.198916221235
    [Google Scholar]
  5. VercelliniP. ParazziniF. OldaniS. PanazzaS. BramanteT. CrosignaniP.G. Surgery: Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: A study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics.Hum. Reprod.19951051160116210.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a1361117657758
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BergholtT. EriksenL. BerendtN. JacobsenM. HertzJ.B. Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy.Hum. Reprod.200116112418242110.1093/humrep/16.11.241811679531
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ParazziniF. MaisV. CiprianiS. BusaccaM. VenturiniP. Determinants of adenomyosis in women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: Results from a prospective multicentric study in Italy.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.2009143210310610.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.12.01019232812
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WallwienerM. TaranF.A. RothmundR. KasperkowiakA. AuwärterG. GanzA. KraemerB. AbeleH. SchönfischB. IsaacsonK.B. BruckerS.Y. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): An implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.201328861329133910.1007/s00404‑013‑2921‑x23775263
    [Google Scholar]
  9. NaftalinJ. HooW. PatemanK. MavrelosD. HollandT. JurkovicD. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic.Hum. Reprod.201227123432343910.1093/humrep/des33223001775
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Di DonatoN MontanariG BenfenatiA Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod Biol.201418128929310.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.016
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TamaiK TogashiK ItoT MorisawaN FujiwaraT KoyamaT. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: Correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls.Radiographics200525214010.1148/rg.251045060
    [Google Scholar]
  12. AscherS.M. JhaR.C. ReinholdC. Benign myometrial conditions: Leiomyomas and adenomyosis.Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging200314428130410.1097/00002142‑200308000‑0000314578775
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HabibaM. BenagianoG. Uterine adenomyosis.ChamSpringer2015
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ReinholdC TafazoliF MehioA. Uterine adenomyosis: Endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation.Radiographics199919S147S16010.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc13s147
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DueholmM. LundorfE. HansenE.S. SørensenJ.S. LedertougS. OlesenF. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Fertil. Steril.200176358859410.1016/S0015‑0282(01)01962‑811532486
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BazotM. CortezA. DaraiE. RougerJ. ChopierJ. AntoineJ.M. UzanS. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Correlation with histopathology.Hum. Reprod.200116112427243310.1093/humrep/16.11.242711679533
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ChampaneriaR. AbedinP. DanielsJ. BalogunM. KhanK.S. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.201089111374138410.3109/00016349.2010.51206120932128
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RadzinskyV.E. KhamoshinaM.B. NosenkoE.N. DukhinA.O. SojunovM.A. OrazmuradovA.A. LebedevaM.G. OrazovM.R. Treatment strategies for pelvic pain associated with adenomyosis.Gynecol. Endocrinol.201632sup2192210.1080/09513590.2016.123267327759444
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TaranF. StewartE. BruckerS. Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd.201373992493110.1055/s‑0033‑135084024771944
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RavinaJ.H. Ciraru-VigneronN. BouretJ.M. HerbreteauD. HoudartE. AymardA. MerlandJ.J. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata.Lancet1995346897667167210.1016/S0140‑6736(95)92282‑27544859
    [Google Scholar]
  21. de BruijnAM AnkumWM ReekersJA Uterine artery embolization vs. hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial.Am. J. Obstet. Gyneco.20161215e741e745
    [Google Scholar]
  22. EdwardsR.D. MossJ.G. LumsdenM.A. WuO. MurrayL.S. TwaddleS. MurrayG.D. Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.N. Engl. J. Med.2007356436037010.1056/NEJMoa06200317251532
    [Google Scholar]
  23. PopovicM PuchnerS BerzaczyD LammerJ BucekRA Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: A review.J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.20112290190910.1016/j.jvir.2011.03.013
    [Google Scholar]
