Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Background

A surrogate uterus is one of the methods of artificial reproduction in the treatment of infertility that has profound consequences in religion, law, ethics and society and is done with the intervention of a third party. This research provides a general overview of jurisprudential legitimacy in the field of surrogacy in some Middle Eastern countries (Turkey, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Palestine) in comparison to Iran in order to fill the research gap as much as possible.

Objective

A comparative approach to the legitimacy of uterine surrogacy in jurisprudence in Iran and some Muslim countries in the Middle East.

Methods

This review article was conducted from November 2022 to April 2023 in order to examine the comparative rights of surrogacy in Iran and some Middle Eastern countries from studies published between 1970-2021 in the reliable database and other jurisprudential texts.

Results

The majority of Sunni Muslim countries have announced the prohibition of surrogacy and the invalidity of contracts concluded in this regard. In Iran, with religious permission, it has had more social acceptance, and jurists and jurists prescribe surrogacy contracts. However, the legislator's silence in this regard will have an effect on the emergence of different procedures in different regions of Iran.

Conclusion

Basically, increasing the adoption and implementation of surrogate pregnancy in different societies of the Middle East requires more jurisprudential and legal efforts. So that the couples involved in this type of fertility and the children born are kept safe from possible harm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048256307231124074455
2024-01-19
2025-01-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. The Holy QuranSurah Surah, verse 11; fatire, verse 11; surah Noah, verse 6; Surah The Night Journey, verse 12; Surah Nur, verse 33; Surah Baqara, verse 233; Surah Ahqaf, verse15
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LaskerS.P. GhilardiM. Genetic Gestational Surrogacy: Hope for Muslims.Bangladesh J. Bioeth.2018831810.3329/bioethics.v8i3.35680
    [Google Scholar]
  3. InhornM.C. GürtinZ.B. Infertility and assisted reproduction in the muslim middle east: social, religious, and resource considerations.FVV in OBGYN, MONOGRAPH20122429Available from: https://fvvo.eu/assets/265/04-Inhornetal.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. InhornM.C. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt.University of Pennsylvania PressPhiladelphia1996
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MascarenhasM.N. FlaxmanS.R. BoermaT. VanderpoelS. StevensG.A. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys.PLoS Med.2012912e100135610.1371/journal.pmed.100135623271957
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BoivinJ. BuntingL. CollinsJ.A. NygrenK.G. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care.Hum. Reprod.20072261506151210.1093/humrep/dem04617376819
    [Google Scholar]
  7. RutsteinS.O. ShahI.H. Infecundity infertility and childlessness in developing countries.GenevaWorld Health Organization2004
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Woman and health: Today's evidence, tomorrow's agenda. World Health Organization.2009http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241563857_eng.pdf
  9. Direkvand MoghadamA. DelpishehA. SayehmiriK. The prevalence of infertility in Iran, a systematic review.Majallah-i Zanan, Mamai va Nazai-i Iran2013168117
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KazemijalisehH. Ramezani TehraniF. Behboudi-GandevaniS. HosseinpanahF. KhaliliD. AziziF. The prevalence and causes of primary infertility in Iran: A population-based study.Glob. J. Health Sci.20157622623210.5539/gjhs.v7n6p22626153187
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PetersonB.D. PirritanoM. ChristensenU. SchmidtL. The impact of partner coping in couples experiencing infertility.Hum. Reprod.20082351128113710.1093/humrep/den06718325885
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PooteA.E. van den AkkerO.B.A. British women’s attitudes to surrogacy.Hum. Reprod.200824113914510.1093/humrep/den33818794160
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PeterR. Brinsden. Gestational surrogacy, Textbook of assisted Reproductive TechniquesTaylor & Francis, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group2004855866
