Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-3963
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6336

Abstract

Introduction

Submaximal field walking tests are easy to apply and low cost, but it is necessary to standardize their application, especially in the pediatric population. The feasibility and its use in patients with congenital heart disease have been studied. The goal of this study was to verify which are the submaximal field walking tests applied in the cardiopulmonary assessment of children and adolescents with CHD and to verify if they are being performed as recommended by the standardization protocols/guidelines.

Methods

Literature review through a search in six electronic databases, structured in PICO format, without date restrictions. Looking for studies that used submaximal field walking tests in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease aged 5 to 18 years. Methodological quality, effectiveness and safety and risk of bias were assessed.

Results

Five studies met the eligibility criteria with a sample of 160 individuals with congenital heart disease, and all used the six-minute walk test. Note that different methodologies and modifications are used. Only the clinical trial showed good methodological quality.Four studies had low risk of bias and one study had moderate risk.

Conclusion

Although the six-minute walk test is the only test used as a field test found in our research, there is no standardization in the application of the test, making it difficult to compare the results. In this sense, reducing the limitations and heterogeneity in the application of the test will enable more concrete outcomes and facilitate their reproduction in clinical practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cpr/10.2174/0115733963263592231127042702
2025-01-01
2024-11-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BoumaB.J. MulderB.J.M. Changing landscape of congenital heart disease.Circ. Res.2017120690892210.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.30930228302739
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChlifM. AmmarM.M. SaidN.B. SergeyL. AhmaidiS. AlasseryF. HamamH. Mechanism of dyspnea during exercise in children with corrected congenital heart disease.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20211919910.3390/ijerph1901009935010359
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AbassiH. GavottoA. PicotM.C. BertetH. MateckiS. GuillaumontS. MoniotteS. AuquierP. MoreauJ. AmedroP. Impaired pulmonary function and its association with clinical outcomes, exercise capacity and quality of life in children with congenital heart disease.Int. J. Cardiol.2019285869210.1016/j.ijcard.2019.02.06930857849
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferrer-SarguesF.J. Peiró-MolinaE. Salvador-ColomaP. Carrasco MorenoJ.I. Cano-SánchezA. Vázquez-ArceM.I. Insa AlbertB. Sepulveda SanchisP. Cebrià i IranzoM.À. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation improves respiratory muscle function and functional capacity in children with congenital heart disease. A prospective cohort study.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20201712432810.3390/ijerph1712432832560441
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AmedroP. DorkaR. MoniotteS. GuillaumontS. FraisseA. KreitmannB. BormB. BertetH. BarreaC. OvaertC. SluysmansT. De La VilleonG. VincentiM. VoisinM. AuquierP. PicotM.C. Quality of life of children with congenital heart diseases: A multicenter controlled cross-sectional study.Pediatr. Cardiol.20153681588160110.1007/s00246‑015‑1201‑x26024647
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MoallaW. GauthierR. MaingourdY. AhmaidiS. Six-minute walking test to assess exercise tolerance and cardiorespiratory responses during training program in children with congenital heart disease.Int. J. Sports Med.200526975676210.1055/s‑2004‑83055816237621
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SenS. BandyopadhyayB. ErikssonP. ChattopadhyayA. Functional capacity following univentricular repair-midterm outcome.Congenit. Heart Dis.20127542343210.1111/j.1747‑0803.2012.00640.x22471644
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FeltezG. CoronelC.C. PellandaL.C. LukrafkaJ.L. Exercise capacity in children and adolescents with corrected congenital heart disease.Pediatr. Cardiol.20153651075108210.1007/s00246‑015‑1129‑125808364
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BrownC.D. WiseR.A. Field tests of exercise in COPD: The six-minute walk test and the shuttle walk test.COPD20074321722310.1080/1541255070148012517729065
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MarinhoR.S. JürgensenS.P. ArcuriJ.F. GoulartC.L. SantosP.B. RoscaniM.G. MendesR.G. OliveiraC.R. CarusoF.R. Borghi-SilvaA. Reliability and validity of six-minute step test in patients with heart failure.Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.20215410e1051410.1590/1414‑431x2020e1051434287574
    [Google Scholar]
  11. StatementA.T.S. ATS Statement.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.2002166111111710.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at110212091180