  24. de BruijnA.M. SminkM. HehenkampW.J.K. NijenhuisR.J. SmeetsA.J. BoekkooiF. ReuwerP.J.H.M. Van RooijW.J. LohleP.N.M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: 7-year clinical follow-up using UFS-Qol questionnaire.Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol.20174091344135010.1007/s00270‑017‑1686‑128516272
    [Google Scholar]
  25. AlabisoG. AlioL. ArenaS. Barbasetti di PrunA. BergaminiV. BerlandaN. BusaccaM. CandianiM. CentiniG. Di CelloA. ExacoustosC. FedeleL. FuggettaE. GabbiL. GeraciE. ImperialeL. LavariniE. IncandelaD. LazzeriL. LuisiS. MaioranaA. ManeschiF. ManniniL. MatteiA. MuziiL. PagliardiniL. PerandiniA. PerelliF. PinzautiS. PorporaM.G. RemorgidaV. Leone Roberti MaggioreU. SeracchioliR. SolimaE. SomiglianaE. TostiC. VenturellaR. VercelliniP. ViganòP. VignaliM. ZannoniL. ZulloF. ZupiE. Adenomyosis: What the patient needs.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.201623447648810.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.01726772777
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LeyendeckerG. BilgicyildirimA. InackerM. StalfT. HuppertP. MallG. BöttcherB. WildtL. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.2015291491793210.1007/s00404‑014‑3437‑825241270
    [Google Scholar]
  27. StrubleJ. ReidS. BedaiwyM.A. Adenomyosis: A clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.201623216418510.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.01826427702
    [Google Scholar]
  28. VavilisD. AgorastosT. TzafetasJ. LoufopoulosA. VakianiM. ConstantinidisT. PatsiaouraK. BontisJ. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: Prevalence and relationship to operative findings and reproductive and menstrual factors.Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.199724136389107456
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SeidmanJ.D. KjerulffK.H. Pathologic findings from the Maryland Women’s Health Study: Practice patterns in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol.199615321722110.1097/00004347‑199607000‑000058811382
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ParazziniF. VercelliniP. PanazzaS. ChatenoudL. OldaniS. CrosignaniP.G. Risk factors for adenomyosis.Hum. Reprod.19971261275127910.1093/humrep/12.6.12759222017
    [Google Scholar]
  31. TogashiK. NishimuraK. ItohK. FujisawaI. NomaS. KanaokaM. NakanoY. ItohH. OzasaH. FujiiS. Adenomyosis: Diagnosis with MR imaging.Radiology1988166111111410.1148/radiology.166.1.33366693336669
    [Google Scholar]
  32. BazotM. DaraïE. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis.Fertil. Steril.2018109338939710.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.02429566851
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SuginoN. Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis.SingaporeSpringer201810.1007/978‑981‑10‑7167‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  34. AtriM. ReinholdC. MehioA.R. ChapmanW.B. BretP.M. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study.Radiology2000215378379010.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn0678310831700
    [Google Scholar]
  35. BazotM. DaraïE. RougerJ. DetchevR. CortezA. UzanS. Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation.Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.200220660561110.1046/j.1469‑0705.2002.00852.x12493051
    [Google Scholar]
  36. FedeleL. BianchiS. DortaM. ArcainiL. ZanottiF. CannelliS. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis.Fertil. Steril.1992581949710.1016/S0015‑0282(16)55142‑51624029
    [Google Scholar]
  37. KepkepK. TuncayY.A. GöynümerG. TutalE. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Which findings are most accurate?Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.200730334134510.1002/uog.398517659649
    [Google Scholar]
  38. LinP. SunY-L. WangC-B. LeeC-Y. WunT-H. LinY.H. TsengC.C. ChenC.H. TsengC.J. Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation.Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol.2010491404410.1016/S1028‑4559(10)60007‑120466291
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ExacoustosC BrienzaL Di GiovanniA. Adenomyosis: Three dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology.Ultrasound. Obstet. Gyneco.201137147147910.1002/uog.8900
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MeredithSM Sanchez-RamosL KaunitzAM Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review and metaanalysis.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.2009201107e1107e610.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.021
    [Google Scholar]
  41. DartmouthK. A systematic review with meta-analysis: The common sonographic characteristics of adenomyosis.Ultrasound201422314815710.1177/1742271X1452883727433212
    [Google Scholar]
  42. AndresM.P. BorrelliG.M. RibeiroJ. BaracatE.C. AbrãoM.S. KhoR.M. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.201825225726410.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.65328864044