    [Google Scholar]
  14. AsemaniO. EmamiM. Comparing the Iranian Surrogacy Law and the Gestational Surrogacy Act of Illinois.J. Reprod. Infertil.2010114305magiran.com/p805252
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sadeghi MoghadamM.H. Lineage and vitro embryo inheritance.Iranian Journal of Medical Law20137246682magiran.com/p1146456
    [Google Scholar]
  16. AfsharL. BagheriA. Embryo donation in Iran: an ethical review.Developing World Bioeth.201313311912410.1111/j.1471‑8847.2012.00334.x22708805
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mir HashemiS. Artificial insemination in jurisprudential-legal thought and its supporters and opponents.Neday Sadegh J2013366498
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LotfiH.A. Surrogacy from the point of view of Ahl al-Bayt and Sunni jurisprudence.Journal of Essays in Medical Jurisprudence.202156149178magiran.com/p2309364
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jahani ShourabN. Latifnejad RoodsariR. A review of human rights, legal, ethical and religious aspects of Surrogacy in Iran with an emphasis on its counseling issues.Iranina Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Infertility2017192253344magiran.com/p1666326
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BhatiaK. MartindaleE.A. RustamovO. NysenbaumA.M. Surrogate pregnancy: an essential guide for clinicians.Obstet Gynaecol.2009111495410.1576/toag.11.1.49.27468
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mohammad KhaniM. 2011
  22. ImrieS. JadvaV. The long-term experiences of surrogates: relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements.Reprod. Biomed. Online201429442443510.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.00425131555
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Söderström-AnttilaV. WennerholmU.B. LoftA. PinborgA. AittomäkiK. RomundstadL.B. BerghC. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families-a systematic review.Hum. Reprod. Update201622226027626454266
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KarimiN. MehtariZ. The jurisprudence of surrogacy.Jurisprudential and Philosophical Studies201231279108
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ministry of Health and Medical Education Regulation for Establishment of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics.MOHME, Islamic Republic of Iran2006
    [Google Scholar]
  26. GooshkiE.S. AllahbedashtiN. The process of justifying assisted reproductive technologies in Iran.Indian J. Med. Ethics2015122579610.20529/IJME.2015.02725920968
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MoalemR. RezaM. Medical fertility from the point of view of jurisprudence and law, first edition of Bostan Kitab Qom. and Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture2004433onwards (fatawi of Ayatollah Khamenei and Ayatollah Seyyed Mahmoud Mousavi Bejnarodi)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Yazidi Mohammad Artificial fertility and its jurisprudence. New methods of human reproduction from the point of view of jurisprudence and law (collection of articles).TehranIbn Sina Research School200367, 72, 97
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rahmani ManshadiH. Legitimacy of surrogacy from jurisprudential viewpoints.J. Med. Ethics200823157195
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ayatollah Khomeini RuhollahTreatise explaining the issues. Eighteen editions.TehranPayam Edalat Publishing House2005
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SerourG.I. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction.Reprod. Biomed. Online20081717Suppl. 3343810.1016/S1472‑6483(10)60328‑818983735
    [Google Scholar]
  32. RoutledgeI.M.C. YorkN. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender.Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt2003
    [Google Scholar]
  33. GürtinZ.B. Patriarchal pronatalism: Islam, secularism and the conjugal confines of Turkey’s IVF boom.Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online20162394610.1016/j.rbms.2016.04.00529892715
    [Google Scholar]
  34. AcarF. AltunokG. The ‘politics of intimate’ at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey.Womens Stud. Int. Forum201341142310.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.001