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Morales-BlanhirJ.E. Palafox VidalC.D. Rosas RomeroM.J. García CastroM.M. Londoño VillegasA. ZamboniM. Teste de caminhada de seis minutos: Uma ferramenta valiosa na avaliação do comprometimento pulmonar.J. Bras. Pneumol.201137111011710.1590/S1806‑3713201100010001621390439
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MoherD LiberatiA TetzlaffJ AltmanDG Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.BMJ20093391b253510.1136/bmj.b2535
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GalvãoT.F. PansaniT de SA. HarradD. Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA.Epidemiol. Serv. Saude201524233534210.5123/S1679‑49742015000200017
    [Google Scholar]
  15. PageMJ McKenzieJE BossuytPM The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ20202110.1136/bmj.n71
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ShiwaS.R. CostaL.O.P. MoserA.D.L. AguiarI.C. OliveiraL.V.F. PEDro: A base de dados de evidências em fisioterapia.Fisioter. Mov.201124352353310.1590/S0103‑51502011000300017
    [Google Scholar]
  17. CashinA.G. McAuleyJ.H. Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.J. Physiother.20206615910.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.00531521549
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SterneJA HernánMA ReevesBC ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.BMJ2016491910.1136/bmj.i4919
    [Google Scholar]
  19. InoueA.S. LopesA.A.B. TanakaA.C.S. FeltrimM.I.Z. GalasF.R.B.G. AlmeidaJ.P. HajjarL.A. NozawaE. Impact of preoperative functional capacity on postoperative outcomes in congenital heart surgery: An observational and prospective study.Arq. Bras. Cardiol.2022118241141910.36660/abc.2020113735262574
    [Google Scholar]
  20. QuJ. ShiH. GuoY. ChenX. XiaoX. ZhengX. CuiY. Is the six-minute walk test still reliable compared to cardiopulmonary exercise test for exercise capacity in children with congenital heart disease?Front Pediatr.20221096573910.3389/fped.2022.96573936452347
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SchaanC.W. MacedoA.C.P. SbruzziG. UmpierreD. SchaanB.D. PellandaL.C. Functional capacity in congenital heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arq. Bras. Cardiol.2017109435736710.5935/abc.2017012528876372
    [Google Scholar]
  22. GuyattG.H. SullivanM.J. ThompsonP.J. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure.Can Med Assoc J1985132891923
    [Google Scholar]
  23. CacauL.A. de Santana-FilhoV.J. MaynardL.G. GomesM. FernandesM. CarvalhoV.O. Reference values for the six-minute walk test in healthy children and adolescents: A systematic review.Rev. Bras. Cir. Cardiovasc.201631538138810.5935/1678‑9741.2016008127982347
    [Google Scholar]
  24. OkuroR.T. SchivinskiC.I.S. Teste de caminhada de seis minutos em pediatria: Relação entre desempenho e parâmetros antropométricos.Fisioter. Mov.201326121922810.1590/S0103‑51502013000100024
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiA.M. YinJ. AuJ.T. SoH.K. TsangT. WongE. FokT.F. NgP.C. Standard reference for the six-minute-walk test in healthy children aged 7 to 16 years.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.2007176217418010.1164/rccm.200607‑883OC17463419
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KleinS.R. GulartA.A. VenâncioR.S. MunariA.B. GavendaS.G. MartinsA.C.B. MayerA.F. Performance difference on the six-minute walk test on tracks of 20 and 30 meters for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Validity and reliability.Braz. J. Phys. Ther.2021251404710.1016/j.bjpt.2020.01.00132007324
    [Google Scholar]
  27. de Assis Pereira CacauL. CarvalhoV.O. dos Santos PinA. Araujo DanielC.R. YkedaD.S. de CarvalhoE.M. FrancicaJ.V. FariaL.M. Gomes-NetoM. FernandesM. VellosoM. KarstenM. de Sá BarrosP. de Santana-FilhoV.J. Reference values for the 6-min walk distance in healthy children age 7 to 12 years in Brazil: Main results of the tc6minbrasil multi- center study.Respir. Care201863333934610.4187/respcare.0568629162717
    [Google Scholar]
  28. HollandA.E. SpruitM.A. TroostersT. PuhanM.A. PepinV. SaeyD. McCormackM.C. CarlinB.W. SciurbaF.C. PittaF. WangerJ. MacIntyreN. KaminskyD.A. CulverB.H. RevillS.M. HernandesN.A. AndrianopoulosV. CamilloC.A. MitchellK.E. LeeA.L. HillC.J. SinghS.J. An official european respiratory society/american thoracic society technical standard: Field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease.Eur. Respir. J.20144461428144610.1183/09031936.0015031425359355
    [Google Scholar]
  29. LancasterL. FieuwA. MeulemansJ. FordP. NathanS.D. Standardization of the 6-min walk test in clinical trials of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Contemp. Clin. Trials202110010622710.1016/j.cct.2020.10622733246099
    [Google Scholar]
  30. KasovićM. ŠtefanL. PetrićV. Normative data for the 6-min walk test in 11–14 year-olds: A population-based study.BMC Pulm. Med.202121129710.1186/s12890‑021‑01666‑534548058
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SilvaO.B. SaraivaL.C.R. Sobral FilhoD.C. Teste ergométrico em crianças e adolescentes: Maior tolerância ao esforço com o protocolo em rampa.Arq. Bras. Cardiol.200789610.1590/S0066‑782X2007001800007
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cpr/10.2174/0115733963263592231127042702
Loading
/content/journals/cpr/10.2174/0115733963263592231127042702
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test