    [Google Scholar]
  43. TogashiK. OzasaH. KonishiI. ItohH. NishimuraK. FujisawaI. NomaS. SagohT. MinamiS. YamashitaK. Enlarged uterus: Differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging.Radiology1989171253153410.1148/radiology.171.2.27048192704819
    [Google Scholar]
  44. ReinholdC McCarthyS BretPM Diffuse adenomyosis: Comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.Radiology199619915115810.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139
    [Google Scholar]
  45. OliveiraM.A.P. CrispiC.P.Jr BrolloL.C. CrispiC.P. De WildeR.L. Surgery in adenomyosis.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.2018297358158910.1007/s00404‑017‑4603‑629197987
    [Google Scholar]
  46. VannucciniS. LuisiS. TostiC. SorbiF. PetragliaF. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis.Fertil. Steril.2018109339840510.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.01329566852
    [Google Scholar]
  47. TanJ. MoriartyS. TaskinO. AllaireC. WilliamsC. YongP. BedaiwyM.A. Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for focal and diffuse adenomyosis: A systematic review.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.201825460862110.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.02029305234
    [Google Scholar]
  48. PontisA. D’AlterioM.N. PirarbaS. de AngelisC. TinelliR. AngioniS. Adenomyosis: A systematic review of medical treatment.Gynecol. Endocrinol.201632969670010.1080/09513590.2016.119720027379972
    [Google Scholar]
  49. PinzautiS. LazzeriL. TostiC. CentiniG. OrlandiniC. LuisiS. ZupiE. ExacoustosC. PetragliaF. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: Association with symptoms.Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.201546673073610.1002/uog.1483425728241
    [Google Scholar]
  50. MochimaruA. AokiS. ObaM.S. KurasawaK. TakahashiT. HiraharaF. Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with adenomyosis with uterine enlargement.J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.201541452953310.1111/jog.1260425363157
    [Google Scholar]
  51. TaranF.A. WeaverA.L. CoddingtonC.C. StewartE.A. Understanding adenomyosis: A case control study.Fertil. Steril.20109441223122810.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.04919643403
    [Google Scholar]
  52. VannucciniS. TostiC. CarmonaF. HuangS.J. ChapronC. GuoS.W. PetragliaF. Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: An update on molecular mechanisms.Reprod. Biomed. Online201735559260110.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.01628693952
    [Google Scholar]
  53. FedeleL. BianchiS. FrontinoG. Hormonal treatments for adenomyosis.Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.200822233333910.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.07.00617765017
    [Google Scholar]
  54. BadawyA.M. ElnasharA.M. MosbahA.A. Aromatase inhibitors or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for the management of uterine adenomyosis: A randomized controlled trial.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.201291448949510.1111/j.1600‑0412.2012.01350.x22229256
    [Google Scholar]
  55. TostiC. VannucciniS. LazzeriL. LuisiS. PetragliaF. TroìaL. Current and future medical treatment of adenomyosis.J. Endometr.20168127135
    [Google Scholar]
  56. OsadaH. Uterine adenomyosis and adenomyoma: The surgical approach.Fertil. Steril.2018109340641710.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.03229566853
    [Google Scholar]
  57. FujishitaA. MasuzakiH. KhanK.N. KitajimaM. IshimaruT. Modified reduction surgery for adenomyosis. A preliminary report of the transverse H incision technique.Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.200457313213810.1159/00007583014707472
    [Google Scholar]
  58. SaremiA BahramiH SalehianP HakakN PooladiA BahramiH Treatment of adenomyomectomy in women with severe uterine adenomyosis using a novel technique.Reprod BioMed.20142875376010.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.008
    [Google Scholar]
  59. HuangX. HuangQ. ChenS. ZhangJ. LinK. ZhangX. Efficacy of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using double-flap method for diffuse uterine adenomyosis.BMC Womens Health20151512410.1186/s12905‑015‑0182‑525783654
    [Google Scholar]
  60. KimTH LeeHH ChungSH LeeW The triple-flap method for huge uterine adenomyosis with pelvic adhesions.Reprod BioMed.20122564965010.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.011
    [Google Scholar]
  61. NishidaM. TakanoK. AraiY. OzoneH. IchikawaR. Conservative surgical management for diffuse uterine adenomyosis.Fertil. Steril.201094271571910.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.04619406396
    [Google Scholar]