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SteinvorthD. Erdogan the misogynist: Turkish prime minister assaults women’s rights.2012Available from: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/turkish-prime-minister-erdogan-targets-women-s-rights-a-839568.html
  36. GürtinZ.B. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey’s ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.Reprod. Biomed. Online201123555556410.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.00421962527
    [Google Scholar]
  37. BaykalB. KorkmazC. CeyhanS.T. GoktolgaU. BaserI. Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy.Fertil. Steril.200889481782210.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.02218406837
    [Google Scholar]
  38. KilicS. UcarM. YarenH. GulecM. AtacA. DemirelF. Determination of the attitudes ofTurkish infertile women towards surrogacy & oocyte donation.Pak. J. Med. Sci.2009251364
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Egypt from "The World Factbook"American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)2008
    [Google Scholar]
  40. KhalilMH Between Heaven and Hell: Islam, Salvation, and the Fate of Others.Oxford University Press2013297
    [Google Scholar]
  41. An Independent Voice for Egypt’s al-Azhar?AHMED MORSY2011
    [Google Scholar]
  42. InhornM.C. TremayneS. Islam, assisted reproduction, and the bioethical aftermath.J. Relig. Health201655242243010.1007/s10943‑015‑0151‑126602421
    [Google Scholar]
  43. InhornM.C. Birenbaum-CarmeliD. TremayneS. GürtinZ.B. Assisted reproduction and Middle East kinship: a regional and religious comparison.Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online20174415110.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.00329774265
    [Google Scholar]
  44. KooliC. Review of assisted reproduction techniques, laws, and regulations in Muslim countries.Middle East Fertil. Soc. J.2020241115
    [Google Scholar]
  45. LaskerS. Surrogacy. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. ten HaveH. SwitzerlandSpringer201610.1007/978‑3‑319‑09483‑0_409
    [Google Scholar]
  46. A mother for nine months: surrogacy on the rise in Egypt, despite legal ban Photo of Hend El-Behary Hend El-Behary2016Available from: https://egyptindependent.com/mother-nine-months-surrogacy-rise-egypt-despite-legal-ban/#:~:text=Forbidden%20in%20law,another%20couple's%20child%20to%20term (Accessed on: October 19, 2016).
  47. LiH.W.R. TankJ. HaththotuwaR. Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUpdated status of assisted reproductive technology activities in the Asia‐Oceania region.J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.20184491667167210.1111/jog.1374230058253
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Chamsi-PashaH. AlbarM.A. Assisted reproductive technology: Islamic Sunni perspective.Hum. Fertil. (Camb.)201518210711210.3109/14647273.2014.99781025660098
    [Google Scholar]
  49. MustafaSM The effect of renting the uterus on the nationality of the infant (Comparative Study).Journal of college of Law for Legal and Political Sciences2018727/part 1
    [Google Scholar]
  50. InhornMC Globalization and gametes: reproductive ‘tourism,’Islamic bioethics, and Middle Eastern modernity.2018
    [Google Scholar]
  51. InhornM.C. Making muslim babies: Ivf and gamete donation in sunni versus shi’a islam.Cult. Med. Psychiatry200630442745010.1007/s11013‑006‑9027‑x17051430
    [Google Scholar]
  52. GürtinZB InhornMC TremayneS Islam and assisted reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing the Sunni Arab world, Shia Iran and secular Turkey.The changing world religion map: Sacred places, identities, practices and politics2015313753
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hadia Al MansourEye-watering costs of fertility treatment killing dreams of motherhood in northwest Syria.2022Available from: https://www.newarab.com/features/fertility-problems-rise-northwest-syria (Accessed on: 25 March 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. RichardsS.C. “Spoiling the womb”: definitions, aetiologies and responses to infertility in north west province, Cameroon.Afr. J. Reprod. Health200261849410.2307/358314912476732
    [Google Scholar]
  55. WiersemaN.J. DrukkerA.J. DungM.B.T. NhuG.H. NhuN.T. LambalkC.B. Consequences of infertility in developing countries: Results of a questionnaire and interview survey in the South of Vietnam.J. Transl. Med.2006415410.1186/1479‑5876‑4‑5417192178