  62. TakeuchiH. KitadeM. KikuchiI. ShimanukiH. KumakiriJ. KitanoT. KinoshitaK. Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy and hysteroplasty: A novel method.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.200613215015410.1016/j.jmig.2005.12.00416527719
    [Google Scholar]
  63. SuginamiH. TokushigeM. TaniguchiF. Surgical treatment of adenomyosis.Obstet Gynecol2008757278
    [Google Scholar]
  64. KishiY. YabutaM. TaniguchiF. Who will benefit from uterus-sparing surgery in adenomyosis-associated subfertility?Fertil. Steril.20141023802807.e110.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.02824954774
    [Google Scholar]
  65. WangP.H. FuhJ.L. ChaoH.T. LiuW.M. ChengM.H. ChaoK.C. Is the surgical approach beneficial to subfertile women with symptomatic extensive adenomyosis?J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.200935349550210.1111/j.1447‑0756.2008.00951.x19527389
    [Google Scholar]
  66. GrimbizisGF MikosT TarlatzisB Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis.Fertil. Steril.201410147248710.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.025
    [Google Scholar]
  67. YounesG. TulandiT. Conservative surgery for adenomyosis and results: A systematic review.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.201825226527610.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.01428739414
    [Google Scholar]
  68. CheungV.Y.T. Current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the management of uterine adenomyosis.Ultrasonography20173629510210.14366/usg.1604028145109
    [Google Scholar]
  69. FukunishiH. FunakiK. SawadaK. YamaguchiK. MaedaT. KajiY. Early results of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery of adenomyosis: Analysis of 20 cases.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.200815557157910.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.01018657480
    [Google Scholar]
  70. JingqiW. LuZ. JunZ. YuhongM. WeiY. LifengR. ChengbingJ. DobromirD.D. HuiZ. KunZ. Clinical usefulness of the microbubble contrast agent SonoVue in enhancing the effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis.J. Ultrasound Med.201837122811281910.1002/jum.1463829689636
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Xiao-YingZ. Ying-ShuG. Jiu-MeiC. Effect of pre-treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue GnRH-α on high-intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: A preliminary study.Int. J. Hyperthermia.20183481910.1080/02656736.2018.1440014
    [Google Scholar]
  72. HouY. QinZ. FanK. XuY. HuangX. Combination therapeutic effects of high intensity focused ultrasound and Metformin for the treatment of adenomyosis.Exp. Ther. Med.20171522104210810.3892/etm.2017.560129434812
    [Google Scholar]
  73. KimMD KimYM KimHC Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: A new technical development of the 1-2-3 protocol and predictive factors of MR imaging affecting outcomes.J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.20112249750210.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.426
    [Google Scholar]
  74. DueholmM. Minimally invasive treatment of adenomyosis.Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.20185111913710.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.01629555380
    [Google Scholar]
  75. de BruijnA.M. LohleP.N.M. HuirneJ.A.F. de VriesJ. TwiskM. HehenkampW.J.K. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: Protocol for the randomized questa trial.JMIR Res. Protoc.201873e4710.2196/resprot.851229496654
    [Google Scholar]
  76. ResnickN.J. KimE. PatelR.S. LooksteinR.A. NowakowskiF.S. FischmanA.M. Uterine artery embolization using a transradial approach: Initial experience and technique.J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.201425344344710.1016/j.jvir.2013.11.01024581468
    [Google Scholar]
  77. BilhimT. PiscoJ.M. DuarteM. OliveiraA.G. Polyvinyl alcohol particle size for uterine artery embolization: A prospective randomized study of initial use of 350-500 μm particles versus initial use of 500-700 μm particles.J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.2011221212710.1016/j.jvir.2010.09.01821106390
    [Google Scholar]
  78. FirouzniaK. GhanaatiH. SanaatiM. JalaliA.H. ShakibaM. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: A series of 15 pregnancies.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.200919261588159210.2214/AJR.07.390419457822
    [Google Scholar]
  79. DasC.J. RathinamD. ManchandaS. SrivastavaD.N. Endovascular uterine artery interventions.Indian J. Radiol. Imaging201727448849510.4103/ijri.IJRI_204_1629379246
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048265172231018071749
Loading
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048265172231018071749
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test