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Palestinian Central Bureau of StatisticsOn the Eve of the International population Day2012Available from: http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_pcbs/PressRelease/int_Pop_2012e.pdf
  57. NurizadehR. Ethical challenges of surrogacy in Iran.Med Ethic20093155186[Persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  58. LotfiA. Esteshab in fiqh and codified law.Law Quart2011154019569[Persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  59. LarijaniB. ZahediF. Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran.J. Relig. Health200746339940810.1007/s10943‑007‑9108‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  60. ZandiM. VanakiZ. ShivaM. MohammadiE. Bagheri LankaraniN. KarimiM. Legal constraints of using surrogacy.Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences201413112310.18869/acadpub.jnms.1.3.11
    [Google Scholar]
  61. ArameshK. Iran’s experience with surrogate motherhood: an Islamic view and ethical concerns.J. Med. Ethics200935532032210.1136/jme.2008.02776319407039
    [Google Scholar]
  62. New methods of human reproduction from the point of view of jurisprudence and law (a collection of articles)Ibn Sina Research Institute (Jihad University) and Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (Samt)Tehran20013927
    [Google Scholar]
  63. MantaziriH.A. Medical rulesFirst editionTehranNeshr Sayeh2002902
    [Google Scholar]
  64. AlizadehM. Spec J Theol Law.200723149168[The nature of using surrogacy contracts]. [Persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  65. AlizadehM. Spec J Theol Law.200619177196[Jurisprudential and legal states of surrogacy]. [Persian.].
    [Google Scholar]
  66. AkhondiM.M. Behjati ArdekaniZ. J. Reprod. Infertil.200891713[Surrogacy and the necessity for its application in infertility reatment]. [Persian.].
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Yadollahi BaghlouA. AzinS.M. Omani Samani R. Features of surrogacy agreement from ethical and legal perspectives.Iran J Med Ethics201531917
    [Google Scholar]
  68. RahimiH. Civil responsibility in surrogacy.J. Reprod. Infertil.200892165181
    [Google Scholar]
  69. TabatabaeiM.S. JaliliM. The analysis of financial and non-financial rights of children who were born by the method of surrogacy.Iran J Med Law20148303763
    [Google Scholar]
  70. HamdollahiA. PoursaeidB. Conventional regulations of surrogate child in relation to succession and maintenance.Islamic Law Res J20111030189243
    [Google Scholar]
  71. SheikhalipourZ. RahmaniA. SattarzadehN. GholizadehL. AllahbakhshianA. HassankhaniH. Gestational surrogacy: Viewpoint of Iranian infertile women.J. Hum. Reprod. Sci.20114313814210.4103/0974‑1208.9228822346081
    [Google Scholar]
  72. International religious freedom report for 2017Available from: https://www.state.gov/reports/2017-report-on-international-religious-freedom/ (Accesed on: 30 March 2019).
  73. AlfredB. "CRS Issue Brief for Congress: Lebanon". The Library of Congress2006Available from: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=464480 (Accessed on: June 11, 2012).
  74. International Religious Freedom Report for.LebanonUnited States Department of State2012
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Bou AssiT. JurjusA. Abou-MradF. The legislative framework of gamete donation in Lebanon: Current status and future perspectives.Ethics Med. Public Health201910152110.1016/j.jemep.2019.06.006
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Surrogacy not an option in Lebanon. The Free Library.Available from: www.thefreelibrary.com/Surrogacy+not+an+option+in+Lebanon.-a0406242943
  77. ClarkeM. Islam and Law in Lebanon: Sharia Within and Without the State.2020Available from: https://tertulia.com/book/islam-and-law-in-lebanon-sharia-within-and-without-the-state-morgan-clarke/9781316637142 (Accessed on: Aug 6th, 2020).
  78. SchenkerJ.G. ShushanA. Ethical and legal aspects of assisted reproduction practice in Asia.Hum. Reprod.199611490891110.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a0192778671351
    [Google Scholar]
  79. InhornM.C. Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon.Med. Anthropol. Q.200418216218210.1525/maq.2004.18.2.16215272802
    [Google Scholar]
  80. GouniO. Jarašiūnaitė-FedosejevaG. Kömürcü AkikB. HolopainenA. Calleja-AgiusJ. Childlessness: Concept Analysis.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2022193146410.3390/ijerph1903146435162484
    [Google Scholar]
  81. MeirowD. SchenkerJ.G. The current status of sperm donation in assisted reproduction technology: Ethical and legal considerations.J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.199714313313810.1007/BF027661289090554
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Abbasi-ShavaziM.J. InhornM.C. Razeghi-NasrabadH.B. TolooG. The “Iranian ART Revolution”.J. Middle East Women’s Stud.20084212810.2979/MEW.2008.4.2.1
    [Google Scholar]
  83. AktasV. Islamization of anatolia and the effects of established sufism (orders).The Anthropologist2014171147155
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism2012Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/global-index-of-religiosity-and-atheism (Accessed on: 2018-06-12).
    [Google Scholar]
  85. KONDA Research and Consultancy2007Religion, Secularism and the Veil in daily lifeAvailable from: https://konda.com.tr/report/102/religion-secularism-and-the-veil-in-daily-life (Accessed on: 2009-03-25).
    [Google Scholar]
  86. "Religions". CIA World Factbook.2018Available from: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/religions/ (Accessed on: 29 November 2020).
  87. "TURKEY" (PDF). Library of Congress: Federal Research Division.Available from: https://www.loc.gov/item/95049612/ (Accessed on: 1 November 2010).
  88. "TURKEY" International Religious Freedom Report 2007. The Office of Website Management, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department.Available from: https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2007/90204.htm
  89. KutluP. AtvarO. VanliogluO.F. KutluU. AriciA. YilmazS. YilmazE. DelikaraN. BenerF. KamarA. AlpakO. OzekiciU. Effect of the new legislation and single-embryo transfer policy in Turkey on assisted reproduction outcomes: preliminary results.Reprod. Biomed. Online201122220821410.1016/j.rbmo.2010.10.00721195669
    [Google Scholar]
  90. ArdaB. The importance of secularism in medical ethics: the Turkish example.Reprod. Biomed. Online200714Suppl. 1242810.1016/S1472‑6483(10)60721‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  91. JorsaraeiG.A. Sepid DarbonA. RajabiF.Z. KohiH. Surrogacy from Legal Point of View.Islam Health J201412714[Persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Latifnejad RoudsariR. Hadizadeh TalasazF. SimbarM. Khadem GhaebiN. Challenges of donor selection: the experiences of Iranian infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive donation procedures.Iran J Obstet Gyneocol Infertile20141688113
    [Google Scholar]
  93. RakhshandehH. SadeghiM. Juridical and legal status of the surrogacy.Quart Womens Stud201047115138[persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Haji AziziB. Ghafghazi AlaslS. The status of parentage of new born from the rented womb: A comparative study under Iranian Law and U.S. Law.Journal of Private Law20164136185magiran.com/p1508351
    [Google Scholar]
  95. MilanifarA.R. AkhondiM.M. ArdakaniZ.B. AbdollahzadehA. Issuing birth certificates and ID cards for newborns following a surrogate birth and the legal and ethical responsibilities of the medical team.J. Reprod. Infertil.2008918288[Persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  96. AsadinejadM. Yadollahi BaghloueeA. AsadinejadM. The examination of conflict between the surrogacy agreement and the provision of woman obedience in Iranian law.Sci J Forensic Med201491233238[Persian].
    [Google Scholar]
  97. GenuisS.J. ChangW.C. GenuisS.K. Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology.CMAJ199314921531618324713
    [Google Scholar]
  98. HalmanL.J. AbbeyA. AndrewsF.M. Attitudes about infertility interventions among fertile and infertile couples.Am. J. Public Health199282219119410.2105/AJPH.82.2.1911739145
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048256307231124074455
Loading
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048256307231124074455
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

PRISMA checklist is available as supplementary material on the publisher’s website along with the published article.


  • Article Type:
    Review Article
Keyword(s): Artificial; children; comparative rights; infertility; insemination; surrogacy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test